Email Alert | RSS

Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis ›› 2025, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 169-174.doi: 10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20240481

Previous Articles     Next Articles

A multicenter clinical study on the diagnostic value of nanopore sequencing technology in patients with smear-negative tuberculosis

Yan Xiaojing1, Wang Yujin1, Wang Jun1, Jing Wei1, Li Xuelian1, Cheng Jie2, Yang Guoli3, Wang Yuqing4, Chu Naihui1, Nie Wenjuan1(), Jiao Xiaoke1()   

  1. 1Department Ⅰ of Tuberculosis, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 101149, China
    2Department of Tuberculosis, Anhui Provincial Chest Hospital, Hefei 230022, China
    3Department of Tuberculosis, Tuberculosis Hospital of Jilin Province, Changchun 130500, China
    4Department of Respiratory,The Fourth People’s Hospital of Qinghai Province, Xining 810000, China
  • Received:2024-11-04 Online:2025-02-10 Published:2025-02-08
  • Contact: Nie Wenjuan, Email: xiaobingxiaomei@sina.cn;Jiao Xiaoke, Email:kekejiao83@vip.sina.com
  • Supported by:
    High Level Public Health Technical Personnel Construction Project and Training Fund for Open Projects at Clinical Institutes and Departments of Capital Medical University(CCMU2022ZKYXZ003);Clinical Medicine Development Special Project “Sailing” Plan Project(ZLRK202331)

Abstract:

Objective: To analyze the diagnostic value of nanopore sequencing technology in patients with smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB). Methods: In this study, 107 smear-negative patients with suspected PTB admitted to infectious disease hospitals from Beijing, Anhui, Qinghai and Jilin Provinces from September 2021 to April 2022 were enrolled as research subjects. Samples of these cases were subjected to BACTEC MGIT 960 liquid culture (MGIT 960 culture), GeneXpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) assay and nanopore sequencing. The final clinical diagnosis was used as reference standard to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of the three methods for detecting PTB. Results: Among the 107 patients with suspected PTB, 70 cases (65.42%) were finally diagnosed as PTB,15 cases (14.02%) were nontuberculous mycobacteria and 22 cases (20.56%) were non-TB. The sensitivities of nanopore sequencing technology, MGIT 960 culture and Xpert detection were 84.29% (59/70), 37.14% (26/70) and 41.43% (29/70), respectively, and their specificities were 86.49% (32/37), 75.68% (28/37) and 97.30% (36/37), respectively. Their Youden index were 0.71, 0.13, and 0.39, respectively. Their AUC values were 0.854 (95%CI: 0.773-0.935), 0.694 (95%CI: 0.596-0.792) and 0.564 (95%CI: 0.451-0.677), respectively. Conclusion: Nanopore sequencing technology has better diagnostic performance than Xpert and MGIT 960 culture in the detection of smear-negative PTB.

Key words: Tuberculosis, pulmonary, Bronchoalveolar lavage fluids, Nanotechnology, Multicenter study

CLC Number: