Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis ›› 2024, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 340-348.doi: 10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20230366
• Original Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Li Jianghong1, Lei Caiying1, Yan Shuping1, Liu Xiaolan1, Yang Qi1, Wang Reqin2(), Liu Fang3, Yang Shumin3
Received:
2023-10-13
Online:
2024-03-10
Published:
2024-03-05
Contact:
Wang Reqin, Email: Supported by:
CLC Number:
Li Jianghong, Lei Caiying, Yan Shuping, Liu Xiaolan, Yang Qi, Wang Reqin, Liu Fang, Yang Shumin. Analysis of drug resistance situation results and rifampicin resistance characteristics in pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Tianshui City from 2015 to 2022[J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2024, 46(3): 340-348. doi: 10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20230366
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.zgflzz.cn/EN/10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20230366
年份 | 可疑患者 例数a | 活动性肺结核 患者例数 | 肺结核 患者例数b | 病原学阳性(例) | 病原学阳 性率(%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
仅涂片 | 仅培养 | 仅分子生物学 | 小计 | |||||
2015 | 8082 | 1562 | 1562 | 177 | 0 | 0 | 177 | 11.33 |
2016 | 7889 | 1726 | 1726 | 185 | 0 | 0 | 185 | 10.72 |
2017 | 8376 | 1625 | 1625 | 254 | 55 | 0 | 309 | 19.02 |
2018 | 5416 | 959 | 808 | 236 | 58 | 52 | 346 | 42.82 |
2019 | 4162 | 901 | 742 | 195 | 39 | 140 | 374 | 50.40 |
2020 | 3385 | 729 | 607 | 213 | 14 | 124 | 351 | 57.83 |
2021 | 2959 | 520 | 440 | 169 | 10 | 79 | 258 | 58.64 |
2022 | 2425 | 436 | 385 | 140 | 16 | 80 | 236 | 61.30 |
合计 | 42694 | 8458 | 7895 | 1569 | 192 | 475 | 2236 | 28.32 |
年份 | 耐药肺结核高危人群 | 耐药肺结核非高危人群a | 合计 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
登记 例数 | 筛查 例数 | 筛查率 (%,95%CI) | 登记 例数 | 筛查 例数 | 筛查率 (%,95%CI) | 登记 例数 | 筛查 例数 | 筛查率 (%,95%CI) | |
2015 | 37 | 18 | 48.65(32.54~64.75) | 140 | 79 | 56.43(48.21~64.64) | 177 | 97 | 54.80(47.47~62.13) |
2016 | 22 | 17 | 77.27(59.76~94.78) | 163 | 70 | 42.94(35.35~50.54) | 185 | 87 | 47.03(39.83~54.22) |
2017 | 60 | 49 | 81.67(71.88~91.46) | 263 | 170 | 64.64(58.86~70.42) | 323 | 219 | 67.80(62.71~72.90) |
2018 | 42 | 42 | 100.00 | 324 | 295 | 91.05(87.94~94.16) | 366 | 337 | 92.08(89.31~94.84) |
2019 | 49 | 49 | 100.00 | 346 | 327 | 94.51(92.11~96.91) | 395 | 376 | 95.19(93.08~97.30) |
2020 | 48 | 48 | 100.00 | 337 | 332 | 98.52(97.23~99.81) | 385 | 380 | 98.70(97.57~99.83) |
2021 | 25 | 25 | 100.00 | 247 | 245 | 99.19(98.07~100.31) | 272 | 270 | 99.26(98.25~100.28) |
2022 | 30 | 30 | 100.00 | 227 | 210 | 92.51(89.09~95.94) | 257 | 240 | 93.39(90.35~96.42) |
合计 | 313 | 278 | 88.82(85.33~92.31) | 2047 | 1728 | 84.42(82.84~85.99) | 2360 | 2006 | 85.00(83.56~86.44) |
61.658 | 346.019 | 397.292 | |||||||
P值 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
年份 | 筛查 例数 | 耐药肺结核 | 利福平耐药肺结核 | 耐多药肺结核 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
例数 | 检出率(%,95%CI) | 例数 | 检出率(%,95%CI) | 例数 | 检出率(%,95%CI) | ||
2015 | 97 | 96 | 98.97(94.08~99.97) | 10 | 10.42(4.31~16.53) | 10 | 10.42(4.31~16.53) |
2016 | 87 | 86 | 98.85(94.67~99.97) | 21 | 24.42(15.34~33.50) | 21 | 24.42(15.34~33.50) |
2017 | 219 | 217 | 99.09(97.15~99.92) | 62 | 28.57(22.56~34.58) | 53 | 24.42(18.71~30.14) |
2018 | 337 | 334 | 99.11(97.72~99.88) | 56 | 16.77(12.76~20.77) | 39 | 11.68(8.23~15.12) |
2019 | 376 | 369 | 98.14(96.57~99.56) | 57 | 15.45(11.76~19.13) | 32 | 8.67(5.80~11.54) |
2020 | 380 | 376 | 98.95(97.61~99.82) | 51 | 13.56(10.10~17.02) | 25 | 6.65(4.13~9.17) |
2021 | 270 | 268 | 99.26(97.69~99.91) | 28 | 10.45(6.79~14.11) | 9 | 3.36(1.20~5.52) |
2022 | 240 | 238 | 99.17(97.40~99.90) | 27 | 11.34(7.32~15.37) | 12 | 5.04(2.26~7.82) |
合计 | 2006 | 1984 | 98.90(98.46~99.63) | 312 | 15.73(14.12~17.33) | 195 | 9.83(8.52~11.14) |
0.072 | 27.248 | 56.393 | |||||
P值 | 0.788 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
特征 | 2015年 | 2016年 | 2017年 | 2018年 | 2019年 | 2020年 | 2021年 | 2022年 | 总计 | P值 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
性别 | 0.117 | 0.733 | |||||||||
男性 | 6(60.00) | 15(71.43) | 39(62.90) | 35(62.50) | 33(57.89) | 32(62.75) | 19(67.86) | 19(70.37) | 198(63.46) | ||
女性 | 4(40.00) | 6(28.57) | 23(37.10) | 21(37.50) | 24(42.11) | 19(37.25) | 9(32.14) | 8(29.63) | 114(36.54) | ||
年龄组(岁) | 1.648 | 0.199 | |||||||||
<20 | 1(10.00) | 1(4.76) | 4(6.45) | 6(10.71) | 7(12.28) | 0(0.00) | 3(10.71) | 2(7.41) | 24(7.69) | 0.309 | 0.843 |
20~29 | 5(50.00) | 3(14.29) | 18(29.03) | 14(25.00) | 17(29.82) | 15(29.41) | 6(21.43) | 7(25.93) | 85(27.24) | 0.128 | 0.721 |
30~39 | 0(0.00) | 1(4.76) | 12(19.36) | 6(10.71) | 12(21.05) | 7(13.73) | 7(25.00) | 2(7.41) | 47(15.06) | 10.522 | 0.470 |
40~49 | 4(40.00) | 11(52.38) | 13(20.97) | 10(17.86) | 9(15.79) | 12(23.53) | 2(7.14) | 5(18.52) | 66(21.15) | 6.669 | 0.010 |
50~59 | 0(0.00) | 3(14.29) | 5(8.06) | 11(19.64) | 6(10.53) | 5(9.80) | 4(14.29) | 4(14.81) | 38(12.18) | 0.391 | 0.531 |
60~83 | 0(0.00) | 2(9.52) | 10(16.13) | 9(16.07) | 6(10.53) | 12(23.53) | 6(21.43) | 7(25.93) | 52(16.67) | 4.801 | 0.028 |
职业 | 15.589 | 0.029 | |||||||||
农民 | 7(70.00) | 19(90.48) | 42(67.74) | 29(51.79) | 38(66.67) | 36(70.59) | 19(67.86) | 23(85.19) | 213(68.27) | ||
其他 | 3(30.00) | 2(9.52) | 20(32.26) | 27(48.21) | 19(33.33) | 15(29.41) | 9(32.14) | 4(14.81) | 99(31.73) | ||
痰涂片 | 17.664 | 0.000 | |||||||||
阳性 | 10(100.00) | 21(100.00) | 51(82.26) | 38(67.86) | 30(52.63) | 31(60.78) | 18(64.29) | 16(59.26) | 215(68.91) | ||
阴性 | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 11(17.74) | 18(32.14) | 27(47.37) | 20(39.22) | 10(35.71) | 11(40.74) | 97(31.09) |
耐药谱类型 | 非高危人群 | 高危人群 | 合计 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
例数 | 耐药率(%) | 例数 | 耐药率(%) | 例数 | 耐药率(%) | |
RFP | 44 | 26.99 | 38 | 25.50 | 82 | 26.28 |
RFP+EMB | 6 | 3.68 | 2 | 1.34 | 8 | 2.56 |
RFP+Sm | 5 | 3.07 | 1 | 0.67 | 6 | 1.92 |
RFP+Ofx | 12 | 7.36 | 6 | 4.03 | 18 | 5.77 |
RFP+EMB+Sm | 1 | 0.61 | 2 | 1.34 | 3 | 0.96 |
RFP+INH | 44 | 26.99 | 29 | 19.46 | 73 | 23.40 |
RFP+INH+EMB | 33 | 20.25 | 51 | 34.23 | 84 | 26.92 |
RFP+INH+Sm | 9 | 5.52 | 3 | 2.01 | 12 | 3.85 |
RFP+INH+Ofx | 3 | 1.84 | 10 | 6.71 | 13 | 4.17 |
RFP+INH+Km | 3 | 1.84 | 0 | 0.00 | 3 | 0.96 |
RFP+INH+Sm+EMB | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 0.67 | 1 | 0.32 |
RFP+INH+Sm+Ofx | 1 | 0.61 | 4 | 2.68 | 5 | 1.60 |
RFP+INH+Sm+Km | 2 | 1.23 | 0 | 0.00 | 2 | 0.64 |
RFP+INH+Ofx+Km | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 0.67 | 1 | 0.32 |
RFP+INH+Sm+EMB+Ofx | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 0.67 | 1 | 0.32 |
合计 | 163 | 100.00 | 149 | 100.00 | 312 | 100.00 |
[1] | World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2022. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2022. |
[2] | 王泊宁, 李涛, 陈伟. 耐药结核病经济负担研究进展. 中国防痨杂志, 2023, 45(6): 607-612. doi:10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20230018. |
[3] | 李晴, 司红艳, 马玲, 等. 2014—2017年甘肃省结核分枝杆菌耐药监测结果分析. 中国防痨杂志, 2021, 43(11): 1183-1193. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2021.11.014. |
[4] | 赵雁林, 逄宇. 结核病实验室检验规程. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2015:18-65. |
[5] | 中国防痨协会. 耐药结核病化学治疗指南(2015). 中国防痨杂志, 2015, 37(5):421-469. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2015.05.001. |
[6] | 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会办公厅. 中国结核病预防控制工作技术规范(2020版). 国卫办疾控函〔2020〕279号. 2020-04-02. |
[7] | 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. WS 288—2017肺结核诊断. 2017-11-09. |
[8] | 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. WS 196—2017结核病分类. 2017-11-09. |
[9] | 赵雁林, 陈明亭. 中国结核病防治工作技术指南(2021版). 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2021. |
[10] | 李仁忠, 阮云洲, 李玉红. 关于世界卫生组织广泛耐药结核病新定义的解读. 中国防痨杂志, 2021, 43(6): 539-541. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2021.06.003. |
[11] | 肖和平, 方勇, 范琳, 等. 耐药结核病化学治疗研究的过去现状与未来. 中国防痨杂志, 2014, 36(8):634-636. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2014.08.003. |
[12] | 白桦, 郭婧玮, 胡培磊, 等. 2014—2018年湖南省耐药监测点结核分枝杆菌耐药监测结果分析. 中国防痨杂志, 2021, 43(4): 364-369. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2021.04.012. |
[13] | World Health Organization. Compendium of WHO guidelines and associated standards. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2018. |
[14] | 中华人民共和国国家疾病预防控制局综合司, 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会办公厅. 关于进一步加强耐药结核病防治工作的通知. 国疾控传防发〔2023〕4号. 2023-02-17. |
[15] | 中华人民共和国国务院办公厅. 国务院办公厅关于印发“十三五”全国结核病防治规划的通知. 国办发〔2017〕16号. 2017-02-06. |
[16] | 田晓梅, 雷娟, 刘静, 等. 宁夏地区利福平耐药肺结核诊疗管理及筹资模式实施效果分析. 中国防痨杂志, 2021, 43(8): 772-777. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2021.08.004. |
[17] | World Health Organization. Programmatic Management of Drug Resistant Tuberculosis. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2017. |
[18] | 买买提艾力·艾合木提, 黄巧玲, 古尔色曼·阿布拉, 等. 新疆喀什地区1307例肺结核患者行利福平和异烟肼耐药性检测的结果分析. 中国防痨杂志, 2020, 42(11): 1209-1213. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2020.11.012. |
[19] | 李俊, 张庆玲, 张宇, 等. 2015—2019年湖北省荆州市肺结核患者一线抗结核药品耐药分析. 中国防痨杂志, 2021, 43(5):521-525. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2021.05.020. |
[20] | Tiberi S, Utjesanovic N, Galvin J, et al. Drug resistant TB-latest developments in epidemiology, diagnostics and management. Int J Infect Dis, 2022, 124 Suppl 1: S20-S25. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2022.03.026. |
[21] | 车贝贝, 王小平, 邱青, 等. 2009—2020年江苏省南通市耐多药/利福平耐药肺结核诊疗服务特征的纵向研究. 中国防痨杂志, 2023, 45(9):864-871. doi:10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20230058. |
[22] | 田晓梅, 沙小兰, 刘晔, 等. 2019—2022年宁夏回族自治区≥65岁老年肺结核疫情及治疗转归特点分析. 中国防痨杂志, 2023, 45(9):857-863. doi:10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20230166. |
[23] | 单灵莺, 刘艳, 王胜难, 等. 上海市普陀区2010—2019年老年人肺结核特征分析. 健康教育与健康促进, 2021, 16(4):363-366. doi:10.16117/j.cnki.31-1974/r.202104363. |
[24] | 滕人聪, 李涛, 李玉红, 等. 2015—2021年全国65岁及以上老年肺结核患者登记情况分析. 中国防痨杂志, 2023, 45(4): 367-371. doi:10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20220494. |
[25] | 徐彩红, 赵雁林. 从《2020年全球结核病报告》看我国结核病防治工作. 中华传染病杂志, 2021, 39(7): 392-397. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn311365-20210406-00117. |
[26] | 王胜芬, 周杨, 欧喜超, 等. 我国结核病耐药状况: 2018年全国结核病耐药监测数据分析. 中国防痨杂志, 2022, 44(11): 1141-1147. doi:10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20220268. |
[27] | 徐静, 姜爽爽, 郑海伦, 等. 290例耐药肺结核高危人群耐药情况及治疗结果分析. 中国防痨杂志, 2023, 45(3):323-327. doi:10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20220485. |
[28] |
Shi W, Davies Forsman L, Hu Y, et al. Improved treatment outcome of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis with the use of a rapid molecular test to detect drug resistance in China. Int J Infect Dis, 2020, 96: 390-397. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.04.049.
pmid: 32353546 |
[1] | Liang Yuexin, Liu Aimei, Zeng Huipin, Huang Lihua, Lyu Liuying, Zeng Xinyan, Li Liyuan, Huang Junli. Strategy-analysis of drug-resistant tuberculosis screening based on all suspected tuberculosis patients of Liuzhou City, Guangxi, 2019—2020 [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2024, 46(8): 958-966. |
[2] | Zhao Xin, Li Yamin, Tao Liying, Zhang Ya’nan, Li Yanyuan, Xu Yan, Yan Yinsuo, Gao Zhidong, He Xiaoxin. Analysis of surveillance and tracking results of pulmonary tuberculosis clusters in schools in Beijing from 2013 to 2023 [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2024, 46(6): 672-677. |
[3] | XU Shu-ming,CHENG Lin-xian,YANG Xuan-qin,XIN Lei,FAN Shang-fei. Analysis of 33 cases of atypical pulmonary tuberculosis ball by CT images [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2013, 35(11): 930-933. |
[4] | HUANG Mai-ling,WU Xiao-guang,MA Li-ping,GAO Meng-qiu,CHEN Hong-mei,LIU Rong-mei,XIE Li,ZHANG Li-qun. Clinical analysis on 33 elder patients with acute hematogenous disseminated pulmonary tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2013, 35(11): 927-929. |
[5] | CHEN Qiu-lan,ZHOU Lin,WANG Ni,HU Dai-yu,LI Fang,CHEN Ming-ting. Exploration and effect evaluation of the intervention of providing transportation subsidies to pulmonary tuberculosis patients in two counties in China [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2012, 34(10): 642-646. |
[6] | YANG Hua-lin, BAO Chang-lin, BAI Li-qiong, LI Yan-hong, GONG De-hua, TANG Yi, WAN Yan-ping, XIAO Tao, FAN Jiang-jing, CHEN You-fang. Comparison between the effects of interventions of telephone supervision and traditional supervision to the pulmonary TB patients in Hunan rural areas [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2011, 33(10): 646-650. |
[7] | Cao Wenli,Chen Zheng,Xu Qingjie,Han Yuefei,Wu Yin,Wang Jinling,Xiang Xi,Tu Dehua . Clinical analysis on sputum smear positive conversion in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis during regular treatment [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2010, 32(9): 92-95. |
[8] | Li Fengjuan,Yan Xiaoting,Nan Qin,Wang Xinhong. Investigation and analysis of the phenomenon of cultural shock of hospital new tuberculosis patients and nursing strategy [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2010, 32(1): 30-34. |
[9] | Li Hong,Tangshenjie.. A clinical trial of Mycobaeterium Vaccae vaccine combining chemotherapy in treating new pulmonary tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2006, 28(4): 241-243. |
[10] | Jin Kequn.. Clinical analysis of 129 cases suffer from AIDS with pulmonary tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2005, 27(1): 51-53. |
[11] | Guo Xingquan,Zhou Xinhua,He Wei.. HRCT manifestation of military pulmonary tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2005, 27(1): 44-46. |
[12] | Huang Xuerui,Gao Weiwei,Bu Jianling,et al.. Analysis of therapeutic effect on the individualized regimens for 69 patients with multi-drug resistant pulmonary tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2004, 26(5): 257-260. |
[13] | ZHANG Ming,YE Nian-cheng.. Analysis on the effect of the tuberculosis control project in Feshan City(1992-2001) [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2003, 25(3): 188-192. |
[14] | ZHU Xing-ming,HUANG Xiang-shui,WU Guang-wei,el al.. The effect analysis of tuberculosis control project of health V in Maoming city [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2003, 25(3): 181-183. |
[15] | CHEN Qing-hua1,ZHANG Jin-liang,LI Yan-xiang.. The SCL-90 mental state investigate and intervene in the sailors with tuberculosis [J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2003, 25(3): 153-155. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||