抗结核药物贝达喹啉的耐药情况及其耐药机制研究进展
Research progress on the drug resistance and mechanism of the anti-tuberculosis drug bedaquiline
通信作者:
责任编辑: 王然
收稿日期: 2022-04-12
基金资助: |
|
Corresponding authors:
Received: 2022-04-12
Fund supported: |
|
随着耐多药结核病(multidrug-resistant tuberculosis,MDR-TB)和广泛耐药结核病(extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis,XDR-TB)菌株的增多,结核分枝杆菌(Mycobacterium tuberculosis,MTB)的耐药性成为全球亟待解决的问题。贝达喹啉(bedaquiline,Bdq)作为近50年来首个明确用于MDR-TB治疗的新药,其耐药问题受到逐步关注。笔者对Bdq的耐药特征和耐药基因突变等研究进展进行综述,旨在更好指导临床用药,提高患者的治疗成功率,减少耐药的发生。
关键词:
With the increase of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) strains, drug resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) has become an urgent problem worldwide. Bedaquiline (Bdq) is the first new drug specifically in the treatment of MDR-TB in recent 50 years, and its drug resistance been gradually concerned. The research progress of drug resistance characteristics and drug resistance gene mutations of Bdq were reviewed, in order to better guide clinical medication, improve the success rate of treatment, and reduce the occurrence of drug resistance.
Keywords:
本文引用格式
姚蓉, 陆宇.
Yao Rong, Lu Yu.
开放科学(资源服务)标识码(OSID)的开放科学计划以二维码为入口,提供丰富的线上扩展功能,包括作者对论文背景的语音介绍、该研究的附加说明、与读者的交互问答、拓展学术圈等。读者“扫一扫”此二维码即可获得上述增值服务。
2020年,全球共报告耐药结核病患者157903 例,其中包括132222例耐多药结核病(multidrug-resistant tuberculosis,MDR-TB)/利福平耐药结核病(rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis,RR-TB)患者,25681例前广泛耐药结核病(pre-extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis,pre-XDR-TB)和广泛耐药结核病(extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis,XDR-TB)[1]。耐药结核病治疗周期长、治愈率低、病死率高、不良反应明显,价格昂贵。Bdq是一种新型口服二芳基喹啉类药物,通过影响腺嘌呤核苷三磷酸(adenosine triphosphate,ATP)合成酶质子泵的活性,导致ATP合成受阻,从而阻止MTB中ATP的能量供应,发挥杀菌作用[2⇓-4]。
2012年12月,Bdq成为首个获批用于治疗成人MDR-TB的新药[5], 在背景方案中纳入Bdq已被证明可以显著改善治疗结局并降低MDR-TB患者的死亡率[6-7]。截至2020年底,已有109个国家使用Bdq作为耐药结核病治疗的一部分[8]。然而,Bdq作为一种具有全新作用机制的抗结核药物,仍无法避免耐药性的出现和发展[9]。因此,有必要采取恰当的表型药物敏感性试验(phenotypic drug sensitivity test,pDST)和耐药性监测,以便最大限度地降低产生耐药性的风险,并最大程度地提高治疗的有效性。本文主要对Bdq耐药情况、可能机制、检测手段以及与临床的相关性进行综述,以提高临床对Bdq的认识,并为合理应用该药提供理论依据。
Bdq耐药现状
一、 原发性耐药情况
原发性耐药是从未接受抗结核治疗的患者对某种或某些抗结核药物发生耐药。一项基于人群的回顾性研究探索了中国台湾地区2008—2019年中从未使用过Bdq的898例MDR/RR-TB患者中的初始MTB分离株对Bdq的耐药情况。采用琼脂稀释法(agar dilution,AD)进行Bdq的药物敏感性试验(DST),发现其耐药性断点≥0.25μg/ml,故中国台湾地区的Bdq耐药率为3.1%(28/898)[10]。在这28例患者中,RR-TB、MDR-TB、pre-XDR-TB和XDR-TB患者含Bdq耐药分别占2.5%(5/202)、3.3%(20/608)、4.1%(3/74)和0.0%(0/14)[10]。2015年中国11个省份的回顾性研究纳入了1603 株既往未接触过新型抗结核药物的菌株[11],1407株(87.8%)来自新发患者,196株(12.2%)来自复治患者。检测到6 株(0.4%,6/1407)菌株对Bdq耐药,提示对Bdq有耐药性的菌株可能存在密集的社区传播。与2007年中国第一次全国耐药性监测结果一致[12],在102株MDR-TB菌株中,只有1株(1.0%)对Bdq耐药,这也是唯一对氯法齐明(Cfz)耐药的菌株[11]。中国的一项回顾性队列研究显示,277例接受Bdq治疗的患者,2.2%(6/277)MDR-TB分离株发现初始Bdq耐药,其中包括5株MDR-TB分离株和1株XDR-TB分离株[13],其基线Bdq耐药率与南非报告的数据(2.3%)相似[14],但高于法国(1.0%)[15]和俄罗斯(1.3%)[16]。因此,不同地理区域的初始Bdq耐药性可能不同。
一项为期5年(2015—2019年)涵盖11个国家的耐药性监测研究评估了5036株MDR-TB分离株的Bdq初治患者对Bdq和其他抗结核药物的敏感性[17]。7H9微量肉汤稀释法(broth microdilution,BMD)显示Bdq的耐药率为0.6%,而7H10/7H11琼脂稀释法(agar dilution,AD)提示Bdq的耐药率为0.4%。在MDR-TB人群中,Bdq和Cfz之间的表型交叉耐药率为0.4%,在pre-XDR-TB/XDR-TB人群中为1%。MDR-TB患者对Bdq和利奈唑胺(linezolid,Lzd)共同耐药率为0.1%,pre-XDR-TB/XDR-TB患者为0.2%。在未接受过Bdq治疗的人群中,Bdq的耐药率较低。
二、获得性耐药情况
获得性耐药是指抗结核治疗达到或超过1个月的患者发生的耐药。Mallick等[18]检索识别出866篇论文,最终纳入13项研究。其中,11项为队列研究(5项前瞻性研究,6项回顾性研究),2项为随机对照试验。表型和基因型获得性Bdq耐药(acquired bedaquiline resistance,ABR)的中位频率分别为2.2%和4.4%。这与Kunkel等[19]的模型估计结果一致。众所周知,并不是所有的耐药相关变异(resistance-associated variants,RAVs)都会产生耐药性[20],这在一定程度上可以解释表型和基因型ABR频率的差异。在巴基斯坦队列中,仅包括接受Bdq治疗后培养转阴延迟的患者,而其他队列包括所有最初培养阳性的患者,以及在Bdq治疗期间早期培养转阴的患者。这可能是 27.6%(表型)和 36.7%(基因型)的 ABR 频率相对较高的原因之一[21]。此外,Mokrousov等[22]检测到基因型ABR频率显著升高至50%。据估计,在既往接受过治疗的患者中,获得性耐药约占MDR-TB新发患者的38.7%[23],这些个体在复发时发生复杂耐药模式的风险可能更高。由于Bdq的半衰期较长,失访受试者发生ABR的风险特别高。因此,提高患者的依从性对预防获得性耐药至关重要。
三、Bdq与Cfz交叉耐药
Ismail等[14]发现Bdq和Cfz的MIC之间存在强相关性,当存在Rv0678 RAV时,相关性更强。这表明它们可能具有共同的生化途径进而发生交叉耐药。在Cfz耐药分离株中,30%(9/30)对Bdq耐药,而在Bdq耐药分离株中,9株(100%)均对Cfz耐药,大多数(8/9)携带Rv0678 RAV。因此,Bdq耐药性可能对Cfz产生完全交叉耐药性,而在Cfz耐药性患者中,1/3将产生交叉耐药性。RAVs的发生率可能会随着时间的推移而增加,所以,持续耐药性监测十分重要。
Bdq耐药基因突变类型
一、atpE基因突变
atpE基因编码Bdq的靶点(ATP合成酶亚基C)的第81位氨基酸。Ghodousi等[28]报告了从肺结核患者中分离的pre-XDR-TB菌株在18个月含Bdq方案治疗期间的微进化。治疗3个月内,与高水平Bdq耐药相关的atpE_Ala63Pro突变一过性出现,提示在相对较短的时间内出现耐药性扩增的风险。然而,其在含Bdq方案治疗9个月后完全消失,这可能与这种突变体的适应性成本增加有关。因此,在MDR-TB高负担国家,发展最低抑菌浓度(MIC)检测、pDST和全基因组测序(whole genome sequencing,WGS)至关重要。
大多数atpE基因突变发生于体外分离株。然而,atpE D28N、E61E、A63V和I66V各发生1株Bdq临床耐药分离株。atpE基因突变可引起MIC增加的范围从8~133倍不等[25]。
二、mmpR(Rv0678)基因突变
mmpR编码一个由165个氨基酸组成的非必需转录抑制因子,该抑制因子通过mmpS5-mmpL5泵影响Bdq的外排。Omar等[30]提到mmpR基因的非靶向突变越来越多地与Bdq耐药性相关。2015—2019年,共有7%的分离株被鉴定出对Bdq耐药。对大多数分离株(130/199)进行WGS分析,发现所有分离株均携带Rv0678突变,未发现atpE基因突变。对其余的分离株(69/199)进行了Sanger测序以鉴定Rv0678基因突变,发现所有分离株均携带Rv0678突变;未进行atpE基因测序[30]。共鉴定出297个Rv0678突变,大多数突变为插入或缺失突变。突变遍布整个基因;但是,5个密码子(46至49和67)突变在297个突变中占了114个(38%),在199株分离株中占了87株(44%)[30]。
在mmpR5中发现163个突变(116个非同义SNP、29个插入缺失和18个启动子变异),其中32个与MIC增加有关,14个与MIC无变化相关。3个SNP被翻译成终止密码子(E13*、W42*和R156*),这可能会改变蛋白质功能。此外,3个移码突变(192_193insG、193_193del、141_142insC)大量出现,均与较高的Bdq体外MIC相关[29]。
12项研究确定了66个独特的mmpR突变,突变广泛分布在密码子1~145之间。与耐药性相关最常见的突变是nt192-198处的6-鸟嘌呤均聚物的移码(Bdq 11株)或nt138-144处的低序列复杂度区域(Bdq 7株)或nt212-216(Bdq 4株)。在nt138-142和212-216的移码突变中,Bdq的MIC至少增加了8倍,但mmpR突变通常与Bdq的MIC适度增加2~4倍有关[25]。
三、pepQ基因突变
编码Xaa-Pro氨肽酶的pepQ基因突变也与低水平的Bdq耐药有关,推测可能通过外排发生。在pepQ基因中发现的120个新突变包括117个非同义SNP和3个插入缺失,其中2个导致单个分离株中的移码,这些移码可能参与pepQ基因的功能丧失[29]。
据报道,外排泵抑制剂可使pepQ突变体对Bdq的敏感性恢复到其野生型亲本的敏感性。体外进化的3个功能缺失突变(L44P和密码子14和271处的两个移码)导致Bdq和Cfz的MIC适度增加4倍[25]。
Bdq表型耐药检测
一、常规pDST检测方法
二、Bdq的MIC关键浓度
Bdq 表型耐药的关键浓度目前尚未完全确定。2018年,世界卫生组织(World Health Organization,WHO)系统地审查了Bdq pDST的可用数据,暂定7H11 琼脂比例法、分枝杆菌生长指示管法的Bdq临界浓度(critical concentration,CCs)分别为0.25μg/ml和1μg/ml[34-35]。欧洲药敏试验委员会(European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing,EUCAST)在7H10和7H11琼脂比例法中采用0.25μg/ml作为临床临界浓度(clinical breakpoint,CB)[36],高于抑制90%分离株或菌株的MIC(0.125μg/ml)。然而,有证据表明,即使DST结果在关键浓度以下仍有可能导致治疗失败[17,21,32],这可能由于关键浓度的选择以及治疗过程中菌株对药物敏感性的变化引起。
Bdq耐药与临床的相关性
一、 Bdq表型耐药与Rv0678、atpE、pepQ和Rv1979c基因突变的相关性
Ismail等[37]首次评估Bdq表型耐药与Rv0678、atpE、pepQ和Rv1979c基因突变间的关系。按照检索标准共检索到1367项研究,最终40项(2.9%)研究符合纳入要求。系统文献综述的结果证实了atpE基因突变可导致高水平的耐药[38],但证据主要来自体外和动物实验,临床病例很少。研究结果显示,Rv0678基因中突变体数量众多并分散在整个基因中,大多数SNPs、插入和缺失发生在表型敏感的临床分离株中。虽有假设pepQ和Rv1979c在Bdq耐药性发展中发挥了作用[39-40],但通过对相关数据统计分析表明其在耐药性中发挥重要作用的可能性很小[37],这项研究采用标准方法证实两个单突变体(atpE187G→C和Rv0678 138_139insG)与耐药性相关。然而,这一认知对临床不会做出实质性贡献,因为在过去13年中,临床分离株中仅报告1次atpE187G→C突变和3次Rv0678 138_139insG突变[37]。总体而言,Bdq耐药尚缺乏明确的基因型与表型关联。
二、Bdq耐药与临床结局的相关性
为监测耐药结核病患者使用Bdq期间该药耐药谱的变化,从13家研究中心的患者中收集阳性培养物,发现277例接受Bdq治疗的患者中,MDR-TB患者的初始Bdq耐药率为2.2%(6/277),5例痰培养阴转,138例在2周内痰培养阴转。另外,初始低水平Bdq耐药(0.25~0.5μg/ml)的MDR-TB患者在接受含Bdq方案治疗时可实现痰培养阴转[13],这可能是由于对这些患者给予Bdq可以克服低水平的Bdq耐药性。
南非一项Bdq耐药性监测项目收集2015—2019年间所有开始接受Bdq治疗的患者的3份痰液样本:基线样本、治疗2个月和6个月的样本,共8041例患者提交监测样本,其中2023例纳入横断面分析,695例纳入纵向分析[41]。结果显示,基线Bdq耐药率为3.8%(76/2023),这一数据略高是因为pre-XDR 或 XDR-TB患者是在发病时接受基于Bdq方案的主要人群。在无Bdq或Cfz既往暴露史的人群(1987例)或未知暴露史人群(17例)中,Bdq耐药率为3.6%(72/2023),而在既往有Bdq或Cfz暴露史的人群中,耐药率为21.1%(4/19)。这一发现表明,Bdq耐药性与既往耐药结核病治疗之间无相关性。然而,如果患者既往暴露于Bdq或Cfz,则在基线时发生Bdq耐药率更高[41]。2.3%(16/695)的患者在治疗第90天时出现治疗引起的Bdq耐药情况,预计这些患者大多发生在 pre-XDR 或 XDR-TB患者的治疗早期。所以与RR-TB患者相比,pre-XDR和XDR-TB患者Bdq耐药率显著更高。此外,服用Bdq的患者若在第2个月仍保持培养阳性或培养状态逆转,应重新检测Bdq耐药性[41]。因此,表型Bdq耐药与较差的结局相关。
总结和展望
总体而言,Bdq耐药率相对较低;然而,随着时间的推移,这一数字可能会增加。Bdq耐药的遗传基础尚未完全阐明,目前已知的耐药机制包括atpE、Rv0678和pepQ基因突变。快速检测和有效治疗是控制Bdq耐药的关键。诊断上,开发准确的分子检测方法需要深入了解Bdq耐药性相关的基因突变,但由于数据稀缺和研究异质性,目前尚不足以开发一种快速的分子检测方法。因此,为提高对Bdq表型-基因型相关性的了解,需报告全面的基因型和表型数据及治疗结局信息,特别是治疗失败的患者。治疗上,科学合理应用新型抗结核药物及设计有效的联合治疗方案将有助于减少耐药性的出现。其次,在制定方案前,对MDR-TB患者进行药物敏感性检测,有利于指导临床是否将Bdq作为其治疗方案的一部分。另外,当存在Bdq与Cfz交叉耐药的情况时,必须收集相关突变的基因组数据并重新考虑含有这两种药物的治疗方案,以降低患者治疗失败的风险和此类菌株在社区中的传播[21]。因此,充分了解Bdq的耐药特征及相应的耐药机制,以期开发Bdq耐药精准诊断方法,对于临床合理应用Bdq及减少耐药性产生至关重要。
利益冲突 所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突
作者贡献 姚蓉:数据的采集及整理、初稿撰写和修改;陆宇:研究指导、批评性审阅、文章修改
参考文献
Delayed bactericidal response of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to bedaquiline involves remodelling of bacterial metabolism
抗结核新药贝达喹啉临床应用专家共识(2020年更新版)
结核分枝杆菌贝达喹啉和氯法齐明耐药及其交叉耐药机制研究进展
The Use of Bedaquiline in the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis: Interim Policy Guidance
Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and culture conversion with bedaquiline
Bedaquiline and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic and critical analysis of the evidence
World Health Organization recommendations on the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis, 2020 update
Bedaquiline: Fallible Hope Against Drug Resistant Tuberculosis
Primary Bedaquiline Resistance Among Cases of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Taiwan
Prevalence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistant to bedaquiline and delamanid in China
Cross-sectional Whole-genome Sequencing and Epidemiological Study of Multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in China
Reduced Susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to Bedaquiline During Antituberculosis Treatment and Its Correlation With Clinical Outcomes in China
Defining Bedaquiline Susceptibility, Resistance, Cross-Resistance and Associated Genetic Determinants: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Bedaquiline (BDQ) is a novel agent approved for use in combination treatment of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). We sought to determine BDQ epidemiological cut-off values (ECVs), define and assess interpretive criteria against putative resistance associated variants (RAVs), microbiological outcomes and cross resistance with clofazimine (CFZ).A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) to BDQ were determined using 7H9 broth microdilution (BMD) and MGIT960. RAVs were genetically characterised using whole genome sequencing. BDQ ECVs were determined using ECOFFinder and compared with 6-month culture conversion status and CFZ MICs.A total of 391 isolates were analysed. Susceptible and intermediate categories were determined to have MICs of ≤0.125μg/ml and 0.25μg/ml using BMD and ≤1μg/ml and 2μg/ml using MGIT960 respectively. Microbiological failures occurred among BDQ exposed patients with a non-susceptible BDQ MIC, an Rv0678 mutation and ≤2 active drug classes. The Rv0678 RAVs were not the dominant mechanism of CFZ resistance and cross resistance was limited to isolates with an Rv0678 mutation.Criteria for BDQ susceptibility are defined and will facilitate improved early detection of resistance. Cross- resistance between BDQ and CFZ is an emerging concern but in this study was primarily among those with an Rv0678 mutation.Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Rapid emergence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis bedaquiline resistance: lessons to avoid repeating past errors
Reduced susceptibility and resistance to bedaquiline in clinical M.tuberculosis isolates
Bedaquiline is an effective drug used to treat MDR and XDR tuberculosis, providing high cure rates in complex therapy. Mutations in the mmpR (rv0678) and atpE genes are associated with reduced susceptibility to bedaquiline and have been identified in both in vitro selected strains and clinical isolates. However, the phenotypic criteria used to detect bedaquiline resistance have yet to be established due to the collection of few clinical isolates from patients receiving bedaquiline-containing treatment regimens.One hundred eighty-two clinical isolates from 74 patients receiving bedaquiline and 163 isolates from 107 patients not exposed to bedaquiline were analysed. The bedaquiline MICs were tested using serial dilutions on 7H11 agar plates and the Bactec MGIT 960 system. The mmpR and atpE genes were sequenced by Sanger sequencing.The 7H11 agar method allowed for rapid discrimination between mutated and wild-type isolates and between exposed and non-exposed isolates. Seventy-three percent of bedaquiline-exposed isolates, as well as 91% of isolates with mutations, had an elevated bedaquiline MIC (≥ 0.12 mg/L on 7H11 media) compared to the reference isolates (89% had an MIC ≤ 0.03 mg/L). Previously reported in vitro-selected mutants (E61D and A63P) and novel AtpE substitutions (G25S and D28G) were observed in the clinical isolates. Substitutions in codon 63 of AtpE were likely associated with a higher bedaquiline MIC. Five new cases of pre-existing reduced susceptibility to bedaquiline, accompanied by mmpR mutations in most isolates, without a history of bedaquiline treatment were identified.Bedaquiline treatment leads to an elevated bedaquiline MIC and the acquisition of mmpR and atpE gene mutations in tuberculosis strains. The standardisation of bedaquiline phenotypic susceptibility testing is urgently needed based on observed discrepancies between our study and previous studies and differences in solid and liquid media MIC determinations.Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Bedaquiline Drug Resistance Emergence Assessment in Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB): a 5-Year Prospective In Vitro Surveillance Study of Bedaquiline and Other Second-Line Drug Susceptibility Testing in MDR-TB Isolates
Acquired bedaquiline resistance during the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review
Tradeoffs in Introduction Policies for the Anti-Tuberculosis Drug Bedaquiline: A Model-Based Analysis
Population-level emergence of bedaquiline and clofazimine resistance-associated variants among patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis in southern Africa: a phenotypic and phylogenetic analysis
Acquisition of Cross-Resistance to Bedaquiline and Clofazimine following Treatment for Tuberculosis in Pakistan
Frequent acquisition of bedaquiline resistance by epidemic extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains in Russia during long-term treatment
Burden of transmitted multidrug resistance in epidemics of tuberculosis: a transmission modelling analysis
Multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis can be acquired through de-novo mutation during tuberculosis treatment or through transmission from other individuals with active MDR tuberculosis. Understanding the balance between these two mechanisms is essential when allocating resources for MDR tuberculosis. We aimed to create a dynamic transmission model of an MDR tuberculosis epidemic to estimate the contributions of treatment-related acquisition and person-to-person transmission of resistance to incident MDR tuberculosis cases.In this modelling analysis, we constructed a dynamic