Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis ›› 2020, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 510-517.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2020.05.017
• Original Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
SHEN Hong-cheng, DU Yu-hua, ZHANG Guang-chuan, WU Gui-feng, LIU Jian-xiong, LI Tie-gang()
Received:
2020-02-14
Online:
2020-05-10
Published:
2020-05-08
Contact:
LI Tie-gang
E-mail:tiegang1977@126.com
SHEN Hong-cheng, DU Yu-hua, ZHANG Guang-chuan, WU Gui-feng, LIU Jian-xiong, LI Tie-gang. Influencing factors of pulmonary tuberculosis patient delay in Guangzhou, 2008—2018[J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(5): 510-517. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2020.05.017
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zgflzz.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2020.05.017
年份 | 患者 例数 | 就诊延 迟例数 | 就诊 延迟率 (%) | 不同性别就诊延迟 | 不同年龄组就诊延迟 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
男 | 女 | <25岁 | 25~岁 | 45~岁 | ≥65岁 | |||||
2008 | 13788 | 7156 | 51.90 | 50.81 (4706/9262) | 54.13 (2450/4526) | 47.77 (1542/3228) | 50.72 (2997/5909) | 56.55 (1679/2969) | 55.77 (938/1682) | |
2009 | 12864 | 6348 | 49.35 | 48.96 (4268/8718) | 50.17 (2080/4146) | 45.07 (1312/2911) | 48.36 (2674/5529) | 53.47 (1558/2914) | 53.25 (804/1510) | |
2010 | 12845 | 6241 | 48.59 | 47.87 (4176/8724) | 50.11 (2065/4121) | 42.72 (1255/2938) | 47.97 (2569/5355) | 52.67 (1587/3013) | 53.93 (830/1539) | |
2011 | 12224 | 5780 | 47.28 | 46.58 (3867/8302) | 48.78 (1913/3922) | 41.95 (1186/2827) | 46.15 (2350/5092) | 51.49 (1518/2948) | 53.50 (726/1357) | |
2012 | 11560 | 5890 | 50.95 | 50.45 (4007/7942) | 52.05 (1883/3618) | 45.33 (1087/2398) | 48.96 (2382/4865) | 56.28 (1645/2923) | 56.48 (776/1374) | |
2013 | 11161 | 5414 | 48.51 | 48.31 (3600/7452) | 48.91 (1814/3709) | 43.40 (1026/2364) | 46.24 (2124/4593) | 53.45 (1548/2896) | 54.74 (716/1308) | |
2014 | 11456 | 5616 | 49.02 | 48.73 (3825/7849) | 49.65 (1791/3607) | 43.37 (1004/2315) | 47.94 (2207/4604) | 52.69 (1653/3137) | 53.71 (752/1400) | |
2015 | 10597 | 5178 | 48.86 | 49.20 (3577/7271) | 48.14 (1601/3326) | 42.70 (837/1960) | 47.07 (1919/4077) | 53.04 (1664/3137) | 53.27 (758/1423) | |
2016 | 9974 | 5030 | 50.43 | 50.53 (3499/6924) | 50.20 (1531/3050) | 44.16 (806/1825) | 49.13 (1902/3871) | 54.46 (1623/2980) | 53.85 (699/1298) | |
2017 | 9372 | 4475 | 47.75 | 47.63 (3074/6454) | 48.01 (1401/2918) | 42.62 (702/1647) | 46.75 (1667/3566) | 51.32 (1473/2870) | 49.11 (633/1289) | |
2018 | 9360 | 4528 | 48.38 | 48.65 (3106/6384) | 47.78 (1422/2976) | 42.89 (736/1716) | 47.17 (1623/3441) | 51.77 (1478/2855) | 51.26 (691/1348) | |
93.55 | 0.13 | 0.01 | ||||||||
P值 | <0.001 | 0.711 | 0.943 |
年份 | 性别 | 年龄组 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
男 | 女 | <25岁 | 25~岁 | 45~岁 | ≥65岁 | ||
2008 | 4706(65.76) | 2450(34.24) | 1542(21.55) | 2997(41.88) | 1679(23.46) | 938(13.11) | |
2009 | 4268(67.23) | 2080(32.77) | 1312(20.67) | 2674(42.12) | 1558(24.54) | 804(12.67) | |
2010 | 4176(66.91) | 2065(33.09) | 1255(20.11) | 2569(41.16) | 1587(25.43) | 830(13.30) | |
2011 | 3867(66.90) | 1913(33.10) | 1186(20.52) | 2350(40.66) | 1518(26.26) | 726(12.56) | |
2012 | 4007(68.03) | 1883(31.97) | 1087(18.46) | 2382(40.44) | 1645(27.93) | 776(13.17) | |
2013 | 3600(66.49) | 1814(33.51) | 1026(18.95) | 2124(39.23) | 1548(28.59) | 716(13.23) | |
2014 | 3825(68.11) | 1791(31.89) | 1004(17.88) | 2207(39.30) | 1653(29.43) | 752(13.39) | |
2015 | 3577(69.08) | 1601(30.92) | 837(16.16) | 1919(37.06) | 1664(32.14) | 758(14.64) | |
2016 | 3499(69.56) | 1531(30.44) | 806(16.02) | 1902(37.81) | 1623(32.27) | 699(13.90) | |
2017 | 3074(68.69) | 1401(31.31) | 702(15.69) | 1667(37.25) | 1473(32.92) | 633(14.14) | |
2018 | 3106(68.60) | 1422(31.40) | 736(16.26) | 1623(35.84) | 1478(32.64) | 691(15.26) | |
36.72 | 464.07 | ||||||
P值 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
因素 | 全部患者 (125201例) | 就诊延迟 | χ2值 | P值 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
否(63545例) | 是(61656例) | ||||
户籍 | 2.81 | 0.094 | |||
本地户籍 | 21920(17.51) | 11238(51.27) | 10682(48.73) | ||
非本地户籍 | 103281(82.49) | 52307(50.65) | 50974(49.35) | ||
性别 | 12.60 | <0.001 | |||
男 | 85282(68.12) | 43577(51.10) | 41705(48.90) | ||
女 | 39919(31.88) | 19968(50.02) | 19951(49.98) | ||
年龄组(岁) | 664.34 | <0.001 | |||
<25 | 26129(20.87) | 14636(56.01) | 11493(43.99) | ||
25~ | 50902(40.66) | 26488(52.04) | 24414(47.96) | ||
45~ | 32642(26.07) | 15216(46.61) | 17426(53.39) | ||
≥65 | 15528(12.40) | 7205(46.40) | 8323(53.60) | ||
民族 | 6.96 | 0.008 | |||
汉族 | 123034(98.27) | 62506(50.80) | 60528(49.20) | ||
少数民族 | 2167(1.73) | 1039(47.95) | 1128(52.05) | ||
职业 | 878.51 | <0.001 | |||
儿童 | 249(0.20) | 88(35.34) | 161(64.66) | ||
学生 | 6442(5.15) | 3824(59.36) | 2618(40.64) | ||
商业服务 | 7544(6.03) | 4593(60.88) | 2951(39.12) | ||
教师/医务人员/干部 | 3975(3.17) | 2127(53.51) | 1848(46.49) | ||
工人/民工 | 22522(17.99) | 11393(50.59) | 11129(49.41) | ||
农民 | 16876(13.48) | 7409(43.90) | 9467(56.10) | ||
离退休人员 | 10884(8.69) | 5361(49.26) | 5523(50.74) | ||
家政/家务/待业 | 29537(23.59) | 15206(51.48) | 14331(48.52) | ||
其他a | 27172(21.70) | 13544(49.85) | 13628(50.15) | ||
患者来源 | 940.21 | <0.001 | |||
健康检查 | 2686(2.15) | 2043(76.06) | 643(23.94) | ||
接触者检查 | 346(0.28) | 269(77.75) | 77(22.25) | ||
因症就诊 | 53194(42.49) | 26202(49.26) | 26992(50.74) | ||
因症推荐 | 1216(0.97) | 583(47.94) | 633(52.06) | ||
转诊 | 56845(45.40) | 29211(51.39) | 27634(48.61) | ||
追踪 | 10078(8.05) | 4731(46.94) | 5347(53.06) | ||
其他b | 836(0.67) | 506(60.53) | 330(39.47) | ||
患者分类 | 127.79 | <0.001 | |||
肺结核 | 119043(95.08) | 60852(51.12) | 58191(48.88) | ||
肺外结核 | 6158(4.92) | 2693(43.73) | 3465(56.27) | ||
并发症 | 162.12 | <0.001 | |||
无 | 123317(98.50) | 62863(50.98) | 60454(49.02) | ||
有 | 1884(1.50) | 682(36.20) | 1202(63.80) |
影响因素 | β值 | s | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR(95%CI) 值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
户籍 | |||||
本地户籍 | 1.00 | ||||
非本地户籍 | -0.05 | 0.02 | 10.86 | 0.001 | 0.95(0.92~0.98) |
性别 | |||||
男 | 1.00 | ||||
女 | 0.10 | 0.01 | 65.74 | <0.001 | 1.11(1.08~1.13) |
年龄组(岁) | |||||
<25 | 1.00 | ||||
25~ | 0.12 | 0.02 | 48.13 | <0.001 | 1.13(1.09~1.16) |
45~ | 0.31 | 0.02 | 272.41 | <0.001 | 1.37(1.32~1.42) |
≥65 | 0.33 | 0.03 | 169.82 | <0.001 | 1.40(1.33~1.47) |
民族 | |||||
汉族 | 1.00 | ||||
少数民族 | 0.20 | 0.04 | 20.21 | <0.001 | 1.22(1.12~1.33) |
职业 | |||||
教师/医务人员/干部 | 1.00 | ||||
儿童 | 0.86 | 0.14 | 36.63 | <0.001 | 2.38(1.80~3.15) |
学生 | -0.06 | 0.04 | 1.72 | 0.190 | 0.95(0.87~1.03) |
商业服务 | -0.28 | 0.04 | 47.88 | <0.001 | 0.76(0.70~0.82) |
工人/民工 | 0.16 | 0.04 | 20.90 | <0.001 | 1.17(1.10~1.26) |
农民 | 0.32 | 0.04 | 77.25 | <0.001 | 1.38(1.28~1.48) |
离退休人员 | -0.01 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.823 | 0.99(0.92~1.07) |
家政/家务/待业 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 2.83 | 0.090 | 1.06(0.99~1.13) |
其他a | 0.16 | 0.03 | 20.96 | <0.001 | 1.17(1.10~1.25) |
患者来源 | |||||
健康检查 | 1.00 | ||||
接触者检查 | -0.16 | 0.14 | 0.70 | 0.260 | 0.89(0.68~1.17) |
因症就诊 | 1.12 | 0.05 | 577.90 | <0.001 | 3.06(2.79~3.35) |
因症推荐 | 1.18 | 0.07 | 258.83 | <0.001 | 3.27(2.83~3.77) |
转诊 | 1.02 | 0.05 | 485.58 | <0.001 | 2.78(2.54~3.05) |
追踪 | 1.21 | 0.05 | 587.70 | <0.001 | 3.35(3.04~3.70) |
其他b | 0.65 | 0.08 | 58.57 | <0.001 | 1.91(1.62~2.26) |
患者分类 | |||||
肺结核 | 1.00 | ||||
肺外结核 | 0.34 | 0.03 | 146.41 | <0.001 | 1.41(1.33~1.49) |
并发症 | |||||
无 | 1.00 | ||||
有 | 0.48 | 0.05 | 95.53 | <0.001 | 1.62(1.47~1.78) |
[1] | 全国第五次结核病流行病学抽样调查技术指导组, 全国第五次结核病流行病学抽样调查办公室. 2010年全国第五次结核病流行病学抽样调查报告. 中国防痨杂志, 2012,34(8):485-508. |
[2] |
Marks GB, Nguyen NV, Nguyen PTB , et al. Community-wide screening for tuberculosis in a high-prevalence setting. N Engl J Med, 2019,381(14):1347-1357.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1902129 URL pmid: 31577876 |
[3] | 中华人民共和国卫生部结核病控制项目办公室. 世界银行贷款中国结核病控制项目工作手册. 2版. 北京: 中华人民共和国卫生部结核病控制项目办公室, 1995: 22-23. |
[4] |
Xu X, Liu JH, Cao SY , et al. Delays in care seeking, diagnosis and treatment among pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Shenzhen, China. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 2013,17(5):615-620.
doi: 10.5588/ijtld.12.0231 URL pmid: 23575326 |
[5] | 周玉兰, 邓亚利, 冉建朝 , 等. 2008—2017年新疆生产建设兵团肺结核患者就诊、确诊延迟及影响因素分析. 现代预防医学, 2018,45(16):3014-3018. |
[6] |
Chen JO, Qiu YB, Rueda ZV , et al. Role of community-based active case finding in screening tuberculosis in Yunnan Province of China. Infect Dis Poverty, 2019,8(1):92.
doi: 10.1186/s40249-019-0602-0 URL pmid: 31661031 |
[7] | 王荣, 李晨, 杨晨 , 等. 南京市2011—2013年肺结核患者就诊延迟状况及影响因素分析. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2015,19(8):854-856. |
[8] | 景睿, 王美花, 王晓婷 , 等. 济南市肺结核患者就诊延迟及其影响因素分析. 结核病与肺部健康杂志, 2019,8(2):106-110. |
[9] |
Fuge TG, Bawore SG, Solomon DW , et al. Patient delay in seeking tuberculosis diagnosis and associated factors in Hadiya Zone, Southern Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes, 2018,11(1):115.
doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3215-y URL pmid: 29426370 |
[10] |
Zão I, Ribeiro AI, Apolinário D , et al. Why does it take so long? The reasons behind tuberculosis treatment delay in Portugal. Pulmonology, 2019,25(4):215-222.
doi: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2019.02.005 URL pmid: 30930122 |
[11] | 魏建军, 曾令霞 . 2014—2017年陕西汉中市肺结核患者就诊延迟及影响因素. 公共卫生与预防医学, 2018,29(5):55-58. |
[12] | 马艳, 高微微 . 老年结核病防治现状与展望. 结核病与肺部健康杂志, 2018,7(3):161-166. |
[13] | 李峻, 钟沛康, 梁立群 , 等. 香港老年人结核病疫情特征及影响因素的研究进展. 中国防痨杂志, 2016,38(8):678-681. |
[14] | 张晓龙, 王斐娴, 陈水平 , 等. 苏州市流动肺结核患者就诊延迟状况及影响因素. 国际流行病学传染病学杂志, 2019,46(1):61-65. |
[15] | 张宁, 马云, 王容 , 等. 闭环管理在老年肺结核患者安全用药中的应用. 中国防痨杂志, 2019,41(11):1197-1202. |
[16] | 梁大斌, 黄敏莹, 林定文 , 等. 2005—2015年广西肺结核患者死亡流行病学特征及疾病负担分析. 中国卫生统计, 2017,34(5):772-775. |
[17] | 姚晶, 沈鑫, 顾凯侃 , 等. 国内外儿童及学校结核病疫情概况. 结核病与肺部健康杂志, 2019,8(2):142-145. |
[18] | 孙琳, 申阿东 . 关注儿童结核病努力实现零死亡. 中国防痨杂志, 2018,40(9):909-911. |
[19] |
Tong Y, Guan X, Hou S , et a1. Determinants of health care-seeking delay among tuberculosis patients in rural area of central China. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2018,15(9):1998.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph15091998 URL pmid: 30217043 |
[20] | 薛浩, 刘荣海, 张红军 , 等. 2009—2015年盐城市肺结核患者就诊延迟影响因素分析. 现代预防医学, 2018,45(4):757-760. |
[21] | 蒋玲, 王黎霞, 黄飞 , 等. 重庆市梁平县肺结核患者就诊延迟及其相关因素分析. 中国防痨杂志, 2014,36(5):341-345. |
[22] | 刘胜兰, 史宇晖, 申洋 , 等. 我国六省市流动人口结核病就诊意向分析. 中国防痨杂志, 2018,40(3):296-301. |
[23] | 王晓君, 付谦, 张正斌 , 等. 武汉市2008—2017年结核病患者就诊延迟情况及影响因素分析. 中华流行病学杂志, 2019,40(6):643-647. |
[24] | 谭英征, 陈双华, 欧阳静 , 等. 以发热、腹痛为主要症状的脊柱结核一例. 中国防痨杂志, 2018,40(9):1026-1028. |
[25] | 马艳, 高微微, 周林 . 结核性脑膜炎防治现状与展望. 中国防痨杂志, 2019,41(1):5-8. |
[1] | LIU Xiao-li, LEI Li-mei, GUO Zhou-li, HUANG Yin, XU Jing, ZHAO Xia, WANG Yan, FU Li. Study on the relationship of stigma and social support of tuberculosis patients [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(9): 1002-1008. |
[2] | Academic Working Committee of Chinese Antituberculosis Association, Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis . Expert consensus of clinical application of fixed-dose combination formulations [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(9): 885-893. |
[3] | JIN Hong-jian. The construction of tuberculosis prevention and control service system at county level in China needs to be strengthened urgently —— Comments and suggestions of an old tuberculosis control and prevention worker [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(9): 896-902. |
[4] | ZHANG Can-you, XIA Hui, CHENG Jun. Testing and reporting requirements for Class Ⅱ biosafety cabinet in tuberculosis laboratory [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(9): 903-909. |
[5] | ZHOU Lin, LIU Er-yong, MENG Qing-lin, CHEN Ming-ting, ZHOU Xin-hua, GAO Wei-wei, LIN Ming-gui, XIE Ru-ming. Evaluation of the quality of pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis after the implementation of the newly revised WS 288-2017 Diagnosis for pulmonary tuberculosis standards [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(9): 910-915. |
[6] | LIU Er-yong, WANG Qian, ZHOU Lin, ZHANG Guo-qin, ZHANG Xiu-lei, MA Yong-cheng, YANG Shu-min, WANG Cui, MENG Qing-lin, CHEN Ming-ting, LIN Ming-gui, TU De-hua.. Analysis of diagnostic quality of pulmonary tuberculosis with negative etiology in some areas of China [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(9): 916-920. |
[7] | MENG Qing-lin, LI Jin-lan, LIN Ding-wen, MA Yong-cheng, HOU Shuang-yi, LIU Nian-qiang, ZHOU Lin. Analysis of the awareness about knowledge on the updated TB diagnosis standard among the practitioners in TB control institutions [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(9): 921-925. |
[8] | WANG Qian, ZHOU Lin, LIU Er-yong, ZHAO Yan-lin, LI Tao, CHEN Ming-ting, YANG Li-jia, WANG Jia.. A survey on the diagnostic ability of tuberculosis in the county-level medical institutions in China [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(9): 926-930. |
[9] | LI Ting, HE Jin-ge, SU Qian, LI Jing, LI Yun-kui, GAO Wen-feng, GAO Yuan, YANG Wen. Value of tuberculin test in screening tuberculosis infection in HIV infected/AIDS patients in Butuo County, Sichuan Province [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(9): 931-936. |
[10] | LI Yun-kui, HE Jin-ge, SU Qian, LI Ting, LI Jing, GAO Wen-feng, YANG Wen, MAO Guang-yu. Value of tuberculin test in screening tuberculosis infection in HIV infected/AIDS patients in Butuo County, Sichuan Province [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(9): 937-941. |
[11] | SU Qian, XIA Yong, LU Jia, WANG Dan-xia, HE Jin-ge. Analysis on the epidemiological characteristics of pulmonary tuberculosis among children aged 0-14 in Sichuan Province from 2009 to 2018 [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(9): 942-947. |
[12] | DENG Ya-li, ZHANG Tian-hua, LIU Wei-ping, ZHANG Hong-wei, MA Yu, LI Peng.. Temporal and spatial clustering analysis of pulmonary tuberculosis incidence in Shaanxi Province from 2014 to 2018 [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(9): 948-955. |
[13] | DONG Xiao, ZHAO Zhen, LIU Nian-qiang, WANG Sen-lu, CUI Yan. Analysis of the finding characteristics of pulmonary tuberculosis in the elderly population in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region during 2009—2017 [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(9): 956-961. |
[14] | MA Ting-long, HAN Yi, CHENG Xu, LIU Zhi-dong. Clinical observation on treatment effectiveness of transdermal ultrasound-mediated drug delivery combined with oral anti-tuberculosis drug in patients with chest wall tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(9): 968-972. |
[15] | NAN Hai, ZHANG Yun, YANG Xin-ting, DUAN Hong-fei. Meta-analysis on the diagnostic value of GeneXpert MTB/RIF for bone and joint tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(9): 973-980. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||