Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis ›› 2018, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (10): 1099-1109.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2018.10.014
• Editorial • Previous Articles Next Articles
Jie XU1,Zhao-cai WANG4,Yin-yin XIA2,Can-you ZHANG2,Jin-ming ZHAO5,Hui-juan CHEN6,Xiao DONG7,Guo-feng YANG8,Hui-hui LIU3,(),Jun CHENG2,()
Received:
2018-05-14
Online:
2018-10-10
Published:
2018-10-18
Contact:
Hui-hui LIU,Jun CHENG
E-mail:liuhh@chinacdc.cn;chengjun@chinacdc.cn
Jie XU,Zhao-cai WANG,Yin-yin XIA,Can-you ZHANG,Jin-ming ZHAO,Hui-juan CHEN,Xiao DONG,Guo-feng YANG,Hui-hui LIU,Jun CHENG. Investigations on willingness of anti-tuberculosis treatment in the cases diagnosed by active finding and impacts after interventions in provinces of China with a high prevalence of tuberculosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2018, 40(10): 1099-1109. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2018.10.014
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.zgflzz.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2018.10.014
人口学特征 | 青海 | 贵州 | 广西 | 西藏 | 新疆 | 合计 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
例数 | 构成比 (%) | 例数 | 构成比 (%) | 例数 | 构成比 (%) | 例数 | 构成比 (%) | 例数 | 构成比 (%) | ||
性别 | |||||||||||
男 | 25 | 25.51 | 25 | 25.51 | 15 | 15.31 | 15 | 15.31 | 18 | 18.36 | 98 |
女 | 9 | 17.65 | 14 | 27.45 | 8 | 15.69 | 6 | 11.76 | 14 | 27.45 | 51 |
年龄(岁) | |||||||||||
<65 | 4 | 9.76 | 15 | 36.58 | 4 | 9.76 | 15 | 36.58 | 3 | 7.32 | 41 |
≥65 | 30 | 27.78 | 24 | 22.22 | 19 | 17.59 | 6 | 5.56 | 29 | 26.85 | 108 |
诊断类别 | |||||||||||
病原学阳性 | 12 | 40.00 | 3 | 10.00 | 3 | 10.00 | 3 | 10.00 | 9 | 30.00 | 30 |
病原学阴性 | 22 | 18.49 | 36 | 30.25 | 20 | 16.80 | 18 | 15.13 | 23 | 19.33 | 119 |
居住地 | |||||||||||
城市 | 2 | 100.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 2 |
农村 | 32 | 21.77 | 39 | 26.53 | 23 | 15.64 | 21 | 14.29 | 32 | 21.77 | 147 |
文化程度 | |||||||||||
文盲或半文盲 | 23 | 35.94 | 7 | 10.94 | 7 | 10.94 | 15 | 23.43 | 12 | 18.75 | 64 |
小学 | 9 | 12.50 | 32 | 44.44 | 13 | 18.06 | 6 | 8.33 | 12 | 16.67 | 72 |
初中及以上 | 2 | 15.38 | 0 | 0.00 | 3 | 23.08 | 0 | 0.00 | 8 | 61.54 | 13 |
医保形式 | |||||||||||
农村合作医疗 | 29 | 20.42 | 39 | 27.46 | 21 | 14.79 | 21 | 14.79 | 32 | 22.54 | 142 |
其他医保形式 | 5 | 71.43 | 0 | 0.00 | 2 | 28.57 | 0 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00 | 7 |
合计 | 34 | 22.82 | 39 | 26.17 | 23 | 15.44 | 21 | 14.09 | 32 | 21.48 | 149 |
时间点 意愿及原因 | 青海 | 贵州 | 广西 | 西藏 | 新疆 | 合计 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
健康教育前 | ||||||
愿意纳入治疗 | 21(17.95) | 38(32.48) | 16(13.67) | 19(16.24) | 23(19.66) | 117 |
不愿意纳入治疗 | 13(40.62) | 1(3.12) | 7(21.88) | 2(6.25) | 9(28.13) | 32 |
不知道免费政策 | 1(16.67) | 1(16.67) | 0(0.00) | 1(16.67) | 3(50.00) | 6 |
没有明显症状 | 3(33.33) | 0(0.00) | 4(44.45) | 0(0.00) | 2(22.22) | 9 |
无法承担费用 | 2(25.00) | 0(0.00) | 3(37.50) | 0(0.00) | 3(37.50) | 8 |
身体原因 | 4(100.00) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 4 |
不良反应 | 2(50.00) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 1(25.00) | 1(25.00) | 4 |
距离远 | 1(100.00) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 1 |
10min健康教育后 | ||||||
愿意纳入治疗 | 24(18.90) | 39(30.71) | 17(13.38) | 20(15.75) | 27(21.26) | 127 |
不愿意纳入治疗 | 10(45.45) | 0(0.00) | 6(27.27) | 1(4.55) | 5(22.73) | 22 |
没有明显症状 | 3(37.50) | 0(0.00) | 3(37.50) | 0(0.00) | 2(25.00) | 8 |
无法承担费用 | 1(14.28) | 0(0.00) | 3(42.86) | 0(0.00) | 3(42.86) | 7 |
身体原因 | 4(100.00) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 4 |
不良反应 | 1(50.00) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 1(50.00) | 0(0.00) | 2 |
距离远 | 1(100.00) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 1 |
人口学特征 | 患者 例数 | 接受治疗意愿等级 | Z值 | P值 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10min健康教育后 无治疗意愿 | 10min健康教育后 有治疗意愿 | 诊断后即有 治疗意愿 | ||||||||
省份 | 18.30 | 0.001 | ||||||||
青海 | 34 | 10(29.41) | 3(8.82) | 21(61.77) | ||||||
贵州 | 39 | 0(0.00) | 1(2.56) | 38(97.44) | ||||||
广西 | 23 | 6(26.09) | 1(4.35) | 16(69.56) | ||||||
西藏 | 21 | 1(4.76) | 1(4.76) | 19(90.48) | ||||||
新疆 | 32 | 5(15.62) | 4(12.50) | 23(71.88) | ||||||
诊断类别 | -2.65 | 0.008 | ||||||||
病原学阳性 | 30 | 1(3.33) | 0(0.00) | 29(96.67) | ||||||
病原学阴性 | 119 | 21(17.65) | 10(8.40) | 88(73.95) | ||||||
性别 | -0.86 | 0.391 | ||||||||
男 | 98 | 13(13.27) | 6(6.12) | 79(80.61) | ||||||
女 | 51 | 9(17.65) | 4(7.84) | 38(74.51) | ||||||
年龄(岁) | -3.05 | 0.002 | ||||||||
≥65 | 108 | 21(19.45) | 9(8.33) | 78(72.22) | ||||||
<65 | 41 | 1(2.44) | 1(2.44) | 39(95.12) | ||||||
居住地 | 1.09 | 0.274 | ||||||||
城市 | 2 | 1(50.00) | 0(0.00) | 1(50.00) | ||||||
农村 | 147 | 21(14.29) | 10(6.80) | 116(78.91) | ||||||
人口学特征 | 患者 例数 | 接受治疗意愿等级 | Z值 | P值 | ||||||
10min健康教育后 无治疗意愿 | 10min健康教育后 有治疗意愿 | 诊断后即有 治疗意愿 | ||||||||
文化程度 | 0.83 | 0.660 | ||||||||
文盲或半文盲 | 64 | 8(12.50) | 4(6.25) | 52(81.25) | ||||||
小学 | 72 | 12(16.67) | 4(5.55) | 56(77.78) | ||||||
初中及以上 | 13 | 2(15.38) | 2(15.38) | 9(69.24) | ||||||
交通方式 | 10.42 | 0.064 | ||||||||
步行 | 15 | 5(33.33) | 2(13.33) | 8(53.34) | ||||||
电动车或自行车 | 20 | 4(20.00) | 0(0.00) | 16(80.00) | ||||||
公交车 | 59 | 4(6.78) | 3(5.08) | 52(88.14) | ||||||
出租车或私家车 | 28 | 5(17.86) | 3(10.71) | 20(71.43) | ||||||
搭便车 | 20 | 2(10.00) | 2(10.00) | 16(80.00) | ||||||
调查点接送 | 7 | 2(28.57) | 0(0.00) | 5(71.43) | ||||||
往返时间(min) | -2.76 | 0.006 | ||||||||
≤30 | 83 | 7(8.43) | 4(4.82) | 72(86.75) | ||||||
>30 | 66 | 15(22.73) | 6(9.09) | 45(68.18) | ||||||
年自付医疗费用(元) | 2.15 | 0.341 | ||||||||
<500 | 68 | 8(11.77) | 4(5.88) | 56(82.35) | ||||||
500~ | 53 | 10(18.87) | 5(9.43) | 38(71.70) | ||||||
>3000 | 28 | 4(14.29) | 1(3.57) | 23(82.14) | ||||||
家庭人均年收入(元) | 0.06 | 0.970 | ||||||||
<1000 | 40 | 4(10.00) | 5(12.50) | 31(77.50) | ||||||
1000~ | 54 | 8(14.81) | 3(5.56) | 43(79.63) | ||||||
>3000 | 55 | 10(18.18) | 2(3.64) | 43(78.18) |
影响因素 | 患者 例数 | 愿意接受治疗 | 不愿意接受治疗 | χ2值 | P值 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
例数 | 构成比(%) | 例数 | 构成比(%) | ||||
省份 | 19.45 | 0.000 | |||||
贵州 | 39 | 38 | 97.44 | 1 | 2.56 | ||
青海 | 34 | 21 | 61.76 | 13 | 38.24 | ||
广西 | 23 | 16 | 69.57 | 7 | 30.43 | ||
西藏 | 21 | 19 | 90.48 | 2 | 9.52 | ||
新疆 | 32 | 23 | 71.88 | 9 | 28.12 | ||
诊断类别 | 7.33 | 0.007 | |||||
病原学阳性 | 30 | 29 | 96.67 | 1 | 3.33 | ||
病原学阴性 | 119 | 88 | 73.95 | 31 | 26.05 | ||
性别 | 0.74 | 0.389 | |||||
男 | 98 | 79 | 80.61 | 19 | 19.39 | ||
女 | 51 | 38 | 74.51 | 13 | 25.49 | ||
年龄(岁) | 9.24 | 0.002 | |||||
<65 | 41 | 39 | 95.12 | 2 | 4.88 | ||
≥65 | 108 | 78 | 72.22 | 30 | 27.78 | ||
居住地 | -a | 0.385 | |||||
城市 | 2 | 1 | 50.00 | 1 | 50.00 | ||
农村 | 147 | 116 | 78.91 | 31 | 21.09 | ||
文化程度 | 0.97 | 0.615 | |||||
文盲/半文盲 | 64 | 52 | 81.25 | 12 | 18.75 | ||
小学 | 72 | 56 | 77.78 | 16 | 22.22 | ||
初中及以上 | 13 | 9 | 69.23 | 4 | 30.77 | ||
交通方式 | 10.08 | 0.059 | |||||
步行 | 15 | 8 | 53.33 | 7 | 46.67 | ||
电动车/自行车 | 20 | 16 | 80.00 | 4 | 20.00 | ||
公交车 | 59 | 52 | 88.14 | 7 | 11.86 | ||
出租车/私家车 | 27 | 19 | 70.37 | 8 | 29.63 | ||
搭便车 | 21 | 17 | 80.95 | 4 | 19.05 | ||
调查点接送 | 7 | 5 | 71.43 | 2 | 28.57 | ||
往返时间(min) | 7.51 | 0.006 | |||||
≤30 | 83 | 72 | 86.75 | 11 | 13.25 | ||
>30 | 66 | 45 | 68.18 | 21 | 31.82 | ||
年自付医疗费用(元) | 2.27 | 0.321 | |||||
<500 | 68 | 56 | 82.35 | 12 | 17.65 | ||
500~ | 53 | 38 | 71.70 | 15 | 28.30 | ||
>3000 | 28 | 23 | 82.14 | 5 | 17.86 | ||
家庭人均年收入(元) | 0.03 | 0.983 | |||||
<1000 | 13 | 10 | 76.92 | 3 | 23.08 | ||
1000~ | 81 | 64 | 79.01 | 17 | 20.99 | ||
>3000 | 55 | 43 | 78.18 | 12 | 21.82 |
影响因素 | β值 | s | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR(95%CI)值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
省份 | |||||
青海 | 3.15 | 1.12 | 7.91 | 0.005 | 23.43(2.60~211.02) |
广西 | 2.53 | 1.15 | 4.88 | 0.027 | 12.55(1.33~118.55) |