transmission model of an MDR tuberculosis epidemic, allowing for both treatment-related acquisition and person-to-person transmission of resistance. We used national tuberculosis notification data to inform Bayesian estimates of the proportion of each country's 2013 MDR tuberculosis incidence that resulted from MDR transmission rather than treatment-related MDR acquisition.Global estimates of 3·5% MDR tuberculosis prevalence among new tuberculosis notifications and 20·5% among re-treatment notifications translate into an estimate that resistance transmission rather than acquisition accounts for a median 95·9% (95% uncertainty range [UR] 68·0-99·6) of all incident MDR tuberculosis, and 61·3% (16·5-95·2) of incident MDR tuberculosis in previously treated individuals. The estimated proportion of MDR tuberculosis resulting from transmission varied substantially with different countries' notification data-ranging from 48% (95% UR 30-75) in Bangladesh to 99% (91-100) in Uzbekistan. Estimates were most sensitive to estimates of the transmissibility of MDR strains, the probability of acquiring MDR during tuberculosis treatment, and the responsiveness of MDR tuberculosis to first-line treatment.Notifications of MDR prevalence from most high-burden settings are consistent with most incident MDR tuberculosis resulting from transmission rather than new treatment-related acquisition of resistance. Merely improving the treatment of drug-susceptible tuberculosis is unlikely to greatly reduce future MDR tuberculosis incidence. Improved diagnosis and treatment of MDR tuberculosis-including new tests and drug regimens-should be highly prioritised.National Institutes of Health and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Cross-resistance between clofazimine and bedaquiline through upregulation of MmpL5 in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
The antileprosy drug clofazimine is also of interest for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. To understand possible resistance mechanisms, clofazimine-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis mutants were isolated in vitro, and, unexpectedly, found to be cross-resistant to bedaquiline. Mutations in the transcriptional regulator Rv0678, with concomitant upregulation of the multisubstrate efflux pump, MmpL5, accounted for this cross-resistance. Mutation in Rv0678 should therefore be considered a confounding factor for the treatment of tuberculosis with clofazimine or bedaquiline.
Systematic review of mutations associated with resistance to the new and repurposed Mycobacterium tuberculosis drugs bedaquiline, clofazimine, linezolid, delamanid and pretomanid
Improved genetic understanding of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) resistance to novel and repurposed anti-tubercular agents can aid the development of rapid molecular diagnostics.Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, in March 2018, we performed a systematic review of studies implicating mutations in resistance through sequencing and phenotyping before and/or after spontaneous resistance evolution, as well as allelic exchange experiments. We focused on the novel drugs bedaquiline, delamanid, pretomanid and the repurposed drugs clofazimine and linezolid. A database of 1373 diverse control MTB whole genomes, isolated from patients not exposed to these drugs, was used to further assess genotype-phenotype associations.Of 2112 papers, 54 met the inclusion criteria. These studies characterized 277 mutations in the genes atpE, mmpR, pepQ, Rv1979c, fgd1, fbiABC and ddn and their association with resistance to one or more of the five drugs. The most frequent mutations for bedaquiline, clofazimine, linezolid, delamanid and pretomanid resistance were atpE A63P, mmpR frameshifts at nucleotides 192-198, rplC C154R, ddn W88* and ddn S11*, respectively. Frameshifts in the mmpR homopolymer region nucleotides 192-198 were identified in 52/1373 (4%) of the control isolates without prior exposure to bedaquiline or clofazimine. Of isolates resistant to one or more of the five drugs, 59/519 (11%) lacked a mutation explaining phenotypic resistance.This systematic review supports the use of molecular methods for linezolid resistance detection. Resistance mechanisms involving non-essential genes show a diversity of mutations that will challenge molecular diagnosis of bedaquiline and nitroimidazole resistance. Combined phenotypic and genotypic surveillance is needed for these drugs in the short term.© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Examination of bedaquiline- and linezolid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from the Moscow region
To study the isolates with acquired resistance to bedaquiline and linezolid that were obtained from patients enrolled in a clinical study of a novel therapy regimen for drug-resistant TB in Moscow, Russia.Linezolid resistance was detected using MGIT 960 with a critical concentration of 1 mg/L. The MIC of bedaquiline was determined using the proportion method. To identify genetic determinants of resistance, sequencing of the mmpR ( Rv0678 ), atpE, atpC, pepQ, Rv1979c, rrl, rplC and rplD loci was performed.A total of 85 isolates from 27 patients with acquired resistance to linezolid and reduced susceptibility to bedaquiline (MIC ≥0.06 mg/L) were tested. Most mutations associated with a high MIC of bedaquiline were found in the mmpR gene. We identified for the first time two patients whose clinical isolates had substitutions D28N and A63V in AtpE, which had previously been found only in in vitro -selected strains. Several patients had isolates with elevated MICs of bedaquiline prior to treatment; four of them also bore mutations in mmpR, indicating the presence of some hidden factors in bedaquiline resistance acquisition. The C154R substitution in ribosomal protein L3 was the most frequent in the linezolid-resistant strains. Mutations in the 23S rRNA gene (g2294a and g2814t) associated with linezolid resistance were also found in two isolates. Heteroresistance was identified in ∼40% of samples, which reflects the complex nature of resistance acquisition.The introduction of novel drugs into treatment must be accompanied by continuous phenotypic susceptibility testing and the analysis of genetic determinants of resistance.© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
In Vitro Drug Susceptibility of Bedaquiline, Delamanid, Linezolid, Clofazimine, Moxifloxacin, and Gatifloxacin against Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Beijing, China
In vivo microevolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and transient emergence of atpE_Ala63Pro mutation during treatment in a pre-XDR TB patient
Genetic diversity of candidate loci linked to Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistance to bedaquiline, delamanid and pretomanid
Bedaquiline-Resistant Tuberculosis Associated with Rv0678 Mutations
Drug resistance mechanisms and drug susceptibility testing for tuberculosis
Tuberculosis (TB) caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) is the deadliest infectious disease and the associated global threat has worsened with the emergence of drug resistance, in particular multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) and extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB). Although the World Health Organization (WHO) End-TB Strategy advocates for universal access to antimicrobial susceptibility testing, this is not widely available and/or it is still underused. The majority of drug resistance in clinical MTB strains is attributed to chromosomal mutations. Resistance-related mutations could also exert certain fitness cost to the drug-resistant MTB strains and growth fitness could be restored by the presence of compensatory mutations. Understanding these underlying mechanisms could provide an important insight into TB pathogenesis and predict the future trend of MDR-TB global pandemic. This review covers the mechanisms of resistance in MTB and provides a comprehensive overview of current phenotypic and molecular approaches for drug susceptibility testing, with particular attention to the methods endorsed and recommended by the WHO.© 2018 Asian Pacific Society of Respirology.
Validation of Bedaquiline Phenotypic Drug Susceptibility Testing Methods and Breakpoints: a Multilaboratory, Multicountry Study
Phenotypic and genotypic drug sensitivity profiles of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and associated factors in northeastern Ethiopia
Tuberculosis is a devastating and a deadly disease despite the novel advances in its diagnostic tools and drug therapy. Drug resistant Mycobacterium contributes a great share to tuberculosis mortality. Status of drug resistance and patients' awareness toward the disease is unknown in northeastern Ethiopia. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the phenotypic and genotypic drug sensitivity patterns and associated factors in Oromia Special Zone and Dessie Town, northeastern Ethiopia.In a cross-sectional study, 384 smear positive tuberculosis cases were recruited and Löwenstein-Jensen culture was done. The performance of GenoTypic MTBDRplus assay using the conventional BACTEC MGIT 960 as a "gold standard" was determined. Drug resistant strains were identified using spoligotyping. Pearson Chi-square test was used to determine the association of drug sensitivity test and tuberculosis type, lineages, dominant strains and clustering of the isolates.The 384 smear positive Mycobacterium samples were cultured on LJ media of which 29.2% (112/384) as culture positive. A fair agreement was found between MTBDRplus assay and the conventional MGIT test in detecting the Mycobacterium tuberculosis with sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of 94.2, 30.2, 68.4 and 76.5%, respectively. Among LJ culture positive samples 95 of them gave valid result for MTBDRplus assay and 16.8% (16/95) as drug resistant. Similarly, MGIT subculture was made for the 112 isolates and 69 of them gave positive result with 15.9% (11/69) as drug resistant. Cohen's kappa value showed almost a perfect agreement between the two testing methods in detecting rifampicin (sensitivity 100% and specificity 98.3%) and multi-drug resistance (sensitivity 83.3% and specificity 100%). Spoligotyping identified 76.5% (13/17) of the drug resistant isolates as Euro-American and family 33 as the predominant family. Significant association was observed between drug resistant isolates and the dominant strains (χ2: 34.861; p = 0.040) of the Mycobacterium.Higher magnitude of drug resistance was found in the study area. The GenoTypic MDRTBplus assay had an acceptable drug sensitivity testing performance.
Tomlins J, et al
Technical Report on Critical Concentrations for Drug Susceptibility Testing of Medicines Used in the Treatment of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis
Genetic variants and their association with phenotypic resistance to bedaquiline in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a systematic review and individual isolate data analysis
In vitro Study of Bedaquiline Resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Multi-Drug Resistant Clinical Isolates
Identification of novel mutations associated with clofazimine resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Although clofazimine has been traditionally used to treat leprosy, there is recent interest in using clofazimine for the treatment of MDR-TB and drug-susceptible TB. However, the mechanisms of resistance to clofazimine are poorly understood. Here, we investigated the molecular basis of clofazimine resistance using resistant mutants isolated in vitro.We isolated 96 mutants of Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistant to clofazimine and performed WGS and Sanger sequencing to identify possible mutations associated with clofazimine resistance.We found that 97% (93/96) of clofazimine-resistant mutants had a mutation in rv0678 encoding a transcription repressor for efflux pump MmpL5. Two mutational hot spots at nucleotide positions 193 and 466 in rv0678 accounted for 43.8% (42/96) and 11.5% (11/96) of the mutations, respectively. The previously reported A202G mutation (S68G) in rv0678 occurred less frequently, in 5 of 96 mutants. The remaining 34 mutations were scattered along the entire rv0678 gene. We discovered two new genes (rv1979c and rv2535c) associated with clofazimine resistance in mutants without rv0678 mutations.Mutations in rv0678 are a major mechanism of clofazimine resistance. Our findings provide useful information for the design of new molecular tests for rapid detection of clofazimine resistance. Further studies are needed to address the role of rv1979c and rv2535c in clofazimine resistance and mechanisms of action.© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Mutations in pepQ Confer Low-Level Resistance to Bedaquiline and Clofazimine in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
The novel ATP synthase inhibitor bedaquiline recently received accelerated approval for treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and is currently being studied as a component of novel treatment-shortening regimens for drug-susceptible and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. In a limited number of bedaquiline-treated patients reported to date, ≥4-fold upward shifts in bedaquiline MIC during treatment have been attributed to non-target-based mutations in Rv0678 that putatively increase bedaquiline efflux through the MmpS5-MmpL5 pump. These mutations also confer low-level clofazimine resistance, presumably by a similar mechanism. Here, we describe a new non-target-based determinant of low-level bedaquiline and clofazimine cross-resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: loss-of-function mutations in pepQ (Rv2535c), which corresponds to a putative Xaa-Pro aminopeptidase. pepQ mutants were selected in mice by treatment with clinically relevant doses of bedaquiline, with or without clofazimine, and were shown to have bedaquiline and clofazimine MICs 4 times higher than those for the parental H37Rv strain. Coincubation with efflux inhibitors verapamil and reserpine lowered bedaquiline MICs against both mutant and parent strains to a level below the MIC against H37Rv in the absence of efflux pump inhibitors. However, quantitative PCR (qPCR) revealed no significant differences in expression of Rv0678, mmpS5, or mmpL5 between mutant and parent strains. Complementation of a pepQ mutant with the wild-type gene restored susceptibility, indicating that loss of PepQ function is sufficient for reduced susceptibility both in vitro and in mice. Although the mechanism by which mutations in pepQ confer bedaquiline and clofazimine cross-resistance remains unclear, these results may have clinical implications and warrant further evaluation of clinical isolates with reduced susceptibility to either drug for mutations in this gene.Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Assessment of epidemiological and genetic characteristics and clinical outcomes of resistance to bedaquiline in patients treated for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study
/
〈 |
|
〉 |
