Email Alert | RSS

Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis ›› 2023, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (11): 1072-1077.doi: 10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20230313

• Original Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of the effect of GeneXpert MTB/RIF technology on early detection of bacteriologically confirmed and drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis in general hospitals

Ruan Yunzhou1, Zhang Hongwei2, Li Yuehua3, Ma Yingzi4, Cheng Shiming5, Fan Haiying5, Li Renzhong1(), Zhao Yanlin1()   

  1. 1National Center for Tuberculosis Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Diseases Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China
    2Tuberculosis Control and Prevention Center, Beijing Center for Diseases Control and Prevention, Beijing 100035, China
    3Office of Wuhan Institute for Tuberculosis Control, Wuhan 430030, China
    4Department of Tuberculosis Prevention and Control, Chengde Center for Diseases Control and Prevention, Chengde 067026, China
    5Chinese Antituberculosis Association, Beijing 100710, China
  • Received:2023-08-28 Online:2023-11-10 Published:2023-11-03
  • Contact: Li Renzhong, Email: lirz@chinacdc.cn; Zhao Yanlin, Email: zhaoyl@chinacdc.cn
  • Supported by:
    Introducing New Technologies in General Hospital for Early Detection of Infectious and Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis(01202204)

Abstract:

Objective: To understand the current situation of GeneXpert MTB/RIF (GeneXpert) technology in the diagnosis of bacteriologically confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis and drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis in general hospitals, so as to better play the role of general hospitals in the detection of pulmonary tuberculosis. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted with pulmonary tuberculosis patients that from 8 tertiary general hospitals equipped with GeneXpert as the study group and those from 3 tertiary general hospitals not equipped with GeneXpert as the control group. The proportion of bacteriologically confirmed patients, the proportion of rifampicin-resistant patients, the diagnosis time of pulmonary tuberculosis patients and the diagnosis time of rifampicin-resistant patients were compared and analyzed between the two groups. Results: A total of 370 patients who were tested by GeneXpert in the study group and 342 patients who were not tested by GeneXpert in the control group were enrolled in the study. The proportion of bacteriologically confirmed patients in the study group (88.9%, 329/370) was higher than that in the control group (67.0%, 229/342; χ2=50.560, P<0.001). Among the patients with bacteriologically confirmed, the proportion of first diagnosis in the study group (96.4%, 317/329) was higher than that in the control group (75.1%, 172/229; χ2=56.228, P<0.001). The diagnosis time of pulmonary tuberculosis in the study group (1 (1,5) d) was shorter than that in the control group (4 (1,11) d; nonparametric test, P<0.001). The study group found that the proportion of patients with rifampicin resistance was 80.0% (8/10), while the proportion found in the control group was 0 (0/6; Fisher’s exact test, P=0.007). The diagnosis time of rifampicin resistance in the study group (1 (1,4) d) was significantly shorter than that in the control group (20 (11,29) d; nonparametric test, P=0.005). Among the patients in the study group who underwent both GeneXpert and sputum smear testing, the proportion of MTB detected by GeneXpert (82.0%, 242/295) was higher than that detected by sputum smear (33.6%, 99/295; χ2=142.092, P<0.001); when GeneXpert and sputum culture were tested simultaneously, the proportion of MTB detected by GeneXpert (86.3%, 107/124) was higher than that of sputum culture (63.7%, 79/124; χ2=16.860, P<0.001). Conclusion: GeneXpert technology is helpful for the early diagnosis of bacteriologically confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis and drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis in general hospitals. It is suggested that general hospitals should routinely carry out GeneXpert test and incorporate it into the medical insurance reimbursement catalogue to improve its efficiency.

Key words: Tuberculosis, pulmonary, Drug resistance, Molecular diagnostic techniques, Comparative study

CLC Number: