Email Alert | RSS    帮助

中国防痨杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (5): 375-379.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2014.05.015

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

含左氧氟沙星联合利福布丁方案治疗复治肺结核患者的疗效观察

李史来 陈伟生 黄钥藩 林少云 吴少仪 蔡清河   

  1. 515073  广东省汕头市第三人民医院内四科
  • 收稿日期:2014-03-08 出版日期:2014-05-10 发布日期:2014-06-07
  • 通信作者: 李史来 E-mail:2693337055@qq.com

Observation on the effect on the retreated tuberculosis patients by levofloxacin combined with rifabutin

LI Shi-lai, CHEN Wei-sheng, HUANG Yao-fan, LIN Shao-yun, WU Shao-yi, CAI Qing-he   

  1. The Fourth Department of Internal Medicine, Third People’s Hospital of Shantou City, Shantou  515073, China
  • Received:2014-03-08 Online:2014-05-10 Published:2014-06-07
  • Contact: LI Shi-lai E-mail:2693337055@qq.com

摘要: 目的 对含左氧氟沙星联合利福布丁方案治疗复治肺结核患者的疗效进行观察,为临床抗结核药物的科学使用提供依据。 方法 采用随机数字表法将172例复治肺结核患者的治疗分为含左氧氟沙星联合利福布丁方案(A组,86例)、链霉素联合利福平方案(B组,86例)两组,每组各86例。A组采用2(HZE+Lfx+Rfb)/6(HE+Rfb)治疗方案(左氧氟沙星0.6 g/d,口服,1次/d;利福布丁 0.3 g/d,口服,1次/d);B组采用2HRZES/6HRE治疗方案(链霉素0.75/d,肌内注射,1次/d;利福平0.45g/d,口服,1次/d)。治疗8个月后对两组痰菌阴转率、疗程结束时痰菌培养阳性率、病灶总吸收率、空洞闭合率进行比较。采用χ2检验,以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。 结果  A组痰菌阴转率、疗程结束时痰菌培养阳性率、病灶总吸收率、空洞闭合率分别为85.7%(72/84)、3.6%(3/84)、95.2%(80/84)、78.8%(41/52);B组痰菌阴转率、疗程结束时痰菌培养阳性率、病灶总吸收率、空洞闭合率分别为58.5%(48/82),14.6%(12/82),61.0%(50/82),50.0%(24/48);A组与B组比较痰菌阴转率(χ2=61.9,P<0.01)、疗程结束时痰菌培养阳性率(χ2=25.0,P<0.01)、病灶总吸收率(χ2=116.6,P<0.01)和空洞闭合率(χ2=28.8,P<0.01),差异均有统计学意义。 结论  含左氧氟沙星联合利福布丁方案(A组)较含链霉素联合利福平方案(B组)治疗复治肺结核患者,更加有助于痰菌阴转、病灶吸收和空洞闭合。

关键词: 结核, 肺/药物疗法, 氧氟沙星, 利福布丁, 药物疗法, 联合, 治疗结果

Abstract: Objective  To observe the effect on retreatment tuberculosis patients by levofloxacin combined with rifabutin. Methods  One hundred and seventy-two retreated TB cases were randomly divided into group A and group B, with 86 cases in each group. The patients in group A were treated with levofloxacin combined with rifabutin (levofloxacin 0.6 g/d, rifabutin 0.3 g/d, qd, PO), and the patients in group B were treated with streptomycin combined with rifampicin (streptomycin 0.75/d, qd, im; rifampicin 0.45 g/d, qd, PO). The sputum negative conversion rates after 8 months’ treatment, the sputum culture positive rates, the absorption rates of lesion and the cavity closure rates of the two groups after treatment were compared. Chi-square test was used to analysis and P<0.05 was set as the criteria of statistical significance. Results  The sputum conversion rate, the sputum culture positive rate, the lesions total absorption rate and the cavity closure rate of group A were 85.7% (72/84), 3.6% (3/84), 95.2% (80/84) and 78.8% (41/52) respectively, while those of group B were 58.5% (48/82), 14.6% (12/82), 61.0% (50/82) and 50.0% (24/48) respectively. The differences were significant between the two groups in all the indexes: the sputum conversion rate (χ2=61.9, P<0.01), the sputum culture positive rate (χ2=25.0, P<0.01), lesions total absorptivity rate (χ2=116.6, P<0.01) and cavity closure rate (χ2=28.8, P<0.01). Conclusion  The effect of levofloxacin combined with rifabutin on retreated TB patients is better than that of streptomycin combined with rifampicin. The sputum negative conversion, lesions absorption and cavity closure is significantly improved with the new treatment regimen.

Key words: Tuberculosis, pulmonary/drug therapy, Ofloxacin, Rifabutin, Drug therapy, combination, Treatment outcome