Email Alert | RSS    帮助

中国防痨杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (4): 541-549.doi: 10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20260023

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

2004—2025年耐多药结核病研究的中英文文献发表情况对比分析

周文斯1, 郭萌2, 陈清波1, 王泉1(), 李维3()   

  1. 1 新疆维吾尔自治区第六人民医院检验科,乌鲁木齐 830001
    2 《中国防痨杂志》期刊社,北京 100035
    3 北京大学医学图书馆,北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2026-01-13 出版日期:2026-04-10 发布日期:2026-04-02
  • 通信作者: 王泉,Email:3197606@qq.com;李维,Email:li_wei@bjmu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    新疆维吾尔自治区“天山英才”医药卫生高层次人才培养计划(TSYC202301B135)

Comparative analysis of published literature in Chinese and English on multidrug-resistant tuberculosis from 2004 to 2025

Zhou Wensi1, Guo Meng2, Chen Qingbo1, Wang Quan1(), Li Wei3()   

  1. 1 Department of Laboratory,The Sixth People’s Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region,Urumqi 830001,China
    2 Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis Publishing House,Beijing 100035,China
    3 Peking University Medical Library,Beijing 100083,China
  • Received:2026-01-13 Online:2026-04-10 Published:2026-04-02
  • Contact: Wang Quan,Email:3197606@qq.com;Li Wei,Email:li_wei@bjmu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Tianshan Talents Program (High-level Medical and Health Personnel Training Program) of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region(TSYC202301B135)

摘要:

目的:系统对比2004—2025年耐多药结核病(multidrug-resistant tuberculosis,MDR-TB)研究的中英文文献发表特征与研究热点演变规律,明确中英文文献的差异与协同方向,为我国MDR-TB研究的高质量发展与精准防控提供循证参考。方法:以Web of Science核心合集和中国知网(CNKI)为数据来源,检索2004—2025年MDR-TB相关中英文研究文献,采用CiteSpace可视化分析工具,从文献产出年代分布、研究热点聚类及纵向演变等维度开展对比分析。结果:共纳入英文文献14991篇、中文文献5218篇。中英文MDR-TB文献均随时间进展呈现阶段性增长态势,2004—2014年,英文文献从326篇增长至985篇,年均增长率为11.6%;中文文献从105篇增长至428篇,年均增长率为15.1%。2015—2025年,英文文献总量为8461篇,较2004—2014年(6530篇)增长了29.6%,中文文献总量为3290篇,较2004—2014年(1928篇)增长了70.6%。另外,中英文MDR-TB文献在不同时间阶段的侧重点也有所不同,如英文研究在第一阶段(2004—2014年)以耐药机制解析为核心构建“基础-临床-公卫”三维整合体系,而中文研究则聚焦于临床护理与基础治疗;但在第二阶段(2015—2025年),英文研究持续领跑底层技术创新,如快速诊断技术,而中文研究则在基层管理等领域实现了局部突破,如社区干预模式、中西医结合。结论:MDR-TB研究相关中文文献发表数量增长较快,但需进一步提升其研究原创性,注重学科融合,助力全球MDR-TB防控目标的实现。

关键词: 结核, 抗多种药物性, 文献计量学, 对比研究

Abstract:

Objective:To systematically compare the publication characteristics and research hotspot evolution patterns of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) studies in Chinese and English from 2004 to 2025,clarify the core differences and collaborative directions between domestic and international researches,and provide evidence-based reference for the high-quality development of MDR-TB researches and precise MDR-TB prevention and control in China. Methods:Using the Web of Science Core Collection and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) as data sources,relevant MDR-TB research literature from 2004 to 2025 was retrieved. CiteSpace visualization analysis tools were employed to conduct comparative analyses across dimensions such as the distribution of literature by publication year,research hotspot clustering,and longitudinal evolution. Results:A total of 14991 English and 5218 Chinese articles were included. Both English and Chinese literature on MDR-TB showed a phased growth trend over time. From 2004 to 2014,the number of English articles increased from 326 to 985,with an average annual growth rate of 11.6%;the number of Chinese articles increased from 105 to 428,with an average annual growth rate of 15.1%. From 2015 to 2025,the total number of English articles reached 8461,an increase of 29.6% compared to the period from 2004 to 2014 (6530 articles),while the total number of Chinese articles was 3290,an increase of 70.6% compared to the period from 2004 to 2014 (1928 articles). Additionally,the focus of Chinese and English MDR-TB literature varies aross different time periods,such as in the first phase (2004-2014),English researches focused on elucidating drug resistance mechanisms to establish a “basic-clinical-public health” three-dimensional integrated system,while Chinese researches concentrated on clinical nursing and foundational treatments. In the second phase (2015-2025),English researches continued to lead in underlying technological innovation,e.g. rapid diagnostic tests,while Chinese researches achieved partial breakthroughs in areas of basic management,such as community intervention models,Integrated Traditional Chinese and Modern Medicine. Conclusion:The number of Chinese publications on MDR-TB research has showed rapid growth. In the future,there is a need to further enhance the originality and continuity of researches,focus on disciplinary integration to contribute to realizing global MDR-TB prevention and control goals.

Key words: Tuberculosis, multidrug-resistant, Bibliometrics, Comparative study

中图分类号: