Background: The risk and timing of tuberculosis among recently exposed close contacts of patients with infectious tuberculosis are not well established. Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients >/=15 years of age with culture-confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis and their close contacts at 9 health departments in the United States and Canada. Close contacts were screened and cross-matched with tuberculosis registries to identify those who developed tuberculosis. Results: Tuberculosis was diagnosed in 158 of 4490 contacts (4%) of 718 index patients with tuberculosis. Of tuberculosis cases among contacts, cumulative totals of 81 (51%), 119 (75%), 128 (81%), and 145 (92%) were diagnosed by 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively, after the index patients' diagnosis. Tuberculosis rates among contacts were 2644, 115, 46, 69, and 25 cases per 100000 persons, respectively, in the 5 consecutive years after the index patients' diagnosis. Of the tuberculosis cases among contacts, 121 (77%) were identified by contact investigation and 37 (23%) by tuberculosis registry cross-match. Conclusions: Close contacts to infectious patients with tuberculosis had high rates of tuberculosis, with most disease diagnosed before or within 3 months after the index patient' diagnosis. Contact investigations need to be prompt to detect tuberculosis and maximize the opportunity to identify and treat latent infection, to prevent disease.

BACKGROUND: Effective treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is an important component of TB elimination programs. Promising new regimens that may be more effective are being introduced. Because few regimens can be directly compared, network meta-analyses, which allow indirect comparisons to be made, strengthen conclusions. PURPOSE: To determine the most efficacious regimen for preventing active TB with the lowest likelihood of adverse events to inform LTBI treatment policies. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science up to 29 January 2014; clinical trial registries; and conference abstracts. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized, controlled trials that evaluated LTBI treatment in humans and recorded at least 1 of 2 prespecified end points (preventing active TB or hepatotoxicity), without language or date restrictions. DATA EXTRACTION: Data from eligible studies were independently extracted by 2 investigators according to a standard protocol. DATA SYNTHESIS: Of the 1516 articles identified, 53 studies met the inclusion criteria. Data on 15 regimens were available; of 105 possible comparisons, 42 (40%) were compared directly. Compared with placebo, isoniazid for 6 months (odds ratio [OR], 0.64 [95% credible interval {CrI}, 0.48 to 0.83]) or 12 months or longer (OR, 0.52 [CrI, 0.41 to 0.66]), rifampicin for 3 to 4 months (OR, 0.41 [CrI, 0.18 to 0.86]), and rifampicin-isoniazid regimens for 3 to 4 months (OR, 0.52 [CrI, 0.34 to 0.79]) were efficacious within the network. LIMITATIONS: The risk of bias was unclear for many studies across various domains. Evidence was sparse for some comparisons, particularly hepatotoxicity. CONCLUSION: Comparison of different LTBI treatment regimens showed that various therapies containing rifamycins for 3 months or more were efficacious at preventing active TB, potentially more so than isoniazid alone. Regimens containing rifamycins may be effective alternatives to isoniazid monotherapy. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.

Comprehensive guidelines for treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) among persons living in the United States were last published in 2000 (American Thoracic Society. CDC targeted tuberculin testing and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:S221-47). Since then, several new regimens have been evaluated in clinical trials. To update previous guidelines, the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association (NTCA) and CDC convened a committee to conduct a systematic literature review and make new recommendations for the most effective and least toxic regimens for treatment of LTBI among persons who live in the United States.The systematic literature review included clinical trials of regimens to treat LTBI. Quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low) from clinical trial comparisons was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. In addition, a network meta-analysis evaluated regimens that had not been compared directly in clinical trials. The effectiveness outcome was tuberculosis disease; the toxicity outcome was hepatotoxicity. Strong GRADE recommendations required at least moderate evidence of effectiveness and that the desirable consequences outweighed the undesirable consequences in the majority of patients. Conditional GRADE recommendations were made when determination of whether desirable consequences outweighed undesirable consequences was uncertain (e.g., with low-quality evidence).These updated 2020 LTBI treatment guidelines include the NTCA- and CDC-recommended treatment regimens that comprise three preferred rifamycin-based regimens and two alternative monotherapy regimens with daily isoniazid. All recommended treatment regimens are intended for persons infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis that is presumed to be susceptible to isoniazid or rifampin. These updated guidelines do not apply when evidence is available that the infecting M. tuberculosis strain is resistant to both isoniazid and rifampin; recommendations for treating contacts exposed to multidrug-resistant tuberculosis were published in 2019 (Nahid P, Mase SR Migliori GB, et al. Treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. An official ATS/CDC/ERS/IDSA clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019;200:e93-e142). The three rifamycin-based preferred regimens are 3 months of once-weekly isoniazid plus rifapentine, 4 months of daily rifampin, or 3 months of daily isoniazid plus rifampin. Prescribing providers or pharmacists who are unfamiliar with rifampin and rifapentine might confuse the two drugs. They are not interchangeable, and caution should be taken to ensure that patients receive the correct medication for the intended regimen. Preference for these rifamycin-based regimens was made on the basis of effectiveness, safety, and high treatment completion rates. The two alternative treatment regimens are daily isoniazid for 6 or 9 months; isoniazid monotherapy is efficacious but has higher toxicity risk and lower treatment completion rates than shorter rifamycin-based regimens.In summary, short-course (3- to 4-month) rifamycin-based treatment regimens are preferred over longer-course (6-9 month) isoniazid monotherapy for treatment of LTBI. These updated guidelines can be used by clinicians, public health officials, policymakers, health care organizations, and other state and local stakeholders who might need to adapt them to fit individual clinical circumstances.

15 minutes late) during video sessions occurred 104 times. No major side effects were reported by V3HP patients. CONCLUSIONS: The NYC TB program observed higher treatment completion with VDOT than that previously seen with clinic DOT among patients on 3HP. Expanding the use of VDOT may improve treatment completion and corresponding outcomes for patients with LTBI.]]>

Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) management is now a critical component of the World Health Organization's End TB Strategy.In this randomised controlled trial (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry identifier ChiCTR-IOR-15007202), two short-course regimens with rifapentine plus isoniazid (a 3-month once-weekly regimen and a 2-month twice-weekly regimen) were initially designed to be evaluated for rural residents aged 50-69 years with LTBI in China.Due to the increasingly rapid growth and unexpected high frequency of adverse effects, the treatments were terminated early (after 8 weeks for the once-weekly regimen and after 6 weeks for the twice-weekly regimen). In the modified intention-to-treat analysis on the completed doses, the cumulative rate of active disease during 2 years of follow-up was 1.21% (14 out of 1155) in the untreated controls, 0.78% (10 out of 1284) in the group that received the 8-week once-weekly regimen and 0.46% (six out of 1299) in the group that received the 6-week twice-weekly regimen. The risk of active disease was decreased, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.63 (95% CI 0.27-1.43) and 0.41 (95% CI 0.15-1.09) for the treatments, respectively. No significant difference was found in the occurrence of hepatotoxicity (1.02% (13 out of 1279) versus 1.17% (15 out of 1279); p=0.704).The short regimens tested must be used with caution among the elderly because of the high rates of adverse effects. Further work is necessary to test the ultrashort regimens in younger people with LTBI.

/= 1 dose of study drug, 153 had a SDR: 138/3893 (3.5%) with 3HP vs 15/3659 (0.4%) with 9H (P /= 35 years (aOR 2.0; 95% CI, 1.4, 2.9), and lower body mass index (body mass index [BMI]; P = .009). In a separate multivariate analysis among persons who received 3HP, severe SDR were associated with white non-Hispanic race/ethnicity (aOR 5.4; 95% CI, 1.8, 16.3), and receipt of concomitant non-study medications (aOR 5.9; 95% CI, 1.3, 27.1). CONCLUSIONS: SDR were more common with 3HP, and mostly flu-like. Persons of white race, female sex, older age, and lower BMI were at increased risk. Severe reactions were rare and associated with 3HP, concomitant medication, and white race. The underlying mechanism is unclear. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT00023452.]]>

There is conflicting evidence about factors associated with failure to complete treatment (FCT) for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). We aim to identify the geographic, sociodemographic, and medical factors associated with FCT in Portugal, highlighting the two main metropolitan areas of Porto and Lisbon. We performed a retrospective cohort study including LTBI patients that started treatment in Portugal between 2013 and 2017. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) using multivariable logistic regression to identify geographic, sociodemographic, and medical factors associated with FCT. Data on completion of treatment were available for 15,478 of 17,144 patients (90.3%). Of those, 2132 (13.8%) failed to complete treatment. Factors associated with FCT were being older than 15 years (aOR, 1.65 (95% CI = 1.34-2.05) for those aged 16 to 29), being born abroad (aOR, 2.04 (95% CI = 1.19-3.50) for Asia; aOR, 1.57 (95% CI = 1.24-1.98) for Africa), having a chronic disease (aOR, 1.29 (95% CI = 1.04-1.60)), alcohol abuse (aOR, 2.24 (95% CI = 1.73-2.90)), and being intravenous drug user (aOR, 1.68 (95% CI = 1.05-2.68)). Three-month course treatment with isoniazid plus rifampicin was associated with decreased FCT when compared with 6- or 9-month courses of isoniazid-only (aOR, 0.59 (95% CI = 0.45-0.77)). In Lisbon metropolitan area, being born in Africa, and in Porto metropolitan area, alcohol abusing and being intravenous drug user were distinctive factors associated with FCT. Sociodemographic and medical factors associated with FCT may vary by geographical area and should be taken into account when planning interventions to improve LTBI treatment outcomes. This study reinforces that shorter course treatment for LTBI might reduce FCT.

OBJECTIVE: In the province of Manitoba, Canada, given that latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) treatment is provided at no cost to the patient, treatment completion rates should be optimal. The objective of this study was to estimate LTBI treatment completion using prescription drug administrative data and identify patient characteristics associated with completion. METHODS: Prescription drug data (1999-2014) were used to identify individuals dispensed isoniazid (INH) or rifampin (RIF) monotherapy. Treatment completion was defined as being dispensed INH for >/= 180 days (INH180) or >/= 270 days (INH270) or RIF for >/= 120 days (RIF120). Logistic regression models tested socio-demographic and comorbidity characteristics associated with treatment completion. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 4985 (90.4%) persons dispensed INH and 529 (9.6%) RIF. Overall treatment completion was 60.2% and improved from 43.1% in 1999-2003 to 67.3% in 2009-2014. INH180 showed the highest completion (63.8%) versus INH270 (40.4%) and RIF120 (27.0%). INH180 completion was higher among those aged 0-18 years (68.5%) compared with those aged 19+ (61.0%). Sex, geography, First Nations status, income quintile, and comorbidities were not associated with completion. CONCLUSIONS: Benchmark 80% treatment completion rates were not achieved in Manitoba. Factors associated with non-completion were older age, INH270, and RIF120. Access to shorter LTBI treatments, such as rifapentine/INH, may improve treatment completion.