Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis ›› 2025, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (12): 1590-1600.doi: 10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20250268
• Original Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Yu Haiying1, Li Shengjie2, Yu Honghong3(
)
Received:2025-06-23
Online:2025-12-10
Published:2025-11-28
Contact:
Yu Honghong, Email: Supported by:CLC Number:
Yu Haiying, Li Shengjie, Yu Honghong. Research on the inpatient expense standards for pulmonary tuberculosis patients based on Diagnosis-Related Groups[J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2025, 47(12): 1590-1600. doi: 10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20250268
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.zgflzz.cn/EN/10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20250268
| 特征 | 例数 | 构成比(%) | 例均住院费用[元,M(Q25,Q75)] | 统计检验值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 性别 | Z=-16.016 | <0.001 | |||
| 男性 | 11422 | 64.06 | 11575.29(4960.68,13540.31) | ||
| 女性 | 6407 | 35.94 | 10163.63(6600.09,11501.26) | ||
| 年龄组(岁) | H=1171.187 | <0.001 | |||
| ≤30 | 4705 | 26.39 | 9277.40(6123.16,10205.36) | ||
| 31~44 | 3641 | 20.42 | 11085.49(6826.06,12566.44) | ||
| 45~60 | 4252 | 23.85 | 11357.62(7170.07,13054.03) | ||
| >60 | 5231 | 29.34 | 12423.98(7944.95,14729.20) | ||
| 住院时间(d) | H=6945.200 | <0.001 | |||
| 2~7 | 11215 | 62.90 | 8484.54(6215.59,9418.89) | ||
| 8~15 | 4960 | 27.82 | 13155.03(9558.13,14881.28) | ||
| >15 | 1654 | 9.28 | 22304.67(14822.39,26859.02) | ||
| 医保类型 | H=0.086 | 0.958 | |||
| 城乡居民 | 10431 | 58.51 | 11005.01(6954.74,12664.89) | ||
| 城镇职工 | 7078 | 39.70 | 11172.26(6904.64,13037.68) | ||
| 自费 | 320 | 1.79 | 10735.97(6874.28,12718.27) | ||
| 合并症或并发症 | Z=-29.367 | <0.001 | |||
| 有 | 12989 | 72.85 | 11779.68(7298.25,13817.30) | ||
| 无 | 4840 | 27.15 | 9155.32(6184.84,10305.09) | ||
| 耐药 | Z=-50.595 | <0.001 | |||
| 是 | 1684 | 9.45 | 21313.90(13844.47,26762.97) | ||
| 否 | 16145 | 90.55 | 9997.84(6752.16,11630.96) |
| 变量 | B(95%CI)值 | β值 | s | t值 | P值 | VIF值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 性别 | -0.042(-0.052~-0.033) | -0.042 | 0.005 | -8.432 | <0.001 | 1.034 |
| 年龄 | 0.052(0.047~0.056) | 0.124 | 0.002 | 23.591 | <0.001 | 1.165 |
| 住院时间 | 0.410(0.403~0.418) | 0.555 | 0.004 | 111.017 | <0.001 | 1.056 |
| 有无合并症或并发症 | -0.086(-0.097~-0.075) | -0.078 | 0.006 | -15.255 | <0.001 | 1.112 |
| 是否为耐药肺结核 | -0.664(-0.679~-0.647) | -0.398 | 0.008 | -80.990 | <0.001 | 1.022 |
| 常量 | 9.878 | - | 0.021 | 478.579 | <0.001 | - |
| 变量 | 低分位点(Q10) | 中分位点(Q50) | 高分位点(Q90) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B(95%CI)值 | P值 | B(95%CI)值 | P值 | B(95%CI)值 | P值 | |
| 截距 | 8.964 | <0.001 | 9.589 | <0.001 | 10.083 | <0.001 |
| 女性 | -0.035(-0.051~-0.019) | <0.001 | -0.044(-0.056~-0.033) | <0.001 | -0.057(-0.075~-0.039) | <0.001 |
| 31~44岁 | 0.174(0.152~0.196) | <0.001 | 0.167(0.152~0.183) | <0.001 | 0.184(0.159~0.208) | <0.001 |
| 45~60岁 | 0.094(0.072~0.116) | <0.001 | 0.096(0.080~0.112) | <0.001 | 0.090(0.065~0.114) | <0.001 |
| >60岁 | 0.078(0.056~0.101) | <0.001 | 0.074(0.058~0.090) | <0.001 | 0.074(0.049~0.099) | <0.001 |
| 住院8~15d | 0.798(0.773~0.827) | <0.001 | 0.818(0.799~0.838) | <0.001 | 0.926(0.896~0.957) | <0.001 |
| 住院>15d | 0.398(0.380~0.415) | <0.001 | 0.387(0.375~0.400) | <0.001 | 0.385(0.365~0.405) | <0.001 |
| 无合并症或并发症 | -0.088(-0.106~-0.070) | <0.001 | -0.081(-0.094~-0.068) | <0.001 | -0.083(-0.103~-0.063) | <0.001 |
| 不耐药 | -0.445(-0.472~-0.419) | <0.001 | -0.714(-0.733~-0.695) | <0.001 | -0.833(-0.862~-0.803) | <0.001 |
| 组别 | 组合方案 | 例数 | 构成比(%) | 实际例均费用(元) | 变异系数 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DRG1 | 耐药肺结核,住院时间>15d | 279 | 1.56 | 32990.73 | 0.338 |
| DRG2 | 非耐药肺结核,住院时间>15d,年龄>60岁 | 659 | 3.70 | 22159.34 | 0.429 |
| DRG3 | 耐药肺结核,住院时间8~15d | 561 | 3.15 | 21562.91 | 0.392 |
| DRG4 | 非耐药肺结核,住院时间>15d,年龄31~60岁 | 531 | 2.98 | 18856.66 | 0.416 |
| DRG5 | 耐药肺结核,住院时间2~7d | 844 | 4.73 | 17313.64 | 0.405 |
| DRG6 | 非耐药肺结核,住院时间>15d,年龄≤30岁 | 185 | 1.04 | 16723.91 | 0.425 |
| DRG7 | 非耐药肺结核,住院时间8~15d,年龄>60岁 | 1762 | 9.88 | 13243.24 | 0.320 |
| DRG8 | 非耐药肺结核,住院时间8~15d,年龄45~60岁 | 1077 | 6.04 | 12029.69 | 0.320 |
| DRG9 | 非耐药肺结核,住院时间8~15d,年龄31~44岁 | 703 | 3.94 | 11486.07 | 0.311 |
| DRG10 | 非耐药肺结核,住院时间8~15d,年龄≤30岁 | 857 | 4.81 | 10268.45 | 0.282 |
| DRG11 | 非耐药肺结核,住院时间2~7d,年龄>60岁 | 2560 | 14.36 | 8530.19 | 0.300 |
| DRG12 | 非耐药肺结核,住院时间2~7d,年龄45~60岁 | 2392 | 13.42 | 7920.51 | 0.310 |
| DRG13 | 非耐药肺结核,住院时间2~7d,年龄31~44岁 | 2182 | 12.24 | 7725.03 | 0.335 |
| DRG14 | 非耐药肺结核,住院时间2~7d,年龄≤30岁 | 3237 | 18.16 | 7077.77 | 0.323 |
| 组别 | 实际例均费用[元,M(Q1,Q3)] | 例均标准费用(元) | 总标准费用(元) | 实际总费用(元) | 解析比例(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DRG1 | 32990.73(24896.84,40128.75) | 32658.46 | 9111710.34 | 9204413.35 | 98.99 |
| DRG2 | 22159.34(15837.98,25210.53) | 20171.80 | 13293216.20 | 14603003.06 | 91.03 |
| DRG3 | 21562.91(14909.55,26432.91) | 20923.09 | 11737853.49 | 12096790.02 | 97.03 |
| DRG4 | 18856.66(13821.30,21877.70) | 17006.63 | 9030520.53 | 10012888.61 | 90.19 |
| DRG5 | 17313.64(11521.55,21851.26) | 17186.34 | 14505266.74 | 14612712.16 | 99.26 |
| DRG6 | 16723.91(12345.31,19367.97) | 14656.75 | 2711498.75 | 3093923.57 | 87.64 |
| DRG7 | 13243.24(10233.46,15286.88) | 12566.34 | 22141882.27 | 23334590.26 | 94.89 |
| DRG8 | 12029.69(9433.37,13817.30) | 11330.99 | 12203476.23 | 12955976.72 | 94.19 |
| DRG9 | 11486.07(9046.24,13212.49) | 10927.53 | 7682053.59 | 8074704.45 | 95.14 |
| DRG10 | 10268.45(8345.40,11890.58) | 9825.23 | 8420222.11 | 8800062.46 | 95.68 |
| DRG11 | 8530.19(6778.14,9795.69) | 8128.96 | 20810124.80 | 21837290.50 | 95.30 |
| DRG12 | 7920.51(6238.75,9221.75) | 7559.22 | 18081642.28 | 18945858.28 | 95.44 |
| DRG13 | 7725.03(6143.93,8747.61) | 7298.62 | 15925577.93 | 16856019.65 | 94.48 |
| DRG14 | 7077.77(5611.27,8138.23) | 6769.86 | 21914036.82 | 22910746.66 | 95.65 |
| 合计 | 11068.43(6932.57,12758.35) | 9034.80 | 161081449.20 | 197339038.50 | 81.63 |
| 病例 分组 | 例数 | 实际例均 费用(元) | 例均标准 费用(元) | 例均费用 上线(元) | 超线 例数 | 超线患者 比例(%) | 实际总费用 (元) | 超线住院费用 (元) | 超线费用 比例(%) | 权重 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DRG1 | 279 | 32990.73 | 32658.46 | 62976.62 | 4 | 1.43 | 9204413.35 | 266138.85 | 2.89 | 2.98 |
| DRG2 | 659 | 22159.34 | 20171.80 | 39269.36 | 35 | 5.31 | 14603003.06 | 1738924.77 | 11.91 | 2.00 |
| DRG3 | 561 | 21562.91 | 20923.09 | 43717.95 | 6 | 1.07 | 12096790.02 | 285172.87 | 2.36 | 1.95 |
| DRG4 | 531 | 18856.66 | 17006.63 | 33962.30 | 27 | 5.08 | 10012888.61 | 1147759.57 | 11.46 | 1.70 |
| DRG5 | 844 | 17313.64 | 17186.34 | 37345.83 | 1 | 0.12 | 14612712.16 | 39429.95 | 0.27 | 1.56 |
| DRG6 | 185 | 16723.91 | 14656.75 | 36110.19 | 6 | 3.24 | 3093923.57 | 259444.54 | 8.39 | 1.51 |
| DRG7 | 1762 | 13243.24 | 12566.34 | 29901.96 | 7 | 0.40 | 23334590.26 | 226080.63 | 0.97 | 1.20 |
| DRG8 | 1077 | 12029.69 | 11330.99 | 22867.01 | 16 | 1.49 | 12955976.72 | 459096.25 | 3.54 | 1.09 |
| DRG9 | 703 | 11486.07 | 10927.53 | 20393.20 | 16 | 2.28 | 8074704.45 | 448743.79 | 5.56 | 1.04 |
| DRG10 | 857 | 10268.45 | 9825.23 | 17208.35 | 12 | 1.40 | 8800062.46 | 250726.02 | 2.85 | 0.93 |
| DRG11 | 2560 | 8530.19 | 8128.96 | 14322.02 | 79 | 3.09 | 21837290.50 | 1291390.97 | 5.91 | 0.77 |
| DRG12 | 2392 | 7920.51 | 7559.22 | 13696.25 | 61 | 2.55 | 18945858.28 | 969433.02 | 5.12 | 0.72 |
| DRG13 | 2182 | 7725.03 | 7298.62 | 12653.13 | 87 | 3.99 | 16856019.65 | 1389798.07 | 8.25 | 0.70 |
| DRG14 | 3237 | 7077.77 | 6769.86 | 11928.67 | 93 | 2.87 | 22910746.66 | 1334233.11 | 5.82 | 0.64 |
| 合计 | 17829 | 11068.43 | 9034.80 | 21497.02 | 450 | 2.52 | 197339038.50 | 10106372.41 | 5.12 | 1.00 |
| 病例组合 | 项目 | 总费用(元) | 药品费 | 耗材费 | 医技费 | 护理费 | 医疗费 | 其他费用 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DRG1 | 线内 | 8938274.50 | 5415331.93 (60.59) | 101476.47 (1.14) | 2366706.30 (26.48) | 288255.00 (3.22) | 470525.80 (5.26) | 295979.00 (3.31) | ||||||||
| 线外 | 266138.85 | 168415.73 (63.28) | 4179.82 (1.57) | 58503.80 (21.98) | 5680.00 (2.13) | 23729.50 (8.92) | 5630.00 (2.12) | |||||||||
| DRG2 | 线内 | 12864078.29 | 3490517.18 (27.13) | 372513.54 (2.90) | 6118614.10 (47.56) | 657080.00 (5.11) | 1516558.47 (11.79) | 708795.00 (5.51) | ||||||||
| 线外 | 1738924.77 | 570759.69 (32.82) | 67628.68 (3.89) | 649933.00 (37.38) | 60170.00 (3.46) | 324059.40 (18.63) | 66374.00 (3.82) | |||||||||
| DRG3 | 线内 | 11811617.15 | 6781175.73 (57.41) | 96396.52 (0.82) | 3807479.40 (32.24) | 338197.00 (2.86) | 454742.50 (3.85) | 333626.00 (2.82) | ||||||||
| 线外 | 285172.87 | 223380.96 (78.33) | 1182.11 (0.41) | 44904.20 (15.75) | 4980.00 (1.75) | 6141.60 (2.15) | 4584.00 (1.61) | |||||||||
| DRG4 | 线内 | 8865129.04 | 2532225.03 (28.56) | 232127.77 (2.62) | 4166857.50 (47.00) | 511053.00 (5.77) | 885363.74 (9.99) | 537502.00 (6.06) | ||||||||
| 线外 | 1147759.57 | 477990.12 (41.65) | 34175.85 (2.98) | 404737.50 (35.26) | 41662.00 (3.63) | 144067.10 (12.55) | 45127.00 (3.93) | |||||||||
| DRG5 | 线内 | 14573285.51 | 8787023.42 (60.30) | 72100.79 (0.49) | 4779011.80 (32.79) | 302572.00 (2.08) | 342150.50 (2.35) | 290427.00 (1.99) | ||||||||
| 线外 | 39429.95 | 24763.28 (62.80) | 112.87 (0.29) | 13180.80 (33.43) | 430.00 (1.09) | 502.00 (1.27) | 441.00 (1.12) | |||||||||
| DRG6 | 线内 | 2834479.03 | 825336.17 (29.12) | 72561.26 (2.56) | 1297307.30 (45.77) | 180402.00 (6.37) | 275650.30 (9.72) | 183222.00 (6.46) | ||||||||
| 线外 | 259444.54 | 96442.40 (37.17) | 8571.94 (3.30) | 103384.60 (39.85) | 9469.00 (3.65) | 30587.60 (11.79) | 10989.00 (4.24) | |||||||||
| DRG7 | 线内 | 23108509.63 | 5135077.32 (22.22) | 504016.88 (2.18) | 13344340.30 (57.75) | 1019786.00 (4.41) | 2014550.13 (8.72) | 1090739.00 (4.72) | ||||||||
| 线外 | 226080.63 | 83965.47 (37.14) | 5041.16 (2.23) | 90906.00 (40.21) | 5335.00 (2.36) | 35592.00 (15.74) | 5241.00 (2.32) | |||||||||
| DRG8 | 线内 | 12496880.47 | 2930743.15 (23.45) | 250178.74 (2.00) | 7198817.60 (57.61) | 591509.00 (4.73) | 911673.98 (7.30) | 613958.00 (4.91) | ||||||||
| 线外 | 459096.25 | 213805.52 (46.57) | 7925.83 (1.73) | 171175.60 (37.29) | 10925.00 (2.38) | 43581.30 (9.49) | 11683.00 (2.54) | |||||||||
| DRG9 | 线内 | 7625960.66 | 1892800.92 (24.82) | 140536.67 (1.84) | 4328549.80 (56.76) | 377613.00 (4.95) | 507730.27 (6.66) | 378730.00 (4.97) | ||||||||
| 线外 | 448743.79 | 182919.78 (40.76) | 8213.61 (1.83) | 192193.20 (42.83) | 13514.00 (3.01) | 37339.20 (8.32) | 14564.00 (3.25) | |||||||||
| DRG10 | 线内 | 8549336.44 | 2075637.72 (24.28) | 160049.28 (1.87) | 4794111.30 (56.08) | 462052.00 (5.40) | 598198.14 (7.00) | 459288.00 (5.37) | ||||||||
| 线外 | 250726.02 | 93320.38 (37.22) | 4612.64 (1.84) | 122618.00 (48.90) | 8074.00 (3.22) | 13310.00 (5.31) | 8791.00 (3.51) | |||||||||
| DRG11 | 线内 | 20545899.53 | 3412710.12 (16.61) | 275925.98 (1.34) | 14445738.70 (70.31) | 726812.00 (3.54) | 949154.73 (4.62) | 735558.00 (3.58) | ||||||||
| 线外 | 1291390.97 | 289953.40 (22.45) | 21423.79 (1.66) | 815738.20 (63.17) | 27326.00 (2.11) | 108072.58 (8.37) | 28877.00 (2.24) | |||||||||
| DRG12 | 线内 | 17976425.26 | 3201640.63 (17.81) | 230567.43 (1.28) | 12506791.09 (69.57) | 653356.00 (3.64) | 754703.30 (4.20) | 629366.00 (3.50) | ||||||||
| 线外 | 969433.02 | 347942.72 (35.89) | 11640.00 (1.20) | 527687.40 (54.43) | 19893.00 (2.05) | 41420.90 (4.27) | 20849.00 (2.15) | |||||||||
| DRG13 | 线内 | 15466221.58 | 2747891.87 (17.77) | 190904.31 (1.23) | 10775613.10 (69.67) | 575702.00 (3.72) | 640001.30 (4.14) | 536109.00 (3.47) | ||||||||
| 线外 | 1389798.07 | 611258.01 (43.98) | 12835.76 (0.92) | 662798.90 (47.69) | 28298.00 (2.04) | 45201.40 (3.25) | 29406.00 (2.12) | |||||||||
| DRG14 | 线内 | 21576513.55 | 3764698.00 (17.45) | 278030.95 (1.29) | 14911112.60 (69.11) | 878446.00 (4.07) | 937581.00 (4.34) | 806645.00 (3.74) | ||||||||
| 线外 | 1334233.11 | 510044.54 (38.23) | 13348.87 (1.00) | 711255.30 (53.31) | 29508.00 (2.21) | 40898.40 (3.06) | 29178.00 (2.19) | |||||||||
| [1] | 李媛媛, 谢晶晶, 李树涛, 等. 2024年WHO全球结核病报告:全球与中国关键数据分析. 新发传染病电子杂志, 2024, 9(6):92-98. doi:10.19871/j.cnki.xfcrbzz.2024.06.016. |
| [2] | 吴唯倩, 曾雁冰. 2009—2022年我国基本医保收支结存状况及风险警戒分析. 中国卫生经济, 2023, 43(1):34-37. |
| [3] | 崔欢欢, 冯海欢, 杨华, 等. 四川省某三甲医院成人肺炎DRG分组效果评价与住院费用分析. 医学与社会, 2024, 32(8):86-91. doi:10.13723/i.vxysh.2024.08.013. |
| [4] | 谢宇, 洪尚志, 李娜, 等. 经济学视角下DRGs的应用条件及国内实践. 中国医院管理, 2019, 39(2): 65-67. |
| [5] | 宋雨潇, 高天. DRG医保支付的国际经验及医院应对路径. 中国医院, 2025, 29(8):27-31. doi:10.19660/i.issn.1671-0592.2025.8.08. |
| [6] | 国家医疗保障局, 北京市医疗保障局. 国家医疗保障疾病诊断相关分组(CHS-DRG)分组方案(1.1版). 北京: 中国人口出版社, 2021. |
| [7] | 董景五. 疾病和有关健康问题的国际统计分类(ICD-10). 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2008. |
| [8] | 苏飞月, 符美玲, 谭慭莘, 等. 基于分位数回归与决策树模型的跌倒患者住院费用影响因素分析. 中国卫生统计, 2021, 38(1):67-72. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-3674.2021.01.018. |
| [9] | 王磊, 杨娅娅, 赵怡妮, 等. 基于分位数回归和随机森林的老年伤害患者住院费用影响因素分析. 中国慢性病预防与控制, 2023, 31(4):246-250. doi:10.16386/j.cjpccd.issn.1004-6194.2023.04.002. |
| [10] | 刘春, 王怀斌, 吴佳. 基于DRGs的三级综合医院2型糖尿病患者住院费用标准研究. 中国卫生统计, 2024, 41(1):139-142. doi:10.11783/i.issn.1002-3674.2024.01.033. |
| [11] | 张生雯, 杨少伦, 陈永聪. 基于决策树模型的脑梗死患者疾病诊断相关分组研究. 中国慢性病预防与控制, 2024, 32(7):481-485, 492. doi:10.16386/j.cjpccd.issn.1004-6194.2024.07.001. |
| [12] | 韩雪, 韩雪梅, 单侯乾, 等. 基于DRGs的高血压3级患者住院费用分析. 中国卫生统计, 2019, 36(3):412-415. |
| [13] | 仲亚琴, 肖静, 许琼琼, 等. 宫颈癌患者住院费用的DRGs分组研究. 中华医院管理杂志, 2017, 33(10):738-741. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6672.2017.10.006. |
| [14] | 陈佳, 刘雪娇, 王棪媛, 等. 基于分位数回归的老年2型糖尿病患者住院费用影响因素分析. 中国病案, 2024, 25(10):61-65. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2566.2024.10.021. |
| [15] | 国家医疗保障局. 国家医疗保障疾病诊断相关分组(CHS-DRG)分组与付费技术规范[EB/OL]. [2019-10-24]. http://www.nhsa.gov.cn/art/2019/10/24/art_52_1875.html. |
| [16] | 金萍妹, 华伟, 陈洁, 等. 基于疾病诊断相关组法制定单病种住院费用标准的研究. 中国卫生经济, 2017, 36(2):26-28. doi:10.7664/CHE20170207. |
| [17] | 朱建平. 应用多元统计分析. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2017. |
| [18] | 唐佳骥, 张彤彦, 许欣悦, 等. DRGs付费改革效果评估指标框架研究. 中国医院, 2020(5):19-21. doi:10.19660/j.issn.1671-0592.2020.05.06. |
| [19] | 张永媛, 王清亮, 连雪洪. 山东省某三级综合医院罕见病患者住院费用结构变动情况及影响因素. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2025, 63(5):111-118. doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2024.0793. |
| [20] | 马思维. TISS-28评分系统在ICU患者分层分级管理中的应用. 中医药管理杂志, 2020, 28(1):161-162. doi:10.16690/j.cnki.1007-9203.2020.01.081. |
| [21] | 张丽娜, 徐博, 蒋银芬, 等. DRG患者成本模型的构建及应用研究. 江苏卫生事业管理, 2023, 34(10):1317-1320, 1335. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-7803.2023.10.002. |
| [22] | 孙晓英, 程俊, 边学峰, 等. 山东省初治肺结核患者直接费用及疾病经济负担分析. 中国热带医学, 2020, 20(2):126-129. doi:10.13604/j.cnki.46-10644.2020.02.07. |
| [23] | 李月华, 彭城, 任妮丽, 等. 武汉市青年结核患者超长住院日影响因素分析. 中国医院管理, 2022, 42(9):51-54. |
| [24] | 章鑫丽, 李晔. 青年肺结核复治的人口统计学特征及影响因素分析. 临床肺科杂志, 2021, 26(8):1139-1142. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6663.2021.08.002. |
| [25] |
Pourali F, Khademloo M, Abedi S, et al. Relationship between smoking and tuberculosis recurrence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian J Tuberc, 2023, 70(4):475-482. doi:10.1016/j.iitb.2023.04.010.
pmid: 37968054 |
| [26] |
Tesfahuneygn G, Medhin G, Legesse M. Adherence to Anti-tuberculosis treatment and treatment outcomes among tuberculosis patientsin Almata District, northeast Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes, 2015, 8:503. doi:10.1186s13104-015-1452-x.
pmid: 26420164 |
| [27] | 顾春娥, 余淑红, 王丽, 等. 315例肺结核患者居家治疗自律性影响因素分析. 宁夏医学杂志, 2023, 45(5):471-475. doi:10.13621/j.1001-5949.2023.05.0471. |
| [28] | 于淼, 李泽耀, 妥宏武, 等. 医保支付方式改革对医疗服务及费用的影响分析——以金华市为例. 中国卫生政策研究, 2025, 18(1):43-50. doi:10.3969/i.issn.16742982.2025.01.006. |
| [29] | 司小平. DRG支付对住院患者医疗费用负担的影响研究. 卫生经济研究, 2025, 42(1):61-64. doi:10.14055/i.cnki33-1056/62025.01.021. |
| [30] | 谢祎, 韩晶, 于维莉, 等. 2008—2017年天津市肺结核患者住院费用结构分析. 现代预防医学, 2019, 46(10):1820-1824. |
| [31] | 张学艳, 周文君, 嵇冬静, 等. 2015—2016 年盐城市肺结核患者经济负担及影响因素分析. 中国社会医学杂志, 2019, 36(4):430-435. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5625.2019.04.026. |
| [32] | 刘燕飞, 李涛, 祝贺, 等. 2018—2020年结核病定点医院肺外结核和结核性胸膜炎患者次均住院费用及影响因素分析. 中国防痨杂志, 2024, 46(5):509-518. doi:10 19982/j.issn1000-6621.20230376. |
| [33] | 汤玲玲, 陈丹萍, 李郁如, 等. 耐药肺结核患者家庭功能现状及影响因素分析. 中国防痨杂志, 2025, 47(8):999-1006. doi:10.19982/j.issn,1000-6621.20250142. |
| [34] | 尚培治, 袁惜方, 张冬儿, 等. 基于疗程管理的耐多药结核病患者医疗成本研究. 中国医院管理, 2023, 43(1):74-78. |
| [1] | HUANG Mai-ling,WU Xiao-guang,MA Li-ping,GAO Meng-qiu,CHEN Hong-mei,LIU Rong-mei,XIE Li,ZHANG Li-qun. Clinical analysis on 33 elder patients with acute hematogenous disseminated pulmonary tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2013, 35(11): 927-929. |
| [2] | XU Shu-ming,CHENG Lin-xian,YANG Xuan-qin,XIN Lei,FAN Shang-fei. Analysis of 33 cases of atypical pulmonary tuberculosis ball by CT images [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2013, 35(11): 930-933. |
| [3] | CHEN Qiu-lan,ZHOU Lin,WANG Ni,HU Dai-yu,LI Fang,CHEN Ming-ting. Exploration and effect evaluation of the intervention of providing transportation subsidies to pulmonary tuberculosis patients in two counties in China [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2012, 34(10): 642-646. |
| [4] | LIU Er-yong, WANG Xue-jing, XUE Xiao, GAO Meng-qiu, ZHANG Li-qun, BAI Li-qiong, PENG Guo-qing, XU Bo, ZHOU Lin, CHENG Shi-ming. Retrospective survey of outpatient TB service in TB institutions under Hunan case-based payment pilot project [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2011, 33(11): 739-742. |
| [5] | ZHANG Yi-rui,BAI Li-qiong,GONG De-hua,PENG Guo-qing,XU Bo,TANG Yi,TAN Zhen,ZHANG Chuan-fang. Effects of case based payment for TB outpatient auxiliary diagnosis and treatment on TB patients’ detection and treatment [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2011, 33(10): 666-670. |
| [6] | YANG Hua-lin, BAO Chang-lin, BAI Li-qiong, LI Yan-hong, GONG De-hua, TANG Yi, WAN Yan-ping, XIAO Tao, FAN Jiang-jing, CHEN You-fang. Comparison between the effects of interventions of telephone supervision and traditional supervision to the pulmonary TB patients in Hunan rural areas [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2011, 33(10): 646-650. |
| [7] | Cao Wenli,Chen Zheng,Xu Qingjie,Han Yuefei,Wu Yin,Wang Jinling,Xiang Xi,Tu Dehua . Clinical analysis on sputum smear positive conversion in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis during regular treatment [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2010, 32(9): 92-95. |
| [8] | Li Fengjuan,Yan Xiaoting,Nan Qin,Wang Xinhong. Investigation and analysis of the phenomenon of cultural shock of hospital new tuberculosis patients and nursing strategy [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2010, 32(1): 30-34. |
| [9] | Li Hong,Tangshenjie.. A clinical trial of Mycobaeterium Vaccae vaccine combining chemotherapy in treating new pulmonary tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2006, 28(4): 241-243. |
| [10] | Jin Kequn.. Clinical analysis of 129 cases suffer from AIDS with pulmonary tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2005, 27(1): 51-53. |
| [11] | Guo Xingquan,Zhou Xinhua,He Wei.. HRCT manifestation of military pulmonary tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2005, 27(1): 44-46. |
| [12] | Huang Xuerui,Gao Weiwei,Bu Jianling,et al.. Analysis of therapeutic effect on the individualized regimens for 69 patients with multi-drug resistant pulmonary tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2004, 26(5): 257-260. |
| [13] | ZHANG Ming,YE Nian-cheng.. Analysis on the effect of the tuberculosis control project in Feshan City(1992-2001) [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2003, 25(3): 188-192. |
| [14] | ZHU Xing-ming,HUANG Xiang-shui,WU Guang-wei,el al.. The effect analysis of tuberculosis control project of health V in Maoming city [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2003, 25(3): 181-183. |
| [15] | CHEN Qing-hua1,ZHANG Jin-liang,LI Yan-xiang.. The SCL-90 mental state investigate and intervene in the sailors with tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2003, 25(3): 153-155. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
京公网安备11010202007215号
Total visitors: Visitors of today: Now online:
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.