Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis ›› 2025, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6): 738-745.doi: 10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20250121
• Original Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Wang Hanfei1, Li Jinhao1, Wen Yaxin1, Xu Caihong1,2()
Received:
2025-03-26
Online:
2025-06-10
Published:
2025-06-11
Contact:
Xu Caihong, Email: Supported by:
CLC Number:
Wang Hanfei, Li Jinhao, Wen Yaxin, Xu Caihong. Analysis of diagnosis and treatment delays and influencing factors of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis patients in China, 2021[J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(6): 738-745. doi: 10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20250121
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.zgflzz.cn/EN/10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20250121
特征 | 患者例数 | 构成比(%) |
---|---|---|
性别 | ||
男性 | 6554 | 72.62 |
女性 | 2471 | 27.38 |
年龄(岁) | ||
<25 | 967 | 10.71 |
25~44 | 2677 | 29.66 |
45~64 | 3639 | 40.32 |
≥65 | 1742 | 19.31 |
职业 | ||
学生及老师 | 461 | 5.11 |
工人 | 368 | 4.08 |
农民 | 4361 | 48.32 |
家务及待业 | 2432 | 26.95 |
其他 | 1403 | 15.54 |
户口所在地 | ||
本县(区) | 8247 | 91.38 |
本省非本县(区) | 415 | 4.60 |
外省 | 363 | 4.02 |
重点人群 | ||
是 | 719 | 7.97 |
否 | 8306 | 92.03 |
既往抗结核治疗史 | ||
无 | 2720 | 30.14 |
有 | 6305 | 69.86 |
治疗分类 | ||
初治 | 5121 | 56.74 |
复治 | 3904 | 43.26 |
药物敏感性检测方法 | ||
分子生物学 | 6897 | 76.42 |
传统药物敏感性试验 | 965 | 10.69 |
未知 | 1163 | 12.89 |
化疗方案 | ||
长疗程 | 8641 | 95.75 |
短疗程 | 384 | 4.25 |
特征 | 患者 例数 | 诊断时间间隔 [d,M(Q1,Q3)] | 统计 检验值 | P值 | 治疗时间间隔 [d,M(Q1,Q3)] | 统计 检验值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
性别 | Z=-1.373 | 0.170 | Z=1.727 | 0.084 | |||
男性 | 6554 | 10(2,49) | 5(0,21) | ||||
女性 | 2471 | 9(2,44) | 6(0,21) | ||||
年龄(岁) | H=5.808 | 0.121 | H=7.494 | 0.058 | |||
<25 | 967 | 8(2,45) | 5(0,20) | ||||
25~44 | 2677 | 9(2,45) | 6(0,22) | ||||
45~64 | 3639 | 10(2,49) | 4(0,22) | ||||
≥65 | 1742 | 11(2,51) | 5(0,21) | ||||
职业 | H=23.050 | 0.001 | H=147.117 | 0.001 | |||
学生及老师 | 461 | 8(2,47) | 5(0,20) | ||||
工人 | 368 | 12(2,57) | 6(0,25) | ||||
农民 | 4361 | 11(2,56) | 6(0,25) | ||||
家务及待业 | 2432 | 8(2,38) | 2(0,15) | ||||
其他 | 1403 | 10(2,41) | 6(0,23) | ||||
户口所在地 | H=8.411 | 0.015 | H=25.052 | <0.001 | |||
本县(区) | 8247 | 10(2,46) | 5(0,21) | ||||
本省非本县(区) | 415 | 13(2,61) | 7(1,24) | ||||
外省 | 363 | 14(2,64) | 8(1,29) | ||||
重点人群 | Z=-2.372 | 0.018 | Z=-0.238 | 0.812 | |||
是 | 719 | 8(2,39) | 5(0,18) | ||||
否 | 8306 | 10(2,49) | 5(0,21) | ||||
既往抗结核治疗史 | Z=-13.356 | <0.001 | Z=-7.534 | <0.001 | |||
无 | 2720 | 6(1,28) | 4(0,15) | ||||
有 | 6305 | 13(2,57) | 6(0,24) | ||||
治疗分类 | Z=1.548 | 0.122 | Z=-4.327 | <0.001 | |||
初治 | 5121 | 10(2,46) | 6(0,23) | ||||
复治 | 3904 | 10(2,50) | 4(0,20) | ||||
药物敏感性检测方法 | H=1584.796 | <0.001 | H=3.465 | 0.177 | |||
分子生物学 | 6897 | 10(2,47) | 5(0,21) | ||||
传统药物敏感性试验 | 965 | 56(29,90) | 6(0,29) | ||||
未知 | 1163 | 2(0,6) | 5(0,18) | ||||
化疗方案 | - | - | Z=2.211 | 0.137 | |||
长疗程 | - | - | 5(0,21) | ||||
短疗程 | - | - | 9(2,23) |
特征 | 患者 例数 | 诊断延迟 [例,率(%)] | χ2值 | P值 | 治疗延迟 [例,率(%)] | χ2值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
性别 | 0.308 | 0.579 | 2.041 | 0.153 | |||
男性 | 6554 | 2878(43.91) | 2816(42.97) | ||||
女性 | 2471 | 1069(43.26) | 1103(44.64) | ||||
年龄(岁) | 2.013 | 0.570 | 5.824 | 0.121 | |||
<25 | 967 | 407(42.09) | 406(41.90) | ||||
25~44 | 2677 | 1158(43.26) | 1202(44.90) | ||||
45~64 | 3639 | 1606(44.13) | 1538(42.26) | ||||
≥65 | 1742 | 776(44.55) | 773(44.37) | ||||
职业 | 19.749 | <0.001 | 91.524 | <0.001 | |||
学生及老师 | 461 | 193(41.87) | 197(42.73) | ||||
工人 | 368 | 173(47.01) | 171(46.47) | ||||
农民 | 4361 | 1988(45.59) | 2056(47.15) | ||||
家务及待业 | 2432 | 981(40.34) | 861(35.40) | ||||
其他 | 1403 | 612(43.62) | 634(45.19) | ||||
户口所在地 | 8.681 | 0.013 | 18.089 | <0.001 | |||
本县(区) | 8247 | 3568(43.26) | 3526(42.75) | ||||
本省非本县(区) | 415 | 200(48.19) | 204(49.16) | ||||
外省 | 363 | 179(49.31) | 189(52.07) | ||||
重点人群 | 7.288 | 0.007 | 1.618 | 0.203 | |||
是 | 719 | 280(38.94) | 296(41.17) | ||||
否 | 8306 | 3667(44.15) | 3623(43.62) | ||||
既往抗结核治疗史 | 138.590 | <0.001 | 35.166 | <0.001 | |||
无 | 2720 | 935(34.38) | 1053(38.71) | ||||
有 | 6305 | 3012(47.77) | 2866(45.46) | ||||
治疗分类 | 0.107 | 0.744 | 25.701 | <0.001 | |||
初治 | 5121 | 2232(43.59) | 2342(45.73) | ||||
复治 | 3904 | 1715(43.93) | 1577(40.39) | ||||
药物敏感性检测方法 | 2146.183 | <0.001 | 5.789 | 0.055 | |||
分子生物学 | 6897 | 2982(43.24) | 2963(42.96) | ||||
传统药物敏感性试验 | 965 | 965(100.00) | 454(47.05) | ||||
未知 | 1163 | 0.00(0.00) | 502(43.16) | ||||
化疗方案 | - | - | 17.058 | <0.001 | |||
长疗程 | - | - | 3713(42.97) | ||||
短程疗 | - | - | 206(53.65) |
变量 | β值 | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR值 | 95%CI值 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
职业 | ||||||
学生及老师 | 1.000 | |||||
工人 | -0.284 | 0.195 | 2.115 | 0.146 | 0.753 | 0.513~1.104 |
农民 | -0.350 | 0.167 | 4.413 | 0.036 | 0.705 | 0.509~0.977 |
家务及待业 | -0.556 | 0.169 | 10.891 | 0.001 | 0.574 | 0.412~0.798 |
其他 | -0.388 | 0.168 | 5.357 | 0.021 | 0.678 | 0.488~0.942 |
户口所在地 | ||||||
本县(区) | 1.000 | |||||
本省非本县(区) | 0.225 | 0.102 | 4.812 | 0.028 | 1.252 | 1.024~1.530 |
外省 | 0.310 | 0.111 | 7.845 | 0.005 | 1.363 | 1.097~1.693 |
既往抗结核治疗史 | ||||||
无 | 1.000 | |||||
有 | 0.555 | 0.048 | 133.666 | <0.001 | 1.743 | 1.586~1.915 |
重点人群 | ||||||
是 | 1.000 | |||||
否 | 0.418 | 0.135 | 9.528 | 0.002 | 1.518 | 1.165~1.979 |
变量 | β值 | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR值 | 95%CI值 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
职业 | ||||||
学生及老师 | 1.000 | |||||
工人 | 0.075 | 0.143 | 0.278 | 0.598 | 1.078 | 0.815~1.427 |
农民 | 0.191 | 0.100 | 3.602 | 0.058 | 1.210 | 0.994~1.473 |
家务及待业 | -0.292 | 0.105 | 7.787 | 0.005 | 0.747 | 0.608~0.917 |
其他 | 0.091 | 0.110 | 0.692 | 0.406 | 1.096 | 0.884~1.358 |
户口所在地 | ||||||
本县(区) | 1.000 | |||||
本省非本县(区) | 0.339 | 0.103 | 10.933 | 0.001 | 1.404 | 1.148~1.717 |
外省 | 0.453 | 0.111 | 16.652 | <0.001 | 1.573 | 1.266~1.956 |
既往抗结核治疗史 | ||||||
无 | 1.000 | |||||
有 | 0.512 | 0.055 | 86.861 | <0.001 | 1.669 | 1.499~1.859 |
治疗分类 | ||||||
初治 | 1.000 | |||||
复治 | -0.446 | 0.051 | 77.491 | <0.001 | 0.640 | 0.580~0.707 |
化疗方案 | ||||||
长疗程 | 1.000 | |||||
短疗程 | 0.399 | 0.106 | 14.137 | <0.001 | 1.491 | 1.211~1.836 |
[1] | 胡鑫洋, 高静韬. 世界卫生组织《2024年全球结核病报告》解读. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2024, 5(6):500-504. doi:10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.2024164. |
[2] | 姜雪, 白云龙, 马建军, 等. 2020—2023年吉林省利福平耐药肺结核患者诊治延迟现状及影响因素分析. 中国防痨杂志, 2025, 47(4):416-424. doi:10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20240530. |
[3] |
Asres A, Jerene D, Deressa W. Delays to treatment initiation is associated with tuberculosis treatment outcomes among patients on directly observed treatment short course in Southwest Ethiopia: a follow-up study. BMC Pulm Med, 2018, 18(1):64. doi:10.1186/s12890-018-0628-2.
pmid: 29716569 |
[4] |
Zerbini E, Chirico MC, Salvadores B, et al. Delay in tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment in four provinces of Argentina. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 2008, 12(1):63-68.
pmid: 18173879 |
[5] | Shewade HD, Gupta V, Satyanarayana S, et al. Patient chara-cteristics, health seeking and delays among new sputum smear positive TB patients identified through active case finding when compared to passive case finding in India. PLoS One, 2019, 14(3):e0213345. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213345. |
[6] | 赵雁林, 陈明亭, 徐彩红, 等. 中国结核病防治工作技术指南. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2021. |
[7] | Sreeramareddy CT, Panduru KV, Menten J, et al. Time delays in diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review of literature. BMC Infect Dis, 2009, 9:91. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-9-91. |
[8] | 孔荣, 陈亮, 黄致信. 初治涂阳肺结核社会经济学调查及延误治疗的相关因素分析. 现代预防医学, 2020, 47(1):88-92. doi:10.20043/j.cnki.mpm.2020.01.023. |
[9] |
Htun YM, Khaing T, Yin Y, et al. Delay in diagnosis and treatment among adult multidrug resistant tuberculosis patients in Yangon Regional Tuberculosis Center, Myanmar: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res, 2018, 18(1):878. doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3715-4.
pmid: 30458776 |
[10] | Rifat M, Hall J, Oldmeadow C, et al. Health system delay in treatment of multidrug resistant tuberculosis patients in Bangladesh. BMC Infect Dis, 2015, 15:526. doi:10.1186/s12879-015-1253-9. |
[11] | 代晓琦, 王黎霞, 李仁忠, 等. 不同诊断流程诊断结核病效果分析. 中国公共卫生, 2019, 35(7):894-899. doi:10.11847/zgggws1123094. |
[12] | 王黎霞. 西部地区应用新技术发现耐多药结核病试点经验. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2019. |
[13] | 李仁忠. 合理使用包含新技术的诊断流程提高耐药肺结核的发现水平. 中国防痨杂志, 2021, 43(12):1223-1225. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2021.12.001. |
[14] | 国家疾病预防控制局传染病防控司. 关于印发《全国结核病防治规划(2024—2030年)》的通知[EB/OL]. [2025-03-20]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202412/content_6991217.htm. |
[15] | 李仁忠, 阮云洲, 苏伟, 等. 《利福平耐药肺结核诊断流程》解读. 中国防痨杂志, 2021, 43(11):1113-1115. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2021.11.002. |
[16] |
Tefera KT, Mesfin N, Reta MM, et al. Treatment delay and associated factors among adults with drug resistant tuberculosis at treatment initiating centers in the Amhara regional state, Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis, 2019, 19(1):489. doi:10.1186/s12879-019-4112-2.
pmid: 31151423 |
[17] |
Kasozi ND, Charles L, JohnBosco A, et al. Predictors of treatment delay among drug resistant tuberculosis patients in Uganda. BMC Infect Dis, 2024, 24(1):1452. doi:10.1186/s12879-024-10339-7.
pmid: 39707234 |
[18] |
Bhagyalaxmi A, Jain S, Patel P, et al. Reasons for the delay in the initiation of treatment and initial default among drug-resistant tuberculosis patients in Ahmedabad corporation area. Indian J Public Health, 2019, 63(4):377-379. doi:10.4103/ijph.IJPH_26_19.
pmid: 32189661 |
[19] | 王芸, 陈慧娟, 禄晓龙, 等. 贵州省2014—2020年耐多药结核病患者三类治疗延迟现况及其影响因素. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2022, 26(11):1283-1289. doi:10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2022.11.008. |
[20] | 丁晓艳, 周扬, 孔雯, 等. 江苏省全球基金耐多药结核病防治项目二线抗结核药品供应与管理. 江苏预防医学, 2015, 26(5):32-34. doi:10.13668/j.issn.1006-9070.2015.05.011. |
[21] | 刘昭, 张国龙, 高雨龙, 等. 5省市二线抗结核药品供应保障现状调研及政策建议. 中国药物经济学, 2021, 16(2):121-124. doi:10.12010/j.issn.1673-5846.2021.02.030. |
[22] | 陆婧婷, 张雨格, 陈诚, 等. 基于医院药品供应的长三角地区耐药结核病治疗药物可及性研究. 中国卫生资源, 2022, 25(3):303-309,314. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-953X.2022.03.007. |
[23] |
Wondawek TM, Ali MM. Delay in treatment seeking and associated factors among suspected pulmonary tuberculosis patients in public health facilities of Adama town, eastern Ethiopia. BMC Public Health, 2019, 19(1):1527. doi:10.1186/s12889-019-7886-7.
pmid: 31727034 |
[1] | Yao Xiuyu, Du Ying, Chen Sijie, Geng Hong, Gao Lei. Common nursing problems and countermeasures or suggestions for home isolation and treatment of patients with infectious pulmonary tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(6): 681-686. |
[2] | Ou Xichao, Teng Chong, Song Yuanyuan, Zheng Yang, Chen Lei, Zhu Jun, Wang Jianguo, Pan Zhaobao, Kang Haitao, Wang Yan, Yao Hongyan, Huang Fei. Multicenter evaluation study on the application of a novel PCR fluorescence probe technology for early diagnosis of tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(6): 687-693. |
[3] | Xie Zhongyao, Zhang Muli, Cao Tingming, Cao Yang, Sun Zhaogang. Research on the diagnostic value of specific ligand protein SMAD2-based detection method for active tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(6): 694-700. |
[4] | Zhao Yanfeng, Tu Xia, Wang Nenhan, Chen Shuangshuang, Tian Lili, Fan Ruifang, Yu Lan, Li Jie, Li Chuanyou, Dai Xiaowei. Contribution analysis of three diagnostic methods in the etiological detection of pulmonary tuberculosis patients [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(6): 701-707. |
[5] | Li Longfen, Shi Chunjing, Luo Yun, Zhang Huajie, Liu Jun, Wang Ge, Zhao Yanhong, Yuan Lijuan, Li Shan, Li Wenming, Shen Lingjun. Establishing and validating a prediction model for HIV-associated nontuberculous mycobacterial disease based on machine learning [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(6): 708-718. |
[6] | Li Xuelian, Zhu Qingdong, Ma Yijing, Tusongjiang Maituoheti, Miriguli Maituoheti, Wang Qingfeng, Ma Liping, Chu Naihui, Nie Wenjuan, Lin Yanrong, Li Wei, Wang Jing. Analysis of incidence and risk factors for linezolid-related hematological side effects: a multicenter cohort study [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(6): 719-726. |
[7] | Peng Hua, Cui Junwei, Shang Qiubai, Li Siqing, Peng Ruiqin. Effectiveness of a nursing intervention based on the Transtheoretical Model combined with the Health Belief Model in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(6): 727-731. |
[8] | Shi Xiaojing, Guo Jianhua, Wang Xin, Zhao Qingran, Wang Yuhan. A study on the acceptance of preventive treatment and its influencing factors among latent tuberculosis infectors in Shijiazhuang City [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(6): 746-752. |
[9] | Zhang Manhui, Zhang Mengdi, Lu Zheng, Li Junqi, Zheng Wenjing, Wang Xin, Huang Fei, Liu Jianjun, Yao Hongyan, Wang Qiqi. Analysis on the trends of pulmonary tuberculosis disease burden among the elderly population in China from 2005 to 2020 [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(6): 753-759. |
[10] | Li Yuhong, Mei Jinzhou, Li Xue, Zhang Hui, Liu Xiaoqiu, Zhao Yanlin. Analysis of the epidemiological characteristics of inter-provincial migrant tuberculosis patients from 2018 to 2022 [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(6): 760-768. |
[11] | Shi Jie, Chang Wenjing, Zheng Danwei, Su Ruyue, Ma Xiaoguang, Zhu Yankun, Wang Shaohua, Sun Jianwei, Sun Dingyong. Screening of core genes and pathways involved in tuberculosis onset based on GEO database [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(6): 769-778. |
[12] | Wei Xiaorui, Yu Zeyang, Yang Kun, Zhou Ke, Huang Fang, Liu Hao, Bai Lu, Liu Jiayun. Expression of liver kinase B1 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected individuals and its correlation with interferon-γ [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(6): 779-784. |
[13] | Li Wei, Zhou Zhichao, Zheng Jie. Trends and hotspots in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis research in China (1995—2023) [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(6): 785-791. |
[14] | Qi Qi, Wang Zihao, Ye Linlin, Peng Wenbei, Zhou Qiong. Immune checkpoint inhibitors and tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(6): 792-797. |
[15] | Huang Weiqiang, Yuan Chuchu, Zhang Huan, Wang Lili, Zhong Xiaofeng, Chen Xingxing, Hu Ming. Analysis of blood concentrations of intravenous antituberculosis drugs in 45 mechanically ventilated patients with severe tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(6): 798-807. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||