Email Alert | RSS    帮助

中国防痨杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (10): 1627-1634.doi: 10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20260049

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于CiteSpace的结核病患者疾病经济负担研究的可视化分析

满意1, 吴彦龙2, 李双林1, 李昕忆1, 裴琼蕴1, 牛柃普1, 吴腾燕1()   

  1. 1 广西医科大学信息与管理学院, 南宁 530021
    2 广西医科大学第一附属医院医务部, 南宁 530021
  • 收稿日期:2026-01-23 出版日期:2026-10-10 发布日期:2026-09-30
  • 通信作者: 吴腾燕,Email:tengyanwu@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(72464004);广西自然科学基金(2023GXNSFAA026397);广西疾病预防控制科技项目(GXJKKJ-2025YB007);健康与经济社会发展研究中心项目(2026RWB35)

Visual analysis of the economic burden of tuberculosis patients based on CiteSpace

Man Yi1, Wu Yanlong2, Li Shuanglin1, Li Xinyi1, Pei Qiongyun1, Niu Lingpu1, Wu Tengyan1()   

  1. 1 School of Information and Management, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, China
    2 Department of Medical Affairs, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, China
  • Received:2026-01-23 Online:2026-10-10 Published:2026-09-30
  • Contact: Wu Tengyan, Email: tengyanwu@163.com
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(72464004);Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi, China(2023GXNSFAA026397);Science and Technology Project of Guangxi Disease Prevention and Control(GXJKKJ2025YB007);Innovation Project of Health Economic and Social Development Research Center(2026RWB35)

摘要:

目的: 分析2010—2025年国内外结核病患者疾病经济负担研究的热点与趋势,为该领域研究提供参考。方法: 检索中国知网、万方、维普、SinoMed、Web of Science和PubMed数据库中2010年1月1日至2025年12月31日发表的结核病患者疾病经济相关中英文文献,运用CiteSpace软件对发文量、国家(地区)、作者、机构及关键词进行可视化分析。结果: 共纳入中文文献623篇,英文文献1891篇,中文和英文的年发文量分别从2010年的30篇和57篇上升至2025年的48篇和142篇。总发文量排名前五位的国家依次为:美国(517篇)、英国(172篇)、南非(116篇)、中国(107篇)和印度(78篇)。作者和机构合作网络分析显示,国内高产作者为王黎霞(20篇)、张慧(14篇)、李仁忠(12篇)等,中国疾病预防控制中心结核病预防控制中心处于中文文献核心位置(31篇);国外高产作者为Anna Vassall(24篇)、Knut L?nnroth(20篇)、Robert G·White(18篇)等,伦敦大学处于英文文献核心位置(101篇)。关键词分析表明,中文文献聚焦“耐多药结核病”“医疗保险”等患者与政策议题,英文文献更关注“cost-effectiveness analysis”“catastrophic expenditures”“health expenditure”等系统性与评价方法主题。结论: 2010—2025年中英文发文量均呈上升趋势。全球结核病患者疾病经济负担研究视角日趋综合,从单一成本测算转向经济、健康与政策多维评估。未来应加强跨学科合作,关注脆弱人群并推动研究向政策转化。

关键词: 结核, 经济学, 医学, 文献计量学

Abstract:

Objective: To analyze the hotspots and trends of research on the economic burden of tuberculosis patients at home and abroad from 2010 to 2025, and to provide reference for research in this field. Methods: Relevant Chinese and English literatures published from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2025 in CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, SinoMed, Web of Science and PubMed databases were retrieved. CiteSpace software was used to visualize the number of publications, countries (regions), authors, institutions and keywords. Results: A total of 623 Chinese articles and 1891 English articles were included. The annual number of Chinese and English articles increased from 30 and 57 in 2010 to 48 and 142 in 2025, respectively. The top five countries in terms of total number of publications were the United States (517 papers), the United Kingdom (172 papers), South Africa (116 papers), China (107 papers) and India (78 papers). The network analysis of authors and institutions showed that the high-yield authors in China were Wang Lixia (20 papers), Zhang Hui (14 papers), Li Renzhong (12 papers) and so on. The National Center for Tuberculosis Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention occupied a central position in the Chinese literature, with 31 publications. The foreign high-yield authors were Anna Vassall (24 papers), Knut L?nnroth (20 papers), Robert G·White (18 papers) and so on. The University of London occupied a core position in English-language literature, with 101 publications. Keyword analysis showed that Chinese literature focused on patients and policy issues such as “multidrug-resistant tuberculosis” and “medical insurance”, while English literature focused more on systematic and evaluation methods such as “cost-effectiveness analysis” “catastrophic expenditures” and “health expenditure”. Conclusion: The number of Chinese and English publications is on the rise from 2010 to 2025. The research perspective on the economic burden of tuberculosis patients in the world is becoming more and more comprehensive, from single cost measurement to multi-dimensional assessment of economy, health and policy. In the future, we should strengthen interdisciplinary cooperation, focus on vulnerable groups and promote the transformation of research into policy.

Key words: Tuberculosis, Economics, medical, Bibliometrics

中图分类号: