Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis ›› 2025, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (10): 1300-1310.doi: 10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20250081
• Original Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Xie Yuanqi1(), Song Lin2, Yao Yanhua3, Cai Lili4
Received:
2025-03-06
Online:
2025-10-10
Published:
2025-09-29
Contact:
Xie Yuanqi, Email:Supported by:
CLC Number:
Xie Yuanqi, Song Lin, Yao Yanhua, Cai Lili. A survey and analysis of quality of life among young and middle-aged pulmonary tuberculosis patients and their spouses[J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(10): 1300-1310. doi: 10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20250081
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.zgflzz.cn/EN/10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20250081
变量 | 患者 | 配偶 |
---|---|---|
性别[例/名,构成比(%)] | ||
男性 | 75(66.96) | 35(32.11) |
女性 | 37(33.04) | 74(67.89) |
年龄(岁, | 37.20±8.05 | 37.21±8.06 |
本地户籍[例/名,构成比(%)] | ||
否 | 46(41.07) | 65(59.63) |
是 | 66(58.93) | 44(40.37) |
职业状态[例/名,构成比(%)] | ||
无业 | 31(27.68) | 71(65.14) |
在职 | 81(72.32) | 38(34.86) |
患病时间[例,构成比(%)] | ||
<1年 | 40(35.71) | - |
>5年 | 47(41.96) | - |
1~5年 | 25(22.32) | - |
文化程度[例/名,构成比(%)] | ||
初中及以下 | 5(4.46) | 6(5.50) |
高中 | 40(35.71) | 46(42.20) |
大专 | 29(25.90) | 27(24.78) |
本科 | 28(25.00) | 23(21.10) |
硕士及以上 | 10(8.93) | 7(6.42) |
变量 | 患者例数 | 总分(分, | 统计检验值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
性别 | t=0.512 | 0.610 | ||
男性 | 75 | 50.77±6.40 | ||
女性 | 37 | 50.14±5.33 | ||
年龄组(岁) | F=1.365 | 0.258 | ||
21~30 | 25 | 49.74±5.34 | ||
31~40 | 47 | 51.91±6.39 | ||
41~50 | 37 | 49.50±5.94 | ||
51~60 | 3 | 49.33±6.67 | ||
文化程度 | F=0.840 | 0.503 | ||
初中及以下 | 5 | 47.15±8.16 | ||
高中 | 40 | 49.89±6.95 | ||
大专 | 29 | 51.67±5.63 | ||
本科 | 28 | 50.10±4.85 | ||
硕士及以上 | 10 | 48.88±5.48 | ||
本地户籍 | t=1.007 | 0.316 | ||
是 | 66 | 50.08±5.10 | ||
否 | 46 | 51.25±7.20 | ||
职业状态 | t=0.990 | 0.324 | ||
在职 | 81 | 50.21±5.96 | ||
无业 | 31 | 51.48±6.28 | ||
人均居住面积(m2) | F=1.705 | 0.187 | ||
<10 | 36 | 49.78±5.84 | ||
10~30 | 62 | 50.41±6.46 | ||
>30 | 14 | 53.23±3.92 | ||
治疗分类 | t=0.444 | 0.658 | ||
初治 | 54 | 50.81±6.18 | ||
复治 | 58 | 50.30±5.96 | ||
诊断分类 | F=1.514 | 0.225 | ||
继发性肺结核 | 54 | 51.44±6.37 | ||
耐药肺结核 | 26 | 50.53±5.79 | ||
其他a | 32 | 49.10±5.60 | ||
并发症 | t=0.989 | 0.325 | ||
有 | 48 | 51.21±6.05 | ||
无 | 64 | 50.07±6.05 | ||
患病时间(年) | F=1.648 | 0.192 | ||
<1 | 40 | 49.81±5.64 | ||
1~5 | 47 | 51.78±5.94 | ||
>5 | 25 | 49.48±6.70 | ||
药物不良反应 | F=6.556 | 0.002 | ||
轻微 | 32 | 52.80±5.22 | ||
一般 | 64 | 50.48±6.07 | ||
严重 | 16 | 46.41±5.54 | ||
吸烟 | t=1.858 | 0.070 | ||
是 | 29 | 52.31±5.74 | ||
否 | 83 | 49.95±6.07 | ||
体质量指数(kg/m2) | F=0.625 | 0.537 | ||
<18.5 | 75 | 50.25±6.48 | ||
18.5~24.9 | 30 | 51.58±5.24 | ||
≥25 | 7 | 49.54±4.36 | ||
睡眠质量 | F=2.340 | 0.101 | ||
欠佳 | 35 | 50.76±6.33 | ||
一般 | 44 | 49.20±5.85 | ||
良好 | 33 | 52.16±5.77 | ||
目前治疗阶段 | t=0.139 | 0.890 | ||
强化期 | 19 | 50.74±5.07 | ||
巩固期 | 93 | 50.52±6.26 | ||
病情严重程度 | t=0.020 | 0.984 | ||
轻度 | 84 | 50.55±5.86 | ||
中度 | 28 | 50.58±6.71 | ||
家庭经济(元/月) | F=7.645 | 0.001 | ||
<3000 | 60 | 48.63±6.03 | ||
3000~8000 | 40 | 52.49±5.50 | ||
>8000 | 12 | 53.81±4.65 | ||
治疗依从性 | F=4.930 | 0.009 | ||
欠佳 | 34 | 48.88±6.32 | ||
一般 | 44 | 49.89±5.86 | ||
良好 | 34 | 53.11±5.32 | ||
性生活频率 | F=6.257 | 0.003 | ||
<1次/周 | 95 | 49.75±5.86 | ||
1~2次/周 | 13 | 54.71±4.96 | ||
>2次/周 | 4 | 56.31±6.44 | ||
夫妻关系 | F=4.659 | 0.011 | ||
差 | 33 | 48.12±6.34 | ||
一般 | 64 | 51.23±5.68 | ||
恩爱 | 15 | 53.08±5.50 | ||
知识宣教 | t=2.043 | 0.043 | ||
是 | 48 | 51.89±6.06 | ||
否 | 64 | 49.56±5.89 |
自变量 | 配偶人数(名) | 总分(分, | 统计检验值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
性别 | t=0.415 | 0.679 | ||
男性 | 35 | 57.27±7.08 | ||
女性 | 74 | 57.96±8.45 | ||
年龄组(岁) | ||||
21~30 | 23 | 57.30±6.61 | F=0.168 | 0.918 |
31~40 | 56 | 57.62±8.74 | ||
41~-50 | 27 | 58.56±7.75 | ||
51~60 | 3 | 55.92±9.44 | ||
文化程度 | F=0.390 | 0.854 | ||
初中及以下 | 6 | 56.92±5.14 | ||
高中 | 46 | 56.74±8.22 | ||
大专 | 27 | 58.92±8.39 | ||
本科 | 23 | 58.91±8.59 | ||
硕士及以上 | 7 | 56.57±5.94 | ||
本地户籍 | t=1.629 | 0.106 | ||
是 | 65 | 56.72±6.55 | ||
否 | 44 | 59.24±9.67 | ||
职业状态 | t=1.418 | 0.159 | ||
在职 | 71 | 56.94±8.39 | ||
无业 | 38 | 59.22±7.12 | ||
人均居住面积(m2) | F=1.196 | 0.306 | ||
<10 | 34 | 57.24±7.05 | ||
10~30 | 61 | 57.31±8.86 | ||
>30 | 14 | 60.82±5.78 | ||
患者治疗分类 | t=0.412 | 0.683 | ||
初治 | 54 | 50.72±5.86 | ||
复治 | 55 | 50.28±5.58 | ||
患者诊断分类 | F=1.833 | 0.165 | ||
继发性肺结核 | 52 | 51.34±4.51 | ||
耐药肺结核 | 25 | 50.77±4.95 | ||
其他a | 32 | 49.24±4.99 | ||
患者并发症 | t=1.562 | 0.122 | ||
有 | 47 | 51.88±5.84 | ||
无 | 62 | 50.17±6.00 | ||
患者患病时长(年) | F=1.952 | 0.147 | ||
<1 | 40 | 49.81±5.64 | ||
1~5 | 45 | 51.78±5.94 | ||
>5 | 24 | 49.48±6.70 | ||
患者药物不良反应 | F=0.582 | 0.562 | ||
轻微 | 30 | 52.34±5.22 | ||
一般 | 63 | 51.40±4.07 | ||
严重 | 16 | 52.11±4.54 | ||
每天照护时间 | F=2.908 | 0.059 | ||
<1h | 40 | 56.54±7.37 | ||
1~4h | 25 | 55.80±9.23 | ||
>4h | 44 | 59.92±7.49 | ||
吸烟 | t=-0.902 | 0.372 | ||
是 | 26 | 61.16±6.16 | ||
否 | 83 | 62.66±8.25 | ||
体质量指数(kg/m2) | F=0.456 | 0.635 | ||
<18.5 | 74 | 57.42±8.48 | ||
18.5~24.9 | 30 | 58.82±7.09 | ||
≥25 | 5 | 55.90±6.49 | ||
睡眠质量 | F=2.359 | 0.099 | ||
欠佳 | 32 | 58.65±7.69 | ||
一般 | 44 | 55.77±7.57 | ||
良好 | 33 | 59.47±8.55 | ||
患者目前治疗阶段 | t=0.048 | 0.962 | ||
是 | 18 | 57.82±7.15 | ||
否 | 91 | 57.72±8.21 | ||
患者病情严重程度 | t=0.003 | 0.997 | ||
轻度 | 82 | 57.73±7.57 | ||
中度 | 27 | 57.74±9.39 | ||
家庭经济(元/月) | F=7.161 | 0.001 | ||
<3000 | 57 | 55.79±7.58 | ||
3000~8000 | 40 | 60.00±7.74 | ||
>8000 | 12 | 62.31±7.09 | ||
防护知识知晓 | F=3.973 | 0.022 | ||
欠佳 | 31 | 55.90±8.17 | ||
一般 | 44 | 56.64±7.62 | ||
良好 | 34 | 60.83±7.69 | ||
性生活频率 | F=6.244 | 0.003 | ||
<1次/周 | 92 | 56.64±7.57 | ||
1~2次/周 | 13 | 63.08±7.36 | ||
>2次/周 | 4 | 65.63±10.50 | ||
夫妻关系 | F=4.219 | 0.017 | ||
差 | 19 | 56.32±7.00 | ||
一般 | 65 | 56.63±8.17 | ||
恩爱 | 25 | 61.70±7.27 | ||
知识宣教 | t=2.183 | 0.031 | ||
是 | 49 | 59.56±7.45 | ||
否 | 60 | 56.37±7.64 |
因素 | β值 | Wald χ2值 | t值 | P值 | 95%CI值 | VIF | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
家庭经济 | 3.104 | 0.832 | 0.349 | 3.731 | <0.001 | 1.473~4.735 | 1.183 |
性生活频率 | 2.625 | 1.014 | 0.206 | 2.590 | 0.012 | 0.638~4.612 | 1.338 |
药物不良反应 | -2.344 | 0.836 | -0.248 | -2.804 | 0.005 | -3.983~-0.705 | 1.476 |
夫妻关系 | 2.657 | 0.898 | 0.280 | 2.959 | 0.003 | 0.897~4.417 | 1.642 |
知识宣教 | 3.758 | 1.175 | 0.309 | 3.198 | 0.001 | 1.455~6.061 | 1.570 |
治疗依从性 | 1.582 | 0.617 | 0.205 | 2.564 | 0.010 | 0.373~2.791 | 1.324 |
因素 | β值 | Wald χ2值 | t值 | P值 | 95%CI值 | VIF | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
家庭经济 | 4.407 | 1.008 | 0.376 | 4.371 | <0.001 | 2.431~6.383 | 1.265 |
性生活频率 | 4.836 | 1.373 | 0.290 | 3.522 | <0.001 | 2.145~7.527 | 1.280 |
夫妻关系 | 2.286 | 1.103 | 0.181 | 2.072 | 0.038 | 0.124~4.448 | 1.336 |
防护知识 | 3.807 | 0.939 | 0.369 | 4.055 | <0.001 | 1.967~5.647 | 1.106 |
知识宣教 | 5.319 | 1.698 | 0.332 | 3.133 | 0.002 | 1.991~8.647 | 1.434 |
[1] | 胡鑫洋, 高静韬. 世界卫生组织《2024年全球结核病报告》解读. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2024, 5(6):500-504. doi:10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.2024164. |
[2] |
Kaakinen J. Distinguished contribution to Family Nursing Award: Dr. Shirley May Harmon Hanson for: Family health care nursing: theory, practice, and research (1996, 2001, 2005). J Fam Nurs, 2007, 13(2):152-156. doi:10.1177/10748407070130020102.
pmid: 17452600 |
[3] | Salehitali S, Noorian K, Hafizi M, et al. Quality of life and its effective factors in tuberculosis patients receiving directly observed treatment short-course (DOTS). J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis, 2019, 15:100093. doi:10.1016/j.jctube.2019.100093. |
[4] | 任怡, 王超, 贾敬波, 等. 肺结核患者家庭亲密度和适应性与健康促进行为相关性研究. 中国慢性病预防与控制, 2020, 28(8):620-623. doi:10.16386/j.cjpccd.issn.1004-6194.2020.08.016. |
[5] | 钟年好, 郑镇泳, 吴少玲, 等. 医患视角下初治中青年肺结核患者延迟重返工作成因的质性研究. 护理学杂志, 2024, 39(12):90-93. doi:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2024.12.090. |
[6] | 郑丽君, 张彦春. 中青年肺结核心理、心理弹性、社会支持状况及其相关性分析. 护理实践与研究, 2021, 18(5):684-687. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-9676.2021.05.014. |
[7] | 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. WS 288—2017肺结核诊断. 结核与肺部疾病杂志, 2024, 5(4):376-378. doi:10.19983/j.issn.2096-8493.2024022. |
[8] | Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed.. L. Erlbaum Associates, 1988. doi:10.4324/9780203771587. |
[9] | 刘桂珍, 邓国防. 《结核病政策指南制订过程中发现的证据和研究缺口(第2版)》解读. 中国防痨杂志, 2024, 46(6):618-624. doi:10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20240076. |
[10] | 国家统计局. 中华人民共和国2024年国民经济和社会发展统计公报. 高校图书馆工作, 2025, 45(2):封3. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-7845.2025.02.013. |
[11] | 卓力, 陈娜, 秦慧. 我国老年人体质指数轨迹与认知障碍及认知功能关系研究. 现代预防医学, 2025, 52(3):481-486. |
[12] | Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, et al. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res, 1989, 28(2):193-213. doi:10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4. |
[13] | 谢星, 王艳. MDT式延续护理干预对耐多药肺结核患者的作用. 中国防痨杂志, 2024, 46(S2):288-290. |
[14] | 孔雪, 李树香, 田咏, 等. 调神利咽针刺法结合吞咽训练在卒中伴吞咽障碍患者中的应用效果. 医疗装备, 2022, 35(20):76-78. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2376.2022.20.025. |
[15] | 李凌江, 郝伟, 杨德森, 等. 社区人群生活质量研究——Ⅲ生活质量问卷(QOLI)的编制. 中国心理卫生杂志, 1995(5):227-231,239,236. |
[16] | 肖淑辉, 徐田云, 王家银, 等. 临沂地区HIV感染者/AIDS患者及其家属生活质量和社会支持的研究. 山东医学高等专科学校学报, 2019, 41(4):245-248. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-0947.2019.04.002. |
[17] | 梁祖花, 潘春柳, 汪俊华, 等. 2021—2022年贵州省贵阳市肺结核患者灾难性支出及影响因素研究. 疾病监测, 2024, 39(5):647-654. doi:10.3784/jbjc.202309180461. |
[18] | Li X, Fang X, Zhou L, et al. Prevalence and Factors Associa-ted with Depression in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Pulmonary Tuberculosis (DM-PTB): A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Int J Gen Med, 2023, 16:3465-3472. doi:10.2147/IJGM.S412675 |
[19] | 左玉杰, 荣宁宁. 医院-家庭联合延伸护理服务对肺结核患者治疗依从性及生活质量的影响. 中国防痨杂志, 2024, 46(S1):275-276. |
[20] | 哈夫洛克·埃利斯. 性心理学.陈维政,袁德成,龙葵,等译. 北京: 北京联合出版公司, 2013. |
[21] | 吴艳丽, 孟秀凤, 胡林婕. 综合护理干预联合心理护理对肺结核合并抑郁症患者焦虑心理状态、生活质量的影响分析. 心理月刊, 2024, 19(4):144-147. doi:10.19738/j.cnki.psy.2024.04.041. |
[22] |
Cuesta-Barriuso R, López-Pina JA, Nieto-Munuera J, et al. Effectiveness of the Medtep Hemophilia online platform for adherence to prophylactic treatment in haemophilia patients: Results from a 1-year observational study. Haemophilia, 2018, 24(3):452-459. doi:10.1111/hae.13444.
pmid: 29493864 |
[23] | Valadares RMC, Carvalho WDS, Miranda SS. Association of adverse drug reaction to anti-tuberculosis medication with quality of life in patients in a tertiary referral hospital. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop, 2019, 53:e20190207. doi:10.1590/0037-8682-0207-2019. |
[24] | 陈莹莹, 王清艳. 集束化护理干预对抗结核药物致肝损伤患者负性情绪及用药依从性的改善作用. 临床护理杂志, 2019, 18(4):48-51. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-8933.2019.04.018. |
[25] | 赵苏礼. 中青年初治肺结核患者出院准备度现状及影响因素研究. 新乡:新乡医学院, 2023. |
[26] | 姜晓颖, 宋艳华, 王玉莹, 等. 270例肺结核患者生命质量评价及影响因素分析. 中国防痨杂志, 2020, 42(1):66-73. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2020.01.015. |
[1] | Song Hongge, Liu Weigao, Chen Li. A comparative study on the therapeutic effects of total hip joint type spacer and pressure model spacer in patients with mid to late stage hip tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2024, 46(5): 562-566. |
[2] | AN Xin, LI Yu-zhuo, ZHANG Dan, WANG Qiu-shuang, WANG Jian-mei, MA Jing-hua. The mediating effect of psychological resilience between caregiver burden and quality of life of caregivers of tuberculosis patients [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2022, 44(1): 83-90. |
[3] | LIU Xi-fang,MA Gai-xia,GAN Jie,LU Zhen-hui,ZHANG Hui-yong,GUO Xiao-yan. Application status and suggestion of quality of life scale for pulmonary tuberculosis patients [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(3): 200-203. |
[4] | JIANG Xiao-ying,SONG Yan-hua,WANG Yu-ying,LIU Zhi,MI Feng-ling,LIANG Jian-qin. Quality of life assessment and risk factors analysis of 270 pulmonary tuberculosis patients [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2020, 42(1): 66-73. |
[5] | Yu-jie ZHAO,Kai YAN,Jin-ou CHEN,Ling LI,Yun-bin YANG,Lin XU. Analysis of the quality of life and its influencing factors in patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2019, 41(1): 88-94. |
[6] | Lei SHEN,Lin ZHANG,Yong-hong TAO,Yong-jun TANG,Mei-juan BAO,Hong-zhou. LU. Study on correlation between care burden and life quality of family caregivers of children with tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2018, 40(10): 1118-1124. |
[7] | Wan-qiu CHENG,Yue-ying CUI,Xiao-wan. WANG. The progress and evaluation of quality of life for tuberculosis patients [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2018, 40(1): 106-110. |
[8] | BAI Li-qiong,ZHOU Lin,ZHONG Qiu,ZHANG Chuan-fang,LIU Er-yong,CHENG Shi-ming. Attention to quantitative research and evaluation of the quality of life of patients with TB [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2014, 36(12): 1011-1014. |
[9] | SUN Yan-ni, WANG Guo-jie, ZHEN Xin-an, LIU Zhan-feng, Harley David, Hall Gillian, Vally Hassan, Sleigh Adrian. The social impacts of MDR-TB on patients compared to non-MDR-TB in Henan province [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2013, 35(1): 41-47. |
[10] | He Peixian,Gao Cuinan,Xu Zhuowei,Zhong Qiu. A survey of quality of life of new smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients in floating and household population in Guangzhou city [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2011, 33(6): 347-349. |
[11] | Zhang Ming,Lou Peian,Liu Lin,Chen Peipei,Zhang Ya,Liu Jie,LiJunzheng. Assessment on quality of life in MDR-TB patients using SF-36 scales [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2010, 32(9): 47-51. |
[12] | Yuan Baodong1,Wag Weihua,Duan Qionghong,et al. Evaluating the quality of life of patients with multi-drug resistant pulmonary tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2006, 28(3): 139-142. |
[13] | Xu Xuqing,Liu Beidou,Li Qun,et al.. The comparative analysis of demographic characteristics and family disease financial burden of drug-resistant tuberculosis in Zhejiang [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2004, 26(6): 332-335. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||