Email Alert | RSS    帮助

中国防痨杂志 ›› 1999, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (2): 64-66.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

河南省结核病耐药监测用药史复核分析

彭义利;王国斌;邢进;李登旭;宋怀周;   

  1. 河南省结核病防治研究所;
  • 收稿日期:1997-10-20 修回日期:1998-02-06 出版日期:1999-02-10 发布日期:1999-02-10
  • 基金资助:
    河南省科委研究项目

Analysis on the rechecking of previous treatment history(PTH) of tuberculosis drug resistnce surveillance(DRS)in Henan

Peng Yili,Wang Guobin,Xing Jin,et al.   

  1. Henan Antituberculo Institute,Zhengzhou 450003
  • Received:1997-10-20 Revised:1998-02-06 Online:1999-02-10 Published:1999-02-10

摘要: 目的复核河南省参与WHO全球结核病耐药监测病人首次询问既往抗结核药物用药史(以下简称用药史)的准确性,评价用药史复核的作用及影响因素?方法由统一培训的县级医生对30个耐药监测县首次询问无用药史的1080例病人进行用药史复核,通过病史启发?村医生帮助回忆等调查方法,填写用药史调查表?省级随机复核县级复核病例?结果省级复核用药史与县级复核结果一致率为95.7%,其中有用药史的一致率为84.4%,无用药史的一致率为100%,首次询问无用药史者47.2%有用药史,耐药组用药率为62.0%,敏感组为31.7%,非结核感染用药者多于结核用药者(1.17∶1),既往用药时间>1月者,耐药组多于敏感组(37.2%,16.8%),结核组多于非结核感染组(82.0%,35.9%),用药种类结核组以HR为多,非结核感染组以SR为多?结论用药史复核是耐药监测质量控制的有效方法,使监测结果更趋准确;对既往用药史的询问应规范提纲?内容?方法,人员统一培训,此工作可随病人督导进行,县级医生经培训后复核用药史结果可信?不能忽视非结核感染用药史?WHO耐药监测新指南用药史>1月的标准有待商榷,其对初始耐药的准确性有一定影响?

关键词: 结核, 药物耐受性, 监测, 用药史

Abstract: Objective To recheck the accuracy of PT H of cases enrolled in WHO DRS in Henan and to evaluate the role of PTH rechecki ng and its influent factors.Method Doctors from 30 DRS counties were trained and 1?080 cas es without PTH in the first inquiry were rechecked.Survey was conducted by arous ing and recalling of PTH,and unified forms were filled.Cases rechecked by provin cial level randomly.Results The rechecking agreement rate is 95.7% between the prov incial and county level.Out of which,cases with and without PTH is 84.4% and 100 % respectively,42.7% cases without PTH in the first inquiry recalled their PTH.T he rate with PTH of drug resistant cases is 62.0%,and it is 31.7% for drug sensi tive cases.Cases with PTH because of non_tuberculosis infectious diseases were more than those because of tuberculosis(1.17∶1).Out of cases with PTH more than one month,drug resistant group is more than drug sensitive group(37.2% and 16.8 %,respectively)and TB group is more than non_TB infectious disease group(82.0% a nd 35.9% respectively).In TB group,INH and RFP were mainly used,and in non_TB gr oup,SM and RFP were mainly used.Conclusion PTH rechecking is an effective quality control meth od for DRS.It will make DRS results more accurate.During PTH inquiring,guideline ,content,method should be unified,technicians should be trained.This work can be done accompanied with regular supervision.Results which got by trained doctors, are reliable.TB drugs were used for non_TB infection should not be ignored.PTH<1 month will be classified as new case in WHO DRS guideline.This criterion is not scientific.It will affect accuracy of initial drug resistance rate.

Key words: Tuberculosis, Drug resistance, Surveillace, Treament history