Email Alert | RSS    帮助

中国防痨杂志 ›› 2012, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 304-309.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

复治肺结核化疗新方案与原复治方案的临床对照研究

朱莉贞 高孟秋 陈巍 李芳 李志惠 叶志忠 施军卫 李丽 岳冀 沈云飞 张立群 杨国峰 李光忠 高远 邱丽华 张红漫 王生伟 吴晓光   

  1. 101149 北京市结核病胸部肿瘤研究所  首都医科大学附属北京胸科医院结核科(朱莉贞、高孟秋、张立群、吴晓光);沈阳市胸科医院结核科(陈巍、高远);山东省胸科医院结核科(李芳、杨国峰、李光忠、邱丽华);河北省胸科医院结核科(李志惠、张红漫);厦门大学附属第一医院肺科(叶志忠);南通市第六人民医院结核科(施军卫);天津市海河医院结核科(李丽);成都市结核病防治院结核科(岳冀);南京市胸科医院结核科(沈云飞、王生伟)
  • 收稿日期:2012-01-10 出版日期:2012-05-10 发布日期:2012-05-03
  • 通信作者: 朱莉贞 E-mail:zhulizhen@hotmail.com
  • 基金资助:

    第一轮中国全球基金结核病项目实施性研究(TB08-002)

Controlled clinical studies comparing the new chemotherapeutic regimens with the primary regimens for retreatment pulmonary tuberculosis patients

ZHU Li-zhen,GAO Meng-qiu,CHEN Wei,LI Fang,LI Zhi-hui,YE Zhi-zhong,SHI Jun-wei,LI Li,YUE Ji,SHEN Yun-fei,ZHANG Li-qun,YANG Guo-feng,LI Guang-zhong,GAO Yuan,QIU Li-hua,ZHANG Hong-man,WANG Sheng-wei,WU Xiao-guang   

  1. Department of Tuberculosis, Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 101149,China
  • Received:2012-01-10 Online:2012-05-10 Published:2012-05-03
  • Contact: ZHU Li-zhen E-mail:zhulizhen@hotmail.com

摘要: 目的  探讨复治肺结核化疗新方案的疗效和安全性。 方法  依照药物敏感试验将345例患者分为复治敏感患者161例(试验组85例,对照组76例);复治耐药患者184例(试验组124例,对照组60例)。治疗方案:(1)复治敏感患者试验组2HRZES/6-10HRE(非糖尿病患者疗程8个月,糖尿病患者12个月);对照组采用原复治方案2H3R3Z3E3S3/6H3R3E3。(2)复治耐药患者试验组3R(H)ZES±Lfx/6-9R(H)ZE±Lfx(耐H或R者,分别以R或H相互替代;耐S以Am替代;耐HS或RS均以Am或Lfx替代);对照组采用原复治方案:2-3HRZES/6HRE (同地,同情况,历史对照)。 结果(1)复治敏感患者试验组和对照组,疗程结束时痰Mtb培养阴转率分别为77.6%(66/85)、88.2%(67/76);病灶显效率分别为63.5%(54/85)、55.3%(42/76);有效率分别为96.5%(82/85)、90.8%(69/76);空洞闭合率分别为68.3%(28/41)、56.1%(23/41);差异均无统计学意义(χ2值分别为2.397 24、0.821 42、1.354 777、0.829 58;P值均>0.05)。伴糖尿病患者试验组和对照组痰Mtb培养阴转率分别为66.7%(16/24)、73.3%(11/15);病灶显效率分别为58.3%(14/24)、46.7%(7/15);差异均无统计学意义(χ2值分别为0.191、0.511;P值均>0.05)。不伴糖尿病患者试验组和对照组上述各项指标分别为82.0%(50/61)、91.8%(56/61);65.6%(40/61)、57.4%(35/61);差异均无统计学意义(χ2值分别为2.589 62、0.861;P值均>0.05)。(2)复治耐药试验组疗程结束时痰Mtb培养阴转率为79.8% (99/124),对照组为66.7% (40/60);两组比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=3.81,P<0.05)。病灶显效率分别为62.9% (78/124)和45.0% (27/60),两组差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.584 29,P<0.05),不良反应的发生率敏感患者试验组和对照组分别为1.1%(1/92)、1.2%(1/82);耐药患者试验组不良反应的发生率为2.8%(4/142)。结论  复治敏感患者无论是否伴有糖尿病,均可采用原复治方案治疗;复治耐药患者采用新方案治疗疗效优异,新方案不良反应发生率较低。

