Email Alert | RSS    帮助

中国防痨杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (2): 206-216.doi: 10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20250360

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于中国共病加权指数的老年肺结核共病患者预后结局模型的研究

伍小英(), 何刚, 蔡晓婷, 何立乾, 邓虹, 何丽燕   

  1. 广东药科大学附属广州市胸科医院(广州市结核病防治所)/广州医科大学结核病防治研究院/呼吸疾病全国重点实验室/广州市结核病研究重点实验室结防二分所, 广州 510095
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-07 出版日期:2026-02-10 发布日期:2026-02-03
  • 通信作者: 伍小英 E-mail:wuxiaoying86@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    广州市科技计划项目(2024A03J0588)

Analysis on the prognostic outcome model of elderly pulmonary tuberculosis patients with comorbidities based on the Chinese multimorbidity-weighted index

Wu Xiaoying(), He Gang, Cai Xiaoting, He Liqian, Deng Hong, He Liyan   

  1. Second Outpatient Department of Guangzhou Chest Hospital (Guangzhou Tuberculosis Control Institute) Affiliated to Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Institute of Tuberculosis, Guangzhou Medical University, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis Research, Guangzhou 510095, China
  • Received:2025-09-07 Online:2026-02-10 Published:2026-02-03
  • Contact: Wu Xiaoying E-mail:wuxiaoying86@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou(2024A03J0588)

摘要:

目的: 采用中国共病加权指数(Chinese multimorbidity-weighted index,CMWI),建立老年肺结核共病患者预后结局的预测模型,为制定老年肺结核共病防治策略提供参考依据。方法: 采用回顾性队列研究方法,对2016年1月1日至2023年12月31日在广州市胸科医院收治的1423例老年肺结核共病患者进行追踪随访,研究起始时间为患者诊断肺结核的日期,追踪随访观察时间为18个月,以预后转归为最终结局。通过“中国疾病预防控制系统”子系统“结核病信息管理系统”、病案资料、《广州市结核病病人治疗记录卡》和《广州市结核病病人治疗管理登记卡》收集研究对象的信息资料,采用描述性方法分析老年肺结核共病患者特征及预后结局,通过logistic回归分析其影响因素并建立预测模型。结果: 1423例老年肺结核共病患者中,成功治疗1205例(84.68%),不良结局218例(15.32%)。高龄(HR=1.054,95%CI:1.033~1.076)、非本地户籍(HR=1.655,95%CI:1.058~2.621)、有临床症状(HR=2.216,95%CI:1.333~3.683)、病原学检查阳性(HR=3.802,95%CI:2.512~5.754)、重症肺结核(HR=4.628,95%CI:2.968~7.216)、高CMWI值(HR=1.301,95%CI:1.196~1.415)均是不良结局的危险因素,规则治疗(HR=0.285,95%CI: 0.180~0.451)是保护因素。建立预测模型logit P=-8.136+0.053X1+0.510X2+0.796X3+1.335X6+1.532X9-1.254X10+0.263X11。拟合优度检验结果显示模型拟合良好(χ2=8.055,P=0.428)。回代法预测总的正确率为87.70%,交互验证法预测总的正确率为88.19%,预测准确性较好。该模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)=0.870(95%CI:0.844~0.896),最佳临界点为0.189,敏感度为73.53%,漏诊率为26.47%,特异度为86.98%,误诊率为13.02%,约登指数为0.605,模型性能良好。应用机器学习算法建立的决策树模型生长共3层、11个节点、4个解释变量,以规则治疗为根节点,其后是重症肺结核、病原学检查、CMWI为子节点。规则治疗、非重症肺结核、CMWI≤3.2分的共病患者成功治疗结局的概率最高(96.36%)。该模型的AUC=0.843(95%CI:0.812~0.875),最佳临界点为0.134,敏感度为77.98%,漏诊率为22.02%,特异度为79.34%,误诊率为20.66%,约登指数为0.573。Brier分数为0.089,校准曲线显示预测准确性较好。决策曲线显示具有良好的临床适用性。结论: 基于CMWI的老年肺结核共病患者预后结局的预测模型具有较好的应用价值,可为探索老年肺结核共病管理提供科学依据。

关键词: 结核,肺, 老年人, 共病现象, 模型, 统计学

Abstract:

Objective: Using the Chinese Multimorbidity-weighted Index (CMWI), a model for predicting the prognosis of elderly pulmonary tuberculosis patients with comorbidities was established, to provide a reference basis for formulating prevention and treatment strategies for comorbidities of pulmonary tuberculosis in the elderly. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 1423 elderly pulmonary tuberculosis patients with comorbidities admitted to Guangzhou Chest Hospital from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2023. The study started from the date of diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis, and the follow-up observation period was 18 months, taking prognosis of study subjects as final outcomes. Information of the subjects was collected from the “TB Information Management System” of the “China Disease Control and Prevention Information System”, medical records, the “tuberculosis patient treatment record card of Guangzhou”, and the “tuberculosis patient treatment management registration card of Guangzhou”. Characteristics and prognosis of patients were analyzed using descriptive methods, followed by logistic regression analysis to identify influencing factors and establish a predictive model. Results: Among 1423 elderly pulmonary tuberculosis patients with comorbidities, 1205 cases (84.68%) got treatment success, and 218 cases (15.32%) got unfavorable outcomes. Higher age (HR=1.054,95%CI:1.033-1.076), non-local-registered residence (HR=1.655,95%CI:1.058-2.621), clinical symptoms (HR=2.216,95%CI:1.333-3.683), positive etiological examination result (HR=3.802,95%CI:2.512-5.754), severe pulmonary tuberculosis (HR=4.628,95%CI:2.968-7.216), and high CMWI (Chinese multimorbidity-weighted index,CMWI)(HR=1.301,95%CI:1.196-1.415) were risk factors for adverse treatment outcomes; regular treatment (HR=0.285,95%CI: 0.180-0.451) was a protective factor. We established a predictive model as logit P=-8.136+0.053X1+0.510X2+0.796X3+1.335X6+1.532X9-1.254X10+0.263X11. The goodness of fit test showed that the model fit well (χ2=8.055, P=0.428). The total accuracy using backtesting and interaction verification methods were 87.70% and 88.19%, respectively, indicating good prediction accuracy. The diagnostic performance of the model was as follows: area under the curve (AUC) was 0.870 (95%CI: 0.844-0.896), optimal critical point was 0.189, sensitivity was 73.53%, missed diagnosis rate was 26.47%, specificity was 86.98%, misdiagnosis rate was 13.02%, and Jordan index was 0.605, showing the model having made good performance. A decision tree model was constructed using machine learning algorithms which consisted of 3 layers, 11 nodes, and 4 explanatory variables, with regular treatment as the root node, followed by severe tuberculosis, etiological examination result, and CMWI as child nodes. The probability of getting treatment success was highest (96.36%) for patients with regular treatment, non-severe pulmonary tuberculosis, and CMWI≤3.2. ROC curve for this model showed: area under the curve (AUC) was 0.843 (95%CI: 0.812-0.875), optimal critical point was 0.134, sensitivity was 77.98%, missed diagnosis rate was 22.02%, specificity was 79.34%, misdiagnosis rate was 20.66%, and Jordan index was 0.573. Brier score was 0.089. Calibration curve indicated good predictive accuracy. Decision curve demonstrated good clinical applicability. Conclusion: The prognostic outcome predictive model for elderly pulmonary tuberculosis patients with comorbidities based on the CMWI has good application value and provides scientific basis for exploring the management of comorbidities of pulmonary tuberculosis in the elderly.

Key words: Tuberculosis, pulmonary, Aged, Comorbidity, Models, statistical

中图分类号: