Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis ›› 2018, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (10): 1099-1109.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2018.10.014
• Editorial • Previous Articles Next Articles
Jie XU1,Zhao-cai WANG4,Yin-yin XIA2,Can-you ZHANG2,Jin-ming ZHAO5,Hui-juan CHEN6,Xiao DONG7,Guo-feng YANG8,Hui-hui LIU3,(),Jun CHENG2,(
)
Received:
2018-05-14
Online:
2018-10-10
Published:
2018-10-18
Contact:
Hui-hui LIU,Jun CHENG
E-mail:liuhh@chinacdc.cn;chengjun@chinacdc.cn
Jie XU,Zhao-cai WANG,Yin-yin XIA,Can-you ZHANG,Jin-ming ZHAO,Hui-juan CHEN,Xiao DONG,Guo-feng YANG,Hui-hui LIU,Jun CHENG. Investigations on willingness of anti-tuberculosis treatment in the cases diagnosed by active finding and impacts after interventions in provinces of China with a high prevalence of tuberculosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2018, 40(10): 1099-1109. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2018.10.014
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.zgflzz.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2018.10.014
人口学特征 | 青海 | 贵州 | 广西 | 西藏 | 新疆 | 合计 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
例数 | 构成比 (%) | 例数 | 构成比 (%) | 例数 | 构成比 (%) | 例数 | 构成比 (%) | 例数 | 构成比 (%) | ||
性别 | |||||||||||
男 | 25 | 25.51 | 25 | 25.51 | 15 | 15.31 | 15 | 15.31 | 18 | 18.36 | 98 |
女 | 9 | 17.65 | 14 | 27.45 | 8 | 15.69 | 6 | 11.76 | 14 | 27.45 | 51 |
年龄(岁) | |||||||||||
<65 | 4 | 9.76 | 15 | 36.58 | 4 | 9.76 | 15 | 36.58 | 3 | 7.32 | 41 |
≥65 | 30 | 27.78 | 24 | 22.22 | 19 | 17.59 | 6 | 5.56 | 29 | 26.85 | 108 |
诊断类别 | |||||||||||
病原学阳性 | 12 | 40.00 | 3 | 10.00 | 3 | 10.00 | 3 | 10.00 | 9 | 30.00 | 30 |
病原学阴性 | 22 | 18.49 | 36 | 30.25 | 20 | 16.80 | 18 | 15.13 | 23 | 19.33 | 119 |
居住地 | |||||||||||
城市 | 2 | 100.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 2 |
农村 | 32 | 21.77 | 39 | 26.53 | 23 | 15.64 | 21 | 14.29 | 32 | 21.77 | 147 |
文化程度 | |||||||||||
文盲或半文盲 | 23 | 35.94 | 7 | 10.94 | 7 | 10.94 | 15 | 23.43 | 12 | 18.75 | 64 |
小学 | 9 | 12.50 | 32 | 44.44 | 13 | 18.06 | 6 | 8.33 | 12 | 16.67 | 72 |
初中及以上 | 2 | 15.38 | 0 | 0.00 | 3 | 23.08 | 0 | 0.00 | 8 | 61.54 | 13 |
医保形式 | |||||||||||
农村合作医疗 | 29 | 20.42 | 39 | 27.46 | 21 | 14.79 | 21 | 14.79 | 32 | 22.54 | 142 |
其他医保形式 | 5 | 71.43 | 0 | 0.00 | 2 | 28.57 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 7 |
合计 | 34 | 22.82 | 39 | 26.17 | 23 | 15.44 | 21 | 14.09 | 32 | 21.48 | 149 |
时间点 意愿及原因 | 青海 | 贵州 | 广西 | 西藏 | 新疆 | 合计 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
健康教育前 | ||||||
愿意纳入治疗 | 21(17.95) | 38(32.48) | 16(13.67) | 19(16.24) | 23(19.66) | 117 |
不愿意纳入治疗 | 13(40.62) | 1(3.12) | 7(21.88) | 2(6.25) | 9(28.13) | 32 |
不知道免费政策 | 1(16.67) | 1(16.67) | 0(0.00) | 1(16.67) | 3(50.00) | 6 |
没有明显症状 | 3(33.33) | 0(0.00) | 4(44.45) | 0(0.00) | 2(22.22) | 9 |
无法承担费用 | 2(25.00) | 0(0.00) | 3(37.50) | 0(0.00) | 3(37.50) | 8 |
身体原因 | 4(100.00) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 4 |
不良反应 | 2(50.00) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 1(25.00) | 1(25.00) | 4 |
距离远 | 1(100.00) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 1 |
10min健康教育后 | ||||||
愿意纳入治疗 | 24(18.90) | 39(30.71) | 17(13.38) | 20(15.75) | 27(21.26) | 127 |
不愿意纳入治疗 | 10(45.45) | 0(0.00) | 6(27.27) | 1(4.55) | 5(22.73) | 22 |
没有明显症状 | 3(37.50) | 0(0.00) | 3(37.50) | 0(0.00) | 2(25.00) | 8 |
无法承担费用 | 1(14.28) | 0(0.00) | 3(42.86) | 0(0.00) | 3(42.86) | 7 |
身体原因 | 4(100.00) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 4 |
不良反应 | 1(50.00) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 1(50.00) | 0(0.00) | 2 |
距离远 | 1(100.00) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 1 |
人口学特征 | 患者 例数 | 接受治疗意愿等级 | Z值 | P值 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10min健康教育后 无治疗意愿 | 10min健康教育后 有治疗意愿 | 诊断后即有 治疗意愿 | ||||||||
省份 | 18.30 | 0.001 | ||||||||
青海 | 34 | 10(29.41) | 3(8.82) | 21(61.77) | ||||||
贵州 | 39 | 0(0.00) | 1(2.56) | 38(97.44) | ||||||
广西 | 23 | 6(26.09) | 1(4.35) | 16(69.56) | ||||||
西藏 | 21 | 1(4.76) | 1(4.76) | 19(90.48) | ||||||
新疆 | 32 | 5(15.62) | 4(12.50) | 23(71.88) | ||||||
诊断类别 | -2.65 | 0.008 | ||||||||
病原学阳性 | 30 | 1(3.33) | 0(0.00) | 29(96.67) | ||||||
病原学阴性 | 119 | 21(17.65) | 10(8.40) | 88(73.95) | ||||||
性别 | -0.86 | 0.391 | ||||||||
男 | 98 | 13(13.27) | 6(6.12) | 79(80.61) | ||||||
女 | 51 | 9(17.65) | 4(7.84) | 38(74.51) | ||||||
年龄(岁) | -3.05 | 0.002 | ||||||||
≥65 | 108 | 21(19.45) | 9(8.33) | 78(72.22) | ||||||
<65 | 41 | 1(2.44) | 1(2.44) | 39(95.12) | ||||||
居住地 | 1.09 | 0.274 | ||||||||
城市 | 2 | 1(50.00) | 0(0.00) | 1(50.00) | ||||||
农村 | 147 | 21(14.29) | 10(6.80) | 116(78.91) | ||||||
人口学特征 | 患者 例数 | 接受治疗意愿等级 | Z值 | P值 | ||||||
10min健康教育后 无治疗意愿 | 10min健康教育后 有治疗意愿 | 诊断后即有 治疗意愿 | ||||||||
文化程度 | 0.83 | 0.660 | ||||||||
文盲或半文盲 | 64 | 8(12.50) | 4(6.25) | 52(81.25) | ||||||
小学 | 72 | 12(16.67) | 4(5.55) | 56(77.78) | ||||||
初中及以上 | 13 | 2(15.38) | 2(15.38) | 9(69.24) | ||||||
交通方式 | 10.42 | 0.064 | ||||||||
步行 | 15 | 5(33.33) | 2(13.33) | 8(53.34) | ||||||
电动车或自行车 | 20 | 4(20.00) | 0(0.00) | 16(80.00) | ||||||
公交车 | 59 | 4(6.78) | 3(5.08) | 52(88.14) | ||||||
出租车或私家车 | 28 | 5(17.86) | 3(10.71) | 20(71.43) | ||||||
搭便车 | 20 | 2(10.00) | 2(10.00) | 16(80.00) | ||||||
调查点接送 | 7 | 2(28.57) | 0(0.00) | 5(71.43) | ||||||
往返时间(min) | -2.76 | 0.006 | ||||||||
≤30 | 83 | 7(8.43) | 4(4.82) | 72(86.75) | ||||||
>30 | 66 | 15(22.73) | 6(9.09) | 45(68.18) | ||||||
年自付医疗费用(元) | 2.15 | 0.341 | ||||||||
<500 | 68 | 8(11.77) | 4(5.88) | 56(82.35) | ||||||
500~ | 53 | 10(18.87) | 5(9.43) | 38(71.70) | ||||||
>3000 | 28 | 4(14.29) | 1(3.57) | 23(82.14) | ||||||
家庭人均年收入(元) | 0.06 | 0.970 | ||||||||
<1000 | 40 | 4(10.00) | 5(12.50) | 31(77.50) | ||||||
1000~ | 54 | 8(14.81) | 3(5.56) | 43(79.63) | ||||||
>3000 | 55 | 10(18.18) | 2(3.64) | 43(78.18) |
影响因素 | 患者 例数 | 愿意接受治疗 | 不愿意接受治疗 | χ2值 | P值 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
例数 | 构成比(%) | 例数 | 构成比(%) | ||||
省份 | 19.45 | 0.000 | |||||
贵州 | 39 | 38 | 97.44 | 1 | 2.56 | ||
青海 | 34 | 21 | 61.76 | 13 | 38.24 | ||
广西 | 23 | 16 | 69.57 | 7 | 30.43 | ||
西藏 | 21 | 19 | 90.48 | 2 | 9.52 | ||
新疆 | 32 | 23 | 71.88 | 9 | 28.12 | ||
诊断类别 | 7.33 | 0.007 | |||||
病原学阳性 | 30 | 29 | 96.67 | 1 | 3.33 | ||
病原学阴性 | 119 | 88 | 73.95 | 31 | 26.05 | ||
性别 | 0.74 | 0.389 | |||||
男 | 98 | 79 | 80.61 | 19 | 19.39 | ||
女 | 51 | 38 | 74.51 | 13 | 25.49 | ||
年龄(岁) | 9.24 | 0.002 | |||||
<65 | 41 | 39 | 95.12 | 2 | 4.88 | ||
≥65 | 108 | 78 | 72.22 | 30 | 27.78 | ||
居住地 | -a | 0.385 | |||||
城市 | 2 | 1 | 50.00 | 1 | 50.00 | ||
农村 | 147 | 116 | 78.91 | 31 | 21.09 | ||
文化程度 | 0.97 | 0.615 | |||||
文盲/半文盲 | 64 | 52 | 81.25 | 12 | 18.75 | ||
小学 | 72 | 56 | 77.78 | 16 | 22.22 | ||
初中及以上 | 13 | 9 | 69.23 | 4 | 30.77 | ||
交通方式 | 10.08 | 0.059 | |||||
步行 | 15 | 8 | 53.33 | 7 | 46.67 | ||
电动车/自行车 | 20 | 16 | 80.00 | 4 | 20.00 | ||
公交车 | 59 | 52 | 88.14 | 7 | 11.86 | ||
出租车/私家车 | 27 | 19 | 70.37 | 8 | 29.63 | ||
搭便车 | 21 | 17 | 80.95 | 4 | 19.05 | ||
调查点接送 | 7 | 5 | 71.43 | 2 | 28.57 | ||
往返时间(min) | 7.51 | 0.006 | |||||
≤30 | 83 | 72 | 86.75 | 11 | 13.25 | ||
>30 | 66 | 45 | 68.18 | 21 | 31.82 | ||
年自付医疗费用(元) | 2.27 | 0.321 | |||||
<500 | 68 | 56 | 82.35 | 12 | 17.65 | ||
500~ | 53 | 38 | 71.70 | 15 | 28.30 | ||
>3000 | 28 | 23 | 82.14 | 5 | 17.86 | ||
家庭人均年收入(元) | 0.03 | 0.983 | |||||
<1000 | 13 | 10 | 76.92 | 3 | 23.08 | ||
1000~ | 81 | 64 | 79.01 | 17 | 20.99 | ||
>3000 | 55 | 43 | 78.18 | 12 | 21.82 |
影响因素 | β值 | s | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR(95%CI)值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
省份 | |||||
青海 | 3.15 | 1.12 | 7.91 | 0.005 | 23.43(2.60~211.02) |
广西 | 2.53 | 1.15 | 4.88 | 0.027 | 12.55(1.33~118.55) |
西藏 | 1.81 | 1.33 | 1.85 | 0.174 | 6.12(0.45~83.47) |
新疆 | 2.52 | 1.12 | 5.04 | 0.025 | 12.44(1.38~112.36) |
病原学诊断阴性 | 3.20 | 1.08 | 8.86 | 0.003 | 24.56(2.98~202.30) |
年龄≥65岁 | 1.96 | 0.85 | 5.37 | 0.021 | 7.11(1.35~37.35) |
往返医院所需时间>30min | 1.22 | 0.49 | 6.13 | 0.010 | 3.39(1.29~8.93) |
影响因素 | 患者 例数 | 愿意接受治疗 | 不愿意接受治疗 | χ2值 | P值 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
例数 | 构成比(%) | 例数 | 构成比(%) | |||||||||||
省份 | 18.13 | <0.001 | ||||||||||||
贵州 | 39 | 39 | 100.00 | 0 | 0.00 | |||||||||
青海 | 34 | 24 | 70.59 | 10 | 29.41 | |||||||||
广西 | 23 | 17 | 73.91 | 6 | 26.09 | |||||||||
西藏 | 21 | 20 | 95.24 | 1 | 4.76 | |||||||||
新疆 | 32 | 27 | 84.38 | 5 | 15.62 | |||||||||
诊断类别 | -a | 0.079 | ||||||||||||
病原学阳性 | 30 | 29 | 96.67 | 1 | 3.33 | |||||||||
病原学阴性 | 119 | 98 | 82.35 | 21 | 17.65 | |||||||||
性别 | 0.51 | 0.474 | ||||||||||||
男 | 98 | 85 | 86.73 | 13 | 13.27 | |||||||||
女 | 51 | 42 | 82.35 | 9 | 17.65 | |||||||||
年龄(岁) | 6.83 | 0.009 | ||||||||||||
<65 | 41 | 40 | 97.56 | 1 | 2.44 | |||||||||
≥65 | 108 | 87 | 80.56 | 21 | 19.44 | |||||||||
居住地 | -a | 0.274 | ||||||||||||
城市 | 2 | 1 | 50.00 | 1 | 50.00 | |||||||||
农村 | 147 | 126 | 85.71 | 21 | 14.29 | |||||||||
文化程度 | 0.47 | 0.790 | ||||||||||||
文盲/半文盲 | 64 | 56 | 87.50 | 8 | 12.50 | |||||||||
小学 | 72 | 60 | 83.33 | 12 | 16.67 | |||||||||
初中及以上 | 13 | 11 | 84.62 | 2 | 15.38 | |||||||||
交通方式 | 9.66 | 0.060 | ||||||||||||
步行 | 15 | 10 | 66.67 | 5 | 33.33 | |||||||||
电动车/自行车 | 20 | 16 | 80.00 | 4 | 20.00 | |||||||||
公交车 | 59 | 55 | 93.22 | 4 | 6.78 | |||||||||
出租车/私家车 | 27 | 22 | 81.48 | 5 | 18.52 | |||||||||
搭便车 | 21 | 19 | 90.48 | 2 | 9.52 | |||||||||
调查点接送 | 7 | 5 | 71.43 | 2 | 28.57 | |||||||||
影响因素 | 患者 例数 | 愿意接受治疗 | 不愿意接受治疗 | χ2值 | P值 | |||||||||
例数 | 构成比(%) | 例数 | 构成比(%) | |||||||||||
往返时间(min) | 5.97 | 0.015 | ||||||||||||
≤30 | 83 | 76 | 91.57 | 7 | 8.43 | |||||||||
>30 | 66 | 51 | 77.27 | 15 | 22.73 | |||||||||
年自付医疗费用(元) | 1.20 | 0.549 | ||||||||||||
<500 | 68 | 60 | 88.24 | 8 | 11.76 | |||||||||
500~ | 53 | 43 | 81.13 | 10 | 18.87 | |||||||||
>3000 | 28 | 24 | 85.71 | 4 | 14.29 | |||||||||
家庭人均年收入(元) | 0.89 | 0.641 | ||||||||||||
<1000 | 13 | 11 | 84.62 | 2 | 15.38 | |||||||||
1000~ | 81 | 71 | 87.65 | 10 | 12.35 | |||||||||
>3000 | 55 | 45 | 81.82 | 10 | 18.18 |
[1] | World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2015[EB/OL]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2015( 2015- 10- 29)[2018-06-06]. . |
[2] |
谭国超, 徐春娟, 马纪龙 , 等. 我国西部汉族人IL-10基因多态性与肺结核易感性的相关性研究. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2016,9(1):56-59.
doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2016.01.013 URL |
[3] |
李新旭, 张慧, 姜世闻 , 等. 2010年中国肺结核患病情况地理分布的研究. 中华流行病学杂志, 2013,34(10):980-984.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2013.10.009 URL |
[4] | 赵锦明 . 广西平果县肺结核主动发现策略实施效果研究. 南宁:广西医科大学, 2015. |
[5] | den Boon S, Verver S, Lombard CJ , et al. Comparison of symptoms and treatment outcomes between actively and passively detected tuberculosis cases: the additional value of active case finding. Epidemiol Infect, 2008,136(10):1342-1349. |
[6] | Santha T, Renu G, Frieden TR , et al. Are community surveys to detect tuberculosis in high prevalence areas useful? Results of a comparative study from Tiruvallur District, South India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 2003,7(3):258-265. |
[7] | Kranzer K, Lawn SD, Meyer-Rath G , et al. Feasibility, yield, and cost of active tuberculosis case finding linked to a mobile HIV service in Cape Town, South Africa: a cross-sectional study. PLoS Med, 2012,9(8):e1001281. |
[8] | 沈学枝 . 2009—2015年兵团第五师医疗机构报告肺结核情况分析. 兵团医学, 2016,48(2):58-60. |
[9] |
杨东超, 彭孝旺, 张俏红 . 喀什结防所报告肺结核患者发现队列及原因分析. 中国医学创新, 2014,11(20):59-61.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4985.2014.20.022 URL |
[10] |
李雪, 姜世闻, 高永鑫 , 等. 北京市流动人口肺结核患者确诊后未在首诊机构登记和治疗管理的原因分析. 中国防痨杂志, 2017,39(1):86-90.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2017.01.019 URL |
[11] | 山珂 . 肺结核发病空间聚集分布及影响因素研究. 济南:山东大学, 2014. |
[12] |
杜正新, 何佩贤 . 涂阴与涂阳肺结核患者发现方式及发现初期临床症状和体征的对比分析. 中国防痨杂志, 2016,38(11):940-944.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2016.11.010 URL |
[13] | 米也萨·阿迪力, 马国芳, 郑玉建 . 喀什市维吾尔族肺结核患者的“知信行”调查结果及其影响因素分析. 中国防痨杂志, 2018,40(3):307-314. |
[14] |
林媛, 谭守勇, 林兆原 , 等. 老年疑似肺结核患者临床诊断评分系统的可行性探讨. 结核病与肺部健康杂志, 2016,5(4):321-326.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-3755.2016.04.017 URL |
[15] | 黄妹宾 . 农村肺结核患者化疗依从性影响因素及护理进展. 广西中医学院学报, 2012,15(1):98-100. |
[16] |
黄敏莹, 林定文, 梁大斌 , 等. 2015年广西公众结核病防治核心信息知晓情况抽样调查. 结核病与肺部健康杂志, 2017,6(1):50-56.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-3755.2017.01.013 URL |
[17] |
李昌业, 李芳 . 日照市居民结核病防治核心信息知晓率调查研究. 结核病与肺部健康杂志, 2014,3(1):69-71.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-3755.2014.01.016 URL |
[18] |
刘二勇, 周林, 成君 , 等. 健康检查与被动就诊在肺结核患者发现中的对比研究. 中国防痨杂志, 2014,36(5):327-330.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2014.05.006 URL |
[19] |
高谦, 杨崇广 . 我国结核病近期传播与控制策略. 结核病与肺部健康杂志, 2017,6(3):193-198.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-3755.2017.03.001 URL |
[1] | Tuberculosis Control Branch of Chinese Antituberculosis Association, The Youth Branch of Chinese Antituberculosis Association, Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis. Evidence-based guidelines for application of digital adherence technology in tuberculosis medication management in China [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(4): 385-397. |
[2] | Li Jinhao, Hu Dongmei, Xu Caihong. Investigation on the willingness of tuberculosis health-care workers to implement tuberculosis preventive treatment and analysis of influencing factors [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(4): 398-407. |
[3] | Li Yuhong, Mei Jinzhou, Su Wei, Ruan Yunzhou, Liu Yushu, Zhao Yanlin, Liu Xiaoqiu. Analysis of the treatment outcomes and influencing factors of rifampicin-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis patients aged 65 and above in China from 2015 to 2021 [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(4): 408-415. |
[4] | Jiang Xue, Bai Yunlong, Ma Jianjun, An Yuan, Yang Fan, Zhao Qinglong. Status and influencing factors of diagnosis and treatment delay of rifampicin resistant pulmonary tuberculosis patients, Jilin Province, 2020—2023 [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(4): 416-424. |
[5] | Wu Xuan, Zhang Yanqiu, Xu Jiying, Meng Dan, Sun Dingyong. Analysis of factors influencing the treatment outcomes of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus in Henan Province (2019—2023) [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(4): 425-431. |
[6] | An Yuan, Bai Yunlong, Zhao Qinglong, Ma Jianjun, Jiang Xue, Pan Yan, Gao Ying, Gao Zhihui. Analysis of treatment outcomes and influencing factors of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis complicated with diabetes mellitus in Jilin Province,2018—2022 [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(4): 432-438. |
[7] | Feng Wei, Zheng Hailun, Meng Weili, Luo Ping. Analysis of under-reporting before arrival of pulmonary tuberculosis patients registered and managed by Tuberculosis Prevention and Control Institutions in Xicheng District, Beijing from 2018 to 2023 [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(4): 439-443. |
[8] | Hu Yifan, Du Boping, Wu Yadong, Zhu Chuanzhi, Zhang Lanyue, Jia Hongyan, Sun Qi, Pan Liping, Zhang Zongde, Li Zihui. Experimental study on the role of Mce4C in the uptake and utilization of cholesterol by Mycobacterium tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(4): 444-453. |
[9] | Sheng Jie, Hong Kaifeng, Mierzhati Aisha, Tang Wei, Dilixiati Abulizi. Study on the mechanism of IL-22 and p38 MAPK signaling pathways in inhibiting bone destruction in bone and joint tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(4): 454-459. |
[10] | Wang Yingchao, Liu Weiyi, Ji Xiuxiu, Shang Xuetian, Jia Hongyan, Zhang Lanyue, Sun Qi, Du Boping, Zhu Chuanzhi, Pan Liping, Zhang Zongde. Profile analysis of circRNA expression and identification of diagnostic markers in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of tuberculosis patients [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(4): 460-470. |
[11] | Zhu Mingzhi, Shao Yanqin, Fan Dapeng, Liu Libin, Mei Bin, Dai Lingshan, Cai Long. Diagnostic value of urine lipoarabinomannan antigen detection in extrapulmonary tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(4): 471-476. |
[12] | Hao Mingxiao, Mi Jie, Xu Zongyi. Effectiveness of a continuity of care model in patients with tuberculous meningitis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(4): 477-481. |
[13] | Shang Xiyu, Zhang Huifang, Cao Yuqing, Xiong Yibai, Ji Xinyu, Tian Yaxin, Li Jiajia, Wang Ni, Ma Yan. Bibliometric analysis of global research status and hotspots in the basic research of Traditional Chinese Medicine for tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(4): 482-497. |
[14] | Qin Lili, Yang Chengqing, Mai Hongzhen, Xu Qifeng, Xue Xinying, Lu Xiwei. Advances in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of post-tuberculosis chronic pulmonary aspergillosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(4): 498-504. |
[15] | Luo Li, Luo Linzi, Yin Quhua, Zhou Lei, Lu Zhibin, Ding Yan, Xiao Yangbao. Progress in bronchoscopic diagnosis and treatment of lymph node fistula tracheobronchial tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(4): 505-512. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||