Email Alert | RSS    帮助

中国防痨杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 347-351.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

177例复治肺结核使用标准复治方案的疗效分析

罗萍 屠德华 洪峰 王静 王甦民 张天豪   

  1. 100035 北京结核病控制研究所门诊部(罗萍、屠德华、王静),所长办公室(洪峰),中心实验室(王甦民),防控科(张天豪)
  • 收稿日期:2012-08-15 出版日期:2013-05-10 发布日期:2013-07-02
  • 通信作者: 张天豪 E-mail:tianhao14032@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    首都医学发展科研基金项目(2007-3069)

Effect analysis on standard regimens of retreatment pulmonary tuberculosis in 177 cases

LUO Ping, TU De-hua, HONG Feng, WANG Jing, WANG Su-min, ZHANG Tian-hao   

  1. Department of Outpatient, Beijing Research Institute of Tuberculosis Control, Beijing 100035,China
  • Received:2012-08-15 Online:2013-05-10 Published:2013-07-02
  • Contact: ZHANG Tian-hao E-mail:tianhao14032@163.com

摘要: 目的  对标准复治方案治疗北京市复治肺结核患者的疗效进行评价。 方法  采用回顾性调查方法,对2009—2010年全市登记管理的复治菌阳肺结核患者,根据药敏试验结果将其分为利福平敏感组(138例)和利福平耐药组(39例),每组又分为异烟肼敏感组和异烟肼耐药组,其中异烟肼、利福平均敏感组114例,异烟肼耐药、利福平敏感组24例,异烟肼敏感、利福平耐药组12例,异烟肼、利福平均耐药组27例,对其使用2HRZE(S)/6HRE标准复治化疗方案的疗效进行回顾性分析。 结果  异烟肼敏感组与异烟肼耐药组比较,痰菌阴转率分别为92.9%(117/126)、66.7%(34/51),治疗成功率分别为87.3%(110/126)、60.8%(31/51)。两组在痰菌阴转情况及治疗转归方面差异均无统计学意义(χ2MH值分别为2.183、1.974,PMH值均>0.05)。利福平敏感组与利福平耐药组比较,痰菌阴转率分别为94.2%(130/138)、53.8%(21/39),治疗成功率分别为88.4%(122/138)、48.7%(19/39),两组在痰菌阴转情况及治疗转归等方面差异均有统计学意义(χ2MH值分别为16.199、12.686,PMH值均<0.001)。 结论  利福平敏感的复治肺结核患者采用标准复治方案治疗,效果良好;对利福平耐药的复治肺结核患者采用标准复治方案治疗的合理性值得探讨,还需要进行更多的研究。

关键词: 结核, 肺/药物疗法, 复发, 临床方案, 治疗结果

Abstract: Objective  To explore the status and effect of standard treatment regimens of retreatment pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Beijing. Methods  This was a retrospective study. The bacteriologically confirmed retreated pulmonary tuberculosis cases registered from 2009 to 2010 in Beijing were enrolled and divided into rifampin-sensitive (138 cases) and rifampin-resistant (39 cases)groups, according to the results of drug susceptibility test. The cases in each group were divided into isoniazid-sensitive and isoniazid-resistant groups. There were 114 cases sensitive to both isoniazid and rifampin, 24 resistant to isoniazid and sensitive to rifampin, 12 sensitive to isoniazid and resistant to rifampin, and 27 resistant to both isoniazid and rifampin. Standard treatment regimens(2HRZES/6HRE)were applied, and the effect was retrospectively analyzed. Results  In isoniazid-sensitive and resistant groups, the sputum conversion rates were 92.9%(117/126)and 66.7%(34/51),and the treatment success rates were 87.3%(110/126)and 60.8%(31/51)respectively. There was no statistical significant difference in the sputum conversion and the treatment success between two groups(χ2MH value were 2.183 and 1.974, both PMH value >0.05).In rifampin-sensitive and resistant groups, the sputum conversion rates were 94.2%(130/138) and 53.8%(21/39),and the treatment success rates were 88.4%(122/138) and 48.7%(19/39) respectively. The differences in the sputum conversion and the treatment success between two groups were statistical significant (χ2MH values were 16.199 and 12.686, both PMH value <0.001). Conclusion  The effect of standard regimens of rifampin-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis has been approved, while the rationality of applying standard regimens to those rifampin-resistant cases needs to be discussed.

Key words: Tuberculosis,Pulmonary/drug therapy, Recurrence, Clinical protocols, Treatment outcome