Email Alert | RSS    帮助

中国防痨杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 183-186.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同破壁方法提取结核分枝杆菌总RNA的比较

罗影殊 高文凤 黄偌颖 刘衡川   

  1. 610041  成都,四川大学华西公共卫生学院医学检验教研室(罗影殊、黄偌颖、刘衡川);四川省疾病预防控制中心结核病预防控制所(高文凤)
  • 收稿日期:2012-10-31 出版日期:2013-03-10 发布日期:2013-03-14
  • 通信作者: 刘衡川 E-mail:lhc54@sohu.com

The comparison of different wall-breaking method for extracting total RNA of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

LUO Ying-shu, GAO Wen-feng, HUANG Ruo-ying, LIU Heng-chuan   

  1. Department of Medical Technology, West China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2012-10-31 Online:2013-03-10 Published:2013-03-14
  • Contact: LIU Heng-chuan E-mail:lhc54@sohu.com

摘要: 目的  建立简便有效的结核分枝杆菌(Mycobacterium tuberculosis,Mtb)总RNA提取方法。 方法  采用5种方法,分别为160、240和400 W超声波联合Trizol法(简称“160 W超声法”、“240 W超声法”和“400 W超声法”)、玻璃珠(简称“玻珠”)联合Trizol法(简称“玻珠法”)和Trizol法(简称“不加玻珠法”),对结核分枝杆菌标准株H37Rv进行破壁,提取总RNA。通过荧光定量逆转录PCR评价不同破壁方法对Mtb总RNA提取效果的影响,以灭菌超纯水代替模板为阴性对照。每种方法分别提取3份样本进行检测。最后结果为3份标本的平均值。 结果  玻珠法检测组Ct值为20.67,△Rn值为0.644;400 W超声法检测组Ct值为22.09,△Rn值为0.571;240 W超声法检测组Ct值为21.86,△Rn值为0.503;160 W超声法检测组Ct值为25.21,△Rn值为0.411;不加玻珠法检测组Ct值为28.40,△Rn值为0.299;阴性对照Ct值为40.00,△Rn值为0.000。  结论  直观地从试验结果来看,玻珠法对结核分枝杆菌破壁效果好于超声法。

关键词: 分枝杆菌, 结核, RNA, 细菌, 逆转录聚合酶链反应, 细胞壁, 细菌学技术

Abstract: Objective  To establish a simple and effective total RNA extraction method of Mycobacterium tuberculosisMethods  Cell wall of Mycobacterium tuberculosis were treated by ultrasonic and glass-bead associated with Trizol method respectively, the total RNA was extracted and the influence of different total RNA extraction methods of Mtb were evaluated through fluorescent quantitative RT-PCR. The negative control is ultrapure water instead of template. Each method were extracted from 3 samples for testing. The final result is the average of 3 specimen.  Results  The Ct and △Rn value of glass-bead group is 20.67 and 0.644, 400 W ultrasonic group is 22.09 and 0.571, 240 W ultrasonic group is 21.86 and 0.503, 160 W ultrasonic group is 25.21 and 0.411, bead absent group is 28.40 and 0.299, negative control is 40.00 and 0.000. Conclusion  The wall-breaking effection of glass-bead method is better than that of ultrasonic method.

Key words: Mycobacterium tuberculosis, RNA, , bacterial, Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, Cell wall, Bacteriological techniques