Email Alert | RSS    帮助

中国防痨杂志 ›› 2010, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 42-46.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

发光二极管荧光显微镜实验室诊断效果评价

尚美, 刘冠, 赵立平, 夏辉, 姜广路, 黄海荣, 赵雁林   

  1. 北京市结核病胸部肿瘤研究所;
  • 出版日期:2010-05-20 发布日期:2010-05-20

Evaluation of fluorescence microscopy with light emitting diode in detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Shang Mei; Liu Guan; Zhao Liping; Xia Hui; Jiang Guanlu; Huang Hairong; Zhao Yanlin   

  1. Beijing Institute of Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor; Beijing 101149; China;
  • Online:2010-05-20 Published:2010-05-20
  • Contact: Zhao Yanlin E-mail:zhaoyanlin@tb123.org

摘要: 目的 评估发光二极管荧光显微镜实验室诊断结核分枝杆菌的能力。 方法 收集409痰标本,以固体罗氏培养为金标准,比较发光二极管荧光显微镜与普通光学显微镜、普通荧光显微镜在敏感性、特异性及检出时间上的差异,并比较技术人员对几种方法 的评价。 结果罗氏培养阳性的175份痰标本中,普通光学显微镜法112份为阳性, 普通荧光显微镜法121份为阳性,发光二极管荧光显微镜法130份为阳性,敏感性分别为64.0%,69.1%,74.3%;罗氏培养阴性的234份痰标本中,普通光学显微镜法233份为阴性, 荧光显微镜法227份为阴性,发光二极管荧光显微镜法227份为阴性,特异性分别为99.6%,97.0%,97.0%。χ2检验统计结果表明,发光二极管荧光显微镜与普通光学显微镜、普通荧光显微镜检测结果差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。普通光学显微镜、普通荧光显微镜和发光二极管荧光显微镜读片所用的读阳性片时间分别为186.7-s、75.1-s、72.2-s,发光二极管荧光显微镜与普通光学显微镜在读阳性片时间上差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),与普通荧光显微镜差异无统计学意义。参与研究的技术员评价发光二极管荧光显微镜较其他2种方法 易接受。 结论 发光二极管荧光显微镜较普通光学显微镜及普通荧光显微镜在检查效果及检出时间上存在明显优势,对技术人员的亲和性好,具有推广使用的价值。

关键词: 分枝杆菌, 结核, 显微镜检查, 荧光

Abstract: Objective To assess the performance of fluorescence microscopy with light emitting diodes (LEDFM) in detectingMycobacterium tuberculosis . Methods Using solid L-J culture (L-J) as gold standard, 409 sputum samples were detected by Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN), conventional fluorescence microscopy (FM) and LEDFM. Their sensitivities, specificities, detection times, and feeling of the user were compared. Results Of 175 L-J-positive samples,112 samples were ZN positive,121 samples were FM positive,130 samples were LEDFM positive. Their sensitivities were 64.0%, 69.1%, 74.3%, respectively. Of 234 L-J-negative samples, 233 samples were ZN negative, 227 samples were FM negative, 227 samples were LEDFM negative. Their specificities were 99.6%,97.0%,97.0%, respectively. There were significant difference among the Results of LEDFM and the other two MethodsP<0.001). Detection times of ZN-, FM-, LEDFM-positive slides were 186.7 sec, 75.1 sec, 72.2 sec, respectively, in which there was significant difference between ZN and LEDFM(P<0.05),but not between FM and LEDFM. LEDFM was highly appreciated by technicians involved in this study.  Conclusions LEDFM had better efficacy and use value in detectingM tuberculosisthan ZN and FM.

Key words: Mycobacterium tuberculosis, microscopy, fluorescence

中图分类号: