Email Alert | RSS    帮助

中国防痨杂志 ›› 1999, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (2): 97-99.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

细胞角质蛋白19片段与癌胚抗原联合检测对良恶性胸腔积液的鉴别诊断价值探讨

宗晓福;刘云霞;王广贤;   

  1. 解放军第81医院;
  • 收稿日期:1998-10-29 修回日期:1999-01-09 出版日期:1999-02-10 发布日期:1999-02-10

Study on diagnosis value of analyzing CYFRA21.1 and CEA in benign and malignant pleural effusion

Zong Xiaofu Liu Yunxia,Wang Guangxian.   

  1. The 81 hospital of PLA .Nanjing.210002
  • Received:1998-10-29 Revised:1999-01-09 Online:1999-02-10 Published:1999-02-10

摘要: 目的探讨细胞角质蛋白19片段(CYFRA21-1)与癌胚抗原(CEA)检测对结核性胸水与癌性胸水的鉴别诊断价值?方法对胸水患者108例(癌性68例?结核性40例)分别测定其血清?胸水中CYFRA21-1和CEA浓度?结果1.两种肿瘤标记物浓度在恶性胸水中明显高于结核性胸水;2.癌性胸水中CYFRA21-1浓度明显高于血清浓度,而胸水中CEA浓度与血清中浓度相比无显著性差异;3.胸水CYFRA21.1的检测结果存在一定的假阳性?结论联合检测CYFRA21-1与CEA对胸水良恶性的鉴别诊断有较高的临床价值?

关键词: CYFRA21-1, CEA, 胸腔积液, 肿瘤标记物

Abstract: Objective To discuss the role of tumour marker in differentiating malignant pleural effusion from benign ones.Method Pleural and serum levels of cytokeratin 19 fragment(CYFRA21.1)and carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA)were determined in 108 patients with pleural effusions(68 malignant and 40 tuberculous).Result Pleural and serum CYFRA21.1 and CEA levels were significantly higher in the cancer group than that in the tuberculous group.In the cancer group,CYFRA21.1 levels in pleural fluid did not differ significantly from that in the serum.CYFRA21.1 levels showed some false positive reaction in the pleural fluid of the patients with tuberculous effusions.Conclusion Combining the CEA test with CYFRA21.1 analysis appears to be very useful in differentiating malignant pleural effusion from the benign ones.

Key words: CYFRA21.1, CEA, Pleural effusion, Tumour marker