Email Alert | RSS    帮助

中国防痨杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 434-439.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2019.04.013

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同性状痰标本的前处理液沉渣对MGIT 960液体培养法污染率的影响

孔成成,贾红兵,段惠娟,梁倩,马异峰,尚媛媛,孙照刚()   

  1. 101149 首都医科大学附属北京胸科医院 北京市结核病胸部肿瘤研究所转化医学研究室(孔成成、贾红兵、段惠娟、孙照刚),国家结核病临床实验室(梁倩、马异峰、尚媛媛)
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-30 出版日期:2019-04-10 发布日期:2019-04-08
  • 通信作者: 孙照刚 E-mail:sunzg75@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    首都卫生发展科研专项(首发2018-2Z-1042);北京市医院管理局临床医学发展专项(XMLX201812);首都临床特色应用研究重点项目(Z181100001718181)

Effect of pretreatment solution sediment of different characters on the pullution rate of MGIT 960 liquid culture

Cheng-cheng KONG,Hong-bing JIA,Hui-juan DUAN,Qian LIANG,Yi-feng MA,Yuan-yuan SHANG,Zhao-gang SUN()   

  1. Translational Medicine Laboratory,Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute,Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 101149,China
  • Received:2018-09-30 Online:2019-04-10 Published:2019-04-08
  • Contact: Zhao-gang SUN E-mail:sunzg75@163.com

摘要:

目的 探讨不同性状的痰标本前处理液沉渣对MGIT 960液体培养污染率的影响及污染菌种的鉴定,以更好地控制污染。方法 收集2018年1—2月于北京胸科医院门诊就诊的疑似肺结核患者痰标本共162份,其中干酪痰和血痰标本各20份,黏液痰标本122份。每份痰标本分为2份,每份5ml,经前处理液消化处理15min,1份记录沉渣质量,1份取0.5ml上清(上清接种组)及0.5ml沉渣(沉渣接种组)分别接种于MGIT 960液体培养管中培养并进行涂片抗酸染色鉴定,分别记录上清接种组和沉渣接种组的培养结果,并对污染标本进行16S rDNA测序分析以鉴定菌种。 结果 162份痰标本中,干酪痰标本消化处理15min后所得沉渣质量[(0.17±0.14)g],高于黏液痰标本[(0.09±0.07)g]和血痰标本[(0.10±0.07)g],差异均有统计学意义(F值分别为14.56、4.29,P值分别为0.00、0.01),血痰标本前处理液的沉渣质量略高于黏液痰,差异无统计学意义(F=0.09,P=0.80)。沉渣接种组标本污染率为16.05%(26/162),高于上清接种组[0.00%(0/162)],差异具有统计学意义(Fisher精确检验,P=0.00)。沉渣接种组不同性状的痰标本污染率不同,由大到小依次为血痰[50.00%(10/20)]、干酪痰[15.00%(3/20)]和黏液痰[10.66%(13/122)],差异具有统计学意义(χ 2=15.61,P=0.00)。26例患者污染标本中,5例未扩增出DNA,其余21例鉴定结果分别属于10种菌,以芽孢杆菌和链球菌较为突出,分别占23.08%(6/26)和15.38%(4/26)。结论 痰标本前处理液沉渣是MGIT 960液体培养法受污染的主要原因之一,接种时避免沉渣存在能够有效降低污染率。

关键词: 分枝杆菌, 结核, 痰, 标本制备, 培养基, 微生物污染, 因素分析, 统计学

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the contamination rate and contaminating bacterial species in a MGIT 960 system inoculated with pretreated sediment from sputum samples with different properties. Methods Sputum specimens from outpatients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis were collected from January to February 2018 at the Beijing Chest Hospital. One hundred and sixty-two randomly-selected sputum samples, including 20 caseous sputum samples, 122 mucus sputum samples and 20 bloody sputum samples were included. Each sputum sample was divided into two parts and each part was then treated for 15 min with a sputum treatment solution, recording the weight of the sediment resulting after pretreatment for one part, and using the other part to inoculate two liquid culture tubes for culture (one with 0.5 ml supernatant (supernatant inoculation group) and the other with 0.5 ml sediment (sediment inoculation group). Bacterial species in contaminated samples were identified by sequencing the 16S rDNA segment. Results The average weight of pretreatment liquid sediment for ‘caseous sputum’ samples was (0.17±0.14)g and was significantly higher than that for ‘mucus sputum’ samples ((0.09±0.07)g)(F=14.56, P=0.00) and ‘bloody sputum’ samples ((0.10±0.07)g)(F=4.29, P=0.01). The quality of the pretreatment liquid sediment from ‘bloody sputum’ samples was slightly higher than that from ‘mucus sputum’ samples, but the difference was not statistically significant (F=0.09, P=0.80). The contamination rate for the sediment inoculation group was 16.05% (26/162) and was higher than that for the supernatant inoculation group (0.00% (0/162)). This difference was tested using Fisher’s exact test and was statistically significant (P=0.00). The contamination rate for the sediment inoculation group was highest for ‘bloody sputum’ (50.00%, 10/20), followed by ‘caseous sputum’ (15.00%, 3/20) and ‘mucus sputum’ (10.66%, 13/122), and differences were statistically significant (χ 2=15.61, P=0.00). Ten bacterial species were found among 21 cases of contamination. DNA could not be amplified from the remaining 5 cases of contamination. Bacillus sp. and Streptococcus sp. were dominant, accounting for 23.08% (6/26) and 15.38% (4/26) cases, respectively. Conclusion Pretreatment liquid sediment in sputum specimens is one of the main reasons for the high contamination rate. Avoiding sediment inoculation can effectively reduce contamination rates.

Key words: Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Sputum, Specimen handling, Culture media, Microbial contamination, Factor analysis, statistics