Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis ›› 2026, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (9): 1290-1299.doi: 10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20260226
• Original Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Xu Chaoyan1,2, Wei Jiaojiao3, Li Shanshan4, Yao Lin5, Li Ling3,6(
), Gao Mengqiu1(
)
Received:2026-04-20
Online:2026-09-10
Published:2026-09-08
Contact:
Li Ling,Gao Mengqiu
E-mail:liling@smu.edu.cn;gaomqwdm@aliyun.com
Supported by:CLC Number:
Xu Chaoyan, Wei Jiaojiao, Li Shanshan, Yao Lin, Li Ling, Gao Mengqiu. Construction and clinical evaluation of an early diagnostic model for Mycobacterium intracellulare pulmonary disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2026, 48(9): 1290-1299. doi: 10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20260226
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.zgflzz.cn/EN/10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20260226
| 特征 | 训练集(335例) | 统计 检验值 | P值 | 测试集(83例) | 统计 检验值 | P值 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 胞内分枝杆菌 肺病(135例) | 肺结核 (200例) | 胞内分枝杆菌 肺病(35例) | 肺结核 (48例) | |||||
| 年龄(岁, | 61.8±12.5 | 51.9±18.4 | t=-5.370 | <0.001 | 70.2±8.9 | 49.7±20.1 | t=-5.630 | <0.001 |
| 性别[例,构成比(%)] | χ2=1.825 | 0.177 | χ2=0.135 | 0.713 | ||||
| 男性 | 80(59.3) | 133(66.5) | 19(54.3) | 28(58.3) | ||||
| 女性 | 55(40.7) | 67(33.5) | 16(45.7) | 20(41.7) | ||||
| BMI(kg/m2, | 19.5±4.1 | 20.8±3.3 | t=3.382 | 0.001 | 18.9±1.7 | 20.3±2.2 | t=3.125 | 0.002 |
| 肺部感染[例,构成比(%)] | χ2=17.436 | <0.001 | χ2=0.473 | 0.492 | ||||
| 是 | 78(57.8) | 158(79.0) | 15(42.9) | 17(35.4) | ||||
| 否 | 57(42.2) | 42(21.0) | 20(57.1) | 31(64.6) | ||||
| 支气管扩张[例,构成比(%)] | χ2=63.366 | <0.001 | χ2=5.723 | 0.017 | ||||
| 是 | 45(33.3) | 4(2.0) | 15(42.9) | 9(18.8) | ||||
| 否 | 90(66.7) | 196(98.0) | 20(57.1) | 39(81.2) | ||||
| 糖尿病[例,构成比(%)] | χ2=13.107 | <0.001 | χ2=0.001 | 0.969 | ||||
| 是 | 16(11.9) | 57(28.5) | 3(8.6) | 4(8.3) | ||||
| 否 | 119(88.1) | 143(71.5) | 32(91.4) | 44(91.7) | ||||
| 甲状腺结节[例,构成比(%)] | χ2=0.550 | 0.458 | NA | NA | ||||
| 是 | 33(24.4) | 42(21.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | ||||
| 否 | 102(75.6) | 158(79.0) | 35(100.0) | 48(100.0) | ||||
| 胃炎[例,构成比(%)] | χ2=8.896 | 0.003 | χ2=1.388 | 0.422 | ||||
| 是 | 11(8.1) | 3(1.5) | 1(2.9) | 0(0.0) | ||||
| 否 | 124(91.9) | 197(98.5) | 34(97.1) | 48(100.0) | ||||
| 手术史[例,构成比(%)] | χ2=0.031 | 0.859 | χ2=0.328 | 0.567 | ||||
| 是 | 15(11.1) | 21(10.5) | 11(31.4) | 18(37.5) | ||||
| 否 | 120(88.9) | 179(89.5) | 24(68.6) | 30(62.5) | ||||
| 咳嗽、咳痰[例,构成比(%)] | χ2=0.488 | 0.485 | χ2=1.072 | 0.391 | ||||
| 是 | 114(84.4) | 163(81.5) | 34(97.1) | 44(91.7) | ||||