关键词: 结核, 肺/药物疗法, 复发, 临床方案, 临床对照试验, 糖尿病

Abstract: Objective  To evaluate the efficacy and safety of new chemotherapeutic regimens for retreatment pulmonary tuberculosis. Methods  A total of 345 cases were enrolled,according to the results of drug susceptibility testing, 161 cases with drug-sensitive results were assigned to a test group(85 cases) and a control group (76 cases),184 with drug-resistant results assigned to the test group(124 cases) and the control group (60 cases). The chemotherapeutic regimens were as follows:(1)For the drug-sensitive group, new chemotherapeutic regimen with 2HRZES/6-10HRE was used in the test group and primary regimen with 2H3R3Z3E3S3/6H3R3E was used in the control, respectively(8 months for PTB but no diabete cases,12 months for PTB with diabete cases). (2)For the drug-resistant group, 3R(H)ZES±Lfx/6-9R(H)ZE±Lfx was used in the test group. R or H could be replaced each other for R or H resistant patients. Am could be used in the case of S resistance. Am and Lfx could be used in HS or RS resistant cases. 2-3HRZES/6HRE regimen was used in the control(We selected the control subjects in the same place, same situation but historical controls). Results  (1)In drug sensitive group, the sputum conversion rate was 77.6%(66/85) and 88.2%(67/76), radiographic improvement rate was 63.5%(54/85) and 55.3%(42/76), effective rate was 96.5%(82/85) and 90.8%(69/76)and cavity closing rate was 68.3%(28/41) and 56.1%(23/41),there was no statistically significant difference between the test group and the control group(χ2=2.397 24,χ2=0.821 42,χ2=1.354 777,χ2=0.829 58, P>0.05). Also in drug sensitive group complicated with diabetic, the sputum conversion rate was 66.7%(16/24) and 73.3%(11/15), radiographic improvement rate was 58.3%(14/24) and 46.7%(7/15),there was no statistically significant difference between the test group and control group complicated with diabetic(χ2=0.191,χ2=0.511,P>0.05). Meanwhile, the sputum conversion rate was 82.0%(50/61) and 91.8%(56/61), radiographic improvement rate was 65.6%(40/61) and 57.4%(35/61)in the test group but no diabetes and control group but no diabetes. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups(χ2=2.589 62,χ2=0.861,P>0.05).(2)In the drug resistant group,  at the end of treatment, the radiographic improvement rate was 79.8%(99/124)in the test group and 66.7%(40/60) in control. There were statistically significant difference between the test group and control (χ2=3.81, P<0.05);Radiographic improvement rate was 62.9%(78/124) in test group and 45.0%(27/60) in the control, there were statistically significant difference between the test group  and the control(χ2=4.584 29, P<0.05); The Incidence of adverse reactions were 1.1%(1/92) and 1.2%(1/82) in the test and control groups in drug sensitive group, respectively, and the Incidence of adverse reaction in the test group of drug-resistant cases was 2.8%(4/142). Conclusion  For retreatment drug-sensitive cases, whether or not complicated with diabetes, can receive the primary chemotherapeutic regimen. New chemotherapeutic regimens had got good effect in the retreatment drug-resistant cases and the Incidence of adverse reactions were lower and no sever adverse reactions developed.

Key words: Tuberculosis,pulmonary/drug therapy, Recurrence, Clinical protocols, Controlled clinical trial, Diabetes mellitus