Email Alert | RSS    帮助

中国防痨杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 251-254.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

《中国防痨杂志》2006—2011年间论著出版时滞的影响因素分析

范永德 薛爱华 张晓进 郭萌 杨颖   

  1. 100035 北京,《中国防痨杂志》编辑部
  • 出版日期:2013-04-10 发布日期:2013-07-02
  • 通信作者: 范永德 E-mail:fanyongde@126.com
  • 基金资助:

    Journal article; Publishing; Time; Factor analysis,statistical

Factor affecting the publication delay of articles of Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis from 2006 to 2011

FAN Yong-de, XUE Ai-hua, ZHANG Xiao-jin, GUO Meng, YANG Ying   

  1. Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, Beijing 100035,China
  • Online:2013-04-10 Published:2013-07-02
  • Contact: FAN Yong-de E-mail:fanyongde@126.com

摘要: 目的  探讨《中国防痨杂志》2006—2011年间论著出版时滞的影响因素,为提高杂志质量及深入研究杂志发展提供参考。 方法  根据收到稿件至发表的时间差计算《中国防痨杂志》2006—2011年54期708篇论著的出版时滞。根据中华人民共和国科学技术委员会《关于颁布五大类科技期刊质量要求及评估标准通知》的规定,将出版时滞<280 d的论著定为“短时滞组”,≥280 d的定为“长时滞组”。采用SAS 9.1统计软件进行统计分析。 结果 2006—2011年间论著出版平均时滞为246.67 d,论文时滞的变异系数平均为51.37%(126.71/246.67)。2006—2011年短时滞论著占61.72%(437/708),长时滞论著占38.28%(271/708)。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,影响《中国防痨杂志》论著出版时滞的影响因素为:地区(东部与中西部比较,β=0.71,sx=0.18,OR=2.04,95%CI=1.44~2.87)、控制类的论著(控制类与基础类比较,β=0.60,sx=0.20,OR=1.83,95%CI=1.23~2.72;控制类与临床类比较,β=0.52,sx =0.19,OR=1.68,95%CI=1.16~2.43)和有基金支持(是与否有基金支持比较,β=0.68,sx=0.19,OR=1.97,95%CI=1.36~2.87)。 结论  《中国防痨杂志》论著的出版时滞受地区、研究内容分类和基金支持与否的影响。

关键词: 期刊论文, 出版, 时间, 因素分析,统计学

Abstract: Objective To explore the influencing factors of delay in publication of articles (DPA) of Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis from 2006 to 2011, and to provide reference for magazine quality improvement and development.  Methods The publication delay is defined as the time difference between the receipts of the manuscript to the publication date. According to the provisions promulgated by the Science and Technology Commission of the People’s Republic of China on the quality requirements and evaluation criteria of the top-five scientific journals, the DPA less than 280 days is defined as short delay, and more than 280 days as long delay. The DPA of a total of 708 original papers published between 2006 to 2011 in 54 issues were analyzed by SAS 9.1.  Results The average DPA was 246.67 days and the coefficient of variation was 51.37%(126.71/246.67) from 2006 to 2011. Majorities were short delays accounting for 61.72%(437/708), long delay accounted for 38.28%(271/708). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that eastern region (eastern vs. middle and western β=0.71, sx=0.18,OR=2.04,95%CI=1.44-2.87), funding support (yes vs. no β=0.68, sx =0.19,OR=1.97,95%CI=1.36-2.87), public health paper (public health paper vs. basic research paper β=0.60,sx=0.20,OR=1.83,95%CI=1.23-2.72; public health paper vs. clinical paper β=0.52, sx=0.19,OR=1.68,95%CI=1.16-2.43) were factors significantly associated with the average DPA.  Conclusion The DPA of Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis is affected by the region and content of the study, and whether with funding support.