Email Alert | RSS    帮助

中国防痨杂志, 2022, 44(7): 720-726 doi: 10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20220103

综述

结核分枝杆菌感染的免疫学检测技术研究进展及临床应用现状

贾红彦, 董静, 张宗德, 潘丽萍,

首都医科大学附属北京胸科医院/耐药结核病研究北京市重点实验室/北京市结核病胸部肿瘤研究所,北京 101149

Progress and clinical application of immunological detection technology for Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection

JIA Hong-yan, DONG Jing, ZHANG Zong-de, PAN Li-ping,

Beijing Key Laboratory for Drug Resistant Tuberculosis Research/Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute/Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 101149, China

通信作者: 潘丽萍,Email: panliping2006@163.com

收稿日期: 2022-03-31  

基金资助: 国家自然科学基金(81902024)
国家自然科学基金(82172279)
北京市医管中心登峰人才项目(DFL20181601)
通州区运河计划人才项目(YH201807)
通州区运河计划人才项目(YH202001)

Corresponding authors: PAN Li-ping, Email: panliping2006@163.com

Received: 2022-03-31  

Fund supported: National Natural Science Foundation(81902024)
National Natural Science Foundation(82172279)
Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Ascent Plan(DFL20181601)
Tongzhou Yunhe Project(YH201807)
Tongzhou Yunhe Project(YH202001)

摘要

结核病仍然是全球和我国重点防控的传染病之一。尽管目前已将结核分枝杆菌核酸检测阳性纳入结核病确诊依据之一,但临床仍然存在大量病原学阴性的结核病患者,需要依靠免疫学检测技术进行辅助诊断。结核分枝杆菌入侵宿主后引发的免疫病理反应及抗结核免疫应答反应是开发免疫学检测技术的基础,参与免疫应答不同阶段的各类细胞、细胞因子、趋化因子、抗体等都是潜在的免疫学诊断靶标。近年来,基于这些靶标开发了多项免疫学检测新技术,包括γ-干扰素释放试验、新型结核菌素皮肤试验、干扰素诱导蛋白-10(IP-10)检测、γ-干扰素/白细胞介素-2(IFN-γ/IL-2)双因子检测等,为结核分枝杆菌感染和结核病的诊断带来了新的希望。此外,尚有一些处在研发过程的新型蛋白标识物、多功能淋巴细胞等也表现出较好的潜在诊断价值。笔者将对已用于临床的免疫学诊断技术的应用现状及优缺点进行综述,并探讨未来可能进入临床应用的标识物和其他潜在靶标。

关键词: 分枝杆菌; 结核; 感染; 免疫; 临床实验室技术

Abstract

In the world and China, tuberculosis is still one of the infectious diseases requiring more attention to the prevention and control. Although the positive detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis nucleic acid has been defined as one of the basis for the diagnosis of tuberculosis, there are still a large number of tuberculosis patients with negative etiology in clinic and need to rely on immunological detection technology for auxiliary diagnosis. The immunopathological response and anti-tuberculosis immune response caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection are the basis for the development of immunological technologies. Various kinds of cells, cytokines, chemokines, and antibodies, etc., involved in different stages of the immune response, are all potential targets for immunological diagnosis. In recent years, a number of new immunological technologies have been developed based on these targets, including interferon-γ release assay, new tuberculin test, IP-10 test and IFN-γ/IL-2 dual release assay, offers new hopes for diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and tuberculosis. In addition, some new protein biomarkers and poly-functional lymphocytes in the development process also show good potential diagnostic values. Herein, the current application status, advantages and disadvantages of immune diagnostic technologies that have been used in clinical practice are reviewed, and biomarkers and other potential targets that may be used in clinic in the future are discussed.

Keywords: Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Infection; Immunity; Clinical laboratory techniques

PDF (886KB) 元数据 多维度评价 相关文章 导出 EndNote| Ris| Bibtex  收藏本文

本文引用格式

贾红彦, 董静, 张宗德, 潘丽萍. 结核分枝杆菌感染的免疫学检测技术研究进展及临床应用现状. 中国防痨杂志, 2022, 44(7): 720-726. Doi:10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20220103

JIA Hong-yan, DONG Jing, ZHANG Zong-de, PAN Li-ping. Progress and clinical application of immunological detection technology for Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2022, 44(7): 720-726. Doi:10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20220103

开放科学(资源服务)标识码(OSID)的开放科学计划以二维码为入口,提供丰富的线上扩展功能,包括作者对论文背景的语音介绍、该研究的附加说明、与读者的交互问答、拓展学术圈等。读者“扫一扫”此二维码即可获得上述增值服务。

据世界卫生组织(World Health Organization,WHO)估算,全球约1/4的人口感染结核分枝杆菌(Mycobacterium tuberculosis,MTB)[1]。我国是结核病高负担国家之一,MTB感染比例较高,约为20%[2,3]。WHO呼吁2035年消除结核病需要对结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染(latent tuberculosis infection,LTBI)进行干预。然而,LTBI的诊断仍缺乏金标准,免疫学检测技术是实现MTB感染诊断的主要方法。此外,结核病的确诊需要依靠病原学实验室检查,但并非所有结核病患者都能够获得病原学诊断依据。据2018年数据统计,我国肺结核患者的病原学阳性率不足40%,肺外结核病原学阳性率更低[4]。根据最新的《肺结核诊断》行业标准,依赖于免疫学检测的MTB感染诊断结果已经成为重要的结核病辅助诊断依据。

宿主免疫系统与MTB的相互作用决定了MTB感染机体的结局。MTB入侵宿主后引发的免疫病理反应及抗结核免疫应答反应是开发免疫学诊断技术的基础,参与免疫应答不同阶段(天然免疫和适应性免疫)的各类细胞亚型、细胞因子、趋化因子、抗体等,都是潜在的免疫学诊断靶标。笔者主要对已经应用于临床实践的免疫学诊断技术原理、应用现状,以及处于研发和探索阶段的免疫学诊断技术的预期应用潜力进行简要概述。

一、应用于临床的MTB感染检测技术

1. 血清学诊断:血清学诊断是以宿主感染MTB后的体液免疫应答为基础,检测MTB抗原或抗体,主要基于酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)、酶联免疫胶体金渗滤法、胶体金免疫层析法、蛋白芯片技术等。由于具有操作简单快速、实验技术要求低、价格低廉等优点,曾经是我国结核病诊断的重要辅助手段。但是,2011年WHO对94项商业化结核病血清学检测试剂盒进行了系统评估,认为血清学检测试剂的敏感度(0%~100%)和特异度(31%~100%)变化巨大,存在大量假阳性或假阴性结果,故不推荐使用[5]。WHO的上述建议直接影响血清学诊断在临床中的应用。血清学诊断不确定性的原因复杂,可能与抗原选择及生产工艺差别有关。

目前,有多项研究提示结核抗原检测对于结核病的诊断是有价值的,包括脂阿拉伯甘露聚糖抗原(lipoarabinomannan,LAM)、早期分泌抗原靶蛋白6(early secretory antigentic target 6,ESAT-6)、培养滤液蛋白10(culture filtrate protein 10,CFP-10)、Ag85抗原复合物及MPT64抗原等[6]。国际研发的基于LAM抗原的侧向流动型尿液检测,在HIV感染人群中诊断敏感度较高,而且随着CD4+T细胞数量降低,诊断敏感度优势越发明显[7]。WHO根据国际多中心研究数据分别于2015年和2019年制定和修订了关于尿液LAM检测的建议,推荐在HIV感染人群中使用。

WHO虽然在2011年否定了当时商业化血清学诊断试剂盒的应用,但并未限制结核新型抗原和新的诊断标识物的研究,当前的临床诊断现状也迫切需要发现新型抗原和分子标识物。通过客观准确的鉴定和评价体系筛选合适的抗原或抗原组合是未来血清学检测发展的方向和关键[8,9]

2. 皮肤试验:结核菌素皮肤试验(tuberculin test,TST)基于迟发型超敏反应,已沿用上百年。在未出现更先进的免疫学诊断技术前,TST检测是检测MTB感染的重要工具,也是结核病的重要辅助诊断工具。但是,由于传统的结核菌素使用结核菌素纯蛋白衍生物,因此容易与卡介苗或非结核分枝杆菌产生交叉反应,导致特异度低。研究提示,在未接种卡介苗的人群中,TST检测的特异度可以达到97%,但在接种卡介苗的人群中,TST检测的特异度仅为59%,临床应用受限[10]

目前,国内外都在研发新型皮肤变态反应原。一项在南非开展的临床试验提示,新型C-Tb皮肤试验,使用ESAT-6和CFP-10抗原混合物,在结核病患者中的诊断敏感度(73.9%)与γ-干扰素释放试验(interferon gamma release assay,IGRA)持平(75.1%),在健康人群中的特异度(99.3%)明显高于传统TST(76.9%),与IGRA检测持平(100%)[11]。国内也有类似研究,将ESAT-6和CFP-10融合蛋白(EC)作为变态反应原,替代原来使用的结核菌素纯蛋白衍生物。临床试验提示,EC蛋白在诊断MTB感染中能够排除卡介苗干扰,优于传统TST,与IGRA检测结果有良好的一致性,已获得国内临床应用许可[12]。新型皮肤试验的研发为MTB感染诊断和结核病辅助诊断提供了新的方法。得益于其操作便利性和技术要求低等优点,更适合在结核病基层防控机构推广实施。

3. IGRA:IGRA是以宿主感染MTB后的细胞免疫应答为基础,通过检测MTB特异抗原刺激后释放 γ-干扰素(IFN-γ)的特异性淋巴细胞数量(酶联免疫斑点法,ELISPOT)或直接检测IFN-γ水平(酶联免疫吸附法,ELISA)来判断机体是否感染MTB,是目前诊断MTB感染的有效工具,也是诊断结核病的重要辅助工具。IGRA技术于2001年获得美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准,延用至今,期间不断有进口试剂盒的更新换代和各类国产试剂盒的问世。

不同国家和地区也对该技术在各类人群中的诊断价值给予了较完善的评估。由于纳入MTB特异抗原ESAT-6和CFP-10,该技术能够排除卡介苗的干扰,对于MTB感染的诊断效果较好[13]。基于IGRA检测获得的全球及我国LTBI率均明显低于TST[2]。该技术在活动性结核病患者中的诊断敏感度优于TST检测,阴性预测值较好,但由于无法与LTBI进行鉴别,在结核病高负担国家中的诊断特异度较低,常用于结核病患者的排除,而非纳入。在结核病低负担国家,该技术的诊断敏感度和特异度均优于TST检测,对于活动性结核病的诊断帮助较大[14]。在结核病发病风险预测方面,尽管IGRA检测的阳性预测值、阴性预测值略高于TST检测,但依然无法准确预测结核病发病[15]。在儿童群体中,荟萃分析提示IGRA检测和TST检测基本一致,并未表现出更好的诊断性能,因此并不推荐以IGRA替代TST用于儿童结核病的辅助诊断[16]。但是,IGRA检测在HIV感染、自身免疫疾病和器官移植人群的诊断敏感度优于TST,临床实践中建议单用IGRA检测或者联用TST检测,优先使用基于ELISPOT方法的检测[13]

IGRA检测主要适用于外周血检测,但也有研究探索了该技术在不同体液中的应用价值,发现基于ELISPOT方法的IGRA检测的诊断性能优于基于ELISA方法的IGRA检测[13,17]。近年来,有研究提出可应用IGRA检测中结核特异抗原免疫应答与阳性抗原免疫应答的比值(TBAg/PHA ratio)作为鉴别活动性结核病和LTBI的指标,但仍需要基于前瞻性大样本队列对该比值进行进一步评价[18,19]。在临床实践中,存在一定比例(5%~20%)的确诊结核病患者的IGRA检测结果为阴性,原因比较复杂,包括高龄、HIV感染、免疫抑制状态、疾病进程、外周血淋巴细胞数量低、体质量指数(BMI)和人类白细胞抗原(HLA)分型等,其中外周血淋巴细胞数量低主要影响基于ELISA方法的IGRA检测结果[20]

当前也有一些研究试图通过改变IGRA检测中的特异性抗原,获得更好的诊断性能[21]。最近的一项研究在联用原有ESAT-6和CFP-10基础上,依次加入新抗原Rv3615c和Rv3879c,虽然敏感度较结核感染T细胞斑点试验(T-SPOT.TB)有所提升,但特异度也相应下降,并没有表现出更好的诊断性能[22]。QuantiFERON-TB Gold plus诊断试剂纳入了针对CD4+T细胞和CD8+T细胞免疫应答的抗原,希望提升诊断敏感度,实现不同感染状态的鉴别诊断。但基于目前对其价值评估的荟萃分析数据,并没有体现出鉴别诊断结核病和LTBI的能力,但其诊断结核病和MTB感染的敏感度略高于其他QuantiFERON-TB诊断试剂[23,24]。对于改良型IGRA检测的研究,未来可能需要尝试更多的新型抗原。

4. 干扰素诱导蛋白-10(interferon gamma-induced protein 10,IP-10):在活动性结核病早期诊断标识物的研究中,发现结核病患者外周血中存在一种高表达的细胞因子,即IP-10。IP-10主要来源于单核/巨噬细胞和T淋巴细胞,是IFN-γ免疫应答通路中一个高表达的CXC家族趋化因子,与IFN-γ受到同一信号通路的调控[25]

有研究证实,将QuantiFERON-TB Gold试剂盒(IGRA的一种)中的检测靶标替换成IP-10蛋白,也适合于MTB特异性细胞免疫反应检测[26]。荟萃分析提示,靶向IP-10蛋白检测用于诊断结核病的敏感度和特异度可达到86%(95%CI:80%~90%)和88%(95%CI:82%~92%),对LTBI的诊断敏感度和特异度分别为85%(95%CI:80%~88%)和89%(95%CI:84%~92%)[27,28]。研究发现,在结核特异抗原刺激后2.5~8h内,IP-10 mRNA的表达量显著上调,上调倍数明显高于IFN-γ,而且能在较长时间内保持稳定的高表达。因此,IP-10 mRNA可能更适合作为MTB特异性细胞免疫反应检测的靶标[29]

目前,国内外关于IP-10 mRNA检测用于MTB感染诊断或结核病辅助诊断的研究有限。国外一项研究平行比较了IGRA检测、IP-10蛋白检测和IP-10 mRNA检测在MTB感染中的诊断价值,发现结核特异抗原刺激后的IP-10 mRNA检测的诊断特异度与IGRA检测和IP-10蛋白检测基本一致,但是敏感度略低于其他两个靶标[30],这可能与结核抗原刺激时间的选择以及RNA提取方案有关。通常情况下,mRNA转录窗口期较短,较长时间的抗原刺激后可能已进入IP-10蛋白累积阶段,mRNA含量下降。因此,锁定恰当的结核抗原刺激时间,捕获处于高表达状态的mRNA对于提高检测性能至关重要。国内也有研究分析了IP-10 mRNA的检测性能,以结核特异抗原刺激后4h作为检测时间点,IP-10 mRNA检测与IGRA检测在诊断MTB感染中获得了基本一致的敏感度和特异度,在HIV与MTB双重感染者中表现出更高的诊断敏感度和更低的不确定结果获得率[25,31]

5. IFN-γ/白细胞介素(IL)-2双因子检测:IL-2是重要的Th1类细胞因子之一,既往研究发现,结核抗原刺激外周血淋巴细胞后,MTB感染者中IL-2表达量较未感染者明显升高。荟萃分析提示,在IFN-γ基础上增加IL-2检测可以提高MTB感染的检出率[32]。Suzukawa等[33]发现,包括IFN-γ和IL-2在内的多个细胞因子均与结核病相关,且联合检测IFN-γ和IL-2的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)大于其他因子的联合检测结果。这些研究均提示IFN-γ和IL-2联合检测可以提高结核病的检出率。

然而,关于IFN-γ和IL-2联合用于活动性结核病和LTBI鉴别诊断的价值,一直存在争议。有研究认为,IGRA检测上清中IFN-γ/IL-2比值有助于鉴别诊断结核病和LTBI[34],也有研究发现长时间刺激后(72h)增加IL-2检测可帮助鉴别诊断结核病和LTBI[35]。也有一些不一致结果,显示联合检测IFN-γ和IL-2并不能鉴别诊断结核病和LTBI[36]。国内2020年上市的IFN-γ/IL-2双因子检测试剂盒,在常规IGRA检测中增加IL-2检测,临床试验数据提示增加IL-2可提高MTB感染的诊断敏感度,但未提及关于结核病和LTBI的鉴别诊断。因此,对于IFN-γ和IL-2联用的价值,尚需要在前瞻性大样本中做进一步评估。此外,国外开发的基于Ala-DH抗原刺激下的IL-2检测试剂,在成人和儿童的活动性结核病和LTBI鉴别诊断中表现出较好的敏感度(100%)和特异度(96%和81%),提示开发基于新型结核抗原刺激下的多因子检测,可能有希望实现活动性结核病和LTBI的诊断[37,38]

6. B细胞ELISPOT检测:B 细胞ELISPOT可用来直接计数抗体分泌细胞和长期记忆B细胞,是分析抗体免疫反应的有力工具,并且是仅有的少数能直接聚焦于抗体分泌细胞(antibody-secreting cell,ASC)的分析方法之一。B细胞ELISPOT能在10万个细胞中实现对单个抗原特异性B细胞进行定量检测,因而具有极高的敏感度[39]。相对于常用的细胞流式检测技术而言,B细胞ELISPOT技术能够帮助研究人员识别样品中的ASC,并测量其总数以及那些对特定抗原分泌抗体的细胞数量,目前主要用于检测B细胞对感染的反应和疫苗引发的反应。研究表明,卡介苗接种人群中由卡介苗引发的MTB特异的记忆性B细胞比例明显高于未接种者[40]。在MTB感染及结核病的诊断中,相对于T细胞介导的细胞免疫而言,对B细胞及其抗体在结核免疫中作用的研究相对较少。早期研究发现,活动性结核病患者中存在功能缺陷的B细胞亚群,表现为增殖受限、抗体及细胞因子释放受损等,提示B细胞在结核病免疫应答中起着重要作用[41]。Gindeh等[42]利用B细胞ELISPOT技术研究发现结核病患者外周血中ESAT-6/CFP-10特异的浆母细胞比例明显高于密切接触者及LTBI者,而且在抗结核治疗后明显降低,提示B细胞ELISPOT技术用于诊断结核病的潜在价值。另一项研究也提示活动性结核病患者中存在较高水平的卡介苗特异的IgG+浆母细胞,其与LTBI者和非结核病患者间的比例差异明显,可作为活动性结核病诊断的分子标识[43]。但是由于目前关于B细胞各亚群在宿主抗结核免疫应答中的作用并未完全阐明,因此目前B细胞ELISPOT检测技术用于结核病诊断的价值研究仍然需要进一步深入探讨。

二、新型MTB感染检测靶标和技术的研发进展

1. 细胞因子检测:新的诊断技术需要新的靶标,国内外研究者一直致力于探寻除IFN-γ之外的其他因子,希望通过单独或综合检测的方式来提高结核病或MTB感染的诊断能力。到目前为止,纳入评估的细胞因子超过100种,包括白细胞介素类(IL1α/β、IL-2、IL-4、IL-5、IL-6、IL-8、IL-10、IL-12、IL-13、IL-15、IL-17、IL-21、IL-23、IL-27等)、趋化因子类(CXCL家族、CXCR家族、MIP-1α/β、MCP、RANTES、I-309等),以及其他细胞因子(TNF-α、VEGF、GM-CSF、G-CSF、MMP-9、TGF-β等)。一项荟萃分析对56项研究进行了综合分析,其中研究最多的是IFN-γ、IL-2、TNF-α、IP-10、IL-10和IL-13。尽管多数研究认为各类细胞因子具有鉴别诊断结核病和LTBI的潜质,但各研究之间的异质性很高,并没有得到非常统一的结果[44]。分析原因,可能与各研究入组人群、研究设计、样本性质及检测方法有关。未来针对结核抗原特异细胞因子的研究,应该基于更加成熟的设计,分别在儿童和成人群体中单独分析。

