Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis ›› 2019, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (12): 1269-1276.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2019.12.007
• Original Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Min WANG,Jing LI,Yang-yi ZHANG,Li-li WANG,Chen-lei YU,Yuan JIANG,Qi-chao PAN
Online:2019-12-10
Published:2019-12-13
Contact:
Yuan JIANG,Qi-chao PAN
Min WANG,Jing LI,Yang-yi ZHANG,Li-li WANG,Chen-lei YU,Yuan JIANG,Qi-chao PAN. The status and risk factors of drug resistance tuberculosis in Shanghai, 2013—2017[J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2019, 41(12): 1269-1276. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2019.12.007
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.zgflzz.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2019.12.007
| 一般资料 | 患者例数 | 构成比(%) | 一般资料 | 患者例数 | 构成比(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 年龄组(岁) | 本市人口 | 3395 | 45.61 | ||
| 15~ | 1541 | 20.70 | 流动人口 | 4048 | 54.39 |
| 25~ | 1687 | 22.67 | 治疗史 | ||
| 35~ | 895 | 12.02 | 初治 | 6854 | 92.09 |
| 45~ | 963 | 12.94 | 复治 | 589 | 7.91 |
| 55~ | 1024 | 13.76 | 年份 | ||
| 65~104 | 1333 | 17.91 | 2013 | 1814 | 24.37 |
| 性别 | 2014 | 1622 | 21.79 | ||
| 男 | 5532 | 74.32 | 2015 | 1385 | 18.61 |
| 女 | 1911 | 25.68 | 2016 | 1374 | 18.46 |
| 户籍 | 2017 | 1248 | 16.77 |
| 年份 | 总株数 | 初治 株数 | 复治 株数 | 耐药 | 耐多药 | 多耐药 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 合计 | 初治 | 复治 | 合计 | 初治 | 复治 | 合计 | 初治 | 复治 | ||||
| 2013 | 1814 | 1670 | 144 | 402(22.16) | 341(20.42) | 61(42.36) | 107(5.90) | 76(4.55) | 31(21.53) | 77(4.24) | 64(3.83) | 13(9.03) |
| 2014 | 1622 | 1465 | 157 | 375(23.12) | 315(21.50) | 60(38.22) | 75(4.62) | 52(3.55) | 23(14.65) | 77(4.75) | 63(4.30) | 14(8.92) |
| 2015 | 1385 | 1273 | 112 | 297(21.44) | 262(20.58) | 35(31.25) | 77(5.56) | 60(4.71) | 17(15.18) | 53(3.83) | 47(3.69) | 6(5.36) |
| 2016 | 1374 | 1269 | 105 | 269(19.58) | 231(18.20) | 38(36.19) | 72(5.24) | 52(4.10) | 20(19.05) | 59(4.29) | 53(4.18) | 6(5.71) |
| 2017 | 1248 | 1177 | 71 | 222(17.79) | 201(17.08) | 21(29.58) | 40(3.21) | 33(2.80) | 7(9.86) | 44(3.53) | 42(3.57) | 2(2.82) |
| 合计 | 7443 | 6854 | 589 | 1565(21.03) | 1350(19.70) | 215(36.50) | 371(4.98) | 273(3.98) | 98(16.64) | 310(4.16) | 269(3.92) | 41(6.96) |
| 15.685 | 7.817 | 3.606 | 6.554 | 8.576 | 2.223 | 1.176 | 0.110 | 3.841 | ||||
| P值 | 0.004 | 0.005 | 0.058 | 0.011 | 0.073 | 0.136 | 0.278 | 0.740 | 0.050 | |||
| 年份 | 总株数 | 初治 株数 | 复治 株数 | 对利福平耐药 | 对异烟肼耐药 | 对链霉素耐药 | 对乙胺丁醇耐药 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 耐药 | 初治 | 复治 | 耐药 | 初治 | 复治 | 耐药 | 初治 | 复治 | 耐药 | 初治 | 复治 | ||||
| 2013 | 1814 | 1670 | 144 | 126 (6.95) | 90 (5.39) | 36 (25.00) | 232 (12.79) | 182 (10.90) | 50 (34.72) | 298 (16.43) | 255 (15.27) | 43 (29.86) | 105 (5.79) | 79 (4.73) | 26 (18.06) |
| 2014 | 1622 | 1465 | 157 | 91 (5.61) | 64 (4.37) | 27 (17.20) | 189 (11.65) | 144 (9.83) | 45 (28.66) | 287 (17.69) | 246 (16.79) | 41 (26.11) | 79 (4.87) | 54 (3.69) | 25 (15.92) |
| 2015 | 1385 | 1273 | 112 | 99 (7.15) | 77 (6.05) | 22 (19.64) | 154 (11.12) | 131 (10.29) | 23 (20.54) | 219 (15.81) | 192 (15.08) | 27 (24.11) | 78 (5.63) | 63 (4.95) | 15 (13.39) |
| 2016 | 1374 | 1269 | 105 | 83 (6.04) | 61 (4.81) | 22 (20.95) | 157 (11.43) | 127 (10.01) | 30 (28.57) | 206 (14.99) | 176 (13.87) | 30 (28.57) | 53 (3.86) | 40 (3.15) | 13 (12.38) |
| 2017 | 1248 | 1177 | 71 | 48 (3.85) | 39 (3.31) | 9 (12.68) | 117 (9.38) | 105 (8.92) | 12 (16.90) | 162 (12.98) | 149 (12.66) | 13 (18.31) | 28 (2.24) | 23 (1.95) | 5 (7.04) |
| 合计 | 7443 | 6854 | 589 | 447 (6.01) | 331 (4.83) | 116 (19.69) | 849 (11.41) | 689 (10.05) | 160 (27.16) | 1172 (15.75) | 1018 (14.85) | 154 (26.15) | 343 (4.61) | 259 (3.78) | 84 (14.26) |
| 7.777 | 3.589 | 2.393 | 7.221 | 2.163 | 6.621 | 9.260 | 6.436 | 1.812 | 20.562 | 13.070 | 5.134 | ||||
| P值 | 0.005 | 0.058 | 0.122 | 0.007 | 0.141 | 0.010 | 0.002 | 0.011 | 0.178 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.024 | |||
| 耐药类型 | 合计 | 初治 | 复治 | χ2值 | P值 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 株数 | 耐药率(%) | 株数 | 耐药率(%) | 株数 | 耐药率(%) | |||
| 单耐药 | 884 | 11.88 | 808 | 11.79 | 76 | 12.90 | 0.644 | 0.422 |
| R | 38 | 0.51 | 27 | 0.39 | 11 | 1.87 | - | 0.000 |
| H | 218 | 2.93 | 190 | 2.77 | 28 | 4.75 | 7.492 | 0.006 |
| S | 585 | 7.86 | 549 | 8.01 | 36 | 6.11 | 2.698 | 0.101 |
| E | 43 | 0.58 | 42 | 0.61 | 1 | 0.17 | - | 0.256 |
| 耐2种药 | 316 | 4.25 | 273 | 3.98 | 43 | 7.30 | 14.683 | 0.000 |
| R+H | 35 | 0.47 | 28 | 0.41 | 7 | 1.19 | - | 0.018 |
| R+S | 22 | 0.31 | 6 | 0.23 | 6 | 1.02 | - | 0.006 |
| R+E | 8 | 0.11 | 8 | 0.12 | 0 | 0.00 | - | 1.000 |
| H+S | 226 | 3.04 | 199 | 2.90 | 27 | 4.58 | 5.203 | 0.023 |
| H+E | 13 | 0.17 | 10 | 0.15 | 3 | 0.51 | - | 0.078 |
| S+E | 12 | 0.16 | 12 | 0.18 | 0 | 0.00 | - | 0.616 |
| 耐3种药 | 165 | 2.22 | 133 | 1.94 | 32 | 5.43 | 30.519 | 0.000 |
| R+H+S | 98 | 1.32 | 82 | 1.20 | 16 | 2.72 | 9.646 | 0.002 |
| R+H+E | 38 | 0.51 | 27 | 0.39 | 11 | 1.87 | - | 0.000 |
| R+S+E | 8 | 0.11 | 7 | 0.10 | 1 | 0.17 | - | 0.480 |
| H+S+E | 21 | 0.28 | 17 | 0.25 | 4 | 0.68 | - | 0.079 |
| 耐4种药 | ||||||||
| R+H+S+E | 200 | 2.69 | 136 | 1.98 | 64 | 10.87 | 163.623 | 0.000 |
| 耐药 | 1565 | 21.03 | 1350 | 19.70 | 215 | 36.50 | 92.256 | 0.000 |
| 耐多药 | 371 | 4.98 | 273 | 3.98 | 98 | 16.64 | 183.415 | 0.000 |
| 多耐药 | 310 | 4.16 | 269 | 3.92 | 41 | 6.96 | 12.527 | 0.000 |
| 任意耐R | 447 | 6.01 | 311 | 4.83 | 116 | 19.69 | 212.318 | 0.000 |
| 任意耐H | 849 | 11.41 | 689 | 10.05 | 160 | 27.16 | 157.167 | 0.000 |
| 任意耐S | 1172 | 15.75 | 1018 | 14.85 | 154 | 26.15 | 52.142 | 0.000 |
| 任意耐E | 343 | 4.61 | 259 | 3.78 | 84 | 14.26 | 135.580 | 0.000 |
| 变量 | 总例数 | 耐药结核病 | 耐多药结核病 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 患者例数 | 率(%) | χ2值 | P值 | 患者例数 | 率(%) | χ2值 | P值 | ||
| 年龄组(岁) | 55.201 | <0.001 | 32.024 | <0.001 | |||||
| 15~ | 1541 | 309 | 20.05 | 61 | 3.96 | ||||
| 25~ | 1687 | 372 | 22.05 | 96 | 5.69 | ||||
| 35~ | 895 | 206 | 23.02 | 45 | 5.03 | ||||
| 45~ | 963 | 243 | 25.23 | 70 | 7.27 | ||||
| 55~ | 1024 | 244 | 23.83 | 62 | 6.05 | ||||
| 65~104 | 1333 | 191 | 14.33 | 37 | 2.78 | ||||
| 性别 | 0.034 | 0.855 | 0.045 | 0.832 | |||||
| 男 | 5532 | 1166 | 21.08 | 274 | 4.95 | ||||
| 女 | 1911 | 399 | 20.88 | 97 | 5.08 | ||||
| 户籍 | 1.855 | 0.173 | 0.163 | 0.687 | |||||
| 本市人口 | 3395 | 690 | 20.32 | 173 | 5.10 | ||||
| 流动人口 | 4048 | 875 | 21.62 | 198 | 4.89 | ||||
| 治疗史 | 92.256 | <0.001 | 183.415 | <0.001 | |||||
| 初治 | 6854 | 1350 | 19.70 | 273 | 3.98 | ||||
| 复治 | 589 | 215 | 36.50 | 98 | 16.64 | ||||
| 合计 | 7443 | 1565 | 21.03 | 371 | 4.98 | ||||
| 参数 | 耐药结核病 | 耐多药结核病 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β值 | s | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR(95%CI)值 | β值 | s | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR(95%CI)值 | |
| 常量 | -1.390 | 0.098 | 200.440 | <0.001 | -3.069 | 0.190 | 261.804 | <0.001 | ||
| 年龄组(岁) | ||||||||||
| 25~ | 0.087 | 0.087 | 0.994 | 0.319 | 1.091 (0.920~1.294) | 0.280 | 0.170 | 2.728 | 0.099 | 1.323 (0.949~1.844) |
| 35~ | 0.118 | 0.103 | 1.321 | 0.250 | 1.126 (0.920~1.377) | 0.070 | 0.205 | 0.115 | 0.735 | 1.072 (0.717~1.603) |
| 45~ | 0.193 | 0.102 | 3.559 | 0.059 | 1.212 (0.993~1.481) | 0.337 | 0.191 | 3.110 | 0.078 | 1.400 (0.963~2.035) |
| 55~ | 0.098 | 0.106 | 0.856 | 0.355 | 1.103 (0.896~1.359) | 0.068 | 0.204 | 0.110 | 0.741 | 1.070 (0.717~1.597) |
| 65~104 | -0.543 | 0.113 | 23.036 | <0.001 | 0.581 (0.466~0.725) | -0.797 | 0.235 | 11.538 | 0.001 | 0.451 (0.285~0.714) |
| 性别 | -0.002 | 0.067 | 0.001 | 0.979 | 0.998 (0.875~1.138) | -0.088 | 0.126 | 0.487 | 0.485 | 0.916 (0.716~1.172) |
| 户籍 | -0.019 | 0.068 | 0.079 | 0.779 | 0.981 (0.859~1.121) | -0.163 | 0.126 | 1.681 | 0.195 | 0.850 (0.664~1.087) |
| 治疗史 | 0.904 | 0.093 | 93.722 | <0.001 | 2.469 (2.056~2.964) | 1.636 | 0.132 | 153.545 | <0.001 | 5.135 (3.964~6.652) |
| [1] | World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2019. Genenva:World Health Organization, 2019. |
| [2] |
李静, 张阳奕, 武洁 , 等. 2007—2012年上海市结核病耐药趋势分析. 中国防痨杂志, 2014,36(1):25-30.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2014.01.006 URL |
| [3] | Zhu L, Yang YZ, Guan HY , et al. Trends in drug-resistant tuberculosis after the implementation of the DOTS strategy in Shenzhen, China, 2000—2013. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 2017,21(7):759-765. |
| [4] | He XC, Tao NN, Liu Y , et al. Epidemiological trends and outcomes of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in Shandong, China. BMC Infect Dis, 2017,17(1):555. |
| [5] | Zhou M, Liu S, Li Q , et al. Drug resistance characteristics of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates between 2014 and 2017 in Sichuan, China: A retrospective study. PLoS One, 2018,13(12):e209902. |
| [6] | 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. WS 196—2017结核病分类. 2017-11-09. |
| [7] | 赵雁林, 逄宇 . 结核病实验室检验规程. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2015: 59-65. |
| [8] | 全国第五次结核病流行病学抽样调查技术指导组, 全国第五次结核病流行病学抽样调查办公室. 2010年全国第五次结核病流行病学抽样调查报告. 中国防痨杂志, 2012,34(8):485-508. |
| [9] | Mustazzolu A, Borroni E, Cirillo DM , et al. Trend in rifampicin-, multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in Italy, 2009-2016. Eur Respir J , 2018,52(1).pii: 1800070. |
| [10] | 于梅, 车洋, 平国华 , 等. 2007年至2010年宁波市结核病耐药趋势及影响因素. 中华传染病杂志, 2012,30(1):48-52. |
| [11] | 王宝英, 孙强, 张健 , 等. 秦皇岛市结核病患者一线抗结核药物的耐药性调查. 临床肺科杂志, 2019,24(8):1454-1458. |
| [12] | 龚德华, 李艳红, 万燕萍 , 等. 2013—2016年湖南省耐多药结核病疫情特征. 中国感染控制杂志, 2017,16(8):708-713. |
| [13] | Li Q, Zhao G, Wu L , et al. Prevalence and patterns of drug resistance among pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Hangzhou, China. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control, 2018,7:61. |
| [14] | Zhao Y, Zhao B, Xu S , et al. National survey of drug-resis-tant tuberculosis in China. N Engl J Med, 2012,366(23):2161-2170. |
| [15] | Yang C, Luo T, Shen X , et al. Transmission of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Shanghai, China: a retrospective observational study using whole-genome sequencing and epidemiological investigation. Lancet Infect Dis, 2017,17(3):275-284. |
| [16] | Nsofor CA, Jiang Q, Wu J , et al. Transmission is a Noticeable Cause of Resistance Among Treated Tuberculosis Patients in Shanghai, China. Scientific Reports, 2017,7(1):7691. |
| [17] |
徐飚 . 强化耐多药患者诊治管理控制耐多药结核病流行. 中国防痨杂志, 2016,38(4):245-247.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2016.04.001 URL |
| [18] | 陈诚, 李仁忠, 陈明亭 , 等. 全国结核病流行病学抽样调查及各省耐药监测中耐药结核病疫情. 疾病监测, 2013,28(4):265-268. |
| [19] | Allix-Béguec C, Arandjelovic I, Bi L , et al. Prediction of Susceptibility to First-Line Tuberculosis Drugs by DNA Sequencing. N Engl J Med, 2018,379(15):1403-1415. |
| [20] | Gygli SM, Keller PM, Ballif M , et al. Whole-Genome Sequencing for Drug Resistance Profile Prediction in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2019,63(4).pii:e02175-18. |
| [21] | Walker TM, Kohl TA, Omar SV , et al. Whole-genome sequencing for prediction of Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug susceptibility and resistance: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis, 2015,15(10):1193-1202. |
| [22] | Jones JM, Armstrong LR . Delayed and Unreported Drug-Susceptibility Testing Results in the US National Tuberculosis Surveillance System,1993-2014. Public Health Rep, 2017,132(4):480-487. |
| [23] | 白大鹏, 孔伟利, 张丽霞 . 2006—2017年天津市结核分枝杆菌耐药性分析. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2019,29(3):346-350. |
| [1] | Yan Yueming, Chen Meng, Li Xuekui, Wang Zhongdong, Sun Haiyan, Dai Xiaoqi, Song Song, Xu Honghong, Zhang Menghan, Wang Zhi, Lyu Kunzheng. Prevalence and influencing factors of latent tuberculosis infection among elderly residents in nursing homes in Qingdao [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(9): 1148-1153. |
| [2] | Zhu Tingting, Wang Mingzhe, Zulikatiayi Abudula, Gulina Badeerhan, Kaideliyan Abuduwaili, Wang Le. Preliminary analysis of the construction of mouse models infected with Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Mycobacterium tuberculosis CAS lineage and H37Rv standard strain [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(9): 1187-1195. |
| [3] | Zhang Xiaoke, Chen Ling. Research progress on the anti-tuberculosis effect and mechanism of cinnamaldehyde on Mycobacterium tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(9): 1220-1226. |
| [4] | Chen Liyao, Peng Xiao, Liu Yuanyuan, Shi Jin, Guo Yongli, Lu Jie. The molecular mechanisms of ferroptosis and their potential applications in the diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(9): 1227-1232. |
| [5] | Zhang Ye, Liang Wenwen, Huo Chenchao, Shi Jinghua, Qi Xianglong, Cheng Kai, Lu Yu, Xu Jian. Synergistic effect of zuclopenthixol on the anti-tuberculosis activity of clofazimine and its mechanism of action on MmpL5-MmpS5 [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(8): 1023-1030. |
| [6] | Fan Ruifang, Dai Xiaowei, Yang Xinyu, Chen Shuangshuang, Chen Hao, Yu Lan, Zhao Yanfeng, Li Chuanyou, Wang Nenhan. A study on the identification of Mycobacterium species using fluorescent PCR probe melting curve technique and DNA microarray chip technique [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(8): 1031-1037. |
| [7] | Tuberculosis Control Branch of Chinese Antituberculosis Association, Standardization Professional Branch of Chinese Antituberculosis Association, Elderly Tuberculosis Control Branch of Chinese Antituberculosis Association. Expert consensus on the application of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection detection technologies [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(7): 813-829. |
| [8] | Zheng Zhuangbin, Bi Lijun, Zhang Liqun. Study on the interaction between Mycobacterium tuberculosis membrane protein MmpS5/MmpL5 and bedaquiline [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(7): 884-892. |
| [9] | Chen Shuangshuang, Wang Nenhan, Zhao Yanfeng, Fan Ruifang, Tian Lili, Chen Hao, Luo Ping, Li Jie, Li Chuanyou, Dai Xiaowei. Application value of MeltPro two-step method in tuberculosis diagnosis and drug resistance screening [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(7): 893-900. |
| [10] | Ou Xichao, Teng Chong, Song Yuanyuan, Zheng Yang, Chen Lei, Zhu Jun, Wang Jianguo, Pan Zhaobao, Kang Haitao, Wang Yan, Yao Hongyan, Huang Fei. Multicenter evaluation study on the application of a novel PCR fluorescence probe technology for early diagnosis of tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(6): 687-693. |
| [11] | Xie Zhongyao, Zhang Muli, Cao Tingming, Cao Yang, Sun Zhaogang. Research on the diagnostic value of specific ligand protein SMAD2-based detection method for active tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(6): 694-700. |
| [12] | Zhao Yanfeng, Tu Xia, Wang Nenhan, Chen Shuangshuang, Tian Lili, Fan Ruifang, Yu Lan, Li Jie, Li Chuanyou, Dai Xiaowei. Contribution analysis of three diagnostic methods in the etiological detection of pulmonary tuberculosis patients [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(6): 701-707. |
| [13] | Gu Yuzhen, Chen Siyi, Huang Hairong, Yu Xia. Evaluation of in vitro activity of lefamulin against mycobacteria [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(6): 732-737. |
| [14] | Shi Xiaojing, Guo Jianhua, Wang Xin, Zhao Qingran, Wang Yuhan. A study on the acceptance of preventive treatment and its influencing factors among latent tuberculosis infectors in Shijiazhuang City [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(6): 746-752. |
| [15] | Wei Xiaorui, Yu Zeyang, Yang Kun, Zhou Ke, Huang Fang, Liu Hao, Bai Lu, Liu Jiayun. Expression of liver kinase B1 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected individuals and its correlation with interferon-γ [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(6): 779-784. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
京公网安备11010202007215号
Total visitors: Visitors of today: Now online:
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.