Email Alert | RSS

Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis ›› 2025, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5): 577-581.doi: 10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20250022

• Original Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of the MiniDock MTB Test for rapid tuberculosis detection

Wu Zhuhua1, Wang Yong2, Lai Xiaoyu1, Ji Liwei3, Chen Ruiming3, LYU Chunfang4, Xu Liuyue1, Guo Huixin1, Chen Yuhui1, Liang Hongdi1, Liu Shengyuan4(), Zhong Xinguang2(), Chen Xunxun1()   

  1. 1Center for Tuberculosis Control of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510632, China
    2Dongguan Sixth People’s Hospital, Guangdong Province, Dongguan 523008, China
    3Shantou Institute of Tuberculosis Prevention and Control, Guangdong Province, Shantou 515031, China
    4Shenzhen Nanshan Center for Chronic Disease Control, Guangdong Province, Shenzhen 518054, China
  • Received:2025-01-15 Online:2025-05-10 Published:2025-04-29
  • Contact: Chen Xunxun, Email: grace_chen514@163.com; Zhong Xinguang, Email: zxgcdc@qq.com; Liu Shengyuan, Email: jfk@sznsmby.com
  • Supported by:
    Guangdong Science and Technology Plan Project(2021B1212030003);Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Tuberculosis(2020B1111170014)

Abstract:

Objective: To assess the diagnostic performance of the MiniDock MTB Test (hereafter referred to as “MiniDock”) for the rapid detection of tuberculosis (TB). Methods: A prospective study was conducted at three clinical sites in Guangdong Province—Dongguan Sixth People’s Hospital, Shantou Institute of Tuberculosis Prevention and Control, and Shenzhen Nanshan Center for Chronic Disease Control. Between May and August 2024, consecutive patients with suspected pulmonary TB who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled. Relevant clinical data were collected. Sputum specimens were subjected to Ziehl-Neelsen smear microscopy, solid culture on L?wenstein-Jensen medium, GeneXpert MTB/RIF (Xpert), and MiniDock testing, all performed by trained laboratory personnel. Results: A total of 213 patients with suspected pulmonary TB were enrolled. The positivity rates for smear microscopy, solid culture on L?wenstein-Jensen medium, Xpert, and MiniDock were 22.07% (47/213), 36.62% (78/213), 32.86% (70/213), and 36.62% (78/213), respectively. When clinical diagnosis was used as the reference standard, MiniDock achieved a sensitivity of 47.24% (77/163) and specificity of 98.00% (49/50), while Xpert showed a sensitivity of 42.94% (70/163) and specificity of 100.00% (50/50). Using culture as the reference, MiniDock yielded a sensitivity of 84.62% (66/78) and specificity of 91.11% (123/135), whereas Xpert demonstrated a sensitivity of 78.21% (61/78) and specificity of 93.33% (126/135). Agreement analysis between the two methods indicated a high level of concordance, with a Kappa coefficient of 0.88. Conclusion: The MiniDock MTB Test demonstrated robust diagnostic performance, with high sensitivity and specificity for TB detection, and showed strong concordance with the results of the Xpert assay.

Key words: Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Nucleic acid amplification techniques, Diagnosis, differential, Comparative study

CLC Number: