Email Alert | RSS    帮助

中国防痨杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 576-581.doi: 10.19982/j.issn.1000-6621.20210648

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

六例布鲁氏菌性脊柱炎误诊为腰椎结核临床分析

刘鑫, 郭乐, 李军孝, 陈其亮, 仵倩红()   

  1. 陕西省结核病防治院/陕西省第五人民医院,西安 710100
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-12 出版日期:2022-06-10 发布日期:2022-06-01
  • 通信作者: 仵倩红 E-mail:15902969531@126.com

Clinical analysis of six cases of Brucella spondylitis misdiagnosed as lumbar tuberculosis

LIU Xin, GUO Le, LI Jun-xiao, CHEN Qi-liang, WU Qian-hong()   

  1. Shaanxi Tuberculosis Control Hospital/The Fifth People's Hospital of Shaanxi Province, Xi'an 710100, China
  • Received:2021-11-12 Online:2022-06-10 Published:2022-06-01
  • Contact: WU Qian-hong E-mail:15902969531@126.com

摘要:

目的: 对误诊为腰椎结核的布鲁氏菌性脊柱炎患者进行分析,探讨布鲁氏菌性脊柱炎的治疗结局。 方法: 收集陕西省结核病防治院2018年6月至2021年6月误诊为腰椎结核的6例布鲁氏菌性脊柱炎患者的临床资料,对临床症状、实验室检查结果、影像学表现、治疗方法及随访结果进行分析。 结果: 6例患者中,男性4例,女性2例;年龄54~81岁,平均(63.00±10.15)岁;2例有布鲁氏菌病接触史,3例有牧区及牛羊接触史,1例接触史不详;1例合并陈旧性肺结核,1例硬膜外脓肿患者行手术治疗。病程20d至1年,平均(4.17±1.32)个月;误诊时间7~24d,平均(15.66±5.53)d;病变部位位于腰2~3椎体2例,腰3~4椎体1例,腰4~5椎体2例,腰5~骶1椎体并发硬膜外脓肿1例。6例患者X线检查均表现为椎间隙狭窄,椎体为边缘型骨质破坏且与增生硬化交替出现,邻近椎间骨桥形成;1例高热,体温>39℃,为波状热,其余5例体温正常;2例结核菌素纯蛋白衍生物(PPD)皮肤试验弱阳性,3例一般阳性,3例结核抗体阳性,2例结核蛋白芯片(LAM抗体)及结核感染T细胞斑点试验(T-SPOT.TB)阳性。所有患者通过虎红平板凝集试验初筛及试管凝集试验阳性确诊为布鲁氏菌性脊柱炎,经盐酸多西环素、利福平治疗12周,随访6个月,最终4例治愈,2例好转,未见复发。 结论: 布鲁氏菌性脊柱炎一般有疾病接触史,通过热型及实验室检查可确诊,布鲁氏菌性脊柱炎患者总体预后良好。

关键词: 布鲁杆菌病, 结核, 脊柱, 误诊

Abstract:

Objective: To analyze the patients with Brucella spondylitis misdiagnosed as lumbar tuberculosis and explore the treatment outcome of Brucella spondylitis. Methods: The clinical data of Brucella spondylitis patients misdiagnosed as lumbar tuberculosis from Shaanxi Tuberculosis Control Hospital between June 2018 and June 2021 were collected, and the clinical symptoms, laboratory examination results, imaging findings, treatment methods and follow-up results were analyzed. Results: Among the 6 patients, 4 were male and 2 were female, with the mean age of (63.00±10.15) years (ranged from 54 to 81 years); 2 had contact history of Brucella, 3 had contact history of pastoral area and cattle and sheep, 1 had unknown contact history; 1 complicated with old pulmonary tuberculosis, and 1 with epidural abscess and underwent surgery. The course of disease ranged from 20 days to 1 year, with an average of (4.17±1.32) months. The duration of misdiagnosis was 7-24 days, with an average of (15.66±5.53) days. The lesion sites were as follows: 2 cases of lumbar 2-3, 1 case of lumbar 3-4, 2 cases of lumbar 4-5, and 1 case of lumbar 5-sacral 1 complicated with epidural abscess. As to imaging findings, all the 6 patients showed intervertebral space stenosis, marginal bone destruction of the vertebral body, which appeared alternately with hyperplasia and sclerosis, and the formation of adjacent intervertebral bone bridges. One case had high fever of >39℃, and the type was undulating fever, while the other 5 cases had normal body temperature. Tuberculin purified protein derivative (PPD) skin test was weakly positive in 2 cases, and generally positive in 3 cases; tuberculosis antibody was positive in 3 cases, LAM antibody and T-SPOT. TB test were positive in 2 cases. All the patients were diagnosed as Brucellosis spondylitis through the positive preliminary screening of Rose-Bengal plate agglutination test and tube agglutination test. They were treated with doxycycline hydrochloride and rifampicin for 12 weeks and followed up for 6 months. Finally, 4 patients were cured and 2 patients improved without recurrence. Conclusion: Brucella spondylitis usually has a history of disease exposure, which can be confirmed by fever type and laboratory examination. The overall prognosis of most Brucella spondylitis patients is good.

Key words: Brucellosis, Tuberculosis, spinal, Diagnostic errors