2. 多功能淋巴细胞亚型:细胞免疫应答在MTB感染引起的宿主适应性免疫应答过程中起到重要作用。结核抗原刺激后的T淋巴细胞,因分泌多种细胞因子而被认为是多功能细胞(poly-functional T cells),表现为不同的细胞亚型和功能。在结核病研究中发现,分泌不同细胞因子的多功能T细胞亚型的数目和比例可能与不同的MTB感染状态相关[45]。早在2011年,Harari等[46]发现,单分泌TNF-α的CD4+T细胞数目在LTBI和活动性结核病中的比例存在明显差异,而且在治疗后明显降低,可能是鉴别诊断活动性结核病和LTBI的标识物。Rozot等[47]构建了基于单分泌TNF-α的CD4+T细胞比例和结核抗原特异的CD8+T细胞数目的诊断模型,可用于活动性结核病和LTBI的鉴别诊断。其后多项研究提示,针对释放IFN-γ和TNF-α的多功能淋巴细胞检测有助于活动性结核病和LTBI的诊断和鉴别诊断[48,49]。也有研究发现,释放IFN-γ并表达CD38、HLA-DR、Ki-67蛋白的CD4+T细胞能够鉴别诊断活动性结核病和LTBI,而且可能作为监测治疗效果的标识物[50]。目前看来,应用流式细胞仪或者多色免疫荧光技术检测特异性抗原刺激后释放多种细胞因子的淋巴细胞亚型,对于实现MTB感染的诊断,甚至是活动性结核病和LTBI的鉴别诊断可能具有较好的意义,但至今尚无相关的诊断试剂用于临床实践[51]

3. 新型生物标识物:通过蛋白质组学技术系统筛选活动性结核病和LTBI的宿主免疫应答标识物,是开发新型免疫学检测技术的重要源动力。2006年,Agranoff等[52]率先采用表面增强激光解析飞行时间质谱技术筛选获得了结核病血浆特异蛋白,并基于支持向量机数学模型构建了由20个蛋白组成的结核病诊断模型。到目前为止,全球研究者开展了至少20余项结核病高通量特异蛋白组研究,筛选获得了上百种宿主蛋白,具有结核病诊断和鉴别诊断的潜在价值,近5年就有10余项研究(表1)。然而,早期的大多数研究止步于系统筛选阶段,近年来的少数研究才开展了诊断模型构建和盲法验证,但仍无确定的生物标识物达到临床应用阶段。其中比较有代表性的包括:De Groote等[53]应用不同数学模型在722个候选蛋白中获得了一组蛋白诊断模型,在三组不同人群中分别获得了较好的诊断价值(AUC为 0.89~0.94);Yang等[54]开展了一项基于蛋白芯片中640个蛋白的筛选和验证,最终获得了一组由8个蛋白组成的、可有效区分结核病和LTBI,以及结核病和非结核肺部疾病的结核病诊断分子标识组合;Sun等[55]建立了一组由3个蛋白组成的、可用于结核病和LTBI鉴别诊断的标识组合。但是,所有这些数据在应用于临床实践之前,均需要更加严格的多中心、多人群独立验证。

表1   结核病特异蛋白标识的研究汇总

时间/文献编号标本类型研究技术分子标识期刊名称
2022[56]血浆MRM-MSCD14/A2GL/NID1/SCTM1/A1AG1EBioMedicine
2021[57]唾液LC-MS/MSNAXE/SERPINA3/PSMB6/IGKV1D-33/
SERPINI1
Tuberculosis
2020[58]血清iTRAQKYAT3/SERPINA1/HP/APOC3Proteomics Clin Appl
2020[59]血清DIA-MSsCD14/PGLYRP2/FGAJ Cell Mol Med
2020[60]淋巴细胞GeLC-MS/MSPSTKPLoS One
2020[61]血浆非标记定量蛋白质组学AGP1/ORM2/C9Proteomics Clin Appl
2020[54]血浆蛋白芯片I-TAC/I-309/MIG/Granulysin/FAP/
MEP1B/Furin/LYVE-1
Thorax
2020[62]血浆DIA-MSAMACR/LDHB/RAP1BInfect Drug Resist
2020[63]血浆q3D LC-MSCFHR5/LRG1/CRP/LBP/SAA1JCI Insight
2019[64]血清蛋白芯片C9/IGFBP-2/CD79A/MXRA-7/NrCAMPLoS Med
2019[65]胸腔积液iTRAQFN/CTSG/LTA4HBiomark Med
2018[55]血浆非标记定量蛋白质组学AGP1/ACT/CDH1Front Microbiol
2017[53]血清蛋白芯片SYWC/Kallistatin/C9/Gelsolin/Testican-2/
Aldolase C
J Clin Microbiol

注 MRM-MS:多反应监测质谱;MS:质谱;LC-MS:液相色谱联合质谱;LC-MS/MS:液相色谱联合串联质谱;iTRAQ:同位素标记相对和绝对定量;DIA-MS:数据非依赖采集质谱;GeLC-MS/MS:电泳结合液相色谱串联质谱;q3D LC-MS:q3D液相色谱联合质谱

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


三、展望

近年来,结核病免疫诊断技术的研发取得了巨大进展,特别是在IGRA技术之后,相继出现了基于IP-10检测和IL-2检测的MTB感染诊断新技术,一方面提高了MTB感染的检出率,另一方面在免疫低下等特殊人群中表现出较好的诊断价值。尽管这些新型的细胞免疫检测技术仍然无法实现活动性结核病和LTBI的鉴别诊断,但足以提示除IFN-γ外,必然存在其他细胞因子或标识物能够指示MTB的不同感染状态。随着对MTB感染后宿主免疫应答机制的深入探讨,必然能够找到更理想的生物标识物,以提高MTB感染和结核病免疫学诊断的敏感度和特异度。

(本文编辑:郭萌)

利益冲突

所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突

作者贡献

贾红彦:文献查阅、起草文章初稿;董静:文献查阅;张宗德:稿件审阅修改;潘丽萍:文献审阅、初稿修改及审校

参考文献

Cohen A, Mathiasen VD, Schön T, et al.

The global prevalence of latent tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Eur Respir J, 2019, 54(3):1900655. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00655-2019.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Gao L, Lu W, Bai L, et al.

Latent tuberculosis infection in rural China: baseline results of a population-based, multicentre, prospective cohort study

Lancet Infect Dis, 2015, 15(3):310-319. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)71085-0.

URL     [本文引用: 2]

高磊, 张慧, 胡茂桂, .

基于多中心调查数据和空间统计模型的全国结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染率估算

中国防痨杂志, 2022, 44(1):54-59. doi: 10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20210661.

[本文引用: 1]

中国疾病预防控制中心.

2018年全国结核病防治工作会议资料汇编

北京:中国疾病预防控制中心, 2018.

[本文引用: 1]

World Health Organization.

Commercial serodiagnostic testsfor diagnosis of tuberculosis policy statement

Geneva: World Heath Organization, 2011.

[本文引用: 1]

张薇, 赵立.

结核分枝杆菌感染的实验室诊断方法及检测技术研究进展

国际呼吸杂志, 2019, 39(20):1586-1591. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-436X.2019.20.014.

[本文引用: 1]

Lawn SD.

Advances in Diagnostic Assays for Tuberculosis

Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med, 2015, 5(12):a017806. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a017806.

[本文引用: 1]

《中国防痨杂志》编辑委员会, 中国医疗保健国际交流促进会结核病防治分会基础学组和临床学组.

现阶段结核抗体检测在我国临床应用的专家共识

中国防痨杂志, 2018, 40(1):9-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2018.01.004.

[本文引用: 1]

杨蕾, 曹俊, 卢锦标, .

血清学抗体检测菌阴肺结核存在的问题讨论

中华微生物学和免疫学杂志, 2017, 37(10):785-789. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5101.2017.10.011.

[本文引用: 1]

Pai M, Zwerling A, Menzies D.

Systematic review: T-cell-based assays for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection: an update

Ann Intern Med, 2008, 149(3):177-184. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-3-200808050-00241.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Ruhwald M, Aggerbeck H, Gallardo RV, et al.

Safety and efficacy of the C-Tb skin test to diagnose Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection, compared with an interferon γ release assay and the tuberculin skin test: a phase 3, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial

Lancet Respir Med, 2017, 5(4):259-268. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30436-2.

PMID      [本文引用: 1]

Targeted screening and treatment of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection substantially reduces the risk of developing active tuberculosis. C-Tb (Statens Serum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark) is a novel specific skin test based on ESAT-6 and CFP10 antigens. We investigated the safety and diagnostic potential of C-Tb compared with established tests in the contact-tracing setting.Negative controls, close contacts, occasional contacts, and patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis were enrolled at 13 centres in Spain. We compared C-Tb with the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube ([QFT] Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) interferon γ release assay (IGRA) and the purified protein derivative (PPD) RT 23 tuberculin skin test ([TST] Statens Serum Institute). All participants older than 5 years were tested with QFT. Some participants in the negative control group received C-Tb without the TST to test for potential interactions between C-Tb and PPD RT 23. The rest were randomly assigned in blocks of ten and tested with both C-Tb and TST, with five in each block receiving injection of C-Tb in the right arm and the TST in the left arm and five vice versa. The primary and safety analyses were done in all participants randomly assigned to a group who received any test. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01631266, and with EudraCT, number 2011-005617-36.From July 24, 2012, to Oct 2, 2014, 979 participants were enrolled, of whom 263 were negative controls, 299 were occasional contacts, 316 were close contacts, and 101 were patients with tuberculosis. 970 (99%) participants completed the trial. Induration sizes were similar for C-Tb and TST, but TST positivity was affected by BCG vaccination status. We found a strong positive trend towards C-Tb test positivity with increasing risk of infection, from 3% in negative controls to 16% in occasional contacts, to 43% in close contacts. C-Tb and QFT results were concordant in 785 (94%) of 834 participants aged 5 years and older, and results did not differ significantly between exposure groups. The safety profile of C-Tb was similar to that for the TST.C-Tb delivered IGRA-like results in a field-friendly format. Being unaffected by BCG vaccination status, the C-Tb skin test might provide more accurate treatment guidance in settings where the TST is commonly used.Statens Serum Institut.Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

中国防痨协会, 中国防痨协会学校与儿童结核病防治专业分会, 《中国防痨杂志》编辑委员会.

重组结核杆菌融合蛋白(EC)临床应用专家共识

中国防痨杂志, 2020, 42(8):761-768. doi: 10.3969/i.issn.1000-6621.2020.08.001.

[本文引用: 1]

中华医学会结核病学分会.

结核分枝杆菌γ-干扰素释放试验及临床应用专家意见(2021年版)

中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2022, 45(2):143-150. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20211110-00794.

[本文引用: 3]

Diel R, Loddenkemper R, Nienhaus A.

Evidence-based comparison of commercial interferon-gamma release assays for detecting active TB: a metaanalysis

Chest, 2010, 137(4):952-968. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-2350.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Diel R, Loddenkemper R, Nienhaus A.

Predictive value of interferon-γ release assays and tuberculin skin testing for progression from latent TB infection to disease state: a meta-analysis

Chest, 2012, 142(1):63-75. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-3157.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Machingaidze S, Wiysonge CS, Gonzalez-Angulo Y, et al.

The utility of an interferon gamma release assay for diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection and disease in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Pediatr Infect Dis J, 2011, 30(8):694-700. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e318214b915.

PMID      [本文引用: 1]

The utility of interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs) has been assessed in adults, but remains unclear in children. We reviewed the literature on the use of a commercial IGRA in immunocompetent children for the diagnosis of both latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and TB disease.We searched PubMed for studies published before January 2010 on the diagnosis of TB in children using an IGRA. We compared the specificity and sensitivity of the tuberculin skin test (TST) and the IGRA for LTBI and conducted a random effects meta-analysis on sensitivity of the IGRA for TB disease.Of 68 studies identified, 20 were included in this review. There was increased specificity of the IGRA for LTBI in children compared with TST, but varying sensitivities. Sensitivity of the IGRA in detecting TB disease in children also varied when compared with TST (mean κ score, 0.57). For all TB cases, the pooled sensitivity was 66% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53%-78%) with heterogeneity (I² = 74.8%). Stratification by background TB incidence highlighted a significantly reduced IGRA sensitivity of 55% (95% CI, 37%-73%) in high incidence settings when compared with low incidence settings, 70% (95% CI, 53%-84%).There was no clear evidence that IGRAs should replace TST for detecting LTBI in children. Sensitivity of the IGRA for TB disease was no different from TST, and a significantly reduced IGRA sensitivity was found in high-burden TB settings compared with low-burden TB settings. Further studies are needed to determine the value of IGRAs in LTBI and TB disease diagnosis in children.

Zhou XX, Liu YL, Zhai K, et al.

Body Fluid Interferon-γ Release Assay for Diagnosis of Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Sci Rep, 2015, 5:15284. doi: 10.1038/srep15284.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Luo Y, Tan Y, Yu J, et al.

The Performance of Pleural Fluid T-SPOT.TB Assay for Diagnosing Tuberculous Pleurisy in China: A Two-Center Prospective Cohort Study

Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2019, 9:10. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00010.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Wang F, Yu J, Zhou Y, et al.

The Use of TB-Specific Antigen/Phytohemagglutinin Ratio for Diagnosis and Treatment Monitoring of Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis

Front Immunol, 2018, 9:1047. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01047.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Pan L, Jia H, Liu F, et al.

Risk factors for false-negative T-SPOT.TB assay results in patients with pulmonary and extra-pulmonary TB

J Infect, 2015, 70(4):367-380. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2014.12.018.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Meier NR, Jacobsen M, Ottenhoff THM, et al.

A Systematic Review on Novel Mycobacterium tuberculosis Antigens and Their Discriminatory Potential for the Diagnosis of Latent and Active Tuberculosis

Front Immunol, 2018, 9:2476. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02476.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Whitworth HS, Badhan A, Boakye AA, et al.

Clinical utility of existing and second-generation interferon-γ release assays for diagnostic evaluation of tuberculosis: an observational cohort study

Lancet Infect Dis, 2019, 19(2):193-202. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30613-3.