西藏 | 1.81 | 1.33 | 1.85 | 0.174 | 6.12(0.45~83.47) |
新疆 | 2.52 | 1.12 | 5.04 | 0.025 | 12.44(1.38~112.36) |
病原学诊断阴性 | 3.20 | 1.08 | 8.86 | 0.003 | 24.56(2.98~202.30) |
年龄≥65岁 | 1.96 | 0.85 | 5.37 | 0.021 | 7.11(1.35~37.35) |
往返医院所需时间>30min | 1.22 | 0.49 | 6.13 | 0.010 | 3.39(1.29~8.93) |
影响因素 | 患者 例数 | 愿意接受治疗 | 不愿意接受治疗 | χ2值 | P值 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
例数 | 构成比(%) | 例数 | 构成比(%) | |||||||||||
省份 | 18.13 | <0.001 | ||||||||||||
贵州 | 39 | 39 | 100.00 | 0 | 0.00 | |||||||||
青海 | 34 | 24 | 70.59 | 10 | 29.41 | |||||||||
广西 | 23 | 17 | 73.91 | 6 | 26.09 | |||||||||
西藏 | 21 | 20 | 95.24 | 1 | 4.76 | |||||||||
新疆 | 32 | 27 | 84.38 | 5 | 15.62 | |||||||||
诊断类别 | -a | 0.079 | ||||||||||||
病原学阳性 | 30 | 29 | 96.67 | 1 | 3.33 | |||||||||
病原学阴性 | 119 | 98 | 82.35 | 21 | 17.65 | |||||||||
性别 | 0.51 | 0.474 | ||||||||||||
男 | 98 | 85 | 86.73 | 13 | 13.27 | |||||||||
女 | 51 | 42 | 82.35 | 9 | 17.65 | |||||||||
年龄(岁) | 6.83 | 0.009 | ||||||||||||
<65 | 41 | 40 | 97.56 | 1 | 2.44 | |||||||||
≥65 | 108 | 87 | 80.56 | 21 | 19.44 | |||||||||
居住地 | -a | 0.274 | ||||||||||||
城市 | 2 | 1 | 50.00 | 1 | 50.00 | |||||||||
农村 | 147 | 126 | 85.71 | 21 | 14.29 | |||||||||
文化程度 | 0.47 | 0.790 | ||||||||||||
文盲/半文盲 | 64 | 56 | 87.50 | 8 | 12.50 | |||||||||
小学 | 72 | 60 | 83.33 | 12 | 16.67 | |||||||||
初中及以上 | 13 | 11 | 84.62 | 2 | 15.38 | |||||||||
交通方式 | 9.66 | 0.060 | ||||||||||||
步行 | 15 | 10 | 66.67 | 5 | 33.33 | |||||||||
电动车/自行车 | 20 | 16 | 80.00 | 4 | 20.00 | |||||||||
公交车 | 59 | 55 | 93.22 | 4 | 6.78 | |||||||||
出租车/私家车 | 27 | 22 | 81.48 | 5 | 18.52 | |||||||||
搭便车 | 21 | 19 | 90.48 | 2 | 9.52 | |||||||||
调查点接送 | 7 | 5 | 71.43 | 2 | 28.57 | |||||||||
影响因素 | 患者 例数 | 愿意接受治疗 | 不愿意接受治疗 | χ2值 | P值 | |||||||||
例数 | 构成比(%) | 例数 | 构成比(%) | |||||||||||
往返时间(min) | 5.97 | 0.015 | ||||||||||||
≤30 | 83 | 76 | 91.57 | 7 | 8.43 | |||||||||
>30 | 66 | 51 | 77.27 | 15 | 22.73 | |||||||||
年自付医疗费用(元) | 1.20 | 0.549 | ||||||||||||
<500 | 68 | 60 | 88.24 | 8 | 11.76 | |||||||||
500~ | 53 | 43 | 81.13 | 10 | 18.87 | |||||||||
>3000 | 28 | 24 | 85.71 | 4 | 14.29 | |||||||||
家庭人均年收入(元) | 0.89 | 0.641 | ||||||||||||
<1000 | 13 | 11 | 84.62 | 2 | 15.38 | |||||||||
1000~ | 81 | 71 | 87.65 | 10 | 12.35 | |||||||||
>3000 | 55 | 45 | 81.82 | 10 | 18.18 |
[1] | World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2015[EB/OL]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2015( 2015- 10- 29)[2018-06-06]. . |
[2] |
谭国超, 徐春娟, 马纪龙 , 等. 我国西部汉族人IL-10基因多态性与肺结核易感性的相关性研究. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2016,9(1):56-59.
doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6902.2016.01.013 URL |
[3] |
李新旭, 张慧, 姜世闻 , 等. 2010年中国肺结核患病情况地理分布的研究. 中华流行病学杂志, 2013,34(10):980-984.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2013.10.009 URL |
[4] | 赵锦明 . 广西平果县肺结核主动发现策略实施效果研究. 南宁:广西医科大学, 2015. |
[5] | den Boon S, Verver S, Lombard CJ , et al. Comparison of symptoms and treatment outcomes between actively and passively detected tuberculosis cases: the additional value of active case finding. Epidemiol Infect, 2008,136(10):1342-1349. |
[6] | Santha T, Renu G, Frieden TR , et al. Are community surveys to detect tuberculosis in high prevalence areas useful? Results of a comparative study from Tiruvallur District, South India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 2003,7(3):258-265. |
[7] | Kranzer K, Lawn SD, Meyer-Rath G , et al. Feasibility, yield, and cost of active tuberculosis case finding linked to a mobile HIV service in Cape Town, South Africa: a cross-sectional study. PLoS Med, 2012,9(8):e1001281. |
[8] | 沈学枝 . 2009—2015年兵团第五师医疗机构报告肺结核情况分析. 兵团医学, 2016,48(2):58-60. |
[9] |
杨东超, 彭孝旺, 张俏红 . 喀什结防所报告肺结核患者发现队列及原因分析. 中国医学创新, 2014,11(20):59-61.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4985.2014.20.022 URL |
[10] |
李雪, 姜世闻, 高永鑫 , 等. 北京市流动人口肺结核患者确诊后未在首诊机构登记和治疗管理的原因分析. 中国防痨杂志, 2017,39(1):86-90.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2017.01.019 URL |
[11] | 山珂 . 肺结核发病空间聚集分布及影响因素研究. 济南:山东大学, 2014. |
[12] |
杜正新, 何佩贤 . 涂阴与涂阳肺结核患者发现方式及发现初期临床症状和体征的对比分析. 中国防痨杂志, 2016,38(11):940-944.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2016.11.010 URL |
[13] | 米也萨·阿迪力, 马国芳, 郑玉建 . 喀什市维吾尔族肺结核患者的“知信行”调查结果及其影响因素分析. 中国防痨杂志, 2018,40(3):307-314. |
[14] |
林媛, 谭守勇, 林兆原 , 等. 老年疑似肺结核患者临床诊断评分系统的可行性探讨. 结核病与肺部健康杂志, 2016,5(4):321-326.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-3755.2016.04.017 URL |
[15] | 黄妹宾 . 农村肺结核患者化疗依从性影响因素及护理进展. 广西中医学院学报, 2012,15(1):98-100. |
[16] |
黄敏莹, 林定文, 梁大斌 , 等. 2015年广西公众结核病防治核心信息知晓情况抽样调查. 结核病与肺部健康杂志, 2017,6(1):50-56.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-3755.2017.01.013 URL |
[17] |
李昌业, 李芳 . 日照市居民结核病防治核心信息知晓率调查研究. 结核病与肺部健康杂志, 2014,3(1):69-71.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-3755.2014.01.016 URL |
[18] |
刘二勇, 周林, 成君 , 等. 健康检查与被动就诊在肺结核患者发现中的对比研究. 中国防痨杂志, 2014,36(5):327-330.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2014.05.006 URL |
[19] |
高谦, 杨崇广 . 我国结核病近期传播与控制策略. 结核病与肺部健康杂志, 2017,6(3):193-198.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-3755.2017.03.001 URL |
[1] | LIU Xiao-li, LEI Li-mei, GUO Zhou-li, HUANG Yin, XU Jing, ZHAO Xia, WANG Yan, FU Li. Study on the relationship of stigma and social support of tuberculosis patients [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(9): 1002-1008. |
[2] | Academic Working Committee of Chinese Antituberculosis Association, Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis . Expert consensus of clinical application of fixed-dose combination formulations [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(9): 885-893. |
[3] | JIN Hong-jian. The construction of tuberculosis prevention and control service system at county level in China needs to be strengthened urgently —— Comments and suggestions of an old tuberculosis control and prevention worker [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(9): 896-902. |
[4] | ZHANG Can-you, XIA Hui, CHENG Jun. Testing and reporting requirements for Class Ⅱ biosafety cabinet in tuberculosis laboratory [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(9): 903-909. |
[5] | ZHOU Lin, LIU Er-yong, MENG Qing-lin, CHEN Ming-ting, ZHOU Xin-hua, GAO Wei-wei, LIN Ming-gui, XIE Ru-ming. Evaluation of the quality of pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis after the implementation of the newly revised WS 288-2017 Diagnosis for pulmonary tuberculosis standards [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(9): 910-915. |
[6] | LIU Er-yong, WANG Qian, ZHOU Lin, ZHANG Guo-qin, ZHANG Xiu-lei, MA Yong-cheng, YANG Shu-min, WANG Cui, MENG Qing-lin, CHEN Ming-ting, LIN Ming-gui, TU De-hua.. Analysis of diagnostic quality of pulmonary tuberculosis with negative etiology in some areas of China [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(9): 916-920. |
[7] | MENG Qing-lin, LI Jin-lan, LIN Ding-wen, MA Yong-cheng, HOU Shuang-yi, LIU Nian-qiang, ZHOU Lin. Analysis of the awareness about knowledge on the updated TB diagnosis standard among the practitioners in TB control institutions [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(9): 921-925. |
[8] | WANG Qian, ZHOU Lin, LIU Er-yong, ZHAO Yan-lin, LI Tao, CHEN Ming-ting, YANG Li-jia, WANG Jia.. A survey on the diagnostic ability of tuberculosis in the county-level medical institutions in China [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(9): 926-930. |
[9] | LI Ting, HE Jin-ge, SU Qian, LI Jing, LI Yun-kui, GAO Wen-feng, GAO Yuan, YANG Wen. Value of tuberculin test in screening tuberculosis infection in HIV infected/AIDS patients in Butuo County, Sichuan Province [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(9): 931-936. |
[10] | LI Yun-kui, HE Jin-ge, SU Qian, LI Ting, LI Jing, GAO Wen-feng, YANG Wen, MAO Guang-yu. Value of tuberculin test in screening tuberculosis infection in HIV infected/AIDS patients in Butuo County, Sichuan Province [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(9): 937-941. |
[11] | SU Qian, XIA Yong, LU Jia, WANG Dan-xia, HE Jin-ge. Analysis on the epidemiological characteristics of pulmonary tuberculosis among children aged 0-14 in Sichuan Province from 2009 to 2018 [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(9): 942-947. |
[12] | DENG Ya-li, ZHANG Tian-hua, LIU Wei-ping, ZHANG Hong-wei, MA Yu, LI Peng.. Temporal and spatial clustering analysis of pulmonary tuberculosis incidence in Shaanxi Province from 2014 to 2018 [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(9): 948-955. |
[13] | DONG Xiao, ZHAO Zhen, LIU Nian-qiang, WANG Sen-lu, CUI Yan. Analysis of the finding characteristics of pulmonary tuberculosis in the elderly population in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region during 2009—2017 [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(9): 956-961. |
[14] | MA Ting-long, HAN Yi, CHENG Xu, LIU Zhi-dong. Clinical observation on treatment effectiveness of transdermal ultrasound-mediated drug delivery combined with oral anti-tuberculosis drug in patients with chest wall tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(9): 968-972. |
[15] | NAN Hai, ZHANG Yun, YANG Xin-ting, DUAN Hong-fei. Meta-analysis on the diagnostic value of GeneXpert MTB/RIF for bone and joint tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(9): 973-980. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||