Email Alert | RSS    帮助

中国防痨杂志, 2022, 44(9): 869-879 doi: 10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20220225

指南·规范·共识

风湿性疾病患者合并结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染诊治的专家共识

国家感染性疾病临床医学研究中心/深圳市第三人民医院, 北京大学深圳医院, 中国医学科学院北京协和医院, 中国防痨协会, 《中国防痨杂志》编辑委员会, 深圳市炎症与免疫性疾病重点实验室

Expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in patients with rheumatic diseases

National Clinical Research Centre for Infectious Disease/The Third People’s Hospital of Shenzhen, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Peking Union Medical College Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Chinese Antituberculosis Association, Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Inflammatory and Immune Diseases

通信作者: 邓国防,Email: jxxk1035@yeah.net;王庆文,Email: wqw_sw@163.com;赵岩,Email: zhaoyan_pumch2002@aliyun.com

责任编辑: 李敬文

收稿日期: 2022-06-9  

基金资助: 国家自然科学基金(82070016)
国家自然科学基金(81974253)
国家自然科学基金(81901641)
广东省感染性疾病(结核病)临床医学研究中心(2020B1111170014)
广东省自然科学基金面上项目(2019A1515011112)
深圳市科技创新委员会重点基础研究项目(JCYJ20200109140203849)
深圳市科技创新委员会重点基础研究项目(JCYJ20210324131813036)
深圳三名工程项目(SZSM201612009)

Corresponding authors: Deng Guofang, Email: jxxk1035@yeah.net;Wang Qingwen, Email: wqw_sw@163.com;Zhao Yan, Email: zhaoyan_pumch2002@aliyun.com

Received: 2022-06-9  

Fund supported: National Natural Science Foundation of China(82070016)
National Natural Science Foundation of China(81974253)
National Natural Science Foundation of China(81901641)
Clinical Research Centre for Infectious Disease (Tuberculosis) of the Guangdong Province, China(2020B1111170014)
The General Program of Natural Science Foundation of the Guangdong Province, China(2019A1515011112)
Key Basic Research Special Program of Shenzhen Scientific Committee(JCYJ20200109140203849)
Key Basic Research Special Program of Shenzhen Scientific Committee(JCYJ20210324131813036)
Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen(SZSM201612009)

摘要

风湿性疾病作为一类常见的自身免疫性疾病,治疗上经常使用糖皮质激素、免疫抑制剂、生物制剂和小分子靶向药物等,这些药物的应用往往会导致患者自身免疫功能异常,致使其具有较高的LTBI发生风险,且发展为活动性结核病的风险也显著增加。因此,在临床工作中,需要对符合筛查条件的风湿性疾病患者进行LTBI筛查。这就要求风湿免疫科医师和结核科医师加强协作,提高意识,针对需要进行LTBI筛查的风湿性疾病患者进行科学评估,制定规范的筛查流程和预防性治疗方案,以防范风湿性疾病患者合并LTBI后发展为活动性结核病。基于此,国家感染性疾病临床医学研究中心/深圳市第三人民医院、北京大学深圳医院、中国医学科学院北京协和医院、中国防痨协会、《中国防痨杂志》编辑委员会和深圳市炎症与免疫性疾病重点实验室共同组织国内结核病和风湿性疾病领域专家撰写了《风湿性疾病患者合并结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染诊治的专家共识》(简称“共识”)。本共识基于我国风湿性疾病患者合并LTBI的流行病学、循证医学证据和临床研究等方面数据,经过多次研讨并达成一致意见,供同道参考借鉴。

关键词: 风湿性疾病; 分枝杆菌,结核; 感染; 诊断; 治疗应用

Abstract

Rheumatic diseases are autoimmune diseases that occur when an individual’s immune system mistakenly attacks healthy tissues, and are often treated with glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants, biological agents, and small-molecule targeted drugs, etc., which can lead to an increased risk of other autoimmune dysfunctions in patients and the activation of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). Therefore, LTBI screening in clinical is essential for patients with rheumatic diseases who meet the screening criteria. This requires greater collaboration and awareness between rheumatologists and tuberculosis physicians, to conduct scientific assessment for patients with rheumatic diseases who need LTBI screening, and to develop preventive treatment guidelines to prevent patients with rheumatic diseases from developing active tuberculosis after LTBI. Therefore, the National Clinical Research Centre for Infectious Disease/The Third People’s Hospital of Shenzhen, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Peking Union Medical College Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Chinese Antituberculosis Association, Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis and Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Inflammatory and Immune Diseases joint effort in the publication of an expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of LTBI in patients with rheumatic diseases. This consensus is based on the epidemiology, evidence-based medicine, and clinical research of rheumatic diseases complicated with LTBI, and has been discussed for many times and reached consensus. It can serve as a reference.

Keywords: Rheumatic diseases; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Infection; Diagnosis; Therapeutic uses

PDF (1599KB) 元数据 多维度评价 相关文章 导出 EndNote| Ris| Bibtex  收藏本文

本文引用格式

国家感染性疾病临床医学研究中心/深圳市第三人民医院, 北京大学深圳医院, 中国医学科学院北京协和医院, 中国防痨协会, 《中国防痨杂志》编辑委员会, 深圳市炎症与免疫性疾病重点实验室. 风湿性疾病患者合并结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染诊治的专家共识. 中国防痨杂志, 2022, 44(9): 869-879. Doi:10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20220225

National Clinical Research Centre for Infectious Disease/The Third People’s Hospital of Shenzhen, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Peking Union Medical College Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Chinese Antituberculosis Association, Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Inflammatory and Immune Diseases. Expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in patients with rheumatic diseases. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2022, 44(9): 869-879. Doi:10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20220225

开放科学(资源服务)标识码(OSID)的开放科学计划以二维码为入口,提供丰富的线上扩展功能,包括作者对论文背景的语音介绍、该研究的附加说明、与读者的交互问答、拓展学术圈等。读者“扫一扫”此二维码即可获得上述增值服务。

机体感染结核分枝杆菌(Mycobacterium tuberculosis,MTB)后可表现为结核病和结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染(latent tuberculosis infection,LTBI)两种状态。LTBI是指机体感染MTB后对其抗原存在长期的免疫应答,但没有发生临床结核病,没有临床病原学或者影像学方面活动性结核病的证据[1]。据估算,2018年全球近1/3的人群感染了MTB[1],2021年我国LTBI者数量逾2亿[2]。LTBI不具有传染性,是否发展为活动性结核病与机体的免疫状态密切相关。在健康人群中,LTBI终身发展为活动性结核病的风险为5%~10%,且多发生在感染后的前5年内[3]。近年来,随着风湿性疾病(rheumatic diseases)患者的增多及生存期的延长,使用糖皮质激素、免疫抑制剂、生物制剂和小分子靶向药物等的人群也相应增多。由于该类人群免疫功能异常,具有较高的LTBI发生风险,且发展为活动性结核病的风险也显著增加。因此,在临床工作中,需要对符合筛查条件的风湿性疾病患者进行LTBI检测。这就要求风湿免疫科医师和结核科医师加强协作,提高意识,针对需要进行LTBI筛查的风湿性疾病患者进行科学评估,制定规范的筛查流程和预防性治疗方案,以防范风湿性疾病患者合并LTBI后发展为活动性结核病。基于此,国家感染性疾病临床医学研究中心/深圳市第三人民医院、北京大学深圳医院、中国医学科学院北京协和医院、中国防痨协会、《中国防痨杂志》编辑委员会和深圳市炎症与免疫性疾病重点实验室共同组织国内结核病和风湿性疾病领域专家撰写了《风湿性疾病患者合并结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染诊治的专家共识》(简称“共识”)。本共识基于我国风湿性疾病患者合并LTBI的流行病学、循证医学证据和临床研究等方面数据,经过多次研讨并达成一致意见,供同道参考借鉴。

本共识采用世界卫生组织(World Health Organization,WHO)推出的“推荐分级的评价、制定与评估(grades of recommendations assessment,development and evaluation,GRADE)”证据质量分级和推荐强度系统(简称“GRADE 系统”)对证据质量和推荐强度进行分级(表1,2)。共识制订工作组召开多次会议,对每个具体临床问题和干预措施进行了充分的讨论,并提出10条推荐意见(表3),之后以德尔菲法的形式向35名专家发放德尔菲问卷。德尔菲问卷内容主要以专家的个人信息、专家对每一条推荐意见的重要性评价和专家权威程度的自我评价三个部分构成,最后回收问卷29份。经统计分析发现专家的积极系数为0.83,积极性程度较高;专家群体权威系数均>0.8,说明专家权威程度较高;变异系数均<0.25,说明专家的协调程度较高。Kendall协调系数为0.226(χ2=59.03,P<0.05),说明29名专家对10条推荐意见的重要性评分较高,并且其重要性评价具有一致性(表4)。

表1   GRADE证据质量分级

证据级别具体描述研究类型表达字母
高级证据非常确信真实的效应值接近效应估计,未来研究几乎不可能改变现有评价结果的可信度随机对照试验;质量升高二级的观察性研究A
中级证据对效应估计值我们有中等程度的信心:真实值有可能接近估计值,但仍存在二者大小相同的可能性;未来研究可能对现有评估有重要影响,可能改变评价结果的可信度质量降低一级的随机对照试验;质量升高一级的观察性研究B
低级证据我们对效应估计值的确信程度有限:真实值可能与估计值大不相同;未来研究很有可能对现有评估有重要影响,改变评估结果可信度的可能性较大质量降低二级的随机对照试验;观察性研究C
极低级证据我们对效应估计值几乎没有信心:真实值很可能与估计值大不相同;任何评估都很不确定质量降低三级的随机对照试验;质量降低一级的观察性研究;系列病例观察;个案报道D

注 GRADE:推荐分级的评价、制定与评估

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


表2   GRADE证据推荐强度分级

证据质量推荐强度具体描述表达数字
高级证据支持使用某项干预措施的强推荐评价者确信干预措施利大于弊1
中级证据支持使用某项干预措施的弱推荐利弊不确定或无论高低质量的证据均显示利弊相当2
低级证据反对使用某项干预措施的弱推荐2
极低级证据反对使用某项干预措施的强推荐评价者确信干预措施弊大于利1

注 GRADE:推荐分级的评价、制定与评估

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


表3   风湿性疾病患者合并LTBI诊治的专家推荐意见

意见条目推荐意见推荐级别及证据级别
1对拟使用肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂治疗的风湿性疾病患者,建议应常规进行LTBI筛查1A
2使用靶向合成改善病情抗风湿药(如托法替布)的患者,建议应常规进行LTBI筛查1B
3对拟长期使用中大剂量糖皮质激素者,尤其是系统性红斑狼疮、使用免疫抑制剂、低体质量指数、合并肺间质病变的人群,有条件者建议进行LTBI筛查1C
4需长期使用具有结核病活动中高风险的改善病情抗风湿药(如来氟米特、甲氨蝶呤、环孢素、环磷酰胺、吗替麦考酚酯)的风湿性疾病患者,有条件者建议进行LTBI筛查1D
5风湿性疾病患者结核菌素皮肤试验硬结平均直径≥10mm的阳性者,或接受免疫抑制治疗时间>1个月、结核菌素皮肤试验硬结平均直径≥5mm的患者,应予以警惕,有条件者建议进一步完善γ-干扰素释放试验检测2D
6对风湿性疾病患者而言,γ-干扰素释放试验的准确性优于结核菌素皮肤试验,建议风湿性疾病患者优先应用γ-干扰素释放试验筛查LTBI1B
7LTBI目前缺乏诊断的金标准,推荐在有条件时联合应用多种方法进行筛查,比如γ-干扰素释放试验联合结核菌素皮肤试验2D
8既往完成规范抗结核治疗5年以内者可不予预防性抗结核治疗,建议此类患者在使用生物制剂的时候首选非肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂1B
9若病情允许,建议合并LTBI的风湿性疾病患者在预防性抗结核治疗至少1个月后再启动生物制剂治疗;如病情紧急需要立即启动生物制剂治疗时,建议在充分评估风险后同时启动生物制剂和预防性抗结核治疗2D
10异烟肼、利福平单药或联合用药方案原则上均可使用,但建议优先推荐使用3个月异烟肼和利福喷丁(3HP)方案1A

注 LTBI:结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


表4   德尔菲法调研结果

意见条目专家群体权威
系数(0~1)
重要性评价变异系数
(0~1)
平均值(0~5)标准差
10.924.900.310.06
20.894.380.820.19
30.843.830.890.23
40.814.000.890.22
50.864.240.880.20
60.884.140.640.15
70.883.900.820.21
80.824.030.680.17
90.874.450.740.17
100.834.000.760.19

注 专家权威系数=(判断依据+熟悉程度+学术水平权)/3,专家群体权威系数为29名专家的专家权威系数的均值

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


一、 LTBI的定义及风湿性疾病患者合并LTBI的流行病学

WHO目前没有LTBI诊断的金标准,我国推荐的诊断标准为:在排除活动性结核病后基于γ-干扰素释放试验(interferon-gamma release assay,IGRA)或结核菌素皮肤试验(tuberculin skin test,TST)阳性来进行判断。在我国,通常TST硬结平均直径≥10mm判读为阳性,而有推荐在免疫抑制人群中硬结平均直径≥5mm即可判读为阳性,特别是对于接受免疫抑制剂治疗>1个月,服用中大剂量且长期使用糖皮质激素,或使用肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(tumour necrosis factor inhibitors,TNFi)的患者[4-5]。重组结核杆菌融合蛋白(EC)皮肤试验又称新型结核菌素皮肤试验(creation tuberculin skin test,C-TST),C-TST红晕或硬结反应平均直径≥5mm可判断为阳性[6]

目前,风湿性疾病患者合并LTBI的发生率尚无确切的大型流行病学数据。部分研究显示,在结核病高负担国家,风湿性疾病患者合并LTBI发生率在12.9%~29.5%之间[7-10],个别研究报道其发生率甚至高达43%[11];其他非结核病高负担国家发生率在10.6%~35%之间,其中,韩国报道合并LTBI发生率约在26.5%~35%之间[10,12-13]。我国几项小样本研究显示,风湿性疾病患者合并LTBI发生率在21.3%~27.27%之间[9,14-17]。需要指出的是,以上数据大部分来自炎症性关节病的患者,如类风湿关节炎和脊柱关节炎,且LTBI筛查方法不一致,部分采用TST,部分采用IGRA或两者联合,故研究结果仅供参考。但以上针对风湿性疾病患者所报道的LTBI发生率大部分高于我国普通人群流行病学调查的结果(18.1%~20.3%)[18-19]

二、风湿性疾病患者筛查LTBI的重要性

中国最近的一项多中心、横断面研究显示,风湿性疾病患者的活动性结核病标准化患病率为882/10万[20],明显高于2010年全国第五次结核病流行病学抽样调查报告的15岁及以上人群活动性肺结核的患病率(459/10万)[21]。在风湿性疾病患者中,由于疾病本身或使用糖皮质激素、免疫抑制剂、生物制剂治疗等原因,LTBI发展为活动性结核病的风险明显增加[7,22]。研究显示,类风湿关节炎患者合并LTBI发展为活动性结核病的风险较普通人群增加2~10倍,银屑病关节炎患者中也存在类似情况[22-23]。此外,在不同地区开展的不同研究均报道系统性红斑狼疮患者的结核病发病率高于普通人群[24-28],其中,我国学者Xiao等[28]和Lao等[27]报道的系统性红斑狼疮患者结核病发病率分别为2.4%(249/10469)和5.3%(59/1108),均明显高于普通人群。另有研究表明,系统性红斑狼疮是结核病的重要独立预测因子[29]。来自中国香港地区的一项研究发现,脊柱关节炎患者结核病患病率约为普通人群的3倍[30]。另一项来自瑞典的大型队列研究显示,使用生物制剂的脊柱关节炎患者结核病患病风险明显大于未使用生物制剂的患者[31]

使用不同类型的生物制剂改善病情抗风湿药(biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs,bDMARD)或靶向合成改善病情抗风湿药(targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs,tsDMARD)治疗的风湿性疾病患者合并LTBI发展为活动性结核病的风险亦有不同程度的增加。研究显示,类风湿关节炎患者合并LTBI使用TNFi后发展为活动性结核病的风险可增加2~30倍[32],在开始使用TNFi治疗的前3个月出现LTBI激活的风险最高[14,22,32],联合使用TNFi及甲氨蝶呤、硫唑嘌呤等免疫抑制剂发展为活动性结核病的风险较单用TNFi增加13倍[33]。并且,使用肿瘤坏死因子α(tumor necrosis factor-α,TNF-α)单克隆抗体发展为活动性结核病的风险较TNF受体-抗体融合蛋白类高[22]。使用英夫利昔单抗和阿达木单抗的患者发展为活动性结核病的风险较依那西普分别高出2.78倍和3.88倍[32],英夫利昔单抗、阿达木单抗、依那西普诱发活动性结核病的平均时间分别为用药后6周、3~8个月、11.2个月[22]

注:2016年欧洲抗风湿病联盟指南将改善病情抗风湿药(disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs,DMARD)分为三类:传统DMARD(conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs,cDMARD),比如甲氨蝶呤、来氟米特、羟氯喹、柳氮磺砒啶、环孢素等;生物制剂DMARD(biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs,bDMARD),如TNFi和IL-17抑制剂等;tsDMARD主要是指JAK(Janus-activated kinase)抑制剂,比如托法替布。除此还有其他抗风湿药物,如糖皮质激素、非甾体抗炎药等。

推荐意见1:对拟使用TNFi治疗的风湿性疾病患者,建议应常规进行LTBI筛查。(1A)

JAK抑制剂相关的系统综述显示,使用JAK抑制剂后出现活动性结核病主要发生在社会经济状况差、结核病流行的中高风险地区或国家[34]。托法替布的药品说明书也强调了其发生结核感染的风险[35]。非TNFi(如利妥昔单抗、阿巴西普、阿那白滞素、乌斯努单抗、托珠单抗、司库奇优单抗等)诱发结核病活动风险则很小[36-41]。但值得注意的是,阿巴西普的药品说明书强调,在开始阿巴西普治疗之前,应筛查有无LTBI[42]

推荐意见2:使用tsDMARD(如托法替布)的患者,建议应常规进行LTBI筛查。(1B)

使用糖皮质激素及DMARD也明显增加结核感染风险。研究显示,使用糖皮质激素者结核感染风险是未使用者的4.9倍,而在中大剂量(泼尼松≥15mg/d或等效剂量)使用人群中则高达7.7倍[43]。一项来自加拿大的大型队列研究显示,使用糖皮质激素的类风湿关节炎患者发生结核病的风险是普通人群的2.4倍[44]。我国一项多中心横断面研究显示,长期使用大剂量糖皮质激素(泼尼松≥30mg/d或等效剂量持续4周以上)是活动性结核病的独立危险因素[20]。另一项研究显示,长期使用中大剂量糖皮质激素的风湿性疾病合并LTBI患者结核病活动风险明显升高,尤其是在低体质量指数、有肺间质病变、合并使用免疫抑制剂、系统性红斑狼疮等患者中[9]

推荐意见3:对拟长期使用中大剂量糖皮质激素者,尤其是系统性红斑狼疮、使用免疫抑制剂、低体质量指数、合并肺间质病变的人群,有条件者建议进行LTBI筛查。(1C)

类风湿关节炎患者合并LTBI时使用cDMARD发展为活动性结核病的风险平均增加3.17倍[32]。其中,以使用来氟米特发展为活动性结核病的风险最高(RR=11.7);甲氨蝶呤、环孢素风险中等(RR值分别为3.3和3.8);羟氯喹、柳氮磺吡啶、硫唑嘌呤风险较小(RR值均为1.6)[23]。而对于使用环磷酰胺及吗替麦考酚酯的风湿性疾病患者,虽已有与结核病相关的病例报告[45-46],但仍缺乏大型的人群研究,其结核感染风险尚不明确。有限的资料显示,两者的结核感染风险是普通人群的23倍[43]。目前尚缺乏他克莫司在风湿性疾病患者中的结核感染风险相关研究,有其他研究报道在银屑病、器官移植患者中,使用他克莫司会增加其结核感染的风险[47-48]。此外,部分风湿性疾病如系统性血管炎、原发性干燥综合征、系统性硬化、特发性炎症性肌病、自身免疫性肝病、IgG4相关性疾病等疾病与结核病的相关研究较少,但亦有可能长期使用中大剂量糖皮质激素、免疫抑制剂或TNFi,如符合筛查条件的,也建议进行LTBI筛查。

推荐意见4:需长期使用具有结核病活动中高风险的DMARD(如来氟米特、甲氨蝶呤、环孢素、环磷酰胺、吗替麦考酚酯)的风湿性疾病患者,有条件者建议进行LTBI筛查。(1D)

三、 风湿性疾病患者合并LTBI的检测方法

(一)TST

TST是采用结核菌素纯蛋白衍生物(purified protein derivative,PPD)为抗原的一种试验,也被称为PPD试验,常用于结核病流行病学调查、卡介苗接种后效果的验证和结核病的辅助诊断与鉴别诊断。在我国,TST已广泛用于LTBI的筛查中。TST常用方法:取5IU的PPD在左前臂掌侧前1/3中央处进行皮内注射,在72(48~96)h检查皮肤硬结大小[4]。考虑到我国人群普遍接种卡介苗,故对于风湿性疾病患者TST硬结平均直径≥10mm的阳性者或接受免疫抑制治疗时间>1个月、TST硬结平均直径≥5mm的患者应予以警惕,有条件者建议进一步完善IGRA检测[49]

由于PPD采用的是MTB复合抗原,PPD中含有致病性分枝杆菌、非致病性分枝杆菌和卡介苗等的共同抗原,使得TST特异性较差,其结果易受卡介苗和非结核分枝杆菌(nontuberculous mycobacteria,NTM)感染的影响出现假阳性,即便TST呈阳性也不能鉴别是MTB感染、卡介苗接种亦或是NTM感染,不能真正反映人群中MTB感染的实际情况[50],特别是风湿性疾病患者的实际感染情况,故对于风湿性疾病患者而言其辅助诊断价值有限。我国现阶段常用PPD有BCG-PPD和TB-PPD两种,TB-PPD是从人型MTB中提纯的结核蛋白制成,而BCG-PPD是从卡介苗培养液滤液中提出蛋白制成。有文献报道,TB-PPD更适合开展LTBI筛查,符合成本-效益原则,建议有条件的地方推荐使用[51]

推荐意见5:风湿性疾病患者TST硬结平均直径≥10mm的阳性者或接受免疫抑制治疗时间>1个月、TST硬结平均直径≥5mm的患者应予以警惕,有条件者建议进一步完善IGRA检测。(2D)

(二)C-TST

文献报道,C-TST具有低成本和高特异性的特点[52]。目前,全球已研制成功的C-TST试剂包括丹麦研制的C-Tb(丹麦哥本哈根Statens血清研究所)[53-54],俄罗斯研制的Dia skin test[55]和我国研制的重组结核杆菌融合蛋白(EC)等。该类试剂包含针对MTB的早期分泌抗原靶蛋白6(early secretory antigenic target 6,ESAT-6)和培养滤液蛋白10(culture filtrate protein 10,CFP-10),可以诱导特异性的迟发型变态反应以鉴别是否存在MTB感染,由于这两种蛋白在卡介菌和其他大多数NTM中缺失,所以可以有效鉴别BCG接种与MTB感染。重组结核杆菌融合蛋白(EC)可以用于≥6月龄婴儿、儿童及<65周岁成人,使用方法与TST类似,在前臂掌侧皮内注射5IU,在注射后48~72h检查注射部位反应,测量并记录红晕和硬结的横径及纵径的毫米数,以红晕或硬结大者为准。反应平均直径≥5mm为阳性反应。凡有水疱、坏死、淋巴管炎者均属于强阳性反应[6]

(三)IGRA

IGRA可以检测MTB抗原刺激后致敏T淋巴细胞中γ-干扰素(interferon-γ,IFN-γ)的释放,从而判断人体是否存在MTB感染。由于IGRA选择卡介苗和大多数NTM缺失的特异性抗原(差别1区、ESAT-6和CFP-10等),其结果不受卡介苗接种的影响,目前越来越多地用于LTBI的检测[7,56]。IGRA有两种常用的方法,第一种是酶联免疫吸附试验(enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays,ELISA),可以检测全血中致敏T淋巴细胞在再次受到MTB特异性抗原刺激后释放INF-γ水平,常用的试剂盒为Quantiferon-TB Gold In-Tube(简称“QFT-GIT”)。第二种是T细胞酶联免疫斑点法(enzyme-linked immunospot,ELISPOT),在MTB特异性抗原刺激之下,可以测定外周血单个核细胞中能够释放的效应T淋巴细胞的数量,常用的试剂盒为结核感染T细胞斑点试验(T-SPOT.TB)。IGRA检测快速,受主观因素影响较小,并具有较高的敏感度[57]。研究发现,IGRA诊断LTBI的特异度>95%[58-59]。新型QFT-Plus的检测性能与QFT-GIT相当,总体敏感度为87.9%[60]。需要注意IGRA结果的判读[61-63]:阴性结果时不支持MTB感染状态的判定,需要结合临床表现进行综合评估,排除免疫功能缺陷或低下、接受免疫抑制剂治疗等情况下可能出现的假阴性结果;阳性结果时支持MTB感染状态的判定,提示体内存在被MTB致敏的T淋巴细胞,但是其结果可被部分NTM(如堪萨斯分枝杆菌、海分枝杆菌、苏尔加分枝杆菌、转黄分枝杆菌、胃分枝杆菌)感染所影响。

推荐意见6:对风湿性疾病患者而言,IGRA的准确性优于TST,建议风湿性疾病患者优先应用IGRA筛查LTBI。(1B)

(四)LTBI检测方法的评价

需要说明的是,LTBI尚缺乏诊断的金标准,在检测风湿性疾病患者是否存在LTBI时,各诊断方法存在差异。例如,美国一项针对200例类风湿关节炎患者的研究发现,T-SPOT.TB和TST的一致性较差(Kappa=-0.019)[64]。故目前多数文献推荐联合应用多种方法进行检测,比如IGRA联合TST以提高检测准确率[63]。在风湿性疾病患者合并LTBI时,IGRA的准确性优于TST[17,65],建议风湿性疾病患者优先应用IGRA筛查LTBI[66]

推荐意见7:LTBI目前缺乏诊断的金标准,推荐在有条件时联合应用多种方法进行筛查,比如IGRA联合TST。(2D)

四、 风湿性疾病患者合并LTBI的筛查流程

应先进行详细的病史询问和相关症状体征的搜集,再进行LTBI的检测,必要时需要进行胸部X线摄片(简称“胸片”)检查或胸部CT扫描等,以全面评估。症状筛查主要包括:咳嗽、咳痰、痰中带血、咯血、反复发作的上呼吸道感染症状、胸痛、乏力、盗汗、气短、食欲不振、体质量下降、午后低热,女性患者可能会出现月经不调和闭经的现象,甚至不孕。少数患者会有急性表现,如中、高度发热和呼吸困难等。详细询问患者症状的主要目的是在进行预防性治疗之前排除活动性结核病和其他疾病,如果不存在以上可疑现象,可直接行LTBI的检测进行LTBI筛查[4,67]。除相关症状的询问,还应询问患者既往结核病相关病史,包括结核病病史、接触史、治疗史、既往接种卡介苗的情况等,并评估危险因素。当风湿性疾病患者LTBI的检测结果为阳性时,需要开展结核分枝杆菌病原学检查以及胸部影像学检查,判断有无发展为活动性结核病[68]。由于90%的结核病病灶在肺部,胸片检查可以检出大部分的活动性结核病,其缺点是不适用于肺外结核的筛查,如盆腔结核等[69]。因胸部CT扫描对患者胸部肺结核的分辨率更高,在极少数患者出现可疑活动性肺结核症状时,建议行胸部CT扫描。筛查流程见图1

图1

图1   风湿性疾病患者结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染筛查及治疗流程

注 LTBI:结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染


五、风湿性疾病患者合并LTBI预防性抗结核治疗策略

(一)治疗原则

符合本共识筛查条件的风湿性疾病合并LTBI的患者,在排除预防性抗结核治疗禁忌证后原则上均建议给予预防性抗结核治疗。有研究发现,预防性抗结核治疗提供的保护可持续到5年以上[70],因此,本共识建议既往完成规范抗结核治疗5年以内者可不予预防性抗结核治疗[71],建议此类患者在使用生物制剂的时候首选非TNFi。

推荐意见8:既往完成规范抗结核治疗5年以内者可不予预防性抗结核治疗,建议此类患者在使用生物制剂的时候首选非TNFi。(1B)

合并LTBI的风湿性疾病患者如病情紧急需要立即启动生物制剂治疗时,临床医生可在充分评估患者LTBI激活风险后同时启动生物制剂和预防性抗结核治疗[72]。若病情可暂缓生物制剂治疗时,应在预防性抗结核治疗1个月后启动生物制剂的治疗[73],但建议尽可能在预防性抗结核治疗完成之后再启动TNFi治疗[72]。对于糖皮质激素和免疫抑制剂的启用时机并没有明确规定,建议参考上述生物制剂的标准执行。

