Email Alert | RSS    帮助

中国防痨杂志 ›› 2009, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 140-143.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

TOPSIS法及RSR分档法在结核病防治效果综合评价中的应用

董柏青;刘飞鹰;王喜文;黄敏莹;罗丹   

  1. 广西壮族自治区疾病预防控制中心 南宁 530028
  • 出版日期:2009-03-10 发布日期:2011-11-03

Application of TOPSIS combined with RSR to comprehensive evaluation of TB control effect

Dong Baiqing, Liu Feiying, Wang Xiwen, Huang Minying, Luo Dan   

  1. Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning 530028, China
  • Online:2009-03-10 Published:2011-11-03

摘要: 目的探索一种适合结核病防治效果综合评价的数理统计方法。方法运用TOPSIS法和RSR分档法相结合对各评价单位的综合评价效果进行排序和分档。结果14个市综合评价排序结果为:好包括南宁、桂林;中包括贵港、崇左、柳州、贺州、玉林、梧州、河池、防城、百色;差包括北海、来宾、钦州。且各组差异具有统计学意义。结论TOPSIS法及RSR分档适合于结核病防治效果的综合评价。

关键词: 结核/预防和控制, 评价研究

Abstract: ObjectiveTo explore a statistical method which is appropriate to evaluate TB control effect comprehensively. MethodsRanked all comprehensive evaluations applying TOPSIS combined with RSR. ResultsThe ranking result of comprehensive evaluations among 14 cities was as follows: Nanning, Guilin were in good group; Guigang, Chongzuo, Liuzhou, Hezhou, Yulin, Wuzhou, Hechi, Fangcheng, Baise were in middle group; Baihai, Laibin, Qingzhou were in poor group. The difference among 3 groups was statistically significant.ConclusionsTOPSIS and RSR are suitable for comprehensive evaluation of TB control effect.

Key words: tuberculosis/prevention and control, evaluation studies