Email Alert | RSS    帮助

中国防痨杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (9): 969-972.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2018.09.012

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

三种抗结核药物血药浓度调控成功率的比较分析

周俊,吕小会,郑修齐,熊朝刚,赵嫄,党丽云()   

  1. 710100 西安市胸科医院
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-08 出版日期:2018-09-10 发布日期:2018-10-17
  • 通信作者: 党丽云 E-mail:dangliyun@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    2017年陕西省科技计划自然科学基础研究项目(2017JQ8016)

Comparative analysis of the adjustment success ratio of plasma drug concentration of three anti-tubercular drugs

Jun ZHOU,Xiao-hui LYU,Xiu-qi ZHENG,Chao-gang XIONG,Yuan ZHAO,Li-yun DANG()   

  1. Xi’an Chest Hospital, Xi’an 710100, China
  • Received:2018-03-08 Online:2018-09-10 Published:2018-10-17
  • Contact: Li-yun DANG E-mail:dangliyun@sina.com

摘要:

目的 基于治疗药物监测(TDM),分析抗结核药物异烟肼(INH)、利福平(RFP)、吡嗪酰胺(PZA)的血药浓度调控结果。方法 利用西安市胸科医院信息管理系统,收集2016年11月至2017年11月期间,根据临床治疗的需要,进行剂量调整及有实施前后2次及以上血浆药物浓度监测资料的初治确诊肺结核患者作为研究对象,共132例。其中,INH、RFP和PZA等3种一线抗结核药物实施2次及以上TDM监测患者例数及剂量调整患者例数为:INH组符合上述两种情况的患者分别为50例和19例;RFP组分别为47例和9例;PZA组分别为35例和11例。分析各组患者药物剂量调整情况。结果 INH、RFP和PZA组血药浓度调整率分别为38.0%(19/50)、19.1%(9/47)和31.4%(11/35)。INH组血药浓度调控成功率为31.6%(6/19);RFP组血药浓度调控成功率为7/9;PZA组血药浓度调控成功率为81.8%(9/11);三组比较差异有统计学意义(Fisher精确概率法,P=0.013),INH组血药浓度调控成功率明显低于PZA组和RFP组。结论 三种一线抗结核药物血药浓度在一次剂量调整后都不能完全达到治疗浓度范围内,其中INH与RFP和PZA相比,其剂量调整的成功率较低,这提示基于TDM制定给药剂量的方案还不能够实现一步到位,针对具体患者和药物品种还有进一步加强TDM和剂量调整。

关键词: 结核, 肺, 抗生素类, 抗结核, 药物监测, 剂量效应关系, 药物, 结果评价(卫生保健)

Abstract:

Objective Based on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), the adjustment results of plasma drug concentration of the anti-tubercular drugs isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RFP) and pyrazinamide (PZA) were analyzed.Methods Using the information management system of Xi’an Chest Hospital to collect and analyze blood drug concentration monitoring data of 132 cases that had applied plasma drug concentration monitoring for two or more times and adjusted the oral dosages to meet the need of clinical treatment from November 2016 to November 2017. Among them, there were 50 and 19 INH-treated cases, 47 and 9 RFP-treated cases, and 35 and 11 PZA-treated cases who performed TDM for two or more times and dose adjustment, respectively. The drug dose adjustment of each treatment group was analyzed.Results The plasma concentration adjustment rates of the INH, RFP, and PZA groups were 38.0% (19/50), 19.1% (9/47), and 31.4% (11/35), respectively. The dose adjustment success rate of plasma drug concentration in the INH group was only 31.6% (6/19), and that of the RFP and PZA groups were 7/9 and 81.8% (9/11), respectively. The result of precise probability test indicated that there was a significant difference in the adjustment success rate of plasma drug concentrations among the three drug groups. The adjustment success rate of INH plasma drug concentration was significantly lower than that of RFP and PZA (Fisher’s exact probability method, P=0.013).Conclusion The blood concentrations of the three first-line anti-tubercular drugs were all not nicely within the clinical therapeutic range after once dose adjustment, and the plasma concentration of INH was even less controllable than that of RFP and PZA. This analysis suggests that the drug regimens adjustment based on TDM for one time can not be perfectly implemented, and for specific individuals and drugs it is also necessary to practise further TDM monitoring and dosage adjustment.

Key words: Tuberculosis, pulmonary, Antibiotics, antitubercular, Drug monitoring, Dose-response relationship, drug, Outcome assessment (health care)