| 否 | 21(15.6) | 37(18.5) | 1(2.9) | 4(8.3) | ||||
| 乏力、纳差[例,构成比(%)] | χ2=0.791 | 0.374 | χ2=0.023 | 0.879 | ||||
| 是 | 30(22.2) | 53(26.5) | 14(40.0) | 20(41.7) | ||||
| 否 | 105(77.8) | 147(73.5) | 21(60.0) | 28(58.3) | ||||
| 胸闷、气短[例,构成比(%)] | χ2=1.456 | 0.228 | χ2=0.022 | 0.881 | ||||
| 是 | 49(36.3) | 60(30.0) | 10(28.6) | 13(27.1) | ||||
| 否 | 86(63.7) | 140(70.0) | 25(71.4) | 35(72.9) | ||||
| 盗汗[例,构成比(%)] | χ2=0.001 | 0.972 | χ2=4.588 | 0.032 | ||||
| 是 | 12(8.9) | 18(9.0) | 10(28.6) | 25(52.1) | ||||
| 否 | 123(91.1) | 182(91.0) | 25(71.4) | 23(47.9) | ||||
| 咯血[例,构成比(%)] | χ2=6.026 | 0.014 | χ2=10.484 | 0.001 | ||||
| 是 | 34(25.2) | 29(14.5) | 7(20.0) | 0(0.0) | ||||
| 否 | 101(74.8) | 171(85.5) | 28(80.0) | 48(100.0) | ||||
| 发热[例,构成比(%)] | χ2=0.149 | 0.699 | χ2=0.288 | 0.592 | ||||
| 是 | 65(48.1) | 92(46.0) | 5(14.3) | 9(18.8) | ||||
| 否 | 70(51.9) | 108(54.0) | 30(85.7) | 39(81.2) | ||||
| 腺苷脱氨酶[U/L,M(Q1,Q3)] | 12.4 (9.5,15.4) | 13.5 (10.2,18.6) | Z=-2.515 | 0.011 | 13.0 (11.0,18.0) | 12.9 (9.8,17.8) | Z=-0.641 | 0.521 |
| 淋巴细胞(%, | 20.5±9.0 | 22.1±10.0 | t=1.564 | 0.119 | 20.2±8.7 | 22.2±8.6 | t=1.060 | 0.292 |
| T淋巴细胞(%, | 71.7±10.2 | 73.1±9.5 | t=1.236 | 0.217 | 62.1±11.7 | 69.5±8.5 | t=3.355 | 0.001 |
| CD4+ T细胞(%, | 41.1±9.9 | 43.3±10.3 | t=2.079 | 0.038 | 32.8±8.8 | 41.7±8.8 | t=4.497 | <0.001 |
| CD8+ T细胞(%, | 27.6±10.2 | 26.2±9.7 | t=-1.259 | 0.209 | 26.3±9.4 | 24.4±7.4 | t=-1.027 | 0.307 |
| 自然杀伤细胞(%, | 16.4±8.9 | 13.9±8.9 | t=-2.526 | 0.012 | 23.5±11.2 | 13.9±7.4 | t=-4.685 | <0.001 |
| B淋巴细胞(%, | 10.3±5.5 | 11.6±6.0 | t=1.712 | 0.088 | 11.2±6.2 | 13.4±6.8 | t=1.476 | 0.144 |
| 变量 | β值 | s | Wald χ2值 | P值 | OR(95%CI)值 | VIF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 年龄 | 0.038 | 0.008 | 24.799 | <0.001 | 1.039(1.023~1.054) | 1.234 |
| 肺部感染 | -1.011 | 0.246 | 16.903 | <0.001 | 0.364(0.225~0.589) | 1.051 |
| 支气管扩张 | 3.199 | 0.537 | 35.472 | <0.001 | 24.500(8.551~70.196) | 1.120 |
| 糖尿病 | -1.087 | 0.309 | 12.374 | <0.001 | 0.337(0.184~0.618) | 1.211 |
| 胃炎 | 1.762 | 0.661 | 7.100 | 0.008 | 5.825(1.594~21.294) | 1.027 |
| 咯血 | 0.686 | 0.282 | 5.903 | 0.015 | 1.985(1.142~3.451) | 1.031 |
| BMI | -0.111 | 0.034 | 10.682 | 0.001 | 0.895(0.837-0.956) | 1.137 |
| 腺苷脱氨酶 | -0.046 | 0.018 | 6.474 | 0.011 | 0.955(0.922~0.990) | 1.184 |
| CD4+ T细胞(%) | -0.023 | 0.011 | 4.237 | 0.040 | 0.977(0.956~0.999) | 1.256 |
| NK细胞(%) | 0.031 | 0.013 | 6.131 | 0.013 | 1.032(1.007~1.058) | 1.415 |
| B淋巴细胞(%) | -0.034 | 0.020 | 2.891 | 0.089 | 0.967(0.930~1.005) | 1.082 |
| 模型 | AUC(95%CI)值 | 敏感度(%) | 特异度(%) | PPV(%) | NPV(%) | 准确度(%) | F1分数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 随机森林 | 0.978(0.967~0.987) | 79.3 | 98.0 | 96.4 | 87.5 | 90.4 | 0.870 |
| 轻梯度提升机 | 0.951(0.935~0.967) | 74.1 | 94.0 | 89.3 | 84.3 | 86.0 | 0.810 |
| 极限梯度提升 | 0.935(0.914~0.956) | 68.1 | 94.0 | 88.5 | 81.4 | 83.6 | 0.770 |
| 极端随机树 | 0.922(0.901~0.948) | 57.0 | 97.5 | 93.9 | 77.1 | 81.2 | 0.710 |
| 自适应提升 | 0.916(0.885~0.937) | 77.0 | 88.0 | 81.2 | 85.0 | 83.6 | 0.791 |
| K最邻近算法 | 0.898(0.869~0.926) | 70.4 | 90.5 | 83.3 | 81.9 | 82.4 | 0.763 |
| 人工神经网络 | 0.880(0.849~0.914) | 65.9 | 87.5 | 78.1 | 79.2 | 78.8 | 0.715 |
| 支持向量机 | 0.877(0.847~0.913) | 59.3 | 91.5 | 82.5 | 76.9 | 78.5 | 0.690 |
| 逻辑回归 | 0.856(0.824~0.897) | 62.2 | 86.5 | 75.7 | 77.2 | 76.7 | 0.683 |
| 决策树 | 0.849(0.803~0.882) | 48.9 | 98.0 | 94.3 | 74.0 | 78.2 | 0.644 |
| 模型 | AUC(95%CI)值 | 敏感度 (%) | 特异度 (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | 准确度 (%) | F1分数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 随机森林_重叠 | 0.897(0.865~0.930) | 65.2 | 89.0 | 80.0 | 79.1 | 79.4 | 0.718 |
| 轻梯度提升机_重叠 | 0.855(0.818~0.893) | 65.9 | 84.5 | 74.2 | 78.6 | 77.0 | 0.698 |
| 极端随机树_重叠 | 0.864(0.827~0.900) | 58.5 | 90.0 | 79.8 | 76.3 | 77.3 | 0.675 |
| 极端梯度提升_重叠 | 0.844(0.805~0.883) | 54.1 | 90.0 | 78.5 | 74.4 | 75.5 | 0.640 |
| 自适应提升_重叠 | 0.831(0.791~0.871) | 61.5 | 83.5 | 71.6 | 76.3 | 74.6 | 0.661 |
| 随机森林_SHAP | 0.946(0.922~0.970) | 77.8 | 91.5 | 86.1 | 85.9 | 86.0 | 0.817 |
| 轻梯度提升机_SHAP | 0.906(0.875~0.937) | 74.8 | 89.5 | 82.8 | 84.0 | 83.6 | 0.786 |
| 极端梯度提升_SHAP | 0.893(0.860~0.927) | 68.1 | 88.5 | 80.0 | 80.5 | 80.3 | 0.736 |
| 极端随机树_SHAP | 0.890(0.857~0.924) | 62.2 | 91.5 | 83.2 | 78.2 | 79.7 | 0.712 |
| 自适应提升_SHAP | 0.854(0.816~0.891) | 67.4 | 86.0 | 76.5 | 79.6 | 78.5 | 0.717 |
| 随机森林_LASSO | 0.911(0.881~0.942) | 72.6 | 87.5 | 79.7 | 82.5 | 81.5 | 0.760 |
| 极端随机树_LASSO | 0.879(0.844~0.914) | 64.4 | 90.5 | 82.1 | 79.0 | 80.0 | 0.722 |
| 轻梯度提升机_LASSO | 0.871(0.835~0.907) | 66.7 | 86.0 | 76.3 | 79.3 | 78.2 | 0.711 |
| 极端梯度提升_LASSO | 0.869(0.832~0.905) | 63.0 | 89.0 | 79.4 | 78.1 | 78.5 | 0.702 |
| 自适应提升_LASSO | 0.849(0.811~0.888) | 69.6 | 82.0 | 72.3 | 80.0 | 77.0 | 0.709 |
| [1] | 江丽娜, 王春花. 非结核分枝杆菌病的流行病学特征、耐药现状及临床治疗研究进展[J]. 中国热带医学, 2026, 26(3): 448-454. doi:10.13604/j.cnki.46-1064/r.2022.07. |
| [2] | 王瑞白, 许达, 赵秀芹, 等. 我国结核与非结核分枝杆菌混合感染的系统性回顾及Meta分析[J]. 中国人兽共患病学报, 2021, 37(12): 1147-1151. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2694.2021.00.161. |
| [3] |
Yu X, Liu P, Liu G, et al. The prevalence of non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections in mainland China: Systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Infect, 2016, 73(6): 558-567. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2016.08.020.
pmid: 27717784 |
| [4] | 马玙, 王敬. 重视非结核分枝杆菌肺病与肺结核的鉴别[J]. 临床肺科杂志, 2010, 15(3): 301-302. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6663.2010.03.001. |
| [5] | Tarashi S, Siadat S D, Fateh A. Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Resistance to Antibiotics and Disinfectants: Challenges Still Ahead[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2022, 2022: 8168750. doi:10.1155/2022/8168750. |
| [6] | 黄明翔. 非结核分枝杆菌病的实验室诊断技术进展[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2013, 35(7): 538-541. doi:10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.2013.07.011. |
| [7] | Pennington K M, Vu A, Challener D, et al. Approach to the diagnosis and treatment of non-tuberculous mycobacterial disease[J]. J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis, 2021, 24: 100244. doi:10.1016/j.jctube.2021.100244. |
| [8] | Sarro Y D S, Butzler M A, Sanogo F, et al. Development and clinical evaluation of a new multiplex PCR assay for a simultaneous diagnosis of tuberculous and nontuberculous mycobacteria[J]. EBioMedicine, 2021, 70: 103527. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103527. |
| [9] | 王艳, 郑华荣, 罗祎斐, 等. 基于机器学习技术利用常规检验数据建立肺结核鉴别诊断方法[J]. 中华检验医学杂志, 2022, 45(12): 1201-1206. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn114452-20220324-00175. |
| [10] | Anh N K, Phat N K, Thu N Q, et al. Discovery of urinary biosignatures for tuberculosis and nontuberculous mycobacteria classification using metabolomics and machine learning[J]. Sci Rep, 2024, 14(1): 15312. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-66113-x. |
| [11] | Wang L, Ding W, Mo Y, et al. Distinguishing nontuberculous mycobacteria from Mycobacterium tuberculosis lung disease from CT images using a deep learning framework[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2021, 48(13): 4293-4306. doi:10.1007/s00259-021-05432-x. |
| [12] | Riley R D, Ensor J, Snell K I E, et al. Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model[J]. BMJ, 2020, 368: m441. doi:10.1136/bmj.m441. |
| [13] | 丁峰, 卢水华. 《世界卫生组织结核病综合指南模块3:诊断》第四版解读[J]. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2025, 6(6): 624-633. doi:10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.20250072. |
| [14] |
World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects[J]. Nurs Ethics, 2002, 9(1): 105-109. doi:10.1191/0969733002ne486xx.
pmid: 16010903 |
| [15] | 姚阳阳, 梁长华, 韩东明, 等. 基于CT影像组学结合临床特征鉴别肺结核与非结核分枝杆菌肺病的研究[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2024, 46(3): 302-310. doi:10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20230337. |
| [16] |
Yan Q, Wang W, Zhao W, et al. Differentiating nontuberculous mycobacterium pulmonary disease from pulmonary tuberculosis through the analysis of the cavity features in CT images using radiomics[J]. BMC Pulm Med, 2022, 22(1): 4. doi:10.1186/s12890-021-01766-2.
pmid: 34991543 |
| [17] | Zhang W, Chen J, Chen Z, et al. Differentiating Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Pulmonary Disease from Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Resource-Limited Settings: A Pragmatic Model for Reducing Misguided Antitubercular Treatment[J]. Healthcare (Basel), 2025, 13(9): 1065. doi:10.3390/healthcare13091065. |
| [18] | Liu Q, Pan X, An H, et al. Building a model for the differential diagnosis of non-tuberculous mycobacterial lung disease and pulmonary tuberculosis: A case-control study based on immunological and radiological features[J]. Int Immunopharmacol, 2023, 124(Pt B): 111064. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2023.111064. |
| [19] | 王蕾, 曹婕, 刘轾彬, 等. 整合淋巴细胞亚群与临床特征的机器学习模型在非结核分枝杆菌肺病、肺结核及其他肺部疾病鉴别诊断中的应用与效能评估[J]. 同济大学学报(医学版), 2025, 46(6): 848-856. doi:10.12289/j.issn.2097-4345.25390. |
| [20] |
Kendall B A, Varley C D, Choi D, et al. Distinguishing tuberculosis from nontuberculous mycobacteria lung disease, Oregon, USA[J]. Emerg Infect Dis, 2011, 17(3): 506-509. doi:10.3201/eid1703.101164.
pmid: 21392445 |
| [21] |
Kim Y K, Hahn S, Uh Y, et al. Comparable characteristics of tuberculous and non-tuberculous mycobacterial cavitary lung diseases[J]. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 2014, 18(6): 725-729. doi:10.5588/ijtld.13.0871.
pmid: 24903945 |
| [22] | Shrestha N, Mishra S R, Ghimire S, et al. Burden of Diabetes and Prediabetes in Nepal: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J]. Diabetes Ther, 2020, 11(9): 1935-1946. doi:10.1007/s13300-020-00884-0. |
| [23] | Wang Y, Shi J, Yin X, et al. The impact of diabetes mellitus on tuberculosis recurrence in Eastern China: a retrospective cohort study[J]. BMC Public Health, 2024, 24(1): 2534. doi:10.1186/s12889-024-20019-5. |
| [1] | Liu Yishuang, Liu Qibin, Xu Feng, Xu Fang, Wang Jie, Wei Shuang. Concomitant spinal tuberculosis and multiple myeloma in an elderly female: a diagnostic challenge and case report [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2026, 48(9): 1409-1414. |
| [2] | Musitapa Abulizi, Maierdan Abulai, Yang Li. Research progress on the precision diagnosis and treatment of Brucella meningitis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2026, 48(9): 1422-1427. |
| [3] | Song Juemin, Shi Liang, Liang Bianxiang, Kang Hui. Research progress on novel detection techniques for HIV-associated tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2026, 48(9): 1436-1443. |
| [4] | Wei Daijue, Deng Mingkun, Chen Yan, Yang Zengwei, Tong Chongxiang. Serum expression levels and clinical value of IFN-γ, IL-2 and IL-6 in elderly pulmonary tuberculosis patients aged 60 years and older [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2026, 48(8): 1170-1175. |
| [5] | Guo Xiaowen, Jiao Tianyu, Sun Li, Ni Conghui, Wang Zilin, Wang Hao. Multi-center study on CE-T1WI radiomics-based machine learning model in differentiating tuberculous spondylitis from brucella spondylitis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2026, 48(8): 1184-1191. |
| [6] | Lyu Yongyun, Li Xiaoqin, Wu Mengtai, Zhou Min, Tian Nan, Shen Ling. Study on hospitalization cost and its influencing factors of pulmonary tuberculosis under the diagnosis-related group payment model [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2026, 48(8): 1205-1213. |
| [7] | Ding Guangzhao, Liu Rongmei. Cell-free RNA liquid biopsy for stratified diagnosis and dynamic monitoring of tuberculosis: research progress and translational challenges [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2026, 48(8): 1220-1225. |
| [8] | Wang Congli, Wang Haoran, Huang Hairong, Jiang Guanglu. Performance evaluation of the Genewise-MTBC System in the rapid detection of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2026, 48(7): 985-991. |
| [9] | Jiangxi Chest Hospital/Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis, Chinese Antituberculosis Association, Guangzhou National Laboratory. Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of breast tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2026, 48(6): 737-750. |
| [10] | Qiao Xiaobo, Li Jing, Wang Baoqian, Zhou Weidong, Wang Fei, Zhang Qibo, Li Tongxia. Study on the diagnostic value of GeneXpert MTB/RIF and BACTEC MGIT 960 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid combined with peripheral blood IGRA testing for etiologically negative pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2026, 48(6): 874-881. |
| [11] | Sun Zheng, Liu Jiongya, Chen Chi, Yu Quanji, Li Yanan, Chen Cheng, Zhu Limei. Study on the application of AI-assisted CT reading system in early detection of pulmonary tuberculosis in general hospitals [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2026, 48(5): 586-593. |
| [12] | . Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of superficial lymph node tuberculosis with integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2026, 48(4): 429-447. |
| [13] | Zhong Guowei, Zhang Shaoyi, Fan Huiling. Expression and clinical value of serum LncRNA LINC00707 and miR-382-5p in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2026, 48(4): 495-503. |
| [14] | Jiang Lina, Dai Wenxi, Ju Hanfang, Meng Sukai, Wang Chunhua. Clinical value of auramine O fluorescence staining automatic microscopic scanning and recognition system for detecting tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2026, 48(4): 504-509. |
| [15] | Zhang Yujie, Zhou Jie, Wang Yun, Fan Lin. Evaluation of diagnostic value of novel blood-derived biomarkers for active pulmonary tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2026, 48(3): 320-328. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
京公网安备11010202007215号
Total visitors: Visitors of today: Now online:
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.