中国防痨杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (9): 906-910.doi: 10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20220238
王玉香, 陈秋奇, 余鑫鑫, 詹森林, 张培泽, 邓国防()
收稿日期:
2022-06-21
出版日期:
2022-09-10
发布日期:
2022-09-05
通信作者:
邓国防
E-mail:jxxk1035@yeah.net
基金资助:
Wang Yuxiang, Chen Qiuqi, Yu Xinxin, Zhan Senlin, Zhang Peize, Deng Guofang()
Received:
2022-06-21
Online:
2022-09-10
Published:
2022-09-05
Contact:
Deng Guofang
E-mail:jxxk1035@yeah.net
Supported by:
摘要:
目的: 评价3HP方案(异烟肼联合利福喷丁;各0.9g/次,1次/周,共12次)预防性治疗风湿性疾病合并结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染患者的安全性与完成率。方法: 采用前瞻性研究方法,纳入2019年6—12月深圳市第三人民医院就诊的38例风湿性疾病合并结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染患者,使用3HP方案预防性抗结核治疗,记录治疗过程中的不良反应和完成率,并随访2年观察活动性结核病发生情况。结果: 使用3HP方案治疗患者不良反应发生率为15.8%(6/38),其中,消化道反应者2例(5.3%),失眠、头晕、皮疹、药物性肝损伤者各1例(2.6%);药物性肝损伤者中断治疗1例,治疗完成率为97.4%(37/38);随访2年均未观察到活动性结核病发生。结论: 3HP方案预防性治疗风湿性疾病患者合并结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染的安全性好,完成率高,预防活动性结核病的效能仍有待进一步评价。
中图分类号:
王玉香, 陈秋奇, 余鑫鑫, 詹森林, 张培泽, 邓国防. 3HP方案治疗风湿性疾病合并结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染的前瞻性研究[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2022, 44(9): 906-910. doi: 10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20220238
Wang Yuxiang, Chen Qiuqi, Yu Xinxin, Zhan Senlin, Zhang Peize, Deng Guofang. 3HP regimen in the treatment of rheumatic diseases complicated with Mycobacterium tuberculosis latent infection:a prospective study[J]. Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis, 2022, 44(9): 906-910. doi: 10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20220238
[1] |
Chaw L, Chien LC, Wong J, et al. Global trends and gaps in research related to latent tuberculosis infection. BMC Public Health, 2020, 20(1):352. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8419-0.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8419-0 URL |
[2] | World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2021. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2021. |
[3] |
Haley CA. Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection. Microbiol Spectr, 2017, 5(2). doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.TNMI7-0039-2016.
doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.TNMI7-0039-2016 |
[4] |
Lobue P, Menzies D. Treatment of latent tuberculosis infection: An update. Respirology, 2010, 15(4): 603-622. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2010.01751.x.
doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2010.01751.x. URL |
[5] |
Sterling TR, Njie G, Zenner D, et al. Guidelines for the Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection: Recommendations from the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association and CDC, 2020. MMWR Recomm Rep, 2020, 69(1):1-11. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6901a1.
doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6901a1 |
[6] | Department of Health and Human Services,National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute. Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE). 2017-11-27. https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/CTCAE_v5_Quick_Reference_8.5x11.pdf. |
[7] |
Liu Y, Birch S, Newbold KB, et al. Barriers to treatment adherence for individuals with latent tuberculosis infection: A systematic search and narrative synthesis of the literature. Int J Health Plann Manage, 2018, 33(2):e416-e433. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2495.
doi: 10.1002/hpm.2495 |
[8] |
Walker RE, Bass S, Srinivas P, et al. Evaluation of 3 Months of Once-Weekly Rifapentine and Isoniazid for Latent Tuberculosis Infection. Ann Pharmacother, 2020, 54(5): 457-463. doi: 10.1177/1060028019888855.
doi: 10.1177/1060028019888855 URL |
[9] |
Kim HW, Kim JS. Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection and Its Clinical Efficacy. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul), 2018, 81(1): 6-12. doi: 10.4046/trd.2017.0052.
doi: 10.4046/trd.2017.0052 URL |
[10] |
Rosales-Klintz S, Bruchfeld J, Haas W, et al. Guidance for programmatic management of latent tuberculosis infection in the European Union/European Economic Area. Eur Respir J, 2019, 53(1):1802077. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02077-2018.
doi: 10.1183/13993003.02077-2018 |
[11] |
Long W, Cai F, Wang X, et al. High risk of activation of latent tuberculosis infection in rheumatic disease patients. Infect Dis(Lond), 2020, 52(2): 80-86.doi: 10.1080/23744235.2019.1682187.
doi: 10.1080/23744235.2019.1682187 |
[12] |
Lopes DMA, Pinheiro VGF, Monteiro HSA. Diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in patients undergoing treatment with immunobiologic agents: a four-year experience in an endemic area. J Bras Pneumol, 2019, 45(6): e20180225.doi: 10.1590/1806-3713/e20180225.
doi: 10.1590/1806-3713/e20180225 URL |
[13] |
Handa R, Upadhyaya S, Kapoor S, et al. Tuberculosis and biologics in rheumatology: A special situation. Int J Rheum Dis, 2017, 20(10): 1313-1325. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13129.
doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13129 URL |
[14] |
Lee EB, Amin M, Man J, et al. Rates of latent tuberculosis infection in patients treated with TNF inhibitors for psoriasis: a retrospective chart review. J Dermatolog Treat, 2018, 29(7): 671-675. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2018.1443198.
doi: 10.1080/09546634.2018.1443198 URL |
[15] |
Ramos GP, Stroh G, Al-Bawardy B, et al. Outcomes of Treatment for Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Receiving Biologic Therapy. Inflamm Bowel Dis, 2018, 24(10): 2272-2277. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izy133.
doi: 10.1093/ibd/izy133 URL |
[16] |
Goletti D, Petrone L, Ippolito G, et al. Preventive therapy for tuberculosis in rheumatological patients undergoing therapy with biological drugs. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther, 2018, 16(6): 501-512.doi: 10.1080/14787210.2018.1483238.
doi: 10.1080/14787210.2018.1483238 pmid: 29848120 |
[17] |
Anton C, Machado FD, Ramirez JMA, et al. Latent tuberculosis infection in patients with rheumatic diseases. J Bras Pneumol, 2019, 45(2): e20190023. doi: 10.1590/1806-3713/e20190023.
doi: 10.1590/1806-3713/e20190023 URL |
[18] |
Júnior JCL, Ramos RTT, Robazzi TCMV. Treatment of latent tuberculosis in patients with juvenile rheumatic diseases: a systematic review. Rev Bras Reumatol Engl Ed, 2017, 57(3): 245-253. doi: 10.1016/j.rbre.2017.01.009.
doi: 10.1016/j.rbre.2017.01.009 |
[19] |
Iwata K, Morishita N, Nishiwaki M, et al. Use of Rifampin Compared with Isoniazid for the Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Japan: A Bayesian Inference with Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method. Intern Med, 2020, 59(21): 2687-2691. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.3477-19.
doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.3477-19 URL |
[20] |
Yamana H, Iba A, Tomio J, et al. Treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in patients receiving biologic agents. J Infect Chemother, 2021, 27(2): 243-249. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2020.09.028.
doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2020.09.028 URL |
[21] |
Abad CLR, Deziel PJ, Razonable RR. Treatment of latent TB Infection and the risk of tuberculosis after solid organ transplantation: Comprehensive review. Transpl Infect Dis, 2019, 21(6): e13178.doi: 10.1111/tid.13178.
doi: 10.1111/tid.13178 |
[22] |
Devrim I, Devbrim F, Bayram N, et al. Isoniazid-induced hepa-totoxicity in children with latent tuberculosis infection. Minerva Pediatr (Torino), 2021, 73(2): 184-187. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5276.17.04338-9.
doi: 10.23736/S2724-5276.17.04338-9 |
[23] |
Swift MD, Molella RG, Vaughn AIS, et al. Determinants of Latent Tuberculosis Treatment Acceptance and Completion in Healthcare Personnel. Clin Infect Dis, 2020, 71(2): 284-290. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz817.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz817 URL |
[24] |
Krishnamoorthy S, Kumaresan N, Zumla A. Latent tuberculosis infection and renal transplantation-Diagnosis and management. Int J Infect Dis, 2019, 80S: S73-S76. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.01.049.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.01.049 |
[25] |
Batt J, Khan K. Responsible use of rifampin for the treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. CMAJ, 2019, 191(25): E678-E679.doi: 10.1503/cmaj.190081.
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.190081 |
[26] |
Njie GJ, Morris SB, Woodruff RY, et al. Isoniazid-Rifapentine for Latent Tuberculosis Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med, 2018, 55(2):244-252. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.030.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.030 URL |
[27] |
Knoll BM, Nog R, Wu Y, et al. Three months of weekly rifapentine plus isoniazid for latent tuberculosis treatment in solid organ transplant candidates. Infection, 2017, 45(3): 335-339. doi: 10.1007/s15010-017-1004-5.
doi: 10.1007/s15010-017-1004-5 pmid: 28276008 |
[28] |
Sridhar R, Vinod Kumar V, Kumar S. Management of latent TB infection in people living with HIV-AIDS. Indian J Tuberc, 2020, 67(4S): S96-S100. doi: 10.1016/j.ijtb.2020.10.006.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijtb.2020.10.006 |
[29] |
Noh CS, Kim HI, Choi H, et al. Completion rate of latent tuberculosis infection treatment in patients aged 65 years and older. Respir Med, 2019, 157: 52-58.doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2019.09.004.
doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2019.09.004 URL |
[30] |
Huang HL, Lee MR, Cheng MH, et al. Impact of Age on Outcome of Rifapentine-Based Weekly Therapy for Latent Tuberculosis Infection. Clin Infect Dis, 2021, 73(5): e1064-e1071.doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1741.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1741 |
[31] |
Lin SY, Ffeng JY, Lee CY, et al. Completion and Adverse Drug Events of Latent Tuberculosis Infection Treatment in Patients Receiving Dialysis: Predictors and Impacts of Dif-ferent Regimens in a Prospective Cohort Study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2021, 65(3):e02184-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02184-20.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.02184-20 |
[32] |
Chiang LY, Baumann B, Romanowski K, et al. Latent Tuberculosis Therapy Outcomes in Dialysis Patients: A Retrospective Cohort. Am J Kidney Dis, 2021, 77(5): 696-703. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.06.017.
doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.06.017 URL |
[33] |
Yang H, Yang Y, Hu ZD, et al. High rate of completion for weekly rifapentine plus isoniazid treatment in Chinese children with latent tuberculosis infection-A single center study. PLoS One, 2021, 16(6): e0253159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253159.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253159 URL |
[34] |
Walker RE, Bass S, Srinivas P, et al. Evaluation of 3 Months of Once-Weekly Rifapentine and Isoniazid for Latent Tuberculosis Infection. Ann Pharmacother, 2020, 54(5): 457-463. doi: 10.1177/1060028019888855.
doi: 10.1177/1060028019888855 URL |
[35] |
Feng JY, Huang WC, Lin SM, et al. Safety and treatment completion of latent tuberculosis infection treatment in the elderly population-A prospective observational study in Taiwan. Int J Infect Dis, 2020, 96: 550-557. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.009.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.009 URL |
[36] |
Lin SY, Chiu YW, Lu PL, et al. Three months of rifapentine and isoniazid for latent tuberculosis infection in hemodialysis patients: High rates of adverse events. J Microbiol Immunol Infect, 2019, 52(1): 158-162.doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2018.05.003.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2018.05.003 URL |
[1] | 邓国防, 王庆文. 重视风湿性疾病合并结核感染的多学科诊治[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2022, 44(9): 865-868. |
[2] | 国家感染性疾病临床医学研究中心/深圳市第三人民医院, 北京大学深圳医院, 中国医学科学院北京协和医院, 中国防痨协会, 《中国防痨杂志》编辑委员会, 深圳市炎症与免疫性疾病重点实验室. 风湿性疾病患者合并结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染诊治的专家共识[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2022, 44(9): 869-879. |
[3] | 吴文琪, 钟剑球, 何娟, 邓国防, 王庆文. 风湿性疾病患者结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染激活机制的研究进展[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2022, 44(9): 954-959. |
[4] | 陈秋奇, 韩婷婷, 王庆文, 邓国防. 风湿性疾病合并结核分枝杆菌潜伏感染的诊治进展[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2022, 44(9): 960-965. |
[5] | 首都医科大学附属北京胸科医院/北京市结核病胸部肿瘤研究所, 中国防痨协会《中国防痨杂志》编辑委员会. 耐药肺结核全口服化学治疗方案中国专家共识(2021年版)[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2021, 43(9): 859-866. |
[6] | 周文强, 张爽, 初乃惠. 耐药肺结核全口服治疗方案研究的现状和展望[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2021, 43(9): 879-882. |
[7] | 廖伟明, 付亮, 邓国防, 袁小亮. 含贝达喹啉方案治疗耐多药结核病的研究进展[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2021, 43(6): 619-624. |
[8] | 万海方, 陶凡, 赵杰, 陈远辉, 黄焱明, 傅云斌. 老年脊柱结核患者术后发生认知功能障碍的影响因素分[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2021, 43(5): 441-445. |
[9] | 戈启萍, 杜建, 舒嶶, 马艳, 马丽萍, 赵彩燕, 陈瑜晖, 张立杰, 黄学锐, 韩喜琴, 陈盛玉, 王飞, 李波, 曹文利, 刘倩颖, 陈东进, 石莲, 王鑫, 黎友伦, 杨尚鹏, 彭章丽, 吴超, 欧阳兵, 王芙蓉, 李钋, 吴湘, 席秀娥, 冷学艳, 张海晴, 李华, 李鹃, 杨澄清, 张朋, 崔洪哲, 谢莉, 刘宇红, 李亮, 高微微. 优化方案治疗复治药物敏感肺结核的疗效评价[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2021, 43(4): 328-334. |
[10] | 上海市感染性疾病(结核病)临床医学研究中心/同济大学附属上海市肺科医院, 首都医科大学附属北京胸科医院/北京市结核病胸部肿瘤研究所,中国防痨协会,《中国防痨杂志》编辑委员会. 复治肺结核病诊断和治疗专家共识[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2021, 43(12): 1226-1238. |
[11] | 贺晓新, 李波, 周林. 《4个月含利福喷丁抗结核治疗方案疗效观察》解读[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2021, 43(12): 1243-1247. |
[12] | 裴异, 高静韬, 黄云辉, 何芳, 封文军, 杨晓云, 胡羽萌, 雷丽萍, 施利. 含贝达喹啉方案治疗44例痰菌阳性耐多药/广泛耐药肺结核24周疗效分析[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2021, 43(11): 1139-1145. |
[13] | 田丹, 胡晓萌, 金武, 程长浩, 熊磊群, 胡荣华, 金倩, 柳云, 杜鹃. 含贝达喹啉方案治疗67例痰菌培养转阴的耐多药/广泛耐药肺结核患者单臂单中心临床观察[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2021, 43(11): 1146-1152. |
[14] | 陈双双, 沙巍, 刘晓宁, 马荣, 程洁, 李晔, 王新强, 阚晓红. 首次复治肺结核患者采用短程化疗方案的疗效评价[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2021, 43(11): 1153-1158. |
[15] | 李果, 庞先琼, 徐华, 敬明燕, 范庞双, 陈绍平. 潜伏性结核感染诊治进展[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2021, 43(1): 91-95. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||