Email Alert | RSS    帮助

中国防痨杂志 ›› 2012, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (10): 642-646.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

重庆市巫溪县和山东省莘县对肺结核患者实施交通补助措施探索及效果评价

陈秋兰 周林 王倪 胡代玉 李芳 陈明亭   

  1. 102206 北京,中国疾病预防控制中心结核病预防控制中心(陈秋兰、周林、王倪、陈明亭);重庆市结核病防治研究所(胡代玉);山东省结核病防治中心(李芳)
  • 收稿日期:2012-07-31 出版日期:2012-10-10 发布日期:2013-01-08
  • 通信作者: 陈明亭 E-mail:chenmt@chinatb.org
  • 基金资助:

    第一轮全球基金结核病项目(07-031)

Exploration and effect evaluation of the intervention of providing transportation subsidies to pulmonary tuberculosis patients in two counties in China

CHEN Qiu-lan,ZHOU Lin,WANG Ni,HU Dai-yu,LI Fang,CHEN Ming-ting   

  1. National Center for Tuberculosis Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China
  • Received:2012-07-31 Online:2012-10-10 Published:2013-01-08
  • Contact: CHEN Ming-ting E-mail:chenmt@chinatb.org

摘要: 目的  探索对肺结核患者实施发放交通补助的必要性和发放标准及方式,为中国制定肺结核患者交通补助相关政策提供参考。 方法  采用现场试验研究方法:对取2008年4月1日至12月28日巫溪县和莘县结核病防治所门诊425例新发涂阳肺结核患者实施交通补助,两县根据实际情况制定不同的发放标准和发放方式;选择2007年同时期患者410例作为对照组;通过比较干预组和对照组的2、5、6个月末查痰率和按时取药率来评价交通补助措施效果。分别采用EpiData 3.0软件和SPSS 11.5软件录入和分析数据。对研究对象的社会人口学特征的分析采用统计描述方法,对干预组和对照组的治疗依从情况的比较分析采用卡方检验。 结果  巫溪县、莘县干预组患者从居住地到结核病防治机构(简称“结防机构”)往返一次所需交通费平均分别为(30.6±20.0)元、(22.2±10.1)元。55.5%(231/416)的患者自述不能承担肺结核治疗复查所需的交通费用。巫溪县、莘县平均向每名患者发放交通补助分别为(86.8±46.6)元、(59.2±23.3)元。两县干预组按时取药率[(巫溪县χ2=413.172, P<0.05),(莘县χ2=88.615,P<0.05)]和2个月末查痰率[(巫溪县χ2=67.523,P<0.05),(莘县χ2=5.776,P<0.05)],莘县5个月末查痰率(χ2=5.136,  P<0.05)、6个月末查痰率(莘县χ2=14.479,  P<0.05)也高于对照组;绝大部分现场工作人员认为实施交通补助帮助患者解决了实际困难,有利于激励患者提高其治疗依从性。 结论  实施交通补助有助于患者提高治疗依从性,应根据患者住址与结防机构距离制定交通补助标准,并在启动疗程和完成疗程后分两次发放较为合理。

关键词: 结核, 肺, 政府补助, 评价研究

Abstract: Objective  To confirm the necessity and to explore the standard and proper way of providing transportation subsidies to pulmonary tuberculosis patients, in order to provide evidence for relative policy development.  Methods  Field test method was used: all of the 425 new smear positive tuberculosis patients(NSP) detected from April 1st to December 28th in 2008 both in Wuxi County and Shen County were selected as the intervention group, and 410 NSP registered in the corresponding period in 2007 as the control group. The transportation subsidies were given to the intervention group throughout the treatment period but in different ways in the two counties. Sputum examination rate at the end of 2nd, 5th and 6th month of treatment and on time drug taken rate were used to evaluate the effect. EpiData 3.0 and SPSS 11.5 were used to input and analyze the data. Descriptive statistics was used to analyze the socio-demographic characteristics of the subject investigated and chi-square test was applied to compare the treatment compliance between the two groups.  Results  The NSP in Wuxi County and Shen County needed (30.6±20.0) RMB and (22.2±10.1) RMB for one round trip respectively. 55.5% (231/416) of all the NSP reported that they couldn’t afford the traffic fees for 3-4 times follow-up during the treatment period. The average amount of the traffic subsidies provided to the NSP in Wuxi County and Shen County were (86.8±46.6) RMB and (59.2±23.3) RMB respectively. The sputum examination rate at the end of the 2nd month of treatment [(Wuxi County χ2=67.523,P<0.05),(Shen County  χ2=5.776,P<0.05)] and the rate of on time drug taken [(Wuxi County χ2=413.172,  P<0.05),(Shen County  χ2=88.615,P<0.05)]during treatment period of the intervention group were higher than the control group. In Shen County the sputum examination rate at the end of the 5th (χ2=5.136,  P<0.05)and 6th treatment month (χ2=14.479,  P<0.05)of the intervention group were also higher than the control group. The vast majority of field staff considered that the implementation of transportation allowance was successful, as it helped the patients solve the practical difficulties and motivated patients to improve their treatment adherence.  Conclusion  The transportation subsidies could improve the patients’ adherence to treatment. The standard of the subsidy should be set according to the distance between patients’ home and the local TB dispensary, and it should be distributed at the beginning and after the complement of treatment.

Key words: Tuberculosis pulmonary, Public assitance, Evaluation studies