Email Alert | RSS    帮助

中国防痨杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (8): 710-713.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2014.08.022

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

北京市某医院结核科护士压力源调查分析

高淑红 史文文 赵艳丽 段振兰   

  1. 101149  首都医科大学附属北京胸科医院 北京市结核病胸部肿瘤研究所肿瘤内科
  • 收稿日期:2014-06-05 出版日期:2014-08-10 发布日期:2014-09-07
  • 通信作者: 段振兰 E-mail:duanzhenlan5022@sina.com

Analysis of stressors of nurses in tuberculosis department in a hospital in Beijing

GAO Shu-hong, SHI Wen-wen, ZHAO Yan-li, DUAN Zhen-lan   

  1. Department of Medical Oncology, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University,Beijing 101149,China
  • Received:2014-06-05 Online:2014-08-10 Published:2014-09-07
  • Contact: DUAN Zhen-lan E-mail:duanzhenlan5022@sina.com

摘要: 目的 对结核科护士工作压力源进行调查分析。 方法 自行设计调查问卷,采用便利抽样方法,对首都医科大学附属北京胸科医院88名结核科护士工作压力源进行调查。结核科护士平均年龄为(33.04±9.07)岁,工作年限(12.70±9.04)年,每月夜班数(4.25±2.25)个。本研究结核科护士工作压力源问卷分为8个维度,共有61个条目,采用分量法计分。其中,没有压力1分,压力程度一般为2分,压力程度较高为3分,压力程度非常高为4分,可能的得分范围为61~244分,分数越高,表明护士所承受的压力越大。采用问卷调查法,调查前向被调查者说明调查的目的、方法,取得知情同意。由研究者亲自发放调查问卷,30 min后当场收回。本次共发放问卷90份,回收88份,有效88份,有效回收率97.8%。 结果 (1)结核科护士压力源总体得分为(154.81±36.03)分。(2)压力源各维度得分从高到低依次是:结核护理专业特殊性的问题(3.07±0.81)分;工作环境及资源方面的问题(2.88±0.81)分;工作量及时间分配问题 (2.67±0.78)分;社会环境带来的问题(2.63±0.78)分;护理专业发展方面的问题(2.55±0.74)分;患者护理方面的问题(2.52±0.68)分;护理专业及工作方面的问题(2.45±0.74)分;管理及人际关系方面的问题(1.89±0.64)分。(3)得分排在前10位的压力源条目分别是:长期接触排菌、耐药肺结核患者(3.55±0.78)分;担心自己患上结核病(3.47±0.88)分;同伴被确诊患上结核病(3.36±0.89);担心消毒防护设施的效果(3.28±0.94)分;担心工作中出现差错事故(3.21±0.95)分;工作环境差(3.18±0.92)分;病区拥挤(3.02±1.07)分;收入差距大(2.98±0.94)分;工作量太大(2.97±0.94)分;经常倒班(2.94±1.03)分。 结论 结核科护士承受着较高的工作压力,护理管理者应采取有针对性的措施,指导护士积极应对,减轻护士工作压力。

关键词: 护士, 厌倦, 职业性, 心理疗法, 开导式情感

Abstract: Objective To understand the work stressor of nurses in tuberculosis (TB) department and to explore positive solutions to promote mental and physical health of nursing staff. Methods  Eighty-eight nurses of TB department in Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University were selected by convenience sampling and investigated with questionnaire on work stressors. The average age, years of working and number of night shift monthly were (33.04±9.07) years, (12.70±9.04) years and (4.25±2.25) respectively. There were 8 dimensions and 61 entries in the questionnaire. Component method was used to score. One score for no pressure, two score for general pressure, three for high pressure and 4 for very high pressure. The possible score ranged 61-244, the higher the score, the more pressure on the nurse. The purpose and methods of the survey were introduced to the respondents before informed consent obtained. Ninety questionnaires were distributed and 88 valid questionnaires were reco-vered, the valid returned rate was 97.8%.  Results (1) The overall stressor score of nurses in TB department was (154.81±36.03). (2) The stressor score of each dimension from high to low was special questions on TB nursing (3.07±0.81), questions on working environment and resources (2.88±0.81), workload and time allocation questions (2.67±0.78), social and environmental questions (2.63±0.78), questions on nursing development (2.55±0.74), patient nursing questions (2.52±0.68), nursing and working questions (2.45±0.74) and management and interpersonal questions (1.89±0.64). (3) The entries scoring in the top 10 stressors were long-term exposure to bacteria excreted, drug-resistant TB patients (3.55±0.78), worrying about suffering from TB (3.47±0.88), partner was diagnosed with TB (3.36±0.89), worrying about the disinfection effect of protective facilities (3.28±0.94), worrying about an accident at work (3.21±0.95), poor working environment (3.18±0.92), crowded ward (3.02±1.07), wide income gap (2.98±0.94), heavy workload (2.97±0.94) and frequent shift (2.94±1.03).  Conclusion Nurses in TB department are under high working pressure, nursing managers should take targeted measures and guide the nurses actively respond to reduce the work pressure.

Key words: Nurse, Burnout, professional, Psychotherapy, rational-emotive