Email Alert | RSS    帮助

中国防痨杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (8): 696-699.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2014.08.019

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

腰椎结核患者围手术期两种排便护理方法的对比研究

雷国华 王倩 陈向军 吴增蕊 王洪莲 段振兰   

  1. 101149  首都医科大学附属北京胸科医院骨科(雷国华、王倩、陈向军、吴增蕊、王洪莲),供应室(段振兰)
  • 收稿日期:2014-05-06 出版日期:2014-08-10 发布日期:2014-09-07
  • 通信作者: 段振兰 E-mail:duanzhenlan5022@sina.com

Comparative study of two different nursing methods of defecation in patients with lumbar tuberculosis during perioperative period

LEI Guo-hua, WANG Qian, CHEN Xiang-jun, WU Zeng-rui, WANG Hong-lian, DUAN Zhen-lan   

  1. Orthopaedic Department of Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 101149, China
  • Received:2014-05-06 Online:2014-08-10 Published:2014-09-07
  • Contact: DUAN Zhen-lan E-mail:duanzhenlan5022@sina.com

摘要: 目的 比较塑料袋和普通便器在腰椎结核患者围手术期排便护理中的应用效果。 方法 2012年1月至2013年6月确诊为腰椎结核并需要进行内固定手术的患者共160例,按照病案号的单双号随机分为塑料袋组和普通便器组。80例塑料袋组患者使用一次性塑料袋进行排便护理,80例普通便器组患者使用普通便器进行排便护理,对两组排便舒适、排便自理、会阴暴露、被服污染及便器处理方便的情况比较采用χ2检验。对排便腰痛程度应用数字疼痛评估表NPRS(numerical pain rating scale, NPRS)评分评价:0分为无痛;1~3分为轻度疼痛;4~6分为中度疼痛;7~10分为重度疼痛。皮肤受损程度评价分为正常、压红及破溃。排便腰痛程度及皮肤受损程度的比较采用Wilcoxon秩和检验,以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果  塑料袋组的排便舒适率(72.50%,174/240)、排便自理率(44.17%,106/240)、便器处理方便率(95.00%,228/240)均优于普通便器组[14.47% (33/228)、18.42% (42/228)和8.33% (19/228)],差异有统计学意义(χ2值分别为159.60、35.84、352.38,P值均<0.001)。塑料袋组的会阴暴露率(29.58%,71/240)、被服污染率(12.08%, 29/240)低于普通便器组[81.14% (185/228)和26.32% (60/228)],差异有统计学意义(χ2值分别为125.43、15.38,P值均<0.001)。塑料袋组患者在排便腰痛程度、皮肤受损程度方面优于普通便器组,塑料袋组排便138例次无痛,明显高于普通便器组33例次无痛(Z=-9.16,P<0.001); 塑料袋组排便后局部皮肤正常227例次,明显高于普通便器组156例次(Z=-8.10,P<0.001)。 结论 应用塑料袋进行排便护理可减轻围手术期腰椎结核患者的腰痛及臀部皮肤损伤,提高排便舒适度,降低护理人员的工作量,有利于维护患者自尊,提高患者排便自理能力。采用塑料袋进行排便护理对于腰椎结核手术患者非常适用。

关键词: 结核, 脊柱/外科学, 腰椎, 排便, 围手术期护理

Abstract: Objective To compare the effects of two nursing methods of defecation by using the disposable plastic bag and the ordinary bedpan respectively among the patients with lumbar tuberculosis (TB) during the perioperative period. Methods From January 2012 to June 2013, a total of 160 patients with lumbar TB and received internal fixation operation were recruited in the study. Those patients were randomly divided into two groups according to the odd number and even number with the patients’ ID number and the two different nursing cares of de-fecation were respectively used for the patients in each group: disposable plastic bag was used for 80 patients in one group and ordinary bedpan was used for another 80 patients in the other group. The following variables were evaluated and compared between the two groups byχ2 test: degree of comfort, taking care independently, exposure of pe-rineum, clothing contamination and convenience of disposal. The degree of the low back pain was graded on a scale of 10 based on the NPRS: 0=no pain, 1-3=little pain; 4-6=moderate pain, 7-10=painful. The degree of skin damage was graded by 3 levels: normal, reddening and bruising. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare the degree of the low back pain and the skin damage between the two groups. A P-value of <0.05 was regarded as statistically significant difference.  Results The rates of patients who felt comfortable, could manage independently and conveniently were 72.50% (174/240), 44.17% (106/240) and 95.00% (228/240) respectively in the disposable plastic bag group, which were much higher than the rates in the bedpan group (14.47% (33/228), 18.42% (42/228) and 8.33% (19/228)). The difference had statistic significant (χ2=159.60, 35.84 and 352.38, P<0.001). The rates of perineum exposure and clothing contamination were 29.58% (71/240) and 12.08% (29/240) respectively in the disposable plastic bag group, which were lower than that in the bedpan group (81.14% (185/228) and 26.32% (60/228)). The difference had statistic significant (χ2=125.43 and 15.38, P<0.001). In the disposable plastic bag group, the number of patients who did not feel lower back pain was 138 person-times, which was significantly higher than that in the bedpan group (33 person-times only; Z=-9.16, P<0.001). The number of patients without buttock skin damage after defecation was 227 person-times in the disposable plastic bag group, which was significantly higher than that in the bedpan group (156 person-times; Z=-8.10, P<0.001).  Conclusion The nursing of defecation by using the disposable plastic bag can reduce the low back pain and buttock skin damage of the patients with lumbar TB during the perioperative period; it also makes the patients to feel more comfortable and dignified, to improve the patient’s self-management capacity and reduce the workload of paramedic. It is a good perioperative nursing method for the patients with lumbar TB.

Key words: Tuberculosis, spinal/surgery, Lumbar vertebrae, Defecation, Perioperative nursing