预防性治疗期间出现活动性结核病的症状、体征及其他相应证据时,应及时停止预防性抗结核治疗,并按活动性结核病的诊治流程进行,如确诊活动性结核病应选择标准的抗结核化疗方案进行治疗[71]

推荐意见9:若病情允许,建议合并LTBI的风湿性疾病患者在预防性抗结核治疗至少1个月后再启动生物制剂治疗;如病情紧急,需要立即启动生物制剂治疗时,建议在充分评估风险后同时启动生物制剂和预防性抗结核治疗。(2D)

(二)预防性抗结核治疗方案(表5)

表5   风湿性疾病患者合并结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染的预防性治疗方案

治疗方案剂量用法疗程
成人儿童最大剂量
异烟肼+利福喷丁每周疗法(3HP)1次/周3个月
异烟肼900mg/次年龄2~14岁:(1)体质量10~15kg:300mg/次;(2)体质量16~23kg:500mg/次;(3)体质量24~30kg:600mg/次;(4)体质量>31kg:700mg/次
年龄>14岁:900mg/次
900mg/次
利福喷丁900mg/次年龄2~14岁:(1)体质量10~15kg:300mg/次;(2)体质量16~23kg:450mg/次;(3)体质量24~30kg:600mg/次;(4)体质量>31kg:750mg/次
年龄>14岁:900mg/次
900mg/次
利福平单药每日疗法体质量<50kg:450mg/次;体质量≥50kg:600mg/次10mg·kg-1·次-1450mg/次1次/d4个月
异烟肼+利福平每日疗法1次/d3个月
异烟肼300mg/次10mg·kg-1·次-1300mg/次
利福平体质量<50kg:450mg/次;体质量≥50kg:600mg/次10mg·kg-1·次-1450mg/次
异烟肼单药每日疗法300mg/次10mg·kg-1·次-1300mg/次1次/d6~9个月

注 如果有明确传染源且传染源确诊为耐利福平或异烟肼患者,则治疗方案应由临床专家组根据传染源的耐药谱制定,并需做详细的风险评估和治疗方案论证

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


1.异烟肼联合利福喷丁每周疗法(3HP方案):即服用3个月异烟肼+利福喷丁(异烟肼:每周15mg/kg;利福喷丁:每周750~900mg),见表5。此方案为目前国际上新增的推荐方案,其优点是疗程短、治疗完成率高、疗效好,缺点是费用偏高,虽然减少了服药次数但是每次服药量较多[1,74-76]

2.利福平单药每日疗法:即服用4个月利福平(0.45~0.6g/d),其疗效与异烟肼单药疗法相似,但肝毒性较小。该方案的缺点是与其他药物的相互作用较多,比如利福平与小分子靶向药物托法替布联用会降低托法替布的疗效[1,74]。当存在使用利福平禁忌时,可以改用利福喷丁,建议使用3HP方案[74]

3.异烟肼联合利福平每日疗法:即服用3个月异烟肼+利福平(异烟肼:0.3g/d;利福平:0.45~0.6g/d),该方案与异烟肼单药疗法相比疗效相似,但是治疗时间短,使其依从性和完成率较高,是国际上推荐的首选方案之一[68,74]。其缺点是两种药物联用可能比单独使用两种药物中的一种有更大的肝毒性风险[74]

4.异烟肼单药每日疗法:即服用6~9个月异烟肼(0.3g/d)。其缺点是治疗时间较长,治疗完成率较低,并且具有一定的肝毒性[1]

推荐意见10:异烟肼、利福平单药或联合用药方案原则上均可使用,但建议优先推荐使用3HP方案。(1A)

(三)风湿性疾病患者合并LTBI符合预防性抗结核治疗但因故未接受治疗的管理

对符合预防性抗结核治疗但因故未接受治疗者,应建议密切随访观察。对于该类人群应尽量避免选用TNFi,建议选择其他的生物制剂。如需使用TNFi,应该在接受TNFi治疗的第3、6、12个月行胸片检查或胸部CT扫描。使用非TNFi的风湿性疾病患者应该在发现LTBI的前2年内每6个月复查1次,在2年后每年复查1次[71,77]。在随访时需要评估患者是否有进展为活动性结核病的可能,一旦出现活动性结核病的症状和体征,无需等待复查节点,要及时复诊并按活动性结核病的诊治流程进行。其次,未接受预防性治疗者继续使用糖皮质激素及免疫抑制剂发展为活动性结核病的风险可能成倍增加,需向患者加以说明,并规律随访。

(四)风湿性疾病患者合并LTBI预防性抗结核治疗的管理

对于诊断为风湿性疾病患者合并LTBI实行预防性治疗前需进行登记,开展健康教育,签署知情同意书,落实预防性治疗督导管理措施,做好治疗期间的随访观察和疗程结束的评价。评价内容包括治疗期间是否规律服药,药物不良反应发生情况,以及是否完成治疗疗程等。为了防止不规律用药产生耐药性和减少抗结核药物不良反应的发生,治疗期间应有监督管理措施,保证服药者的依从性,以使其能够顺利完成治疗疗程[71]。需要强调的是,在治疗期间,若患者出现可疑活动性肺结核症状或体征时,建议立即行胸片检查或胸部CT扫描,有条件的医疗机构建议同时行痰涂片、GeneXpert MTB/RIF和痰培养[5],以进一步排查有无活动性结核病。治疗结束后的随访同上述未接受预防性抗结核治疗患者的管理。

六、总结与展望

风湿性疾病患者合并LTBI发生率日益增高,符合筛查条件的风湿性疾病患者应尽早进行LTBI检测,并及时诊断、预防性治疗及规范管理,可以明显降低患者发展为活动性结核病的风险。但目前全球对于风湿性疾病患者合并LTBI的危险因素评估、筛查方法应用、预防性抗结核治疗指征及管理策略的相关文献的证据级别有待提高。因此,亟待结核病和风湿免疫疾病领域的医务工作者加强密切合作,广泛开展临床队列研究,尤其是前瞻性随机对照研究,有望获得高的循证医学证据,以进一步科学规范指导临床实践。

执笔者 邓国防 王庆文 陈秋奇 吴文琪 钟剑球

参加讨论与撰写本共识的主要专家(按姓氏笔画排序):王华(安徽省胸科医院)、王庆文(北京大学深圳医院)、王黎霞(《中国防痨杂志》期刊社)、邓国防(深圳市第三人民医院)、石桂秀(厦门大学附属第一医院)、卢洪洲(深圳市第三人民医院)、卢水华(深圳市第三人民医院)、叶志中(深圳市福田区风湿病专科医院)、叶珊慧(广州医科大学附属第一医院)、付亮(深圳市第三人民医院)、邝浩斌(广州市胸科医院)、成诗明(中国防痨协会)、刘爱梅(广西壮族自治区胸科医院)、许韩师(中山大学附属第一医院)、李洋(广东省人民医院)、李娟(南方医科大学南方医院)、李涯松(浙江省人民医院)、李敬文(《中国防痨杂志》期刊社)、吴文琪(北京大学深圳医院)、吴桂辉(成都市公共卫生临床医疗中心)、吴锐(南昌大学第一附属医院)、何娟(北京大学深圳医院)、沙巍(同济大学附属上海市肺科医院)、初乃惠(首都医科大学附属北京胸科医院)、张齐龙(江西省胸科医院)、张志毅(哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院)、张学武(北京大学人民医院)、张培泽(深圳市第三人民医院)、陈心春(深圳大学医学部)、陈秋奇(广东医科大学研究生院)、陈效友(首都医科大学附属北京地坛医院)、邵凌云(复旦大学附属华山医院)、武丽君(新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院)、范永德(《中国防痨杂志》期刊社)、范琳(同济大学附属上海市肺科医院)、金龙(黑龙江省传染病防治院)、宗佩兰(江西省胸科医院)、赵永胜(北京大学深圳医院)、赵岩(中国医学科学院北京协和医院)、胡朝晖(《中华医学杂志》社有限责任公司)、钟剑球(北京大学深圳医院)、施春花(江西省人民医院)、洪小平(深圳市人民医院)、梅轶芳(深圳市第三人民医院)、梁瑞霞(河南省胸科医院)、谭守勇(广州市胸科医院)、穆荣(北京大学第三医院)

利益冲突 所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突

作者贡献 邓国防和王庆文:起草文章、对文章的知识性内容作批评性审阅;赵岩:对文章的知识性内容作批评性审阅

参考文献

World Health Organization.

Latent tuberculosis infection: updated and consolidated guidelines for programmatic management

Geneva: World Health Organization, 2018.

[本文引用: 5]

World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2021. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2021.

[本文引用: 1]

World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2018. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2018.

[本文引用: 1]

中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. WS 288-2017 肺结核诊断. 2017-11-09.

[本文引用: 3]

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

LTBI: a guide for primary health care providers-Diagnosis of latent TB infection

Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2019.

[本文引用: 2]

中国防痨协会, 中国防痨协会学校与儿童结核病防治专业分会,《中国防痨杂志》编辑委员会.

重组结核杆菌融合蛋白(EC)临床应用专家共识

中国防痨杂志, 2020, 42(8): 761-768. doi: 10.3969/i.issn.1000-6621.2020.08.001.

[本文引用: 2]

Anton C, Machado FD, Ramirez JMA, et al.

Latent tuberculosis infection in patients with rheumatic diseases

J Bras Pneumol, 2019, 45(2):e20190023. doi: 10.1590/1806-3713/e201 90023.

URL     [本文引用: 3]

Garziera G, Morsch ALB, Otesbelgue F, et al.

Latent tuberculosis infection and tuberculosis in patients with rheumatic diseases treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor agents

Clin Rheumatol, 2017, 36(8):1891-1896. doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3714-6.

PMID      [本文引用: 1]

The introduction of biological agents, especially the tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (anti-TNF), for the treatment of rheumatic diseases increased the risk of developing tuberculosis (TB). Screening for latent TB infection (LTBI) is strongly recommended before starting therapy with anti-TNF agents. The objective of this study was to identify the prevalence of LTBI and TB among patients with rheumatic diseases on anti-TNF agents. This is a cross-sectional study. The electronic medical records of all adult patients (≥18 years old) undergoing anti-TNF treatment were reviewed. Every patient underwent tuberculin skin test (TST) before starting anti-TNF treatment. In total, 176 patients were included; the mean age was 51.9 ± 12.4 years, 34.7% were males, and 90.9% were white. The underlying diseases were rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in 50.6% (N = 89), ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in 27.8% (N = 49), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in 17.6% (N = 31). The prevalence of positive TST was 29.5%. Household contact with TB was significantly associated with a positive TST (p = 0.020). RA patients had lower TST reactions than AS patients (p = 0.022). There were six cases of TB (3.4%) diagnosed during anti-TNF therapy. We demonstrated a high prevalence of positive TST (29.5%) among patients with rheumatic diseases in a region with high TB prevalence. Our data corroborates the ACR's recommendation that patients who live in high TB incidence settings should be tested annually for LTBI.

Long W, Cai F, Wang X, et al.

High risk of activation of latent tuberculosis infection in rheumatic disease patients

Infect Dis (Lond), 2020, 52(2):80-86. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2019.1682187.

[本文引用: 3]

Pettipher C, Benitha R.

Tuberculosis in biologic users for rheumatic diseases: results from the South African Biologics Registry (SABIO)

Ann Rheum Dis, 2020, 79(2):292-299. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216128.

PMID      [本文引用: 2]

To evaluate the rate of tuberculosis (TB) in biologic users for rheumatic diseases in South Africa, the effectiveness of our latent TB infection (LTBI) programme, risk factors and outcome.TB cases were collected from the South African Biologics Registry (SABIO), rheumatologists and pharmaceutical companies. Demographics, LTBI screening and treatment, biological and disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapies, TB diagnosis and outcomes were recorded.96 TB cases were collected from 1999 to June 2017: rheumatoid arthritis 55, ankylosing spondylitis 27, psoriatic arthritis 4, and juvenile inflammatory arthritis 10. The TB rate was 1240/100 000 person years for biologic users (n=96) versus the biologic naive cohort of 0/100 000 years with an incidence rate difference of 0.0124 (p<0.0001). 60/96 had pulmonary and 36/96 had extra-pulmonary TB. Reactivation TB occurred in 45/96 cases. TB occurred in all biologics licenced in South Africa, the majority in monoclonal inhibitors (1683/100 000 person years) compared with etanercept (861/100 000 person years) and non-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors (681/100 000 person years). The incidence rate ratio for monoclonal inhibitors compared with etanercept was 1.96 (p=0.005) and 2.47 (p=0.002) compared with non-TNF inhibitors with no significant difference between non-TNF inhibitors and etanercept (p=0.336). From those (12.9%) who screened LTBI positive, 14 developed TB, while the majority (77) screened LTBI negative. Black race, male sex, younger age and residence in the Western Cape were statistical risk factors. Two drug resistant TB cases and six deaths occurred.Reactivation and new onset TB is a significant risk for all biologics users in SA. Screening for LTBI is an imperative preventative strategy.© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Malaviya AN, Aggarwal VK, Rawat R, et al.

Screening for latent tuberculosis infection among patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the era of biologics and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in India, a high-burden TB country: The importance of Mantoux and Quantiferon-TB Gold tests

Int J Rheum Dis, 2018, 21(8):1563-1571. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13261.

PMID      [本文引用: 1]

To test the validity of an augmented tuberculosis skin test (a-TST) combined with Quantiferon TB-gold (QFTG) test for the screening of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) being considered for treatment with biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs or targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs.Standard TST using 1 tuberculin unit (TU) of purified protein derivative (PPD, RT23 strain) was carried out. If the positivity was less as compared to the general population, then a-TST using 10 TU PPD was employed. Simultaneously, QFTG test was also performed.Using standard TST, 6/44 (13.6%), patients were positive compared to the reported figures of ~ 40% of the general population; 38 of the remaining TST-negative patients were then given an a-TST with 10 TU PPD; eight of them dropped out. Of the remaining 30 patients, eight (26.6%) were positive. Another 70 patients tested directly with a-TST; 22 (31.4%) were found positive. Thus, of a total of 100 patients tested with a-TST, 30 (30%) were positive. In 54 a-TST negative patients, QFTG was done; seven (13%) were positive. Thus, in combined a-TST with QFTG, 43% of the RA patients were found positive, suggestive of the presence of LTBI.Combined a-TST with QFTG testing gave 43% positivity among RA patients, which is close to the reported ~ 40% Mantoux positivity in the general population. Therefore, this method for the screening of LTBI in Indian patients with RA being considered for tumor necrosis factor alpha treatment could be satisfactory for offsetting TB flare. It may apply to other high-burden TB countries around the world.© 2018 Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Lee J, Kim E, Jang EJ, et al.

Efficacy of Treatment for Latent Tuberculosis in Patients Undergoing Treatment with a Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonist

Ann Am Thorac Soc, 2017, 14(5):690-697. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201608-647OC.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Cuomo G, D’Abrosca V, Iacono D, et al.

The conversion rate of tuberculosis screening tests during biological therapies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Clin Rheumatol, 2017, 36(2):457-461. doi: 10.1007/s10067-016-3462-z.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

王子浔, 荣兰香, 马淑红, .

风湿免疫性疾病患者行T-SPOT.TB检测筛查潜伏性结核感染的价值

中国实验诊断学, 2017, 21(3):512-514. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4287.2017.03.047.

[本文引用: 2]

黄安芳, 罗妍, 赵毅, .

风湿病患者合并潜伏性结核感染的分析

中华内科杂志, 2016, 55(4):307-310. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2016.04.012.

[本文引用: 1]

邓国防, 王玉香, 陈涛, .

风湿免疫性疾病并发结核感染的临床特征分析

中国防痨杂志, 2018, 40(4):392-396. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2018.04.009.

[本文引用: 1]

刘羽佳, 徐婧, 郭倩, .

慢性炎症性关节炎患者潜伏性结核感染的发生率及不同筛查方法的诊断价值

中华医学杂志, 2019, 99(1): 20-24. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491. 2019.01.005.

[本文引用: 2]

中国医学科学院病原生物学研究所, 中国疾病预防控制中心, 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所.

全国结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染率估算专家共识

中国防痨杂志, 2022, 44(1): 4-8. doi: 10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20210662.

[本文引用: 1]

Gao L, Lu W, Bai L, et al.

Latent tuberculosis infection in rural China: baseline results of a population-based, multicentre, prospective cohort study

Lancet Infect Dis, 2015, 15(3): 310-319. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)71085-0.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Liu X, Zhang L, Zhang F, et al.

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Active Tuberculosis in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases: A Multi-center, Cross-Sectional Study in China

Emerg Microbes Infect, 2021, 10:1-36. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2021.2004864.

URL     [本文引用: 2]

全国第五次结核病流行病学抽样调查技术指导组, 全国第五次结核病流行病学抽样调查办公室.

2010年全国第五次结核病流行病学抽样调查报告

中国防痨杂志, 2012, 34(8): 485-508.

[本文引用: 1]

Scrivo R, Armignacco O.

Tuberculosis risk and anti-tumour necrosis factor agents in rheumatoid arthritis: a critical appraisal of national registry data

Int J Rheum Dis, 2014, 17(7):716-724. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12375.

URL     [本文引用: 5]

Cantini F, Nannini C, Niccoli L, et al.

Guidance for the management of patients with latent tuberculosis infection requiring biologic therapy in rheumatology and dermatology clinical practice

Autoimmun Rev, 2015, 14(6):503-509. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2015.01.011.

URL     [本文引用: 2]

Muhammed H, Jain A, Pattanaik SS, et al.

Clinical spectrum of active tuberculosis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Rheumatol Int, 2021, 41(12):2185-2193. doi: 10.1007/s00296-021-04933-0.

PMID      [本文引用: 1]

There is paucity of data on tuberculosis in Indian patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We retrospectively studied clinical features and outcome of tuberculosis in SLE.Medical records of patients who developed tuberculosis simultaneous or after the diagnosis of SLE were retrospectively reviewed. All patients fulfilled 1997 ACR and/or SLICC 2012 classification criteria for SLE. A diagnosis of tuberculosis required bacteriological, histopathological or CT/MRI suggestive of tuberculosis and initiation of four drug antituberculous therapy. Baseline parameters were compared with the rest of cohort to identify predictors of tuberculosis.In our cohort of 1335 SLE patients, 48 (3.6%) developed tuberculosis. Incidence of tuberculosis was calculated to be 733 per 100,000 patient years and occurred after a mean disease duration of 3.0 ± 4.1 years. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis (n = 37) was commoner than pulmonary tuberculosis (n =11). Most common radiological pattern in pulmonary tuberculosis was miliary and musculoskeletal TB was most common extrapulmonary TB. A microbiological diagnosis was obtained in 52.1% patients. Male gender was associated with higher risk of tuberculosis [OR 3.30 (1.55-7.05)]. Mortality was 14.5% and all patients who died had either disseminated (n = 5) or central nervous system (CNS) tuberculosis (n = 2).Incidence of tuberculosis in SLE is higher than general population and is associated with different phenotype and higher mortality. Male gender was associated with increased risk of tuberculosis in SLE.

Greenstein L, Makan K, Tikly M.

Burden of comorbidities in South Africans with systemic lupus erythematosus

Clin Rheumatol, 2019, 38(8):2077-2082. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04511-7.

PMID      [本文引用: 1]

To investigate the prevalence and spectrum of comorbidities in South Africans with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).A nested case-control study of a known alive group (AG) and deceased group (DG) of 200 and 40 patients, respectively, matched for age and sex, attending a tertiary Lupus Clinic. Comorbidities that were documented included, but not restricted to, those listed in the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). Lupus disease severity was assessed using the lupus severity index (LSI).Patients were mainly black female (94%), and the median age (IQR) and median disease duration (IQR) were 33 (25-42) and 6 (3-11) years, respectively. Overall, 191 (79.5%) patients experienced ≥ 1 comorbidities. The median (IQR) LSI and CCI scores were significantly higher in the DG than the AG (8.5 (6.7-9.1) vs 6.3 (5.2-8.3), p < 0.001 and 1 (1-3) vs 0 (0-2), p = 0.002, respectively). The commonest comorbidities were hypertension (42%), serious infections (36.6%) and tuberculosis (TB) (18.8%), the latter two being significantly more common in the DG (OR = 7.34, p < 0.0001 and OR = 3.40, p = 0.001, respectively). Of the CCI comorbidities, congestive cardiac failure (OR = 10.39, p = 0.0003), cerebrovascular disease (OR = 7.29, p = 0.01) and chronic kidney disease (OR = 3.08, p = 0.02) were more common in the DG. Both serious infections and TB were independent predictors of death.In this study of predominantly black South African SLE patients, comorbidities were common, with serious infections and TB amongst the commonest comorbidities. Unlike in industrialised Caucasian populations, cardiovascular comorbidities were rare in spite of a high prevalence of HPT.

González-Naranjo LA, Coral-Enríquez JA, Restrepo-Escobar M, et al.

Factors associated with active tuberculosis in Colombian patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a case-control study

Clin Rheumatol, 2021, 40(1):181-191. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05225-x.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Lao M, Chen D, Wu X, et al.

Active tuberculosis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus from Southern China: a retrospective study

Clin Rheumatol, 2019, 38(2): 535-543. doi: 10.1007/s10067-018-4303-z.

URL     [本文引用: 2]

Xiao X, Da G, Xie X, et al.

Tuberculosis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus-a 37-year longitudinal survey-based study

J Intern Med, 2021, 290(1): 101-115. doi: 10.1111/joim.13218.

PMID      [本文引用: 2]

Infections are one of the most common causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). SLE patients have a higher risk of tuberculosis (TB) infection due to impaired immune defence.To investigate the demographics, clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with SLE and concomitant TB.Medical records of SLE patients with TB who were admitted to Peking Union Medical College (PUMC) Hospital in 1983-2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Age- and sex-matched SLE inpatients without TB were randomly selected as controls. Clinical and laboratory features and treatment were analysed and compared, and subjects were followed up to assess their outcome.Of the 10 469 SLE inpatients, 249 (2.4%) were diagnosed with TB. Compared with controls, SLE/TB + patients exhibited higher frequency of prior haematologic, mucocutaneous and musculoskeletal system involvement, and prior treatment with potent glucocorticoid/immunosuppressive agents (GC/ISA). Arthritis and alopecia, positive T-SPOT.TB test and lymphocytopenia were more common in SLE/TB + patients. SLE/TB + patients with lupus before TB (SLE → TB) had higher risk of miliary TB (22.8%) and intracranial TB (16.5%) than SLE/TB + patients with lupus after TB (TB → SLE). SLE/TB + patients exhibited shorter long-term survival than SLE/TB- patients; those with poorer in-hospital outcomes had more severe lymphocytopenia and had received less treatment with ISAs.Systemic lupus erythematosus patients treated vigorously with GC/ISA should be alerted of increased risk of TB infection, especially miliary and intracranial TB. Positive T-SPOT.TB and lymphocytopenia served as discriminatory variables between SLE/TB + and SLE/TB- patients. Lymphocytopenia was associated with poorer outcomes in SLE/TB + patients.© 2020 The Association for the Publication of the Journal of Internal Medicine.

Yang Y, Thumboo J, Tan BH, et al.

The risk of tuberculosis in SLE patients from an Asian tertiary hospital

Rheumatol Int, 2017, 37(6): 1027-1033. doi: 10.1007/s00296-017-3696-3.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Ciang NC, Chan SCW, Lau CS, et al.

Risk of tuberculosis in patients with spondyloarthritis: data from a centralized electronic database in Hong Kong

BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2020, 21(1): 832. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03855-5.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

de Vries MK, Arkema EV, Jonsson J, et al.

Tuberculosis Risk in Ankylosing Spondylitis, Other Spondyloarthritis, and Psoriatic Arthritis in Sweden: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 2018, 70(10):1563-1567. doi: 10.1002/acr.23487.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Ai JW, Zhang S, Ruan QL, et al.

The Risk of Tuberculosis in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Tumor Necrosis Factor-Antagonist: A Metaanalysis of Both Randomized Controlled Trials and Registry/Cohort Studies

J Rheumatol, 2015, 42(12):2229-2237. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.150057.

URL     [本文引用: 4]

Lorenzetti R, Zullo A, Ridola L, et al.

Higher risk of tuberculosis reactivation when anti-TNF is combined with immunosuppressive agents: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Ann Med, 2014, 46(7):547-554. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2014.941919.

PMID      [本文引用: 1]

Treatment with tumour necrosis factor antagonists (anti-TNF) has been recognized as a risk factor for tuberculosis (TB) reactivation. Our aim was to evaluate risk of TB reactivation in rheumatologic and non-rheumatologic diseases treated with the same anti-TNF agents with and without concomitant therapies.We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating infliximab, adalimumab, and certolizumab in both rheumatologic and non-rheumatologic diseases until 2012. Results were calculated as pooled rates and/or pooled odd ratios (OR).Overall, 40 RCTs with a total of 14,683 patients (anti-TNF: 10,010; placebo: 4673) were included. TB reactivation was 0.26% (26/10,010) in the anti-TNF group and 0% (0/4673) in the control group, corresponding to an OR of 24.8 (95% CI 2.4-133). TB risk was higher when anti-TNF agents were combined with methotrexate or azathioprine as compared with either controls (24/4241 versus 0/4673; OR 54; 95% CI 5.3-88) or anti-TNF monotherapy (24/4241 versus 2/5769; OR 13.3; 95% CI 3.7-100). When anti-TNF was used as monotherapy, TB risk tended to be higher than placebo (2/5769 versus 0/4673; OR 4; 95% CI 0.2-15.7).TB risk with anti-TNF agents appeared to be increased when these agents were used in combination with methotrexate or azathioprine as compared with monotherapy regimen. TB risk seemed to be higher than placebo, even when monotherapy is prescribed.

Cantini F, Blandizzi C, Niccoli L, et al.

Systematic review on tuberculosis risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving inhibitors of Janus Kinases

Expert Opin Drug Saf, 2020, 19(7):861-872. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2020.1774550.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

美国辉瑞制药有限公司.

枸橼酸托法替布片说明书

[EB/OL]. [2022-04-28]. https://labeling.pfizer.com/ShowLabeling.aspx?id=14493.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Goletti D, Petrone L, Ippolito G, et al.

Preventive therapy for tuberculosis in rheumatological patients undergoing therapy with biological drugs

Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther, 2018, 16(6):501-512. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2018.1483238.

PMID      [本文引用: 1]

Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) accounts for almost a quarter of the world population, and, in 5-10% of the subjects with impaired immune-response against M. tuberculosis growth, it may progress to active tuberculosis (TB). In this review, we focus on the need to propose a screening for LTBI including preventive therapy offer in rheumatic patients undergoing therapy with biological drugs. Areas covered: We report on evidence that biologics are associated with an increased risk of active TB reactivation. This effect seems to be mainly limited to treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents, while non-anti-TNF-targeted biologics are not likely associated to any increased risk. We introduce the concept that the patients' coexisting host-related risk factors, such as comorbidities, are crucial to identify those at higher risk to reactivate TB. We report that preventive TB therapy is well tolerated in patients treated with biological drugs. Expert commentary: Availability of non-anti-TNF targeted biologics, that are not associated with an increased risk of TB reactivation, offers a great opportunity to tailor a therapeutic intervention at low/absent TB risk. After proper LTBI screening investigations, preventive TB therapy has been demonstrated to be effective and well-tolerated to reduce the risk of TB reactivation in rheumatic patients requiring biological drugs.

Elewski BE, Baddley JW, Deodhar AA, et al.

Association of Secukinumab Treatment With Tuberculosis Reactivation in Patients With Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis, or Ankylosing Spondylitis

JAMA Dermatol, 2021, 157(1):43-51. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.3257.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Cantini F, Niccoli L, Goletti D. Tuberculosis risk in patients treated with non-anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) targeted biologics and recently licensed TNF-α inhibitors: data from clinical trials and national registries. J Rheumatol Suppl, 2014, 91:56-64. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.140103.

[本文引用: 1]

Campbell L, Chen C, Bhagat SS, et al.

Risk of adverse events including serious infections in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with tocilizumab: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Rheumatology (Oxford), 2011, 50(3):552-562. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq343.

PMID      [本文引用: 1]

To assess the risk of adverse events (AEs) in patients with RA treated with tocilizumab, an IL-6 receptor antibody, in published randomized controlled trials (RCTs).A systematic literature search was conducted using the Cochrane library, PUBMED and EMBASE for all RCTs (of the use of tocilizumab for RA) until September 2009. Fixed effect meta-analyses were conducted to compare the incidence of AEs after treatment with tocilizumab 8 and 4 mg/kg in combination with MTX, and 8 mg/kg tocilizumab monotherapy, with controls. Pooled summary odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method.Six trials were analysed (four trials included 8 mg/kg tocilizumab and MTX combination therapy, three of which also assessed the 4 mg/kg dose). Three studies assessed tocilizumab monotherapy at 8 mg/kg. Pooled ORs revealed statistical significance for an increased risk of AEs in the 8 mg/kg combination group compared with controls (OR = 1.53; 95% CI 1.26, 1.86). The risk of infection was significantly higher in the 8 mg/kg combination group compared with controls (OR = 1.30; 95% CI 1.07, 1.58). No increased incidence of malignancy, tuberculosis reactivation or hepatitis was seen.Tocilizumab in combination with MTX as a treatment for RA is associated with a small but significantly increased risk of AEs, which is comparable with that of other biologics. Vigilance for untoward effects is, therefore, imperative in any patient treated with these immuno-suppressive agents.

Koike T, Harigai M, Inokuma S, et al.

Effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab: postmarketing surveillance of 7901 patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Japan

J Rheumatol, 2014, 41(1):15-23. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.130466.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Lin CT, Huang WN, Hsieh CW, et al.

Safety and effectiveness of tocilizumab in treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis-A three-year study in Taiwan

J Microbiol Immunol Infect, 2019, 52(1):141-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2017.04.002.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

先声药业集团有限公司.

阿巴西普药物说明书

[EB/OL].[2022-06-08]. https://packageinserts.bms.com/pi/pi_orencia.pdf.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Jick SS, Lieberman ES, Rahman MU, et al.

Glucocorticoid use, other associated factors, and the risk of tuberculosis

Arthritis Rheum, 2006, 55(1):19-26. doi: 10.1002/art.21705.

URL     [本文引用: 2]

Brassard P, Lowe AM, Bernatsky S, et al.

Rheumatoid arthritis, its treatments, and the risk of tuberculosis in Quebec, Canada

Arthritis Rheum, 2009, 61(3):300-304. doi: 10.1002/art.24476.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Cooray S, Zhang H, Breen R, et al.

Cerebral tuberculosis in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus following cyclophosphamide treatment: a case report

Lupus, 2018, 27(4): 670-675. doi: 10.1177/0961203317722849.

PMID      [本文引用: 1]

Central nervous system (CNS) tuberculosis (TB) is a rare but catastrophic event in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Here we report a case of cerebral TB in a patient with lupus myocarditis and nephritis, following cyclophosphamide immunosuppression. To our knowledge this is the first reported case of cerebral TB in SLE in a non-endemic country. A 31-year-old female with SLE and a history of regular travel to Kenya presented to our centre with clinical features of acute heart failure. She was diagnosed with severe lupus myocarditis, and a renal biopsy also confirmed lupus nephritis. Prior to admission, she had also had a cough, fever and weight loss and was under investigation for suspected TB infection. She was treated with ivabradine, beta-blockers and diuretics together with methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide immunosuppression. Subsequent sputum cultures confirmed TB and she was commenced on triple therapy. Despite this, she developed confusion, dizziness, blurred vision and fluctuating consciousness. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and lumbar puncture revealed CNS TB infection resulting in meningitis. This was later complicated by obstructive hydrocephalus due to TB abscesses. A ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt was inserted and TB medications were given intravenously (IV) with dexamethasone. Following a prolonged hospital admission, the patient eventually recovered and rituximab treatment was used to control her SLE. TB infection has been associated with SLE flares. It is likely in this case that TB exacerbated a lupus flare and subsequent immunosuppression resulted in mycobacterial dissemination to the CNS. Systemic and CNS features of TB and SLE are difficult to distinguish and their contemporaneous management represents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.

Macauley P, Rapp M, Park S, et al.

Miliary Tuberculosis Presenting With Meningitis in a Patient Treated With Mycophenolate for Lupus Nephritis: Challenges in Diagnosis and Review of the Literature

J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep, 2018, 6:2324709618770226. doi: 10.1177/2324709618770226.

[本文引用: 1]

Ting SW, Ting SY, Lin YS, et al.

Association between dif-ferent systemic therapies and the risk of tuberculosis in psoriasis patients: A population-based study

Int J Clin Pract, 2021, 75(12):e15006. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.15006.

[本文引用: 1]

Ha YE, Joo EJ, Park SY, et al.

Tacrolimus as a risk factor for tuberculosis and outcome of treatment with rifampicin in solid organ transplant recipients

Transpl Infect Dis, 2012, 14(6):626-634. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3062.2012.00721.x.

PMID      [本文引用: 1]

The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence, risk factors, and treatment outcome of tuberculosis (TB) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients treated with rifampicin.The incidence density of TB was calculated by a retrospective cohort study. Risk factors for TB were analyzed by a nested case-control study. Treatment outcome and effects of anti-TB drugs on immunosuppressants and allograft were compared between patients whose initial 2-month intensive regimen included rifampicin and those whose intensive regimen did not.Among the 2144 SOT recipients over 16 years, 40 cases of TB were found (1.7%). The incidence density was 372 cases per 10(5) patient years (95% confidence interval [CI], 270-503), which was 4 times higher than for the general Korean population (90 cases per 10(5) person years). The median time to the development of TB was 234 days (range, 33-3940 days). The use of tacrolimus (odds ratio [OR] 4.90; 95% CI, 1.74-13.80; P = 0.003) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection within the prior 3 months (OR 4.62; 95% CI, 1.44-14.87; P = 0.01) were found to be risk factors for TB. Patients whose intensive regimen included rifampicin were more likely to have an increased dose of calcineurin inhibitors than patients whose intensive regimen did not include rifampicin (13/15 [86.7%] vs. 3/14 [21.4%], P = 0.001). Graft rejection and mortality did not differ between the 2 groups.Use of tacrolimus and CMV infection were major risk factors for TB in SOT recipients. The graft outcome and mortality did not differ whether rifampicin was used or not during the first 2-month intensive phase.© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

朱翠云.

对人类免疫缺陷病毒感染者潜伏性结核感染的筛查和干预

上海医药, 2020, 41(11):14-16,20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1533.2020.11.005.

[本文引用: 1]

Wang L, Turner MO, Elwood RK, et al.

A meta-analysis of the effect of Bacille Calmette Guérin vaccination on tuberculin skin test measurements

Thorax, 2002, 57(9):804-809. doi: 10.1136/thorax.57.9.804.

PMID      [本文引用: 1]

The accurate diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is an important component of any tuberculosis control programme and depends largely on tuberculin skin testing. The appropriate interpretation of skin test results requires knowledge of the possible confounding factors such as previous BCG vaccination. Uncertainty about the effect of BCG vaccination on tuberculin skin testing and the strength with which recommendations are made to individual patients regarding treatment of LTBI have identified a need to analyse the available data on the effect of BCG on skin testing. A meta-analysis of the evidence for the effect of BCG vaccination on tuberculin skin testing in subjects without active tuberculosis was therefore performed.Medline was searched for English language articles published from 1966 to 1999 using the key words "BCG vaccine", "tuberculin test/PPD", and "skin testing". Bibliographies of relevant articles were reviewed for additional studies that may have been missed in the Medline search. Articles were considered for inclusion in the meta-analysis if they had recorded tuberculin skin test results in subjects who had received BCG vaccination more than 5 years previously and had a concurrent control group. Only prospective studies were considered. The geographical location, number of participants, type of BCG vaccine used, type of tuberculin skin test performed, and the results of the tuberculin skin test were extracted.The abstracts and titles of 980 articles were identified, 370 full text articles were reviewed, and 26 articles were included in the final analysis. Patients who had received BCG vaccination were more likely to have a positive skin test (5 TU PPD: relative risk (RR) 2.12 (95% confidence interval (CI)1.50 to 3.00); 2 TU RT23: 2.65 [corrected] (95% CI 1.83 to 3.85). The effect of BCG vaccination on PPD skin test results was less after 15 years. Positive skin tests with indurations of >15 mm are more likely to be the result of tuberculous infection than of BCG vaccination.In subjects without active tuberculosis, immunisation with BCG significantly increases the likelihood of a positive tuberculin skin test. The interpretation of the skin test therefore needs to be made in the individual clinical context and with evaluation of other risk factors for infection. The size of the induration should also be considered when making recommendations for treatment of latent infection.

孟炜丽, 罗萍, 胡京坤, .

BCG-PPD与TB-PPD皮肤试验在大学生结核病筛查中的差异性分析

中国防痨杂志, 2014, 36(7):532-536. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2014.07.005.

[本文引用: 1]

Friedman L, Dedicoat M, Davies P. Clinical Tuberculosis. 6th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2020: 154.

[本文引用: 1]

Aggerbeck H, Ruhwald M, Hoff ST, et al.

Interaction between C-Tb and PPD given concomitantly in a split-body randomised controlled trial

Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 2019, 23(1): 38-44. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.18.0137.

PMID      [本文引用: 1]

Seven tuberculosis (TB) clinics in South Africa.As both purified protein derivative (PPD) and a -specific skin test (C-Tb) contain region of difference 1 (RD1) antigens, we conducted a study to evaluate whether there was any interaction between the two during concomitant and separate administration in patients with newly diagnosed culture-positive TB.Adult patients with active TB ( = 456, 20% human immunodeficiency virus infected) were randomised to receive only C-Tb, only PPD, or concomitant injection of both C-Tb and PPD using the Mantoux technique. Indurations were read after 48-72 h. QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT) was performed in tandem.Of the 456 study participants, 154 simultaneously received both C-Tb and PPD, 153 only C-Tb and 149 only PPD. There was no effect of concomitant injection of PPD on the mean C-Tb induration (19 mm, 95%CI 17-22 vs. 18 mm, 95%CI 16-21; = 0.91). In patients with active TB, C-Tb sensitivity (78%) was similar to PPD (81%) and QFT (84%; excluding 82/429 [19%] indeterminate results). All tests showed reduced sensitivity in participants with CD4 <100 cells/μl.In patients with active TB, there was no interaction between C-Tb and PPD during concomitant injection of both agents. Sensitivities were similar for PPD and C-Tb.

Abubakar I, Jackson C, Rangaka MX.

C-Tb: a latent tuberculosis skin test for the 21st century?

Lancet Respir Med, 2017, 5(4):236-237. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30012-7.

PMID      [本文引用: 1]

Starshinova A, Dovgalyk I, Malkova A, et al.

Recombinant tuberculosis allergen (Diaskintest) in tuberculosis diagnostic in Russia (meta-analysis)

Int J Mycobacteriol, 2020, 9(4):335-346. doi: 10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_131_20.

PMID      [本文引用: 1]

Immunological testing for tuberculosis has been one of the most rapidly developing areas in the last decade. A new-generation immunological skin test, Diaskintest (DST), has been developed in the Russian Federation and successfully implemented into clinical practice since 2009. This article presents the results of a meta-analysis of publications reporting data on the use of the recombinant tuberculosis allergen DST (n = 121) from 2009 to 2019 included in Russian and international databases. The analysis included a total of 61 papers consistent with the study design, which cumulatively presented the results of 3,777,083 patients tested with DST (83.0%). The obtained data showed that the overall diagnostic sensitivity of the test in this population, regardless of age, was 86.0%, with 98.0% negative results. It was found that the intensity of the immune response of tuberculosis patients to specific ESAT-6 and CFP-10 antigens of DST may depend on the biological properties of the pathogen characteristic to various Mycobacterium tuberculosis genotypes, tuberculosis severity, and the presence of concomitant diseases. These factors are more prevalent in the adult population. In children, however, the test sensitivity reaches 100%. The proportion of positive DST results in HIV-positive patients tested for tuberculosis was 60.0%. The analysis showed that the accuracy (overall validity) of DST was 95.1% in the total studied population (95% confidence interval [CI]: 95.06-95.1) and 92.4% in HIV-positive patients (95% CI: 91.9-92.7).

潘艳艳, 吴园园, 蔡红娇, .

不同的风湿免疫性疾病患者免疫功能差异分析

当代医学, 2020, 26(19):1-4. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4393.2020.19.001.

[本文引用: 1]

Pang C, Wu Y, Wan C, et al.

Accuracy of the Bronchoalveolar Lavage Enzyme-Linked Immunospot Assay for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Meta-analysis

Medicine (Baltimore), 2016, 95(12):e3183. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003183.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Pai M, Zwerling A, Menzies D.

Systematic review: T-cell-based assays for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection: an update

Ann Intern Med, 2008, 149(3):177-184. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-3-200808050-00241.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Metcalfe JZ, Everett CK, Steingart KR, et al.

Interferon-γ release assays for active pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis in adults in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review and meta-analysis

J Infect Dis, 2011, 204 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S1120-S1129. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir410.

[本文引用: 1]

Barcellini L, Borroni E, Brown J, et al.

First evaluation of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus performance in contact screening

Eur Respir J, 2016, 48(5):1411-1419. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00510-2016.

PMID      [本文引用: 1]

Identifying latently infected individuals is crucial for the elimination of tuberculosis (TB). We evaluated for the first time the performance of a new type of interferon-γ release assay, QuantiFERON-TB Plus (QFT-Plus), which includes an additional antigen tube (TB2), stimulating both CD4 and CD8 T-cells in contacts of TB patients.Contacts were screened for latent TB infection by tuberculin skin test, QFT-Plus and QuantiFERON-TB Gold in Tube (QFT-GIT).In 119 TB contacts, the overall agreement between QFT-Plus and QFT-GIT was high, with a Cohen's κ of 0.8. Discordant results were found in 12 subjects with negative QFT-GIT and positive QFT-Plus results. In analyses of markers of TB exposure and test results, the average time spent with the index case was the strongest risk factor for positivity in each of these tests. The difference in interferon-γ production between the two antigen tubes (TB2-TB1) was used as an estimate of CD8 stimulation provided by the TB2. TB2-TB1 values >0.6 IU·mL were significantly associated with proximity to the index case and European origin.QFT-Plus has a stronger association with surrogate measures of TB exposure than QFT-GIT in adults screened for latent TB infection. Interferon-γ response in the new antigen tube used an indirect estimate of specific CD8 response correlates with increased Mycobacterium tuberculosis exposure, suggesting a possible role in identifying individuals with recent infection.Copyright ©ERS 2016.

中华医学会结核病学分会.

非结核分枝杆菌病诊断与治疗指南(2020年版)

中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2020, 43(11):918-946. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20200508-00570.

[本文引用: 1]

Kim CH, Lim JK, Yoo SS, et al.

Diagnostic performance of the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube assay and factors associated with nonpositive results in patients with miliary tuberculosis

Clin Infect Dis, 2014, 58(7):986-989. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu045.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

中华医学会结核病学分会.

结核分枝杆菌γ-干扰素释放试验及临床应用专家意见(2021年版)

中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2022, 45(2):143-150. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20211110-00794.

[本文引用: 2]

Behar SM, Shin DS, Maier A, et al.

Use of the T-SPOT.TB assay to detect latent tuberculosis infection among rheumatic disease patients on immunosuppressive therapy

J Rheumatol, 2009, 36(3):546-551. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.080854.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Pyo J, Cho SK, Kim D, et al.

Systemic review: agreement between the latent tuberculosis screening tests among patients with rheumatic diseases

Korean J Intern Med, 2018, 33(6):1241-1251. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2016.222.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Ruan Q, Zhang S, Ai J, et al.

Screening of latent tuberculosis infection by interferon-γ release assays in rheumatic patients: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Clin Rheumatol, 2016, 35(2):417-425. doi: 10.1007/s10067-014-2817-6.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

World Health Organization.

Guidelines on the Management of Latent Tuberculosis Infection

Geneva: World Health Organization, 2015.

[本文引用: 1]

Wang PH, Lin CH, Chang TH, et al.

Chest roentgenography is complementary to interferon-gamma release assay in latent tuberculosis infection screening of rheumatic patients

BMC Pulm Med, 2020, 20(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12890-020-01274-9.

URL     [本文引用: 2]

中华医学会结核病学分会.

肺结核诊断和治疗指南

中国实用乡村医生杂志, 2013, 20(2):7-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7185.2013.02.005.

[本文引用: 1]

Badje A, Moh R, Gabillard D, et al.

Effect of isoniazid preventive therapy on risk of death in west African, HIV-infected adults with high CD4 cell counts: long-term follow-up of the Temprano ANRS 12136 trial

Lancet Glob Health, 2017, 5(11):e1080-e1089. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30372-8.

[本文引用: 1]

中国防痨协会.

高危人群结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染检测及预防性治疗专家共识

中国防痨杂志, 2021, 43(9):874-878. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2021.09.004.

[本文引用: 4]

Health Protection Surveillance Centre.

Guidelines on the Prevention and Control of Tuberculosis in Ireland, 2010-Amended 2014

Dublin: Health Protection Surveillance Centre, 2014:41-42.

[本文引用: 2]

Singh JA, Furst DE, Bharat A, et al.

2012 update of the 2008 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 2012, 64(5):625-639. doi: 10.1002/acr.21641.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Sterling TR, Njie G, Zenner D, et al.

Guidelines for the Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection: Recommendations from the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association and CDC, 2020

MMWR Recomm Rep, 2020, 69(1):1-11. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6901a1.

[本文引用: 5]

Sterling TR, Villarino ME, Borisov AS, et al.

Three months of rifapentine and isoniazid for latent tuberculosis infection

N Engl J Med, 2011, 365(23):2155-2166. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1104875.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Villarino ME, Scott NA, Weis SE, et al.

Treatment for preventing tuberculosis in children and adolescents: a randomized clinical trial of a 3-month, 12-dose regimen of a combination of rifapentine and isoniazid

JAMA Pediatr, 2015, 169(3):247-255. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3158.

PMID      [本文引用: 1]

Three months of a once-weekly combination of rifapentine and isoniazid for treatment of latent tuberculosis infection is safe and effective for persons 12 years or older. Published data for children are limited.To compare treatment safety and assess noninferiority treatment effectiveness of combination therapy with rifapentine and isoniazid vs 9 months of isoniazid treatment for latent tuberculosis infection in children.A pediatric cohort nested within a randomized, open-label clinical trial conducted from June 11, 2001, through December 17, 2010, with follow-up through September 5, 2013, in 29 study sites in the United States, Canada, Brazil, Hong Kong (China), and Spain. Participants were children (aged 2-17 years) who were eligible for treatment of latent tuberculosis infection.Twelve once-weekly doses of the combination drugs, given with supervision by a health care professional, for 3 months vs 270 daily doses of isoniazid, without supervision by a health care professional, for 9 months.We compared rates of treatment discontinuation because of adverse events (AEs), toxicity grades 1 to 4, and deaths from any cause. The equivalence margin for the comparison of AE-related discontinuation rates was 5%. Tuberculosis disease diagnosed within 33 months of enrollment was the main end point for testing effectiveness. The noninferiority margin was 0.75%.Of 1058 children enrolled, 905 were eligible for evaluation of effectiveness. Of 471 in the combination-therapy group, 415 (88.1%) completed treatment vs 351 of 434 (80.9%) in the isoniazid-only group (P = .003). The 95% CI for the difference in rates of discontinuation attributed to an AE was -2.6 to 0.1, which was within the equivalence range. In the safety population, 3 of 539 participants (0.6%) who took the combination drugs had a grade 3 AE vs 1 of 493 (0.2%) who received isoniazid only. Neither arm had any hepatotoxicity, grade 4 AEs, or treatment-attributed death. None of the 471 in the combination-therapy group developed tuberculosis vs 3 of 434 (cumulative rate, 0.74%) in the isoniazid-only group, for a difference of -0.74% and an upper bound of the 95% CI of the difference of +0.32%, which met the noninferiority criterion.Treatment with the combination of rifapentine and isoniazid was as effective as isoniazid-only treatment for the prevention of tuberculosis in children aged 2 to 17 years. The combination-therapy group had a higher treatment completion rate than did the isoniazid-only group and was safe.clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00023452.

中华医学会结核病学分会儿童结核病专业委员会, 国家儿童医学中心, 首都医科大学附属北京儿童医院, 等.

儿童结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染筛查和预防性治疗专家共识

中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2020, 43(4):345-349. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20200106-00006.

[本文引用: 1]

/