Email Alert | RSS    帮助

中国防痨杂志 ›› 2000, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (3): 125-126.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

示范县与非示范县结核病控制效果的对比分析

黄连章;孙开友;   

  1. 江苏省盐城市结核病防治所 224002;
  • 出版日期:2000-03-10 发布日期:2000-03-10

The evaluation of the tuberculosis control effect between the demonstrational county and the other

HUANG Lian-zhang,SUN Kai-you.   

  1. Yancheng Antituberculosis Institute,Jiangsu 224002
  • Online:2000-03-10 Published:2000-03-10

摘要: 目的 评价盐城市实施WHO西太区结核病控制示范项目的成效。方法 根据结核病控制示范项目实施细则所列主要评价和考核指标,对示范县、非示范县防治资料进行对比分析。结果 示范县年涂阳新登记率、年新发涂阳新登记率分别是非示范县的2.6倍和2.2倍,新发涂阳病人满疗程治愈率高于非示范县7.2个百分点,每例新发涂阳病人平均治管费用、平均治愈一例新发涂阳病人的费用分别比非示范县低83.5元和120.4元。结论 示范县采用的短程间歇化疗方案和全程督导管理等干预措施,符合“低成本、高效益”的原则,是实现肺结核病“高发现率、高治愈率”的关键。

关键词: 结核, 肺/预防和控制

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the effect of the WHO West Pacific Region tuberculosis control demonstration project carried out in Yancheng city.Methods To compare and analyze the TB control datum of the demonstration at counties and the non-demonstrational counties,according to the chief evaluation and assessment of the tuberculosis control model project.Results The annual smear-positive new register rate and the annual new smear-positive new register rate in demonstrational counties are 2.6 times and 2.2 times more than those of the other.The whole therapeutic term cure rate of the new smear-positive case is 7.2 percent higher than that of non-demonstrational counties.The average cure and management expense on every new smear-positive case and the average cure expense on every new smear-positive case are $ 83.5 and $120.4 lower than those of non-demonstrational counties.Conclusion The short-course intermittent chemical therapy and the whole-course direct supervision are not only based on“the low cost,the high effect”but also the key to realize“the high case-finding rate,the high cure rate.”

Key words: Tuberculosis, pulmonary/Prevention and control