Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis ›› 2026, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (9): 1277-1289.doi: 10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20260282
• Original Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Li Cheng1,2, Wu Chunli1,2, Xia Fan1,2, Yu Wenduo1,2, Liu Zhenguo3, Yi Hengzhong4, Wen Xinmin4, Tang Zhigang4, Huang Sheng4, Li Yao4, Chen Mengshi1,2(
), Rong Pengfei5(
)
Received:2026-05-20
Online:2026-09-10
Published:2026-09-08
Contact:
Chen Mengshi,Rong Pengfei
E-mail:121444639@qq.com;rongpengfei66@163.com
Supported by:CLC Number:
Li Cheng, Wu Chunli, Xia Fan, Yu Wenduo, Liu Zhenguo, Yi Hengzhong, Wen Xinmin, Tang Zhigang, Huang Sheng, Li Yao, Chen Mengshi, Rong Pengfei. Study on the association between gut microbiota and drug-induced liver injury in patients with drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2026, 48(9): 1277-1289. doi: 10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20260282
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.zgflzz.cn/EN/10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20260282
| 变量 | 分类及赋值 |
|---|---|
| 民族 | 0=汉族,1=其他 |
| 婚姻状况 | 0=未婚,1=已婚,2=其他 |
| 职业 | 0=农民,1=专业技术人员,2=公司职员,3=无业人员,5=其他 |
| 受教育程度 | 0=小学及以下,1=初中,2=高中/中专/职高,3=大专及以上 |
| 医疗付费方式 | 0=城镇职工基本医疗保险,1=城镇居民基本医疗保险,2=自费,3=其他 |
| 胸部CT | 0=无空洞,1=有空洞 |
| 抗酸杆菌涂片镜检 | 0=阴性,1=阳性 |
| 吸烟史 | 0=无,1=有 |
| 饮酒史 | 0=无,1=有 |
| 喝茶史 | 0=无,1=有 |
| 饮食习惯 | 0=素食为主,1=肉食为主,2=均衡饮食 |
| 淀粉类 | 0=基本不吃,1=每月1~4次,2=每周≥2次 |
| 蔬菜类 | 0=基本不吃,1=每月1~4次,2=每周≥2次 |
| 水果类 | 0=基本不吃,1=每月1~4次,2=每周≥2次 |
| 畜禽肉类 | 0=基本不吃,1=每月1~4次,2=每周≥2次 |
| 水产品类 | 0=基本不吃,1=每月1~4次,2=每周≥2次 |
| 蛋类 | 0=基本不吃,1=每月1~4次,2=每周≥2次 |
| 奶类 | 0=基本不吃,1=每月1~4次,2=每周≥2次 |
| 大豆类 | 0=基本不吃,1=每月1~4次,2=每周≥2次 |
| 坚果类 | 0=基本不吃,1=每月1~4次,2=每周≥2次 |
| 油炸烧烤类 | 0=基本不吃,1=每月1~4次,2=每周≥2次 |
| 腌制类 | 0=基本不吃,1=每月1~4次,2=每周≥2次 |
| 酸奶类 | 0=基本不吃,1=每月1~4次,2=每周≥2次 |
| 贝达喹啉 | 0=无,1=有 |
| 利奈唑胺 | 0=无,1=有 |
| 莫西沙星 | 0=无,1=有 |
| 左氧氟沙星 | 0=无,1=有 |
| 氯法齐明 | 0=无,1=有 |
| 环丝氨酸 | 0=无,1=有 |
| 对氨基水杨酸 | 0=无,1=有 |
| 丙硫异烟胺 | 0=无,1=有 |
| 阿米卡星 | 0=无,1=有 |
| 特征 | 对照组(68例) | DILI组(68例) | 统计检验值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 民族[例(构成比,%)] | χ2=0.000 | 1.000 | ||
| 汉族 | 65(95.6) | 65(95.6) | ||
| 少数民族 | 3(4.4) | 3(4.4) | ||
| 婚姻状况[例(构成比,%)] | χ2=0.728 | 0.695 | ||
| 未婚 | 10(14.7) | 9(13.2) | ||
| 已婚 | 56(82.4) | 55(80.9) | ||
| 其他 | 2(2.9) | 4(5.9) | ||
| 职业[例(构成比,%)] | χ2=17.322 | 0.002 | ||
| 农民 | 36(52.9) | 29(42.6) | ||
| 专业技术人员 | 8(11.8) | 5(7.4) | ||
| 公司职员 | 7(10.3) | 22(32.4) | ||
| 无业人员 | 16(23.5) | 6(8.8) | ||
| 其他 | 1(1.5) | 6(8.8) | ||
| 体质量指数(kg/m2, | 21.30±2.74 | 21.00±2.83 | t=0.262 | 0.609 |
| 胸部CT[例(构成比,%)] | χ2=0.118 | 0.731 | ||
| 有空洞 | 36(52.9) | 34(50.0) | ||
| 无空洞 | 32(47.1) | 34(50.0) | ||
| 抗酸杆菌涂片[例(构成比,%)] | χ2=0.765 | 0.382 | ||
| 阴性 | 60(88.2) | 63(92.6) | ||
| 阳性 | 8(11.8) | 5(7.4) | ||
| 吸烟史[例(构成比,%)] | χ2=1.106 | 0.293 | ||
| 无 | 24(35.3) | 30(44.1) | ||
| 有 | 44(64.7) | 38(55.9) | ||
| 饮酒史[例(构成比,%)] | χ2=3.741 | 0.053 | ||
| 无 | 21(30.9) | 32(47.1) | ||
| 有 | 47(69.1) | 36(52.9) | ||
| 喝茶史[例(构成比,%)] | χ2=0.654 | 0.419 | ||
| 无 | 54(79.4) | 50(73.5) | ||
| 有 | 14(20.6) | 18(26.5) | ||
| 服用氯法齐明[例(构成比,%)] | χ2=3.934 | 0.047 | ||
| 否 | 50(73.5) | 39(57.4) | ||
| 是 | 18(26.5) | 29(42.6) | ||
| 服用对氨基水杨酸[例(构成比,%)] | χ2=5.747 | 0.017 | ||
| 否 | 40(58.8) | 53(77.9) | ||
| 是 | 28(41.2) | 15(22.1) |
| 物种 | 相对丰度(%) | P值 | Fdr校正P值 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 药物性肝损伤组 | 对照组 | |||
| p__Fusobacteria | 0.775 | 0.441 | 0.011 | 0.041 |
| p__Actinobacteria | 0.642 | 0.236 | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| p__Ascomycota | 0.197 | 0.047 | 0.012 | 0.041 |
| c__Betaproteobacteria | 0.521 | 0.842 | 0.028 | 0.092 |
| c__Fusobacteriia | 0.775 | 0.441 | 0.011 | 0.055 |
| c__Actinobacteria | 0.409 | 0.183 | 0.011 | 0.055 |
| o__Burkholderiales | 0.513 | 0.826 | 0.035 | 0.176 |
| o__Fusobacteriales | 0.774 | 0.440 | 0.011 | 0.109 |
| f__Prevotellaceae | 7.512 | 2.277 | 0.021 | 0.210 |
| g__Prevotella | 7.131 | 2.135 | 0.019 | 0.190 |
| s__Prevotella copri | 2.821 | 0.611 | 0.029 | 0.072 |
| s__Klebsiella pneumoniae | 0.525 | 0.968 | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| s__Bacteroides plebeius | 0.468 | 0.781 | 0.005 | 0.025 |
| s__Subdoligranulum variabile | 0.487 | 0.748 | 0.013 | 0.044 |
| 各水平肠道微生物 | log10平均 相对丰度 | LDA值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 药物性肝损伤组 | |||
| c__Chlamydiia | 3.05 | 2.57 | 0.045 |
| f__Morganellaceae | 3.39 | 2.78 | 0.045 |
| g__Anaerostipes | 3.14 | 2.53 | 0.024 |
| g__Chlamydia | 3.05 | 2.57 | 0.044 |
| g__Prevotellamassilia | 2.74 | 2.37 | 0.003 |
| g__Ruminococcus | 3.87 | 3.38 | 0.033 |
| o__Chlamydiales | 3.05 | 2.57 | 0.044 |
| o__Lactobacillales | 3.64 | 2.88 | 0.041 |
| p__Actinobacteria | 3.83 | 3.40 | 0.043 |
| p__Chlamydiae | 3.05 | 2.57 | 0.044 |
| s__Chlamydia trachomatis | 3.05 | 2.57 | 0.043 |
| s__Dorea longicatena | 2.89 | 2.37 | 0.037 |
| s__Faecalibacterium prausnitzii | 3.96 | 3.27 | 0.049 |
| s__Prevotella sp.CAG:386 | 2.95 | 2.46 | 0.002 |
| s__Prevotella sp.CAG:732 | 2.99 | 2.59 | 0.018 |
| s__Prevotella stercorea | 3.39 | 2.94 | 0.021 |
| s__Prevotellamassilia timonensis | 2.74 | 2.37 | 0.003 |
| 对照组 | |||
| g__Klebsiella | 4.29 | 3.62 | 0.017 |
| g__Romboutsia | 2.64 | 2.33 | 0.045 |
| p__Proteobacteria | 5.34 | 4.26 | 0.047 |
| s__Clostridium sp.CAG:7 | 3.15 | 2.70 | 0.005 |
| s__Eubacterium sp.CAG:38 | 3.13 | 2.79 | 0.019 |
| s__Faecalibacterium sp.CAG:82 | 2.70 | 2.35 | 0.021 |
| s__Klebsiella michiganensis | 4.01 | 3.37 | 0.014 |
| s__Prevotella sp.885 | 3.39 | 3.14 | 0.032 |
| 差异菌种 | 未调整F值 | 未调整P值 | 调整后F值a | 调整后P值a |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| s__Chlamydia trachomatis | 4.268 | 0.041 | 1.511 | 0.160 |
| s__Dorea longicatena | 4.506 | 0.036 | 2.810 | 0.007 |
| s__Faecalibacterium prausnitzii | 4.082 | 0.045 | 1.740 | 0.095 |
| s__Prevotella sp.CAG:386 | 10.356 | 0.002 | 2.595 | 0.012 |
| s__Prevotella sp.CAG:732 | 5.811 | 0.017 | 1.472 | 0.174 |
| s__Prevotella stercorea | 5.486 | 0.021 | 2.564 | 0.013 |
| s__Prevotellamassilia timonensis | 9.464 | 0.003 | 2.077 | 0.043 |
| s__Clostridium sp.CAG:7 | 8.473 | 0.004 | 2.374 | 0.020 |
| s__Eubacterium sp.CAG:38 | 5.697 | 0.018 | 3.323 | 0.002 |
| s__Faecalibacterium sp.CAG:82 | 5.475 | 0.021 | 2.039 | 0.047 |
| s__Klebsiella michiganensis | 6.354 | 0.013 | 5.797 | 0.000 |
| s__Prevotella sp.885 | 4.770 | 0.031 | 1.349 | 0.226 |
| 通路名称 | log10平均相对丰度 | LDA值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 对照组 | |||
| 丙酮酸代谢(KEGG等级3) | 4.37 | 2.77 | 0.010 |
| 人类疾病(KEGG等级1) | 4.79 | 2.77 | 0.012 |
| 耐药性抗菌剂(KEGG等级1) | 4.40 | 2.53 | 0.041 |
| 丁酸盐代谢(KEGG等级3) | 4.12 | 2.48 | 0.034 |
| 缬氨酸、亮氨酸和异亮氨酸降解(KEGG等级3) | 3.69 | 2.40 | 0.009 |
| 乙氧基化物和二甲酸酯代谢(KEGG等级3) | 4.23 | 2.46 | 0.041 |
| 阳离子抗菌肽抗性(KEGG等级3) | 3.99 | 2.62 | 0.031 |
| 药物性肝损伤组 | |||
| 淀粉和蔗糖代谢(KEGG等级3) | 4.46 | 2.95 | 0.027 |
| 果糖和甘露糖的代谢(KEGG等级3) | 4.34 | 2.92 | 0.005 |
| 神经退行性疾病(KEGG等级3) | 3.38 | 2.44 | 0.001 |
| 物种 | 丙酮酸代谢 | 丁酸盐代谢 | 缬氨酸、亮氨酸和 异亮氨酸降解 | 乙氧基化物和 二甲酸酯代谢 | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r值 | P值 | Fdr校 正P值 | r值 | P值 | Fdr校 正P值 | r值 | P值 | Fdr校 正P值 | r值 | P值 | Fdr校 正P值 | ||||||||||
| s__Dorea longicatena | -0.125 | 0.147 | 0.178 | -0.206 | 0.016 | 0.023 | -0.467 | 0.000 | 0.000 | -0.294 | 0.001 | 0.001 | |||||||||
| s__Prevotella sp.CAG:386 | -0.213 | 0.013 | 0.019 | -0.069 | 0.426 | 0.466 | -0.503 | 0.000 | 0.000 | -0.295 | 0.000 | 0.001 | |||||||||
| s__Prevotella stercorea | -0.432 | 0.000 | 0.000 | -0.334 | 0.000 | 0.000 | -0.422 | 0.000 | 0.000 | -0.312 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||||||||
| s__Prevotellamassilia timonensis | -0.439 | 0.000 | 0.000 | -0.250 | 0.003 | 0.005 | -0.409 | 0.000 | 0.000 | -0.326 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||||||||
| s__Clostridium sp.CAG:7 | -0.206 | 0.016 | 0.022 | -0.202 | 0.019 | 0.025 | -0.565 | 0.000 | 0.000 | -0.463 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||||||||
| s__Eubacterium sp.CAG:38 | -0.065 | 0.450 | 0.487 | -0.126 | 0.143 | 0.177 | -0.378 | 0.000 | 0.000 | -0.170 | 0.048 | 0.063 | |||||||||
| s__Faecalibacterium sp.CAG:82 | -0.039 | 0.650 | 0.675 | -0.052 | 0.544 | 0.577 | -0.360 | 0.000 | 0.000 | -0.236 | 0.006 | 0.009 | |||||||||
| s__Klebsiella michiganensis | 0.507 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.595 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.419 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.465 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||||||||
| 物种 | 阳离子抗菌肽抗性 | 淀粉和蔗糖代谢 | 果糖和甘露糖代谢 | ||||||||||||||||||
| r值 | P值 | Fdr校正P值 | r值 | P值 | Fdr校正P值 | r值 | P值 | Fdr校正P值 | |||||||||||||
| s__Dorea longicatena | -0.551 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.124 | 0.149 | 0.178 | -0.113 | 0.191 | 0.223 | ||||||||||||
| s__Prevotella sp.CAG:386 | -0.338 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.031 | 0.722 | 0.736 | -0.003 | 0.976 | 0.976 | ||||||||||||
| s__Prevotella stercorea | -0.403 | 0.000 | 0.000 | -0.105 | 0.222 | 0.256 | -0.198 | 0.021 | 0.028 | ||||||||||||
| s__Prevotellamassilia timonensis | -0.332 | 0.000 | 0.000 | -0.208 | 0.015 | 0.021 | -0.158 | 0.067 | 0.084 | ||||||||||||
| s__Clostridium sp.CAG:7 | -0.632 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.076 | 0.381 | 0.422 | -0.125 | 0.146 | 0.178 | ||||||||||||
| s__Eubacterium sp.CAG:38 | -0.455 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.048 | 0.579 | 0.608 | -0.085 | 0.325 | 0.366 | ||||||||||||
| s__Faecalibacterium sp.CAG:82 | -0.294 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.102 | 0.238 | 0.272 | -0.029 | 0.736 | 0.743 | ||||||||||||
| s__Klebsiella michiganensis | 0.687 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.188 | 0.029 | 0.038 | 0.321 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||||||||||||
| [1] | 朱蓉蓉, 谢治强, 马瑞萍. 药物性肝损伤研究现状[J]. 社区医学杂志, 2023, 21(10): 535-539. doi:10.19790/j.cnki.JCM.2023.10.10. |
| [2] | 王鲜茹, 胡新俊, 王雪茹, 等. 抗结核药物性肝损伤危险因素及其与SLCO1B1/ABCB1基因多态性的关联性[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2021, 31(19): 2920-2924. doi:10.11816/cn.ni.2021-203119. |
| [3] | Kumar R, Kumar A, Kumar S. Acute liver failure from anti-tuberculosis drug-induced liver injury: An update[J]. World J Hepatol, 2025, 17(5): 106618. doi:10.4254/wjh.v17.i5.106618. |
| [4] | Diallo D, Sun S, Somboro A M, et al. Metabolic and immune consequences of antibiotic related microbiome alterations during first-line tuberculosis treatment in Bamako, Mali[J]. Front Immunol, 2025, 16: 1561459. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1561459. |
| [5] | Woodhouse C A, Patel V C, Singanayagam A, et al. Review article: the gut microbiome as a therapeutic target in the pathogenesis and treatment of chronic liver disease[J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2018, 47(2): 192-202. doi:10.1111/apt.14397. |
| [6] | Wang H B, Wang P Y, Wang X, et al. Butyrate enhances intestinal epithelial barrier function via up-regulation of tight junction protein Claudin-1 transcription[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2012, 57(12): 3126-3135. doi:10.1007/s10620-012-2259-4. |
| [7] | Mao X, Hu X, Fang J. Gut microbiota-metabolite interactions in drug-induced liver injury: mechanisms, biomarkers, and therapeutic perspectives[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2025, 15: 1737234. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2025.1737234. |
| [8] | 中国医药生物技术协会药物性肝损伤防治技术专业委员会, 中华医学会肝病学分会药物性肝病学组. 中国药物性肝损伤诊治指南(2023年版)[J]. 中华肝脏病杂志, 2023, 31(4): 355-384. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20230419-00176-1. |
| [9] | 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. WS 288-2017 肺结核诊断[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2024, 5(4): 376-378. doi:10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.2024022. |
| [10] | 中华医学会结核病学分会. 中国耐多药和利福平耐药结核病治疗专家共识(2019年版)[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2019, 42(10):733-749. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2019.10.006. |
| [11] | Reunanen J, Kainulainen V, Huuskonen L, et al. Akkermansia muciniphila Adheres to Enterocytes and Strengthens the Integrity of the Epithelial Cell Layer[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2015, 81(11): 3655-3662. doi:10.1128/AEM.04050-14. |
| [12] |
Compare D, Coccoli P, Rocco A, et al. Gut--liver axis: the impact of gut microbiota on non alcoholic fatty liver disease[J]. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis, 2012, 22(6): 471-476. doi:10.1016/j.numecd.2012.02.007.
pmid: 22546554 |
| [13] | Grander C, Adolph T E, Wieser V, et al. Recovery of ethanol-induced Akkermansia muciniphila depletion ameliorates alcoholic liver disease[J]. GUT, 2018, 67(5): 892-901. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313432. |
| [14] | 中华预防医学会. 成人慢性病行为危险因素监测基本数据集标准(T/CPMA 033-2023)[J]. 中国预防医学杂志, 2024, 25(3):257-266. doi:10.16506/j.1009-6639.2024.03.001. |
| [15] | Eribo O A, du Plessis N, Ozturk M, et al. The gut microbiome in tuberculosis susceptibility and treatment response: guilty or not guilty?[J]. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2020, 77(8): 1497-1509. doi:10.1007/s00018-019-03370-4. |
| [16] |
Wang J, Xiong K, Zhao S, et al. Long-Term Effects of Multi-Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment on Gut Microbiota and Its Health Consequences[J]. Front Microbiol, 2020, 11: 53. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.00053.
pmid: 32082283 |
| [17] | Vallianou N, Christodoulatos G S, Karampela I, et al. Understanding the Role of the Gut Microbiome and Microbial Metabolites in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Current Evidence and Perspectives[J]. Biomolecules, 2021, 12(1): 56. doi:10.3390/biom12010056. |
| [18] | Sultan S, El-Mowafy M, Elgaml A, et al. Alterations of the Treatment-Naive Gut Microbiome in Newly Diagnosed Hepatitis C Virus Infection[J]. ACS Infect Dis, 2021, 7(5): 1059-1068. doi:10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00432. |
| [19] | Mao J, Wang D, Long J, et al. Gut microbiome is associated with the clinical response to anti-PD-1 based immunotherapy in hepatobiliary cancers[J]. J Immunother Cancer, 2021, 9(12): e003334. doi:10.1136/jitc-2021-003334. |
| [20] | He S, Xiong Q, Tian C, et al. Inulin-type prebiotics reduce serum uric acid levels via gut microbiota modulation: a randomized, controlled crossover trial in peritoneal dialysis patients[J]. Eur J Nutr, 2022, 61(2): 665-677. doi:10.1007/s00394-021-02669-y. |
| [21] | Liu J, Fu Y, Zhang H, et al. The hepatoprotective effect of the probiotic Clostridium butyricum against carbon tetrachloride-induced acute liver damage in mice[J]. Food Funct, 2017, 8(11): 4042-4052. doi:10.1039/c7fo00355b. |
| [22] | Lu Y, Tang H, Fan Q, et al. Eubacterium limosum modulates gut microbiota and produces anti-inflammatory metabolites to alleviate DSS-induced colitis[J]. Front Immunol, 2025, 16: 1728808. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1728808. |
| [23] |
Ouyang X, Cirillo P, Sautin Y, et al. Fructose consumption as a risk factor for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease[J]. J Hepatol, 2008, 48(6): 993-999. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2008.02.011.
pmid: 18395287 |
| [24] | Muriel P, López-Sánchez P, Ramos-Tovar E. Fructose and the Liver[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22(13): 6969. doi:10.3390/ijms22136969. |
| [25] | Liu X, Hu W, Sun J, et al. Fructose intake driven glycolysis-ROS-EGFR axis specifically promotes the generation and pathogenicity of Th17 cells[J]. Nat Commun, 2025, 16(1):11115. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-66064-5. |
| [26] | Cui X, Zhang Y, Lu Y, et al. ROS and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Pulmonary Disease[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2022, 13: 879204. doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.879204. |
| [27] | Lv T, Fan X, He C, et al. SLC7A11-ROS/αKG-AMPK axis regulates liver inflammation through mitophagy and impairs liver fibrosis and NASH progression[J]. Redox Biol, 2024, 72: 103159. doi:10.1016/j.redox.2024.103159. |
| [28] | Hu M, Chen Y, Deng F, et al. D-Mannose Regulates Hepatocyte Lipid Metabolism via PI3K/Akt/mTOR Signaling Pathway and Ameliorates Hepatic Steatosis in Alcoholic Liver Disease[J]. Front Immunol, 2022, 13: 877650. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.877650. |
| [29] | Gray L R, Tompkins S C, Taylor E B. Regulation of pyruvate metabolism and human disease[J]. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2014, 71(14): 2577-2604. doi:10.1007/s00018-013-1539-2. |
| [30] | Huang X, Mo W, Wang X. Metabolomics in autoimmune hepatitis: progress and perspectives[J]. Front Med (Lausanne), 2025, 12: 1667391. doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1667391. |
| [31] | Kalhan S C, Guo L, Edmison J, et al. Plasma metabolomic profile in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease[J]. Metabolism, 2011, 60(3): 404-413. doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2010.03.006. |
| [32] |
Brahe L K, Astrup A, Larsen L H. Is butyrate the link between diet, intestinal microbiota and obesity-related metabolic diseases?[J]. Obes Rev, 2013, 14(12): 950-959. doi:10.1111/obr.12068.
pmid: 23947604 |
| [33] | Zhai S, Qin S, Li L, et al. Dietary butyrate suppresses inflammation through modulating gut microbiota in high-fat diet-fed mice[J]. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 2019, 366(13):fnz153. doi:10.1093/femsle/fnz153. |
| [34] |
Ohira H, Fujioka Y, Katagiri C, et al. Butyrate attenuates inflammation and lipolysis generated by the interaction of adipocytes and macrophages[J]. J Atheroscler Thromb, 2013, 20(5): 425-442. doi:10.5551/jat.15065.
pmid: 23470566 |
| [35] |
Sun M, Wu W, Liu Z, et al. Microbiota metabolite short chain fatty acids, GPCR, and inflammatory bowel diseases[J]. J Gastroenterol, 2017, 52(1): 1-8. doi:10.1007/s00535-016-1242-9.
pmid: 27448578 |
| [36] |
Tan J, McKenzie C, Potamitis M, et al. The role of short-chain fatty acids in health and disease[J]. Adv Immunol, 2014, 121: 91-119. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-800100-4.00003-9.
pmid: 24388214 |
| [37] | Barbara M, Mindikoglu A L. The role of zinc in the prevention and treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease[J]. Metabol Open, 2021, 11: 100105. doi:10.1016/j.metop.2021.100105. |
| [1] | Tan Xiao, Li Fangping, Zhang Qian, Zhang Meijia. Causal effects of gut microbiota on non-tuberculous mycobacterial lung infection: a bidirectional two-sample mendelian randomization study [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2026, 48(1): 121-130. |
| [2] | Geng Junling, Zhang Yinan, Pan Hongqiu. Establishment and validation of a risk prediction model for drug-induced liver injury in patients with tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2024, 46(6): 699-706. |
| [3] | Chen Fang, Zhang Xiaofo, Zhou Haiyi, Zhang Feng, Wang Manzhi. Analysis of status and influencing factors associated with anti-tuberculosis drug-related liver injury in children [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2023, 45(1): 45-51. |
| [4] | LU Ni-hong, SHEN Ling-jun, LIU Hong-lu, CHEN Yang-jun, YANG Yan, DU Ying-rong. Clinical value of ESAT-6, immune and inflammatory indexes in the diagnosis of anti-tuberculosis drug-induced liver injury [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2022, 44(7): 654-659. |
| [5] | LU Ni-hong, SHEN Ling-jun, LIU Hong-lu, CHEN Yang-jun, DU Ying-rong. Analysis of correlation between the level of matrix metalloproteinases and anti-tuberculosis drug-induced liver injury [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2022, 44(2): 164-168. |
| [6] | Chen Qifu, Zhang Shengkun, Liao Guangsheng, Tang Zhong, Zhan Shenlin, Deng Guofang, Zhang Peize, Chu Ming. Clinical effect on the treatment of long tunnelled external ventricular drainage for tuberculous meningitis complicated with hydrocephalus [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2022, 44(11): 1187-1192. |
| [7] | ZHANG Yang-ting, LU Xue-zhao, LI Xiao-na, ZHONG Zhao-yi, WANG Na, CAI Jing, MA Ai-guo, LIU Yu-feng, WANG Qiu-zhen. Study on influencing factors of anti-tuberculosis drug-induced liver injury in pulmonary tuberculosis patients complicated with diabetes mellitus [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2022, 44(1): 64-70. |
| [8] | CAO Xin-yu, XUE Miao, WEN Yan, LIU Li. Research progress on susceptibility genes of anti-tuberculous drug-induced liver injury [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2021, 43(2): 190-193. |
| [9] | WANG Xue-di,JIANG Feng,DAI Qian-lan,WANG Jing,WANG Dong-mei.. Comparative analysis on drug-induced liver injury of the combination of traditional Chinese and Western medicine and single Western medicine in tuberculosis treatment (Literature review 2000-2019) [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(2): 126-132. |
| [10] | Ling-hai LI,Da-qing YU,Chun WANG,Tao LIU,Zhi-guo SHI. Risk factors for development of intraoperative hypothermia in patients undergoing spinal tuberculosis surgery [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2019, 41(4): 426-429. |
| [11] | Juan-wen LIAN,Jia-ling XU,Tao HUA,Jie DING,Yu FAN. Clinical characteristics and related factors of patients with secondary tuberculosis after malignant tumors [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2019, 41(3): 254-259. |
| [12] | Yao CHENG,Tao HUANG,Hong-de CHEN,Gui-hui WU. Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of cryptococcus neoformans meningitis and tuberculous meningitis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2019, 41(1): 48-52. |
| [13] | Yan-ping GE,Shao-jun ZHANG,Lan YAO,Ya HE,Lin FAN. Analysis of clinical characteristics in drug-resistant tuberculosis patients with drug-induced liver injury caused by chemotherapy [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2018, 40(8): 800-804. |
| [14] | Gui-zhen PAN,Jin-xin ZHANG,Qi ZHANG,Liang CHEN,Wen-ji ZUO,Yun-hui CHEN,Ping-ping LIU,Nai-rong. ZHONG. Analysis of influencing factors of pulmonary tuberculosis in schools students in Guangzhou [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2018, 40(7): 761-767. |
| [15] | SUN Qin, LIU Zhi-bin, SHA Wei, XIAO He-ping.. Association between UGT1A1 and CYP2E1 gene polymorphisms and susceptibility of first-line anti-tuberculous drug induced liver injury [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2017, 39(10): 1073-1079. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
京公网安备11010202007215号
Total visitors: Visitors of today: Now online:
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.