Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis ›› 2026, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (10): 1618-1626.doi: 10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20260175
• Original Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Zhou Lijuan1, Wu Wei2, Chen Jin’ou2, Yang Yunbin2, Liu Liangli2, Li Ling2, Xu Lin2(
)
Received:2026-03-31
Online:2026-10-10
Published:2026-09-30
Contact:
Xu Lin,Email:Supported by:CLC Number:
Zhou Lijuan, Wu Wei, Chen Jin’ou, Yang Yunbin, Liu Liangli, Li Ling, Xu Lin. Trend analysis of patient delay and its associated factors among pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Yunnan Province, 2005—2024[J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2026, 48(10): 1618-1626. doi: 10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20260175
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.zgflzz.cn/EN/10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20260175
| 特征 | 患者例数 | 构成比(%) | 特征 | 患者例数 | 构成比(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 性别 | 治疗分类 | ||||
| 男性 | 69667 | 67.29 | 初治 | 95250 | 91.99 |
| 女性 | 33872 | 32.71 | 复治 | 8289 | 8.01 |
| 年龄组(岁) | 病原学结果 | ||||
| <65 | 86611 | 83.65 | 阴性及无结果 | 49275 | 47.59 |
| ≥65 | 16928 | 16.35 | 阳性 | 53597 | 51.77 |
| 民族 | 阳性且对利福平耐药 | 667 | 0.64 | ||
| 汉族 | 67343 | 65.04 | 户籍地址类别 | ||
| 少数民族 | 36196 | 34.96 | 本地 | 95148 | 91.90 |
| 职业 | 外地 | 8391 | 8.10 | ||
| 学生及儿童 | 6034 | 5.83 | 地区疫情 | ||
| 农民 | 87536 | 84.54 | 高 | 33175 | 32.04 |
| 其他 | 9969 | 9.63 | 低 | 70364 | 67.96 |
| 患者来源 | 重点人群 | ||||
| 主动发现 | 6863 | 6.63 | 是 | 5176 | 5.00 |
| 被动发现 | 96676 | 93.37 | 否 | 98363 | 95.00 |
| 特征 | 2005年 | 2010年 | 2015年 | 2020年 | 2024年 | P值 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 性别 | |||||||
| 男性 | 8714(80.79) | 11465(77.46) | 11445(73.64) | 9242(58.87) | 8509(66.28) | 1483.429 | <0.001 |
| 女性 | 4346(80.20) | 5490(78.17) | 5538(74.03) | 4424(58.49) | 4344(68.03) | 635.942 | <0.001 |
| 年龄组(岁) | |||||||
| <65 | 11450(80.46) | 14994(78.28) | 14751(73.80) | 11151(58.32) | 9349(66.22) | 1989.108 | <0.001 |
| ≥65 | 1610(81.52) | 1961(73.42) | 2232(73.54) | 2515(60.72) | 3504(68.64) | 167.851 | <0.001 |
| 民族 | |||||||
| 汉族 | 12889(80.52) | 10089(77.07) | 10384(73.59) | 7694(58.39) | 7436(67.85) | 1388.217 | <0.001 |
| 少数民族 | 171(86.36) | 6866(78.61) | 6599(74.05) | 5972(59.20) | 5417(65.55) | 657.776 | <0.001 |
| 职业 | |||||||
| 学生及儿童 | 679(70.80) | 717(69.81) | 745(60.08) | 823(45.47) | 545(54.61) | 171.161 | <0.001 |
| 农民 | 11159(81.86) | 14931(78.90) | 14816(75.63) | 11686(60.65) | 10933(67.81) | 1831.832 | <0.001 |
| 其他 | 1222(75.67) | 1307(69.74) | 1422(64.87) | 1157(52.93) | 1375(65.41) | 108.464 | <0.001 |
| 患者来源 | |||||||
| 主动发现 | 1395(81.15) | 1040(78.37) | 844(61.16) | 704(43.24) | 414(51.17) | 598.774 | <0.001 |
| 被动发现 | 11665(80.53) | 15915(77.64) | 16139(74.57) | 12962(59.91) | 12439(67.55) | 1742.397 | <0.001 |
| 治疗分类 | |||||||
| 初治 | 11081(82.89) | 15930(77.38) | 16448(73.70) | 12471(58.22) | 11733(66.84) | 2230.898 | <0.001 |
| 复治 | 1979(69.76) | 1025(82.73) | 535(76.10) | 1195(64.88) | 1120(67.15) | 24.198 | <0.001 |
| 病原学结果 | |||||||
| 阴性及无结果 | 3887(80.26) | 6506(75.71) | 12955(72.73) | 6610(55.56) | 3890(63.48) | 1125.353 | <0.001 |
| 阳性 | 9173(80.73) | 10449(78.97) | 3978(77.26) | 6872(61.99) | 8753(68.55) | 1014.640 | <0.001 |
| 阳性且对利福平耐药 | - | - | 50(83.33) | 184(65.48) | 210(64.42) | 4.669 | 0.031 |
| 户籍地址类别 | |||||||
| 本地 | 12662(80.96) | 16205(77.90) | 14871(74.41) | 11695(58.72) | 12567(66.84) | 2029.477 | <0.001 |
| 外地 | 398(70.44) | 750(73.39) | 2112(69.57) | 1971(58.87) | 286(68.10) | 66.308 | <0.001 |
| 地区疫情 | |||||||
| 高 | 3337(84.14) | 5761(88.17) | 5976(83.23) | 5336(62.61) | 5000(71.71) | 1021.800 | <0.001 |
| 低 | 9723(79.44) | 11194(73.21) | 11007(69.48) | 8330(56.51) | 7853(64.11) | 1408.459 | <0.001 |
| 重点人群 | |||||||
| 是 | 34(89.47) | 172(81.13) | 446(71.02) | 674(56.17) | 1911(61.68) | 36.435 | <0.001 |
| 否 | 13026(80.57) | 16783(77.65) | 16537(73.85) | 12992(58.88) | 10942(67.86) | 1916.916 | <0.001 |
| 特征 | 2005年 | 2010年 | 2015年 | 2020年 | 2024年 | J-T统计量 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 性别 | |||||||
| 男性 | 52(21,121) | 41(16,91) | 36(14,73) | 21(7,52) | 25(11,51) | -54.974 | <0.001 |
| 女性 | 53(20,121) | 43(18,95) | 36(14,74) | 21(7,50) | 26(11,53) | -38.560 | <0.001 |
| 年龄组(岁) | |||||||
| <65 | 53(21,121) | 43(17,92) | 36(14,74) | 20(6,50) | 25(11,53) | -63.629 | <0.001 |
| ≥65 | 51(21,119) | 36(13,92) | 34(13,74) | 23(8,55) | 25(12,50) | -20.733 | <0.001 |
| 民族 | |||||||
| 汉族 | 52(21,120) | 40(16,89) | 35(14,70) | 20(7,51) | 26(11,53) | -55.547 | <0.001 |
| 少数民族 | 60(28,158) | 44(18,96) | 37(14,83) | 22(7,50) | 25(11,50) | -36.489 | <0.001 |
| 职业 | |||||||
| 学生及儿童 | 33(12,77.5) | 31(12,68) | 23(6,52) | 12(4,33) | 16(7,35) | -15.825 | <0.001 |
| 农民 | 56(22,127) | 44(18,94) | 37(15,76) | 23(7,55) | 26(11,53) | -64.332 | <0.001 |
| 其他 | 39(15,95) | 32(11,76) | 27(8,62) | 16(6,43) | 26(10,55) | -12.418 | <0.001 |
| 患者来源 | |||||||
| 主动发现 | 62(21,153) | 41(18,98) | 23(6,59) | 10(1,33) | 15(6,35) | -30.767 | <0.001 |
| 被动发现 | 52(21,117) | 42(17,92) | 36(14,75) | 22(7,53) | 26(11,53) | -61.833 | <0.001 |
| 治疗分类 | |||||||
| 初治 | 58(24,125) | 41(16,92) | 36(14,73) | 20(7,49) | 25(11,51) | -68.740 | <0.001 |
| 复治 | 33(10,94) | 44(22,109) | 40(15,91) | 30(8,70) | 28(11,61) | -6.188 | <0.001 |
| 病原学结果 | |||||||
| 阴性及无结果 | 45(20,100) | 38(15,84) | 34(13,70) | 18(6,42) | 22(10,45) | -45.379 | <0.001 |
| 阳性 | 57(21,130) | 45(18,97) | 43(16,92) | 25(7,62) | 27(12,55) | -49.056 | <0.001 |
| 阳性且对利福平耐药 | - | - | 61.5(20,132) | 31(7,72) | 26(10,66) | -2.339 | 0.019 |
| 户籍地址类别 | |||||||
| 本地 | 53(21,121) | 42(17,92) | 36(14,74) | 21(7,50) | 25(11,52) | -65.599 | <0.001 |
| 外地 | 42(9,106) | 38(13,96) | 32(10,71) | 22(7,54) | 25(11,53) | -13.139 | <0.001 |
| 地区疫情 | |||||||
| 高 | 57(25,118) | 60(30,98) | 49(23,83) | 25(8,48) | 29(13,53) | -48.444 | <0.001 |
| 低 | 51(19,121) | 36(13,89) | 32(11,68) | 19(6,53) | 23(10,51) | -51.749 | <0.001 |
| 重点人群 | |||||||
| 是 | 68(39,133) | 49(19,114) | 31(11,68.5) | 18(6,51) | 21(9,44) | -5.102 | <0.001 |
| 否 | 52(21,121) | 42(17,92) | 36(14,74) | 21(7,51) | 26(11,53) | -64.783 | <0.001 |
| 州市 | 2005年 | 2010年 | 2015年 | 2020年 | 2024年 | J-T统计量 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 昆明市 | 42(15,112) | 33(12,81) | 32(11,70) | 24(9,59) | 25(9,56) | -10.982 | <0.001 |
| 曲靖市 | 62(26,136) | 45(20,96) | 31(14,66) | 15(5,39) | 26(10,57) | -27.363 | <0.001 |
| 玉溪市 | 51(19,118) | 35(14,91) | 36(16,92) | 22(5,58) | 24(11,41) | -11.051 | <0.001 |
| 保山市 | 53(23,126) | 35(17,69) | 34(15,67) | 18(7,53) | 31(11,70) | -11.418 | <0.001 |
| 昭通市 | 53(26,120) | 58(26,98) | 43(20,72) | 21(7,46) | 27(13,52) | -36.220 | <0.001 |
| 丽江市 | 61(15,131) | 29(13,72) | 14(11,33) | 30(9,69) | 22(7,46) | -7.427 | <0.001 |
| 普洱市 | 61(22,139) | 67(34,115) | 59(29,95) | 31(10,67) | 29(13,53) | -24.685 | <0.001 |
| 临沧市 | 46(18,96) | 41(14,85) | 24(2,67) | 31(9,78) | 19(8,47) | -10.291 | <0.001 |
| 楚雄彝族自治州 | 44(19,121) | 15(4,41) | 15(4,41) | 29(11,63) | 27(13,55) | -6.361 | <0.001 |
| 红河哈尼族彝族自治州 | 49(20,107) | 35(17,78) | 33(14,66) | 12(3,33) | 16(7,42) | -29.312 | <0.001 |
| 文山壮族苗族自治州 | 76(33,153) | 49(18,115) | 45(24,96) | 30(10,64) | 31(15,61) | -22.340 | <0.001 |
| 西双版纳傣族自治州 | 62(27,133) | 55(17,102) | 36(8,107) | 12(3,37) | 30(9,69) | -10.094 | <0.001 |
| 大理白族自治州 | 34(13,90) | 30(10,75) | 27(7,62) | 21(6,49) | 24(13,47) | -9.600 | <0.001 |
| 德宏傣族景颇族自治州 | 46(18,101) | 31(10,66) | 27(7,62) | 14(4,34) | 20(9,41) | -9.786 | <0.001 |
| 怒江傈僳族自治州 | 84(39,207) | 69(34,118) | 51(30,101) | 33(19,39) | 28(12,38) | -22.823 | <0.001 |
| 迪庆藏族自治州 | 26(7,70) | 66(29,150) | 73(25,131) | 32(12,66) | 15(7,35) | -4.600 | <0.001 |
| 特征 | 患者例数 | 就诊延迟患者数(例) | 就诊延迟率(%) | χ2值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 性别 | 1.783 | 0.182 | |||
| 男性 | 69667 | 49375 | 70.87 | ||
| 女性 | 33872 | 24142 | 71.27 | ||
| 年龄组(岁) | 13.391 | <0.001 | |||
| <65 | 86611 | 61695 | 71.23 | ||
| ≥65 | 16928 | 11822 | 69.84 | ||
| 民族 | 94.188 | <0.001 | |||
| 汉族 | 67343 | 48492 | 72.01 | ||
| 少数民族 | 36196 | 25025 | 69.14 | ||
| 职业 | 760.958 | <0.001 | |||
| 学生及儿童 | 6034 | 3509 | 58.15 | ||
| 农民 | 87536 | 63525 | 72.57 | ||
| 其他 | 9969 | 6483 | 65.03 | ||
| 患者来源 | 171.749 | <0.001 | |||
| 主动发现 | 6863 | 4397 | 64.07 | ||
| 被动发现 | 96676 | 69120 | 71.50 | ||
| 治疗分类 | 0.633 | 0.426 | |||
| 初治 | 95250 | 67663 | 71.04 | ||
| 复治 | 8289 | 5854 | 70.62 | ||
| 病原学结果 | 258.147 | <0.001 | |||
| 阴性及无结果 | 49275 | 33848 | 68.69 | ||
| 阳性 | 53597 | 39225 | 73.19 | ||
| 阳性且利福平耐药 | 667 | 444 | 66.57 | ||
| 户籍地址类别 | 122.481 | <0.001 | |||
| 本地 | 95148 | 68000 | 71.47 | ||
| 外地 | 8391 | 5517 | 65.75 | ||
| 地区疫情 | 740.825 | <0.001 | |||
| 高 | 33175 | 25410 | 76.59 | ||
| 低 | 70364 | 48107 | 68.37 | ||
| 重点人群 | 189.651 | <0.001 | |||
| 是 | 5176 | 3237 | 62.54 | ||
| 否 | 98363 | 70280 | 71.45 |
| 变量 | β值 | s | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR(95%CI)值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 年龄组 | |||||
| ≥65岁(参照) | 1 | ||||
| <65岁 | 0.113 | 0.019 | 36.478 | <0.001 | 1.120(1.079~1.162) |
| 民族 | |||||
| 少数民族(参照) | 1 | ||||
| 汉族 | 0.239 | 0.015 | 264.624 | <0.001 | 1.270(1.234~1.307) |
| 职业 | |||||
| 学生及儿童(参照) | 1 | ||||
| 农民 | 0.597 | 0.028 | 448.434 | <0.001 | 1.817(1.719~1.920) |
| 其他 | 0.349 | 0.034 | 103.276 | <0.001 | 1.417(1.325~1.516) |
| 患者来源 | |||||
| 主动(参照) | 1 | ||||
| 被动 | 0.336 | 0.027 | 157.363 | <0.001 | 1.400(1.328~1.475) |
| 病原学结果 | |||||
| 阴性及无结果(参照) | 1 | ||||
| 阳性 | 0.219 | 0.014 | 243.54 | <0.001 | 1.245(1.211~1.279) |
| 阳性且对利福平耐药 | -0.082 | 0.083 | 0.974 | 0.324 | 0.921(0.782~1.085) |
| 户籍地址类别 | |||||
| 外地(参照) | 1 | ||||
| 本地 | 0.157 | 0.025 | 39.862 | <0.001 | 1.169(1.114~1.228) |
| 地区疫情负担 | |||||
| 低疫情(参照) | 1 | ||||
| 高疫情 | 0.453 | 0.016 | 828.027 | <0.001 | 1.574(1.526~1.623) |
| 重点人群 | |||||
| 是(参照) | 1 | ||||
| 否 | 0.241 | 0.031 | 61.701 | <0.001 | 1.273(1.199~1.352) |
| [1] | 姜雪, 白云龙, 马建军, 等. 2020—2023年吉林省利福平耐药肺结核患者诊治延迟现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2025, 47(4):416-424. doi:10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20240530. |
| [2] | 王黎霞. 结核病防治可持续发展之路——回顾“十三五”展望“十四五”[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2021, 43(1):3-5. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2021.01.002. |
| [3] | Marks G B, Nguyen N V, Nguyen P T B, et al. Community-wide Screening for Tuberculosis in a High-Prevalence Setting[J]. N Engl J Med, 2019, 381(14):1347-1357. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1902129. |
| [4] | 黄飞, 杜昕, 陈伟, 等. 中国结核病信息管理系统介绍[J]. 中国数字医学, 2011, 6(10): 97-100. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-7571.2011.10.032. |
| [5] | 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. WS 288—2017肺结核诊断[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2024, 5(4):376-378. doi:10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.2024022. |
| [6] | 云南省疾病预防控制局, 云南省卫生健康委员会, 云南省发展和改革委员会, 等. 云南省结核病防治规划(2025—2030年)[A/OL]. (2025-05-30)[2026-04-24]. https://ynsjkj.yn.gov.cn/html/2025/qtwjzwgk_0609/718.html. |
| [7] | 李欣霖, 万彬, 赵霞, 等. 中国肺结核患者就诊延迟情况的Meta分析[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2025, 47(11):1442-1453. doi:10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20250393. |
| [8] | 郝冬青, 李涛, 徐彩红. 2020年我国西部地区肺结核患者就诊及诊断延迟影响因素分析[J]. 疾病监测, 2023, 38(11):1294-1300. doi:10.3784/jbjc.202307200354. |
| [9] | 马斌忠, 魏於家, 蒋明霞, 等. 青海省藏族2013—2023年肺结核病例就诊延迟现状及影响因素[J]. 中国热带医学, 2025, 25(11):1481-1485. doi:10.13604/j.cnki.46-1064/r.2025.11.18. |
| [10] | 赵静, 廖影, 庞艳, 等. 2018—2024年重庆市梁平区肺结核患者就诊延迟的变化趋势及影响因素分析[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2025, 6(5):558-565. doi:10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.20250058. |
| [11] | 王美凤, 逯嘉, 李洪敏, 等. 2017—2023年内江市肺结核患者就诊延迟及影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学情报杂志, 2026, 42(3):364-374. doi:10.19971/j.cnki.1006-4028.240278N. |
| [12] | 余爱平, 张正斌, 张泽方, 等. 2017—2022年武汉市肺结核患者就诊延迟情况及影响因素分析[J]. 中国预防医学杂志, 2025, 26(1):32-36. doi:10.16506/j.1009-6639.2025.01.006. |
| [13] | 吴蔚, 邱玉冰, 陈金瓯, 等. “十三五”期间云南省结核病新型防治服务模式实施效果研究[J]. 卫生软科学, 2023, 37(6):1-4. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2800.2023.06.001. |
| [14] | 杨蕊, 苏智阳, 刘宜平, 等. 2020年云南省结核病防治核心信息知晓情况及影响因素分析[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2023, 45(11):1045-1051. doi:10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20230209. |
| [15] | 孔鹏, 杨金侠. 我国结核病防治纳入新型农村合作医疗现状研究[J]. 中国卫生经济, 2011, 30(2): 33-36. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0743.2011.02.012. |
| [16] | 杨蕊, 许琳, 陈留萍, 等. 云南省肺结核患者主动筛查策略试行效果评估[J]. 现代预防医学, 2018, 45(15): 2788-2790, 2813. |
| [17] | Shi X, Guo Z, Liu Q, et al. Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on tuberculosis patients’ healthcare-seeking behaviors and doctors’ diagnosis delays[J]. BMC Public Health, 2025, 25(1):3324. doi:10.1186/s12889-025-24621-z. |
| [18] | Li T, Du X, Kang J, et al. Patient, Diagnosis, and Treatment Delays Among Tuberculosis Patients Before and During COVID-19 Epidemic-China, 2018-2022[J]. China CDC Wkly, 2023, 5(12):259-265. doi:10.46234/ccdcw2023.047. |
| [19] |
Guo J, Feng Y P, Liu Z D, et al. Analysis of factors influencing patient delay by patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in Lishui City, Zhejiang Province[J]. BMC Pulm Med, 2023, 23(1):264. doi:10.1186/s12890-023-02554-w.
pmid: 37464373 |
| [20] | Wang X, Li Y, Fu Q, et al. Trends of a decade in risk factors of patient delay among pulmonary tuberculosis patients during fast aging and urbanization-analysis of surveillance data from 2008 to 2017 in Wuhan, China[J]. BMC public health, 2023, 23(1): 803. doi:10.1186/s12889-023-15707-7. |
| [21] | 陈代权, 林淑芳, 周银发, 等. 2010—2019年福建省结核病患者就诊延迟及影响因素分析[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2023, 45(1):96-103. doi:10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20220294. |
| [22] | 卢莉萍, 王铂, 邵芙蓉, 等. 2018—2023年甘肃省肺结核患者延迟就诊状况分析[J]. 疾病监测, 2025, 40(12):1560-1565. doi:10.3784/jbjc.202503060150. |
| [23] | Tong Y, Guan X, Hou S, et al. Determinants of Health Care-Seeking Delay among Tuberculosis Patients in Rural Area of Central China[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2018, 15(9):1998. doi:10.3390/ijerph15091998. |
| [24] | 马建军, 赵庆龙, 张铁娟, 等. 2016—2020年吉林省老年肺结核流行特征及就诊延迟影响因素分析[J]. 疾病监测, 2024, 39(2):156-160. doi:10.3784/jbjc.202309180489. |
| [25] | 尹鹏亮, 宋丽新, 谢赐福, 等. 长沙市2019—2023年结核病患者就诊延迟现况及影响因素[J]. 中国热带医学, 2025, 25(1):81-86. doi:10.13604/j.cnki.46-1064/r.2025.01.14. |
| [26] | 韩阳, 牛孝彬, 彭爱玲, 等. 2017—2021年安徽省淮北市结核患者就诊延迟情况及影响因素[J]. 上海预防医学, 2023, 35(8):758-763. doi:10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2023.22860. |
| [27] | 傅丽娟, 汪业胜, 朱文龙, 等. 湖州市2008—2018年肺结核患者就诊延迟情况及影响因素[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2021, 25(2):235-239. doi:10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2021.02.022. |
| [28] | 杨超, 王晶, 唐桂林. 2012—2021年北京市通州区流动人口肺结核患者就诊延迟的变化趋势及影响因素分析[J]. 疾病监测, 2023, 38(9):1033-1038. doi:10.3784/jbjc.202303300140. |
| [29] | 王秉萍, 赵茜, 杨敬源, 等. 2015—2020年贵州省本地与外地肺结核患者就诊延迟特征及影响因素分析[J]. 疾病监测, 2022, 37(8):1016-1021. doi:10.3784/jbjc.202202280074. |
| [30] | 呼景飞, 周鸿让, 周喆, 等. 上海市青浦区2011—2022年肺结核患者就诊延迟现状及影响因素[J]. 中国热带医学, 2024, 24(3):333-339. doi:10.13604/j.cnki.46-1064/r.2024.03.18. |
| [31] | 王炜, 郝晓刚, 祝平. 浙江省衢州市农村老年人大规模主动筛查发现的肺结核病例特征分析[J]. 疾病监测, 2021, 36(12): 1308-1311. doi:10.3784/jbjc.202101270049. |
| [1] | Shangguan Shichao, Hu Qingping, Zhen Lili, Pan Wei, Jiang Xuemei, Dai Bingqin. Analysis of characteristics and trends of patient delay in elderly pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Shandong Province, 2010—2024 [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2026, 48(9): 1402-1408. |
| [2] | Wang Dafu, Ma Xiaoxue, Wang Yun, Li Fudong, Rao Wen, Gong Tingting, Li Shijun, Li Jinlan. Analysis of risk factors for patient delay and adverse treatment outcomes among patients with pulmonary tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus in Guizhou Province, 2016—2023 [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(2): 201-209. |
| [3] | Gong Dehua, Tan Wenqian, Huang Juan, Wan Yanping, Xu Zuhui, Liu Zhaochun. Analysis of the detection delay and influencing factors of student with pulmonary tuberculosis in Hunan from 2011 to 2020 [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2023, 45(3): 271-278. |
| [4] | Chen Daiquan, Lin Shufang, Zhou Yinfa, Chen Kun, Dai Zhisong. Patient delay and related factors among tuberculosis patient in Fujian Province, 2010—2019 [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2023, 45(1): 96-103. |
| [5] | XIE Yan-tao, GAO Han-qing, WU Yue, WANG Sai-sai, KANG Wan-li, LIU Yang. Influencing factors of patient delay and diagnosis delay among tuberculosis patients in schools of Tongzhou District, Beijing,2014—2019 [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2021, 43(5): 506-512. |
| [6] | ZHANG Hong-wei, RUAN Yun-zhou, ZHANG Tian-hua, DENG Ya-li, XIONG De-ming, LIU Xi-bo. Analysis of visit behavior of pulmonary tuberculosis patients in underdeveloped areas of Shaanxi [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2021, 43(12): 1292-1296. |
| [7] | SHEN Hong-cheng, DU Yu-hua, ZHANG Guang-chuan, WU Gui-feng, LIU Jian-xiong, LI Tie-gang. Influencing factors of pulmonary tuberculosis patient delay in Guangzhou, 2008—2018 [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(5): 510-517. |
| [8] | HUANG Mai-ling,WU Xiao-guang,MA Li-ping,GAO Meng-qiu,CHEN Hong-mei,LIU Rong-mei,XIE Li,ZHANG Li-qun. Clinical analysis on 33 elder patients with acute hematogenous disseminated pulmonary tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2013, 35(11): 927-929. |
| [9] | XU Shu-ming,CHENG Lin-xian,YANG Xuan-qin,XIN Lei,FAN Shang-fei. Analysis of 33 cases of atypical pulmonary tuberculosis ball by CT images [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2013, 35(11): 930-933. |
| [10] | CHEN Qiu-lan,ZHOU Lin,WANG Ni,HU Dai-yu,LI Fang,CHEN Ming-ting. Exploration and effect evaluation of the intervention of providing transportation subsidies to pulmonary tuberculosis patients in two counties in China [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2012, 34(10): 642-646. |
| [11] | YANG Hua-lin, BAO Chang-lin, BAI Li-qiong, LI Yan-hong, GONG De-hua, TANG Yi, WAN Yan-ping, XIAO Tao, FAN Jiang-jing, CHEN You-fang. Comparison between the effects of interventions of telephone supervision and traditional supervision to the pulmonary TB patients in Hunan rural areas [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2011, 33(10): 646-650. |
| [12] | Cao Wenli,Chen Zheng,Xu Qingjie,Han Yuefei,Wu Yin,Wang Jinling,Xiang Xi,Tu Dehua . Clinical analysis on sputum smear positive conversion in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis during regular treatment [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2010, 32(9): 92-95. |
| [13] | Li Fengjuan,Yan Xiaoting,Nan Qin,Wang Xinhong. Investigation and analysis of the phenomenon of cultural shock of hospital new tuberculosis patients and nursing strategy [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2010, 32(1): 30-34. |
| [14] | Li Hong,Tangshenjie.. A clinical trial of Mycobaeterium Vaccae vaccine combining chemotherapy in treating new pulmonary tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2006, 28(4): 241-243. |
| [15] | Guo Xingquan,Zhou Xinhua,He Wei.. HRCT manifestation of military pulmonary tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2005, 27(1): 44-46. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
京公网安备11010202007215号
Total visitors: Visitors of today: Now online:
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.