Email Alert | RSS

Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis ›› 2020, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 493-497.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2020.05.014

• Original Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study of the serum concentration at two time points after taking rifampicin

ZHANG Pei-ze, ZHENG Jun-feng, CAO Wei-peng, WANG Yu-xiang, CHEN Tao, FU Liang, DENG Guo-fang()   

  1. Department II of Tuberculosis, the Third People’s Hospital of Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518112, China
  • Received:2019-11-13 Online:2020-05-10 Published:2020-05-08
  • Contact: DENG Guo-fang E-mail:jxxk1035@yeah.net

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the application of the peak plasma concentration, which were plasma concentrations of rifampicin (RFP) at 2 h (C2 h) and 6 h (C6 h) post-dose in newly diagnosed active tuberculosis patients, in guidance for clinical management. Methods According to the inclusion criteria, 148 active tuberculosis patients from the Third People’s Hospital of Shenzhen between November 2016 and November 2017 were included, and their C2 h and C6 h were monitored by HPLC one week after taking rifampicin. Based on international rifampicin plasma Cmax (8-24 μg/ml), plasma concentration, malabsorption and delayed absorption of the two time points were analyzed using SPSS 19.0. Gender, age, BMI, rifampicin dosage, concurrent diabetes, concurrent hepatitis B virus and serum albumin levels etc. of the low Cmax group (those who were below the standard range) and the normal Cmax group (those who in the standard range) were described as “ x ˉ ±s” and compared by t test. Categorical variables were compared by χ 2 test and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results C2 h was below the standard range in 24.3% (36/148) of all the patients;however, among them, 36.1% (13/36) patients reached target Cmax (8-24 μg/ml) at C6 h; totally, C6 h of 84.5% (125/148) patients reached the target Cmax, the rate of delayed absorption was 10.4% (13/125). There were no statistical differences between low Cmax group and the normal Cmax group in gender (male, 60.9% (14/23) vs. 68.8% (86/125), χ 2=0.558, P=0.455), age ((36.9±4.2) years vs. (38.2±3.5) years, t=-1.585, P=0.115), BMI ((21.5±4.0) vs. (22.9±3.7), t=-1.647, P=0.102), rifampicin dosage of 450 mg/d (60.9% (14/23) vs. 43.2% (54/125), χ 2=2.442, P=0.118), concurrent diabetes (8.7% (2/23) vs. 22.4% (28/125), χ 2=2.257, P=0.166), complicated with hepatitis B virus (4.3% (1/23) vs. 9.6% (12/125), χ 2=0.669, P=0.694), and serum albumin levels ((42.3±4.4) g/L vs. (40.9±3.2) g/L, t=1.457, P=0.157). Conclusion Monitoring rifampicin Cmax at two time points could reflect the absorption of rifampicin in the body more accurately. However, there was no influence factors been found, and expanded sample for further research would be warranted in the future.

Key words: Rifampin, Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), Dose-response relationship,drug, Pharmacokinetics, Outcome assessment (health care)