Email Alert | RSS    帮助

中国防痨杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (11): 1208-1213.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2018.11.012

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同结算方式下汉中市肺结核患者门诊诊疗费用分析

张宏伟,许静(),邓亚丽,张天华   

  1. 710048 西安,陕西省结核病防治研究所防治科
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-30 出版日期:2018-11-10 发布日期:2018-12-04
  • 通信作者: 许静 E-mail:xujingfzhk@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    中国国家卫生和计划生育委员会-比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会结核病防治合作项目(51914)

Analysis of outpatient treatment cost of common tuberculosis patients in Hanzhong under different payment models

ZHANG Hong-wei,XU Jing(),DENG Ya-li,ZHANG Tian-hua   

  1. Department Control and Prevention, Shaanxi Provincial Institute for TB Control and Prevention,Xi’an 710048,China
  • Received:2018-08-30 Online:2018-11-10 Published:2018-12-04
  • Contact: Jing XU E-mail:xujingfzhk@126.com

摘要:

目的 通过对汉中市不同结算方式下全疗程未住院肺结核患者门诊诊疗费用的分析,为制定肺结核患者筹资支付政策提供参考。方法 收集、整理汉中市结核病定点医院2014年1月至2015年6月,治疗管理并完成疗程的1388例肺结核患者门诊诊疗费用数据,其中初治患者1204例,复治患者184例。对患者的就诊天数、就诊次数、次均诊疗费、诊疗总费用等变量采用中位数(四分位数)[M(Q1,Q3)]进行描述,不同治疗分类、医保类型、费用报销类型患者的就诊天数、就诊次数、次均诊疗费、诊疗总费用采用秩和检验,不同报销方式下的患者自付比率采用χ2检验进行统计分析,以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。 结果 初治、复治患者诊疗总费用分别为1580.45元(1259.70元, 2420.23元)、1920.13元(1497.81元, 2300.44元),差异有统计学意义(Z=-3.267,P=0.001)。不同结算模式下,单病种定额结算、单病种据实结算、非单病种结算和患者自费次均诊疗费用分别为241.40元(199.21元,358.30元)、175.00元(144.64元,212.07元)、140.46元(128.05元,163.76元)和107.54元(94.71元,136.37元);上述患者诊疗总费用分别为2054.14元(1460.23元, 2655.98元)、1342.51元(1002.25元, 1820.33元)、1018.15元(869.65元, 1321.55元)和674.20元(495.03元,848.07元),不同结算方式之间次均诊疗费用(χ2=408.726,P=0.000)和诊疗总费用(χ2=342.875,P=0.000)差异均有统计学意义。初治患者超过门诊定额标准3000元者占5.65%(68/1204),复治患者超过4000元定额标准者占4.35%(8/184);定点医院平均每例单病种定额方式结算患者可获得非服务性补偿770.00元,单病种据实结算、非单病种和患者自费结算方式为医院提供非服务性补偿为0元;单病种结算方式报销的患者平均个人自付额度为409.65元(233.82元,702.15元),个人自付比例为24.84%(619580.87/2494194.76),非单病种结算方式患者平均个人自付额度为483.90元(403.62元,587.25元),个人自付比率为51.32%(8245.05/16065.98),单病种结算患者自付比率低于非单病种结算患者,两者比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=5967.453,P=0.000);单病种定额结算患者个人自付率为24.52%(441100.08/1798921.41),低于单病种据实结算患者自付比例25.67%(1784.80.79/695273.35),两者比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=355.422,P=0.000)。 结论 结核病患者门诊诊疗费用实行单病种定额方式结算,并未增加医院经济负担,且能够减轻患者经济负担。故应该将肺结核患者门诊诊疗费用纳入单病种定额结算政策的范围内并加以推广,但在实际应用中需进一步完善。

关键词: 结核, 肺, 门诊医疗, 按诊疗收费计划, 支付标准制定和审核, 方案评价

Abstract:

Objective To analyze the outpatient treatment cost of tuberculosis (TB) patients who had not been hospitalized for the whole course of treatment under different payment models, and to provide a reference for the development of the payment policy for the financing of TB patient.Methods The data of the treatment cost of 1388 TB outpatients who completed treatment in Hanzhong designated TB hospital from January 2014 to June 2015 were collected and collated, which included 1204 cases of primary treatment and 184 cases of retreatment. The median variables (four quantiles) (M (Q1, Q3)) were used to describe the variables of days of medical consultation, number of visit, average cost of diagnosis and treatment per time, total cost of diagnosis and treatment, etc. Rank sum test and chi-square test were used to analyze the above variables with different treatment classification, type of health insurance, type of reimbursement and percentage of out-of-patient cost. P<0.05 was statistically significant.Results The medians of total cost of diagnosis and treatment for the primary and retreatment patients was 1580.45 Yuan (1259.70 Yuan, 2420.23 Yuan) and 1920.13 Yuan (1497.81 Yuan, 2300.44 Yuan) respectively, with statistical significance (Z=-3.267,P=0.001). The medians of average outpatient cost for single disease quota payment was 241.40 Yuan (199.21 Yuan, 358.30 Yuan), for single disease settlement according to facts was 175.00 Yuan (144.64 Yuan, 212.07 Yuan), for non-single disease payment was 140.46 Yuan (128.05 Yuan, 63.76 Yuan), and for out-of-pocket payment was 107.55 Yuan (94.71 Yuan, 136.37 Yuan), there has statistically significant difference (χ2=408.726, P=0.000). The medians of total cost for those payment models were 2054.14 Yuan (1460.23 Yuan, 2655.98 Yuan), 1342.51 Yuan (1002.25 Yuan, 1820.33 Yuan), 1018.15 Yuan (869.65 Yuan, 1321.55 Yuan) and 674.20 Yuan (495.03 Yuan, 848.07 Yuan) respectively, with statistical significance (χ2=342.875,P=0.000). 5.65% (68/1204) of primary treatment patients exceeded the outpatient quota of 3000 Yuan, and 4.35% (8/184) of re-treatment patients exceeded the quota of 4000 Yuan. The average non-service compensation was 770.00 Yuan per patient settled according to single-disease quota, and this of other models were 0. The average amount of out-of-pocket payment for the patient with single-disease payment was 409.65 Yuan (233.82 Yuan, 702.15 Yuan),with the proportion 24.84% (619580.87/2494194.76), which was lower than that of non-single disease payment patients 51.32% (8245.05/16065.98), with statistical significance (χ2=5967.453, P=0.000). The proportion of out-of-pocket payment for single-disease quota payment patients was 24.52% (441100.08/1798921.41), which was significantly lower than that of patients with single-disease settlement according to facts (χ2=355.422, P=0.000). Conclusion The quota payment for outpatient diagnosis and treatment of TB does not increase the financial burden of the hospital, and can reduce the economic burden of the patients. The outpatient diagnosis and treatment cost of TB patients should be included in the scope of the single-disease quota settlement policy and promoted, but it needs further improvement in practical application.

Key words: Tuberculosis, pulmonary, Ambulatory care, Fee-for-service plans, Rate setting and review, Program evaluation