PMID      [本文引用: 1]

The clinical utility of interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs) for diagnosis of active tuberculosis is unclear, although they are commonly used in countries with a low incidence of tuberculosis. We aimed to resolve this clinical uncertainty by determining the accuracy and utility of commercially available and second-generation IGRAs in the diagnostic assessment of suspected tuberculosis in a low-incidence setting.We did a prospective cohort study of adults with suspected tuberculosis in routine secondary care in England. Patients were tested for Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection at baseline with commercially available (T-SPOT.TB and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube [QFT-GIT]) and second-generation (incorporating novel M tuberculosis antigens) IGRAs and followed up for 6-12 months to establish definitive diagnoses. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and predictive values of the tests were determined.Of the 1060 adults enrolled in the study, 845 were included in the analyses and 363 were diagnosed with tuberculosis. Sensitivity of T-SPOT.TB for all tuberculosis diagnosis, including culture-confirmed and highly probable cases, was 81·4% (95% CI 76·6-85·3), which was higher than QFT-GIT (67·3% [62·0-72·1]). Second-generation IGRAs had a sensitivity of 94·0% (90·0-96·4) for culture-confirmed tuberculosis and 89·2% (85·2-92·2) when including highly probable tuberculosis, giving a negative likelihood ratio for all tuberculosis cases of 0·13 (95% CI 0·10-0·19). Specificity ranged from 86·2% (95% CI 82·3-89·4) for T-SPOT.TB to 80·0% (75·6-83·8) for second-generation IGRAs.Commercially available IGRAs do not have sufficient accuracy for diagnostic evaluation of suspected tuberculosis. Second-generation tests, however, might have sufficiently high sensitivity, low negative likelihood ratio, and correspondingly high negative predictive value in low-incidence settings to facilitate prompt rule-out of tuberculosis.National Institute for Health Research.Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Pourakbari B, Mamishi S, Benvari S, et al.

Comparison of the QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube interferon-γ release assays: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Adv Med Sci, 2019, 64(2):437-443. doi: 10.1016/j.advms.2019.09.001.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Sotgiu G, Saderi L, Petruccioli E, et al.

QuantiFERON TB Gold Plus for the diagnosis of tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

J Infect, 2019, 79(5):444-453. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2019.08.018.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

潘丽萍, 高孟秋, 贾红彦, .

新型结核分枝杆菌特异性细胞免疫反应检测技术对结核病辅助诊断的价值评估

中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2021, 44(5):443-449. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20200821-00916.

[本文引用: 2]

Petrone L, Vanini V, Chiacchio T, et al.

Evaluation of IP-10 in Quantiferon-Plus as biomarker for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection

Tuberculosis (Edinb), 2018, 111:147-153. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2018.06.005.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Qiu X, Xiong T, Su X, et al.

Accumulate evidence for IP-10 in diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis

BMC Infect Dis, 2019, 19(1):924. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4466-5.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Syed Ahamed Kabeer B, Raman B, Thomas A, et al.

Role of QuantiFERON-TB gold, interferon gamma inducible protein-10 and tuberculin skin test in active tuberculosis diagnosis

PLoS One, 2010, 5(2):e9051. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009051.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Blauenfeldt T, Heyckendorf J, Graff Jensen S, et al.

Development of a one-step probe based molecular assay for rapid immunodiagnosis of infection with M.tuberculosis using dried blood spots

PLoS One, 2014, 9(9):e105628. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105628.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Blauenfeldt T, Villar-Hernández R, García-García E, et al.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Interferon Gamma-Induced Protein 10 mRNA Release Assay for Tuberculosis

J Clin Microbiol, 2020, 58(10):e00848-20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00848-20.

[本文引用: 1]

Pan L, Huang M, Jia H, et al.

Diagnostic Performance of a Novel CXCL10 mRNA Release Assay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection

Front Microbiol, 2022, 13:825413. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.825413.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Mamishi S, Pourakbari B, Teymuri M, et al.

Diagnostic accuracy of IL-2 for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis: a systema-tic review and meta-analysis

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 2014, 33(12):2111-2119. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2190-z.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Suzukawa M, Akashi S, Nagai H, et al.

Combined Analysis of IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-5, IL-10, IL-1RA and MCP-1 in QFT Supernatant Is Useful for Distinguishing Active Tuberculosis from Latent Infection

PLoS One, 2016, 11(4):e0152483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152483.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Suter-Riniker F, Berger A, Mayor D, et al.

Clinical significance of interleukin-2/gamma interferon ratios in Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific T-cell signatures

Clin Vaccine Immunol, 2011, 18(8):1395-1396. doi: 10.1128/CVI.05013-11.

PMID      [本文引用: 1]

The simultaneous determination of interleukin-2 (IL-2) and gamma interferon (IFN-γ) in QuantiFERON-TB test plasma supernatants permitted the detection of shifts in Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific T-cell signatures. A subset of the 84 subjects tested revealed a significantly elevated IL-2/IFN-γ ratio, which may be a marker for the successful elimination of M. tuberculosis infection.

Biselli R, Mariotti S, Sargentini V, et al.

Detection of interleukin-2 in addition to interferon-gamma discriminates active tuberculosis patients, latently infected individuals, and controls

Clin Microbiol Infect, 2010, 16(8):1282-1284. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.03104.x.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Santin M, Morandeira-Rego F, Alcaide F, et al.

Detection of interleukin-2 is not useful for distinguishing between latent and active tuberculosis in clinical practice: a prospective cohort study

Clin Microbiol Infect, 2016, 22(12): 1007.e1-1007.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.09.004.

[本文引用: 1]

Chiappini E, Della Bella C, Bonsignori F, et al.

Potential role of M.tuberculosis specific IFN-γ and IL-2 ELISPOT assays in discriminating children with active or latent tuberculosis

PLoS One, 2012, 7(9):e46041. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046041.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Della Bella C, Spinicci M, Grassi A, et al.

Novel M.tuberculosis specific IL-2 ELISpot assay discriminates adult patients with active or latent tuberculosis

PLoS One, 2018, 13(6):e0197825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197825.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Hwai H, Chen YY, Tzeng SJ.

B-Cell ELISpot Assay to Quantify Antigen-Specific Antibody-Secreting Cells in Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells

Methods Mol Biol, 2018, 1808:133-141. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8567-8_11.

PMID      [本文引用: 1]

Peripheral blood is commonly used to assess the cellular and humoral immune responses in clinical studies. It is a convenient sample to collect for immunological research as compared to the surgically excised and biopsied lymphoid specimens. To determine the functional status of immune system from peripheral blood, the enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) assay is a popular method of choice owing to its high sensitivity, great accuracy, and easy performance. The ELISpot allows detection and quantification of cellular functionality at the single-cell level. Therefore, ELISpot assay is commonly applied to detect cytokines and cytotoxic granules released from T cells as well as to measure antibodies secreted from B cells. Because the ELISpot assay has been increasingly used for evaluation of the vaccine efficacy in clinical trials, standardization and reproducibility are crucial to minimize assay variability amongst samples from different sources. Here we introduce methods to isolate human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) for quantification of the antigen-specific antibody-secreting cells using the ELISpot assay.

Sebina I, Cliff JM, Smith SG, et al.

Long-lived memory B-cell responses following BCG vaccination

PLoS One, 2012, 7(12):e51381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051381.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Joosten SA, van Meijgaarden KE, Del Nonno F, et al.

Patients with Tuberculosis Have a Dysfunctional Circulating B-Cell Compartment, Which Normalizes following Successful Treatment

PLoS Pathog, 2016, 12(6):e1005687. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005687.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Gindeh A, Owolabi O, Donkor S, et al.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific plasmablast levels are differentially modulated in tuberculosis infection and disease

Tuberculosis (Edinb), 2020, 124:101978. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2020.101978.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Ashenafi S, Aderaye G, Zewdie M, et al.

BCG-specific IgG-secreting peripheral plasmablasts as a potential biomarker of active tuberculosis in HIV negative and HIV positive patients

Thorax, 2013, 68(3):269-276. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-201817.

PMID      [本文引用: 1]

Diagnosis of active tuberculosis (TB) among sputum-negative cases, patients with HIV infection and extra-pulmonary TB is difficult. In this study, assessment of BCG-specific IgG-secreting peripheral plasmablasts, was used to identify active TB in these high-risk groups.Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from patients with TB and controls and cultured in vitro using an assay called Antibodies in Lymphocyte Supernatant, which measures spontaneous IgG antibody release from migratory plasmablasts. A BCG-specific ELISA and flow cytometry were used to quantify in vivo activated plasmablasts in blood samples from Ethiopian subjects who were HIV negative or HIV positive. Patients diagnosed with different clinical forms of sputum-negative active TB or other diseases (n=96) were compared with asymptomatic individuals including latent TB and non-TB controls (n=85). Immunodiagnosis of TB also included the tuberculin skin test and the interferon (IFN)-γ release assay, QuantiFERON.This study demonstrated that circulating IgG+ plasmablasts and spontaneous secretion of BCG-specific IgG antibodies were significantly higher in patients with active TB compared with latent TB cases and non-TB controls. BCG-specific IgG titres were particularly high among patients coinfected with TB and HIV with CD4 T-cell counts <200 cells/ml who produced low levels of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific IFNγ in vitro.These results suggest that BCG-specific IgG-secreting peripheral plasmablasts could be successfully used as a host-specific biomarker to improve diagnosis of active TB, particularly in people who are HIV positive, and facilitate administration of effective treatment to patients. Elevated IgG responses were associated with impaired peripheral T-cell responses, including reduced T-cell numbers and low M tuberculosis-specific IFNγ production.

Sudbury EL, Clifford V, Messina NL, et al.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific cytokine biomarkers to differentiate active TB and LTBI: A systematic review

J Infect, 2020, 81(6):873-881. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.09.032.

PMID      [本文引用: 1]

New tests are needed to overcome the limitations of existing immunodiagnostic tests for tuberculosis (TB) infection, including their inability to differentiate between active TB and latent TB infection (LTBI). This review aimed to identify the most promising cytokine biomarkers for use as stage-specific markers of TB infection.A systematic review was done using electronic databases to identify studies that have investigated Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB)-specific cytokine responses as diagnostic tools to differentiate between LTBI and active TB.The 56 studies included in this systematic review measured the MTB-specific responses of 100 cytokines, the most frequently studied of which were IFN-γ, IL-2, TNF-α, IP-10, IL-10 and IL-13. Ten studies assessed combinations of cytokines, most commonly IL-2 and IFN-γ. For most cytokines, findings were heterogenous between studies. The variation in results likely relates to differences in the study design and laboratory methods, as well as participant and environmental factors.Although several cytokines show promise as stage-specific markers of TB infection, this review highlights the need for further well-designed studies, in both adult and paediatric populations, to establish which cytokine(s) will be of most use in a new generation of immunodiagnostic tests.Copyright © 2020 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Day CL, Abrahams DA, Lerumo L, et al.

Functional capacity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific T cell responses in humans is associated with mycobacterial load

J Immunol, 2011, 187(5):2222-2232. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1101122.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Harari A, Rozot V, Bellutti Enders F, et al.

Dominant TNF-α + Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific CD4 + T cell responses discriminate between latent infection and active disease

Nat Med, 2011, 17(3):372-376. doi: 10.1038/nm.2299.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Rozot V, Patrizia A, Vigano S, et al.

Combined use of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses is a powerful diagnostic tool of active tuberculosis

Clin Infect Dis, 2015, 60(3):432-437. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu795.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Kim JY, Kang YA, Park JH, et al.

An IFN-γ and TNF-α dual release fluorospot assay for diagnosing active tuberculosis

Clin Microbiol Infect, 2020, 26(7):928-934. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.11.003.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Kim JY, Park JH, Kim MC, et al.

Combined IFN-γ and TNF-α release assay for differentiating active tuberculosis from latent tuberculosis infection

J Infect, 2018, 77(4):314-320. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.04.011.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Adekambi T, Ibegbu CC, Cagle S, et al.

Biomarkers on patient T cells diagnose active tuberculosis and monitor treatment response

J Clin Invest, 2015, 125(5):1827-1838. doi: 10.1172/JCI77990.

PMID      [本文引用: 1]

The identification and treatment of individuals with tuberculosis (TB) is a global public health priority. Accurate diagnosis of pulmonary active TB (ATB) disease remains challenging and relies on extensive medical evaluation and detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) in the patient's sputum. Further, the response to treatment is monitored by sputum culture conversion, which takes several weeks for results. Here, we sought to identify blood-based host biomarkers associated with ATB and hypothesized that immune activation markers on Mtb-specific CD4+ T cells would be associated with Mtb load in vivo and could thus provide a gauge of Mtb infection.Using polychromatic flow cytometry, we evaluated the expression of immune activation markers on Mtb-specific CD4+ T cells from individuals with asymptomatic latent Mtb infection (LTBI) and ATB as well as from ATB patients undergoing anti-TB treatment.Frequencies of Mtb-specific IFN-γ+CD4+ T cells that expressed immune activation markers CD38 and HLA-DR as well as intracellular proliferation marker Ki-67 were substantially higher in subjects with ATB compared with those with LTBI. These markers accurately classified ATB and LTBI status, with cutoff values of 18%, 60%, and 5% for CD38+IFN-γ+, HLA-DR+IFN-γ+, and Ki-67+IFN-γ+, respectively, with 100% specificity and greater than 96% sensitivity. These markers also distinguished individuals with untreated ATB from those who had successfully completed anti-TB treatment and correlated with decreasing mycobacterial loads during treatment.We have identified host blood-based biomarkers on Mtb-specific CD4+ T cells that discriminate between ATB and LTBI and provide a set of tools for monitoring treatment response and cure.Registration is not required for observational studies.This study was funded by Emory University, the NIH, and the Yerkes National Primate Center.

《中国防痨杂志》编辑委员会, 中国医疗保健国际交流促进会结核病防治分会基础专业和临床专业学术部.

结核病患者外周血淋巴细胞亚群检测及临床应用专家共识

中国防痨杂志, 2020, 42(10):1009-1016. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2020.10.001.

[本文引用: 1]

Agranoff D, Fernandez-Reyes D, Papadopoulos MC, et al.

Identification of diagnostic markers for tuberculosis by proteomic fingerprinting of serum

Lancet, 2006, 368(9540):1012-1021. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69342-2.

PMID      [本文引用: 1]

We investigated the potential of proteomic fingerprinting with mass spectrometric serum profiling, coupled with pattern recognition methods, to identify biomarkers that could improve diagnosis of tuberculosis.We obtained serum proteomic profiles from patients with active tuberculosis and controls by surface-enhanced laser desorption ionisation time of flight mass spectrometry. A supervised machine-learning approach based on the support vector machine (SVM) was used to obtain a classifier that distinguished between the groups in two independent test sets. We used k-fold cross validation and random sampling of the SVM classifier to assess the classifier further. Relevant mass peaks were selected by correlational analysis and assessed with SVM. We tested the diagnostic potential of candidate biomarkers, identified by peptide mass fingerprinting, by conventional immunoassays and SVM classifiers trained on these data.Our SVM classifier discriminated the proteomic profile of patients with active tuberculosis from that of controls with overlapping clinical features. Diagnostic accuracy was 94% (sensitivity 93.5%, specificity 94.9%) for patients with tuberculosis and was unaffected by HIV status. A classifier trained on the 20 most informative peaks achieved diagnostic accuracy of 90%. From these peaks, two peptides (serum amyloid A protein and transthyretin) were identified and quantitated by immunoassay. Because these peptides reflect inflammatory states, we also quantitated neopterin and C reactive protein. Application of an SVM classifier using combinations of these values gave diagnostic accuracies of up to 84% for tuberculosis. Validation on a second, prospectively collected testing set gave similar accuracies using the whole proteomic signature and the 20 selected peaks. Using combinations of the four biomarkers, we achieved diagnostic accuracies of up to 78%.The potential biomarkers for tuberculosis that we identified through proteomic fingerprinting and pattern recognition have a plausible biological connection with the disease and could be used to develop new diagnostic tests.

De Groote MA, Sterling DG, Hraha T, et al.

Discovery and Validation of a Six-Marker Serum Protein Signature for the Diagnosis of Active Pulmonary Tuberculosis

J Clin Microbiol, 2017, 55(10):3057-3071. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00467-17.

PMID      [本文引用: 2]

New non-sputum biomarker tests for active tuberculosis (TB) diagnostics are of the highest priority for global TB control. We performed in-depth proteomic analysis using the 4,000-plex SOMAscan assay on 1,470 serum samples from seven countries where TB is endemic. All samples were from patients with symptoms and signs suggestive of active pulmonary TB that were systematically confirmed or ruled out for TB by culture and clinical follow-up. HIV coinfection was present in 34% of samples, and 25% were sputum smear negative. Serum protein biomarkers were identified by stability selection using L1-regularized logistic regression and by Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) statistics. A naive Bayes classifier using six host response markers (HR6 model), including SYWC, kallistatin, complement C9, gelsolin, testican-2, and aldolase C, performed well in a training set (area under the sensitivity-specificity curve [AUC] of 0.94) and in a blinded verification set (AUC of 0.92) to distinguish TB and non-TB samples. Differential expression was also highly significant (< 10) for previously described TB markers, such as IP-10, LBP, FCG3B, and TSP4, and for many novel proteins not previously associated with TB. Proteins with the largest median fold changes were SAA (serum amyloid protein A), NPS-PLA2 (secreted phospholipase A2), and CA6 (carbonic anhydrase 6). Target product profiles (TPPs) for a non-sputum biomarker test to diagnose active TB for treatment initiation (TPP#1) and for a community-based triage or referral test (TPP#2) have been published by the WHO. With 90% sensitivity and 80% specificity, the HR6 model fell short of TPP#1 but reached TPP#2 performance criteria. In conclusion, we identified and validated a six-marker signature for active TB that warrants diagnostic development on a patient-near platform.Copyright © 2017 De Groote et al.

Yang Q, Chen Q, Zhang M, et al.

Identification of eight-protein biosignature for diagnosis of tuberculosis

Thorax, 2020, 75(7):576-583. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-213021.

URL     [本文引用: 2]

Sun H, Pan L, Jia H, et al.

Label-Free Quantitative Proteomics Identifies Novel Plasma Biomarkers for Distinguishing Pulmonary Tuberculosis and Latent Infection

Front Microbiol, 2018, 9:1267. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01267.

URL     [本文引用: 2]

Singer SN, Ndumnego OC, Kim RS, et al.

Plasma host protein biomarkers correlating with increasing Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection activity prior to tuberculosis diagnosis in people living with HIV

EBioMedicine, 2022, 75:103787. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103787.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Mutavhatsindi H, Calder B, McAnda S, et al.

Identification of novel salivary candidate protein biomarkers for tuberculosis diagnosis: A preliminary biomarker discovery study

Tuberculosis (Edinb), 2021, 130:102118. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2021.102118.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Arya R, Dabral D, Faruquee HM, et al.

Serum Small Extracellular Vesicles Proteome of Tuberculosis Patients Demonstrated Deregulated Immune Response

Proteomics Clin Appl, 2020, 14(1):e1900062. doi: 10.1002/prca.201900062.

[本文引用: 1]

Chen J, Han YS, Yi WJ, et al.

Serum sCD14, PGLYRP2 and FGA as potential biomarkers for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis based on data-independent acquisition and targeted proteomics

J Cell Mol Med, 2020, 24(21):12537-12549. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.15796.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Kaewseekhao B, Roytrakul S, Yingchutrakul Y, et al.

Proteomic analysis of infected primary human leucocytes revealed PSTK as potential treatment-monitoring marker for active and latent tuberculosis

PLoS One, 2020, 15(4):e0231834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231834.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Pan L, Zhang X, Jia H, et al.

Label-Free Quantitative Proteomics Identifies Novel Biomarkers for Distinguishing Tuberculosis Pleural Effusion from Malignant Pleural Effusion

Proteomics Clin Appl, 2020, 14(1):e1900001. doi: 10.1002/prca.201900001.

[本文引用: 1]

Shen Y, Xun J, Song W, et al.

Discovery of Potential Plasma Biomarkers for Tuberculosis in HIV-Infected Patients by Data-Independent Acquisition-Based Quantitative Proteomics

Infect Drug Resist, 2020, 13:1185-1196. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S245460.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Garay-Baquero DJ, White CH, Walker NF, et al.

Comprehensive plasma proteomic profiling reveals biomarkers for active tuberculosis

JCI Insight, 2020, 5(18):e137427. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.137427.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Penn-Nicholson A, Hraha T, Thompson EG, et al.

Discovery and validation of a prognostic proteomic signature for tuberculosis progression: A prospective cohort study

PLoS Med, 2019, 16(4):e1002781. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002781.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Shi J, Li P, Zhou L, et al.

Potential biomarkers for antidiastole of tuberculous and malignant pleural effusion by proteome analysis

Biomark Med, 2019, 13(2):123-133. doi: 10.2217/bmm-2018-0200.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

/