Email Alert | RSS    帮助

中国防痨杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (6): 892-902.doi: 10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20250513

• 综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

肺结核预后评价中血清学标志物的研究进展

张文雅1,2, 张艳秋2,3, 王伟东2,3, 许晓莞2,3, 何梦雅2,3, 孙定勇1,2,3()   

  1. 1 郑州大学公共卫生学院流行病学系, 郑州 450001
    2 河南省疾病预防控制中心结核病预防控制所, 郑州 450016
    3 河南省传染病病原生物重点实验室, 郑州 450016
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-22 出版日期:2026-06-10 发布日期:2026-05-25
  • 通信作者: 孙定勇 E-mail:sundy2222@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    河南省科技发展计划(242102311130);河南疾控科技攻关专项计划(HNCDCZD20250105)

Research progress of serological markers for the prognostic evaluation of pulmonary tuberculosis

Zhang Wenya1,2, Zhang Yanqiu2,3, Wang Weidong2,3, Xu Xiaowan2,3, He Mengya2,3, Sun Dingyong1,2,3()   

  1. 1 Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
    2 Department of Tuberculosis Prevention and Control Center, Henan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhengzhou 450016, China
    3 Henan Key Laboratory of Infectious Pathogenic Microbiology, Zhengzhou 450016, China
  • Received:2025-12-22 Online:2026-06-10 Published:2026-05-25
  • Contact: Sun Dingyong E-mail:sundy2222@126.com
  • Supported by:
    Henan Provincial Science and Technology Development Plan(242102311130);Henan CDC Scientific and Technological Key Research Program(HNCDCZD20250105)

摘要:

肺结核的精准预后评估对改善临床结局至关重要。血清学标志物可动态、定量地反映宿主的炎症、代谢及免疫状态,弥补传统方法的不足。笔者综述了五类预后相关血清学标志物的研究进展:(1)非特异性炎症与急性期反应指标(如C反应蛋白、降钙素原),其动态变化与疾病活动度及治疗反应相关;(2)营养与代谢状态指标(如白蛋白、血清阴离子间隙),评估全身状况与死亡风险;(3)固有免疫与微环境调控标志物(如可溶性髓系细胞触发受体-1、γ-干扰素诱导蛋白10),揭示免疫病理状态;(4)免疫效应细胞因子(如γ-干扰素、白细胞介素6、白细胞介素10),其平衡影响疾病转归;(5)细胞程序性死亡与代谢重编程新型标志物(如消皮素D、谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶4),从细胞命运层面提供新见解。多指标联合与预测模型是提升效能的关键方向。尽管部分标志物预测价值良好,但仍面临特异性不足、标准化欠缺等挑战。未来需通过多维度整合、模型构建及前瞻性验证,推动其向临床精准管理转化。笔者结合国内外最新研究进展,旨在对肺结核预后评价中血清学标志物的价值进行探讨,以期为肺结核患者预后评价提供新视角。

关键词: 结核, 肺, 血清, 生物学标记, 预后

Abstract:

Accurate prognostic evaluation is crucial for improving clinical outcomes in pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). Serological markers can dynamically and quantitatively reflect the host’s inflammatory, metabolic, and immune status, complementing the limitations of traditional methods. This article systematically reviews the research progress on five categories of serological markers related to prognosis: (1) Non-specific inflammatory and acute-phase response indicators (e.g., CRP, PCT), whose dynamic changes correlate with disease activity and treatment response; (2) Nutritional and metabolic status indicators (e.g., Alb, AG), which assess systemic condition and mortality risk; (3) Innate immune and microenvironment regulatory markers (e.g., sTREM-1, IP-10), revealing immunopathological status; (4) Immune effector cytokines (e.g., IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-10), whose balance influences disease progression; (5) Novel markers related to programmed cell death and metabolic reprogramming (e.g., GSDMD, GPX4), providing new insights from the perspective of cell fate. Multi-marker combinations and predictive models are key directions for enhancing prognostic efficacy. Although some markers show good predictive value, challenges remain, such as lack of specificity and standardization. Future efforts should focus on multi-dimensional integration, model construction, and prospective validation to advance their translation into precise clinical management.

Key words: Tuberculosis, pulmonary, Serum, Biological markers, Prognosis

中图分类号: