评价传染性肺结核患者隔离治疗的伦理学框架

doi:10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20240389

中国防痨杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (12): 1434-1441.doi: 10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20240389

评价传染性肺结核患者隔离治疗的伦理学框架

张迪¹(), 杜莹², 高磊³()

¹中国医学科学院北京协和医学院人文和社会科学学院,北京 100730
²首都医科大学公共卫生学院,北京 100069
³中国医学科学院北京协和医学院病原生物学研究所,北京 102629

收稿日期:2024-09-05 出版日期:2024-12-10 发布日期:2024-12-03
通信作者: 张迪,Email:zhangdi87@outlook.com;高磊,Email:gaolei@ipbcams.ac.cn
基金资助:
首都医科大学科研培育基金(校自然);首都医科大学科研培育基金(PYZ23024)

Ethical framework for evaluating isolation treatment of patients with infectious pulmonary tuberculosis

Zhang Di¹(), Du Ying², Gao Lei³()

¹School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
²School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
³Institute of Pathogen Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 102629, China

Received:2024-09-05 Online:2024-12-10 Published:2024-12-03
Contact: Zhang Di, Email: zhangdi87@outlook.com; Gao Lei, Email: gaolei@ipbcams.ac.cn
Supported by:
Capital Medical University Scientific Research and Cultivation Fund (Natural Science Foundation of CCMU);Capital Medical University Scientific Research and Cultivation Fund(PYZ23024)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

结核病是全球范围内导致死亡人数最多的传染病,传染性肺结核患者的隔离治疗作为一项公共卫生策略开展实施,可有效阻止肺结核传播,对于实现终结结核病流行目标至关重要。然而,隔离治疗引发了一系列重要的公共卫生伦理问题,其核心是为了保护人群健康而限制个体自由。我国目前启动了隔离治疗的立法工作,妥善解决这些问题可促进有效的隔离治疗法规和政策的制定与实施。本文的目的是构建评价隔离的伦理学框架,以协助立法者、政策制定者和公共卫生实践者应对隔离的伦理学问题,并使隔离治疗符合伦理。

关键词: 结核,肺, 病人隔离, 伦理学,医学

Abstract:

Tuberculosis is the infectious disease that causes the largest number of deaths in the world. As a public health policy, the isolation treatment of patients with infectious pulmonary tuberculosis could effectively prevent the spread of tuberculosis and is very important for achieving the global goals of the “END TB” strategy. However, isolation treatment has raised a series of important public health ethical issues, the core of which is to restrict individual freedom in order to protect people’s health. At present, China has started the legislative work of isolation treatment for patients with infectious pulmonary tuberculosis. Properly solving such problems would promote the formulation and implementation of effective isolation treatment regulations and policies. The purpose of this paper is to construct an ethical framework for evaluating isolation, so as to assist legislators, policy makers and public health practitioners to deal with the ethical problems of isolation and make isolation treatment ethical.

Key words: Tuberculosis, pulmonary, Patient isolation, Ethics, medical

中图分类号:

R52
R-052

张迪, 杜莹, 高磊. 评价传染性肺结核患者隔离治疗的伦理学框架[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2024, 46(12): 1434-1441. doi: 10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20240389

Zhang Di, Du Ying, Gao Lei. Ethical framework for evaluating isolation treatment of patients with infectious pulmonary tuberculosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2024, 46(12): 1434-1441. doi: 10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20240389

参考文献 23

[1]	CADTH Rapid Response Reports. Home Isolation to Prevent Tuberculosis Transmission: A Review of the Clinical Evidence and Guidelines. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, 2014.
[2]	Petersen E, Khamis F, Migliori GB, et al. De-isolation of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis after start of treatment-clear, unequivocal guidelines are missing. Int J Infect Dis, 2017, 56: 34-38. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2017.01.029. pmid: 28163167
[3]	Migliori GB, Sotgiu G, Rosales-Klintz S, et al. ERS/ECDC Statement: European Union standards for tuberculosis care, 2017 update. Eur Respir J, 2018, 51(5): 1702678. doi:10.1183/13993003.02678-2017.
[4]	Migliori GB, Nardell E, Yedilbayev A, et al. Reducing tuberculosis transmission: a consensus document from the World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. Eur Respir J, 2019, 53(6): 1900391. doi:10.1183/13993003.00391-2019.
[5]	Cooper R. Appendix B: de-isolation review and recommendations. Can J Respir Crit Care Sleep Med, 2022, 6: 248-255.
[6]	Shah M, Dansky Z, Nathavitharana R, et al. NTCA Guidelines for Respiratory Isolation and Restrictions to Reduce Transmission of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Community Settings. Clin Infect Dis, 2024: ciae199. doi:10.1093/cid/ciae199.
[7]	Gammon J, Hunt J. A review of isolation practices and procedures in healthcare settings. Br J Nurs, 2018, 27(3): 137-140. doi:10.12968/bjon.2018.27.3.137.
[8]	Lee LM. Public health ethics theory: review and path to convergence. J Law Med Ethics, 2012, 40(1): 85-98. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00648.x.
[9]	Kass NE. An ethics framework for public health. Am J Public Health, 2001, 91(11): 1776-1782. doi:10.2105/ajph.91.11.1776. pmid: 11684600
[10]	UN Commission on Human Rights. The Siracusa Principles on the Limitation and Derogation Provisions in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights[A/OL]. Geneva: United Nations, 1984: 4-5 [2024-11-04]. https://undocs.org/E/CN.4/1985/4.
[11]	World Health Organization. Ethics guidance for the implementation of the end TB strategy. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2017.
[12]	Karat AS, Gregg M, Barton HE, et al. Evidence for the Use of Triage, Respiratory Isolation, and Effective Treatment to Reduce the Transmission of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis in Healthcare Settings: A Systematic Review. Clin Infect Dis, 2021, 72(1): 155-172. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa720.
[13]	DeGrazia D, Millum J. A Theory of Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021: 6.
[14]	Oliva Rapoport VE, Altamirano E, Senador L, et al. Impact of prolonged isolation on adolescents with drug-susceptible tuberculosis in Lima, Peru: a qualitative study. BMJ Open, 2022, 12(9): e063287. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063287.
[15]	Oladimeji O, Ushie BA, Udoh EE, et al. Psychosocial wellbeing of patients with multidrug resistant tuberculosis voluntarily confined to long-term hospitalisation in Nigeria. BMJ Glob Health, 2016, 1(3): e000006. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2015-000006.
[16]	World Health Organization. Ethics guidance for the implementation of the end TB strategy. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2017.
[17]	Harris J, Holm S. Is there a moral obligation not to infect others?. BMJ, 1995, 311(7014): 1215-1217. doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7014.1215. pmid: 7488907
[18]	Silva DS, Citro B, Volchenkov G, et al. Ethics and human rights considerations regarding involuntary isolation of people with TB. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 2020, 24(5): 15-20. doi:10.5588/ijtld.17.0879. pmid: 32553038
[19]	Fidler DP, Gostin LO, Markel H. Through the quarantine looking glass: drug-resistant tuberculosis and public health governance, law, and ethics. J Law Med Ethics, 2007, 35(4): 616-628, 512. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2007.00185.x.
[20]	Adler NE, Ostrove JM. Socioeconomic status and health: what we know and what we don’t. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 1999, 896: 3-15. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08101.x.
[21]	Schreier HM, Chen E. Socioeconomic status and the health of youth: a multilevel, multidomain approach to conceptualizing pathways. Psychol Bull, 2013, 139(3): 606-654. doi:10.1037/a0029416. pmid: 22845752
[22]	Gostin LO, Bayer R, Fairchild AL. Ethical and legal challenges posed by severe acute respiratory syndrome: implications for the control of severe infectious disease threats. JAMA, 2003, 290(24): 3229-3237. doi:10.1001/jama.290.24.3229. pmid: 14693876
[23]	World Health Organization. Guidance on ethics of tuberculosis prevention, care and control. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2010.

评价传染性肺结核患者隔离治疗的伦理学框架

Ethical framework for evaluating isolation treatment of patients with infectious pulmonary tuberculosis

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 23

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

友情链接

[1]	刘盛元,杨亚蕊,陈亮,郭旭君,钟涛,朱闵敏,王健,李盛斌,张洁,宋春发,杨南森,马剑平. 信息化技术在涂阳肺结核患者居家隔离中的应用初探[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2018, 40(9): 1012-1018.
[2]	何方，张弘，梁瑞英，张爱洁，刘英杰，刘晖. 北京市朝阳区涂阳肺结核患者住院隔离治疗的影响因素研究[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2015, 37(4): 383-388.
[3]	卢惠林刘本坚雷志明刘文福. 广东省中山市小榄镇痰涂片阳性肺结核患者执行居家隔离措施的现状调查[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2013, 35(6): 451-455.
[4]	袁保东,王卫华,段琼红,张炎林,陆兰英. 耐多药肺结核患者生命质量的评价[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2006, 28(3): 139-142.